Target and non-target vessel related events at 10 years post percutaneous coronary intervention

J J Coughlan, Alp Aytekin, Erion Xhepa, Salvatore Cassese, Michael Joner, Tobias Koch, Jens Wiebe, Tobias Lenz, Tobias Rheude, Constanza Pellegrini, Senta Gewalt, Tareq Ibrahim, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz, Heribert Schunkert, Adnan Kastrati, Sebastian Kufner, J J Coughlan, Alp Aytekin, Erion Xhepa, Salvatore Cassese, Michael Joner, Tobias Koch, Jens Wiebe, Tobias Lenz, Tobias Rheude, Constanza Pellegrini, Senta Gewalt, Tareq Ibrahim, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz, Heribert Schunkert, Adnan Kastrati, Sebastian Kufner

Abstract

Aims: To define the incidence of events related to the stented vessel (target vessel related events: TVRE) and events related to non-stented vessels (non-target vessel related events: NTVRE) through to 10-year follow-up in patients post-PCI with newer generation drug eluting stents (DES).

Methods and results: The current study is a post-hoc analysis of patient level data from two randomised controlled trials in Germany. Patients older than 18 years with ischemic symptoms or evidence of myocardial ischemia in the presence of ≥ 50% de novo stenosis located in the native coronary vessels were considered eligible. The endpoints of interest were TVRE (a composite of first target vessel myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization) and NTVRE (a composite of first non-target vessel MI or non-target vessel revascularization) through to 10 years post PCI. We included 4953 patients in this analysis. Through to 10-years post-PCI, TVRE occurred in 1238 of 4953 patients (cumulative incidence: 25.8%) and NTVRE occurred in 1442 of 4953 patients (cumulative incidence: 30.3%). The majority of TVRE and NTVRE were revascularization events. From 0 to 1 years, the cumulative incidence of TVRE was 15.9% and of NTVRE was 12.3%. From 1 to 10 years, the cumulative incidences of TVRE and NTVRE were 11.2% and 22.4%, respectively.

Conclusion: At 10-year post-PCI with new generation drug eluting stents, events related to remote vessel disease progression account for a higher proportion of events than events related to the stented vessel.

Trial registration: ISAR TEST 4 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00598676. ISAR TEST 5 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00598533.

Keywords: Atherosclerotic coronary artery disease; Cardiovascular outcomes; Drug eluting stents; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Target vessel.

Conflict of interest statement

MJ reports speaker fees from Biotronik, personal fees from Orbus Neich, grants and personal fees from Boston Scientific, grants and personal fees from Edwards, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Recor, grants from AMGEN, not related to the current work, HS reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer Vital, MSD SHARP&DOHME, Novartis, Servier, Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Amgen, Pfizer and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Amgen, MSD SHARP&DOHME, not related to the current work, SK reports speaker fees from AstraZeneca and speaker fees and consultant fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, not related to the current work; the other authors report no conflict of interest.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cumulative incidence of target vessel and non-target vessel related events through to 10 years post PCI
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Landmark analysis of target vessel and non-target vessel related events from 0–1 and 1–10 years post PCI

References

    1. Stone GW, et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(3):226–235. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002358.
    1. Zellweger MJ, et al. Coronary artery disease progression late after successful stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(9):793–799. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.024.
    1. Cutlip DE, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007;115(17):2344–2351. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313.
    1. Cutlip DE, et al. Beyond restenosis: five-year clinical outcomes from second-generation coronary stent trials. Circulation. 2004;110(10):1226–1230. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140721.27004.4B.
    1. Chacko R, et al. Impact of target lesion and nontarget lesion cardiac events on 5-year clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting or bare-metal stenting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(6):498–503. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.03.013.
    1. Spitaleri G, et al. Correlates of non-target vessel-related adverse events in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: insights from five-year follow-up of the EXAMINATION trial. EuroIntervention. 2018;13(16):1939–1945. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00608.
    1. Abdel-Wahab M, et al. Incidence and predictors of unplanned non-target lesion revascularisation up to three years after drug-eluting stent implantation: insights from a pooled analysis of the RESOLUTE Global Clinical Trial Program. EuroIntervention. 2016;12(4):465–472. doi: 10.4244/EIJY15M07_07.
    1. Byrne RA, et al. Randomized, non-inferiority trial of three limus agent-eluting stents with different polymer coatings: the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of 3 Limus-Eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST-4) Trial. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(20):2441–2449. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp352.
    1. Massberg S, et al. Polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting versus new generation zotarolimus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting versus Zotarolimus-eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) trial. Circulation. 2011;124(5):624–632. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.026732.
    1. Kufner S, et al. Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes From a Trial of Three Limus-Eluting Stents With Different Polymer Coatings in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation. 2019;139(3):325–333. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038065.
    1. Kufner S, et al. 10-year outcomes from a randomized trial of polymer-free versus durable polymer drug-eluting coronary stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(2):146–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.026.
    1. Navarese EP, et al. First-generation versus second-generation drug-eluting stents in current clinical practice: updated evidence from a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials comprising 31 379 patients. Open Heart. 2014;1(1):e000064. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000064.
    1. Leon MB, et al. Late clinical events after drug-eluting stents: the interplay between stent-related and natural history-driven events. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(6):504–512. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.04.004.
    1. van der Giessen WJ, et al. Marked inflammatory sequelae to implantation of biodegradable and nonbiodegradable polymers in porcine coronary arteries. Circulation. 1996;94(7):1690–1697. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.94.7.1690.
    1. Finn AV, et al. Pathological correlates of late drug-eluting stent thrombosis: strut coverage as a marker of endothelialization. Circulation. 2007;115(18):2435–2441. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.693739.
    1. Byrne RA, Joner M, Kastrati A. Polymer coatings and delayed arterial healing following drug-eluting stent implantation. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2009;57(5):567–584.
    1. Joner M, et al. Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(1):193–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.042.
    1. Lavin Plaza B, et al. Sustained focal vascular inflammation accelerates atherosclerosis in remote arteries. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40(9):2159–2170. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.314387.
    1. Park SJ, Ahn JM, Kang SJ. Paradigm shift to functional angioplasty: new insights for fractional flow reserve- and intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2011;124(8):951–957. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.012344.
    1. Mitchell JD, Brown DL. Harmonizing the paradigm with the data in stable coronary artery disease: a review and viewpoint. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(11):e007006. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007006.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir