Effect of epoch length on intensity classification and on accuracy of measurement under controlled conditions on treadmill: Towards a better understanding of accelerometer measurement

Nicolas Fabre, Léna Lhuisset, Caroline Bernal, Julien Bois, Nicolas Fabre, Léna Lhuisset, Caroline Bernal, Julien Bois

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of epoch length on intensity classification during continuous and intermittent activities.

Methods: Ten active students exercised under controlled conditions on a treadmill for four 5-min bouts by combining two effort intensities (running and walking) and two physical activity (PA) patterns (continuous or intermittent). The testing session was designed to generate a known level of moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) for each condition. These PA levels were used as criterion measures to compare with the accelerometer measures. Data obtained from the accelerometer were reintegrated into 1-sec, 10-sec, 30-sec and 60-sec epochs. Equivalence testing was used to examine measurement agreements between MVPA values obtained with the different epochs and the reference values. Mean absolute percent errors (MAPE) were also calculated to provide an indicator of overall measurement error.

Results: During the intermittent conditions, only the value obtained with the 1-sec epoch was significantly equivalent to the reference value. With longer epochs the difference increased for both intermittent conditions but in an opposite way: with longer epochs, MVPA decreased during walking but increased during running. Regarding the measurement accuracy, the pattern of variations according to the epoch length selected during the intermittent conditions was identical between walking and running: MAPE increased with the increase in epoch length. MAPE remained low only for the 1-sec epoch (7.6% and 2.7% for walking and running, respectively), increased at 31.3% and 34% for the 10-sec epoch and until near 100% with the 30- and 60-sec epoch lengths.

Conclusion: This study highlighted the misclassification of exercise intensity based on accelerometer measurement and described for the first time the extent and the direction of this misclassification. Moreover, we can confirm that the shorter epochs are more accurate to measure the real exercise intensity during intermittent PA whatever the intensity.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Results from 95% equivalence testing…
Fig 1. Results from 95% equivalence testing for agreement in time MVPA according to the different epoch lengths selected.
Upper and lower panels represent data from the continuous and intermittent conditions, respectively. Dark lines represent the reference values (i.e., 5-min for continuous conditions and 2.5-min for intermittent conditions) and the dotted lines indicate the equivalence zone (±10% of the reference value); Grey and dark bars represent the 90% confidence interval for the mean MVPA value obtained with the corresponding epoch. * Within the equivalence zone. a Significantly different from the 10-sec epoch with p<0,001. b Significantly different from the 30-sec epoch with p<0,001. c Significantly different from the 60-sec epoch with p<0,001.
Fig 2. Mean absolute percentage error (±SD)…
Fig 2. Mean absolute percentage error (±SD) between measurements with the different epochs and the reference value (i.e., MVPA = 5-min for continuous conditions and MVPA = 2.5-min for intermittent conditions).
a Significantly different from the 10-sec epoch with p<0,001. b Significantly different from the 30-sec epoch with p<0,001. c Significantly different from the 60-sec epoch with p<0,001.

References

    1. Trost SG. Objective measurement of physical activity in youth: Current issues, future directions. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2001;29(1): 32–36. 10.1097/00003677-200101000-00007
    1. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Mâsse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(1): 181–188. 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3
    1. Sagelv EH, Ekelund U, Pedersen S, Brage S, Hansen BH, Johansson J, et al. Physical activity levels in adults and elderly from triaxial and uniaxial accelerometry. The Tromso Study. PLoS One. 2019;14(12): e0225670 10.1371/journal.pone.0225670
    1. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(5): 777–781. 10.1097/00005768-199805000-00021
    1. Welk GJ, Blair SN, Wood K, Jones S, Thompson RW. A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9 Suppl): S489–497. 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00008
    1. Yngve A, Nilsson A, Sjostrom M, Ekelund U. Effect of monitor placement and of activity setting on the MTI accelerometer output. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(2): 320–326. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000048829.75758.A0
    1. Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson P. Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9 Suppl): S442–449.
    1. Chomistek AK, Yuan C, Matthews CE, Troiano RP, Bowles HR, Rood J, et al. Physical Activity Assessment with the ActiGraph GT3X and Doubly Labeled Water. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(9): 1935–1944. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001299
    1. Trost SG, Ward DS, Moorehead SM, Watson PD, Riner W, Burke JR. Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(4): 629–633. 10.1097/00005768-199804000-00023
    1. Gastin PB, Cayzer C, Dwyer D, Robertson S. Validity of the ActiGraph GT3X+ and BodyMedia SenseWear Armband to estimate energy expenditure during physical activity and sport. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(3):291–295. 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.07.022
    1. Baquet G, Stratton G, Van Praagh E, Berthoin S. Improving physical activity assessment in prepubertal children with high-frequency accelerometry monitoring: A methodological issue. Prev Med. 2007;44(2): 143–147. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.10.004
    1. Migueles JH, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Ekelund U, Delisle Nystrom C, Mora-Gonzalez J, Lof M, et al. Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations. Sports Med. 2017;47(9): 1821–1845. 10.1007/s40279-017-0716-0
    1. Nilsson A, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sjöström M. Assessing physical activity among children with accelerometers using different time sampling intervals and placements. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2002;14(1): 87–96.
    1. Reilly JJ, Penpraze V, Hislop J, Davies G, Grant S, Paton JY. Objective measurement of physical activity and sedentary behaviour: Review with new data. Arch Dis Child. 2008;93(7): 614–619. 10.1136/adc.2007.133272
    1. Vale S, Santos R, Silva P, Soares-Miranda L, Mota J. Preschool children physical activity measurement: importance of epoch length choice. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2009;21(4): 413–420. 10.1123/pes.21.4.413
    1. Aibar A, Chanal J. Physical Education: The Effect of Epoch Lengths on Children’s Physical Activity in a Structured Context. PloS one. 2015;10(4): e0121238 10.1371/journal.pone.0121238
    1. Sanders T, Cliff DP, Lonsdale C. Measuring adolescent boys' physical activity: bout length and the influence of accelerometer epoch length. PloS one. 2014;9(3): e92040 10.1371/journal.pone.0092040
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Han H, Aguiar EJ, Barreira TV, Schuna JM, Jr., Kang M, et al. How fast is fast enough? Walking cadence (steps/min) as a practical estimate of intensity in adults: a narrative review. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(12): 776–788. 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097628
    1. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N, Bassett DR Jr., Tudor-Locke C, et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(8): 1575–1581. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12
    1. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Mâsse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(1): 181–188. 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3
    1. Orme M, Wijndaele K, Sharp SJ, Westgate K, Ekelund U, Brage S. Combined influence of epoch length, cut-point and bout duration on accelerometry-derived physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11(1): 34 10.1186/1479-5868-11-34
    1. Dixon PM, Saint-Maurice PF, Kim Y, Hibbing P, Bai Y, Welk GJ. A Primer on the Use of Equivalence Testing for Evaluating Measurement Agreement. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(4): 837–845. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001481
    1. Kim Y, Crouter SE, Lee JM, Dixon PM, Gaesser GA, Welk GJ. Comparisons of prediction equations for estimating energy expenditure in youth. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(1): 35–40. 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.10.002
    1. Lee JM, Kim Y, Welk GJ. Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(9): 1840–1848. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000287
    1. Ojiambo R, Cuthill R, Budd H, Konstabel K, Casajus JA, Gonzalez-Aguero A, et al. Impact of methodological decisions on accelerometer outcome variables in young children. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011;35 Suppl 1: S98–103.
    1. Sallis JF, McKenzie TL. Physical education's role in public health. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1991;62(2): 124–137. 10.1080/02701367.1991.10608701
    1. OMS. Global Recommendations on Physical activity for Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. 60 p.
    1. Plasqui G, Westerterp KR. Physical activity assessment with accelerometers: an evaluation against doubly labeled water. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15(10): 2371–2379.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir