Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus

Katrien Wijndaele, Kate Westgate, Samantha K Stephens, Steven N Blair, Fiona C Bull, Sebastien F M Chastin, David W Dunstan, Ulf Ekelund, Dale W Esliger, Patty S Freedson, Malcolm H Granat, Charles E Matthews, Neville Owen, Alex V Rowlands, Lauren B Sherar, Mark S Tremblay, Richard P Troiano, Søren Brage, Genevieve N Healy, Katrien Wijndaele, Kate Westgate, Samantha K Stephens, Steven N Blair, Fiona C Bull, Sebastien F M Chastin, David W Dunstan, Ulf Ekelund, Dale W Esliger, Patty S Freedson, Malcolm H Granat, Charles E Matthews, Neville Owen, Alex V Rowlands, Lauren B Sherar, Mark S Tremblay, Richard P Troiano, Søren Brage, Genevieve N Healy

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to describe the scope of accelerometry data collected internationally in adults and to obtain a consensus from measurement experts regarding the optimal strategies to harmonize international accelerometry data.

Methods: In March 2014, a comprehensive review was undertaken to identify studies that collected accelerometry data in adults (sample size, n ≥ 400). In addition, 20 physical activity experts were invited to participate in a two-phase Delphi process to obtain consensus on the following: unique research opportunities available with such data, additional data required to address these opportunities, strategies for enabling comparisons between studies/countries, requirements for implementing/progressing such strategies, and value of a global repository of accelerometry data.

Results: The review identified accelerometry data from more than 275,000 adults from 76 studies across 36 countries. Consensus was achieved after two rounds of the Delphi process; 18 experts participated in one or both rounds. The key opportunities highlighted were the ability for cross-country/cross-population comparisons and the analytic options available with the larger heterogeneity and greater statistical power. Basic sociodemographic and anthropometric data were considered a prerequisite for this. Disclosure of monitor specifications and protocols for data collection and processing were deemed essential to enable comparison and data harmonization. There was strong consensus that standardization of data collection, processing, and analytical procedures was needed. To implement these strategies, communication and consensus among researchers, development of an online infrastructure, and methodological comparison work were required. There was consensus that a global accelerometry data repository would be beneficial and worthwhile.

Conclusions: This foundational resource can lead to implementation of key priority areas and identification of future directions in physical activity epidemiology, population monitoring, and burden of disease estimates.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Global overview of countries with accelerometry data (n ≥ 400) in adults. Countries with national population-based cohorts are represented in dark gray (all with n > 1000), whereas countries with any other study types (i.e., nonnational population based, birth and twin cohorts, and other) are represented in light gray.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Contribution by sample size (A) or by study (B) of the different monitor types to the global pool of accelerometry data.

References

    1. Aresu M, Becares L, Brage S, et al. Health Survey for England 2008—Volume 1 Physical Activity and Fitness. Leeds (United Kingdom): NHS Information Centre; 2009. p. 385.
    1. Arnardottir NY, Koster A, Van Domelen DR, et al. Objective measurements of daily physical activity patterns and sedentary behaviour in older adults: age, gene/environment susceptibility-Reykjavik study. Age Ageing. 2013; 42 (2): 222– 9.
    1. Assah FK, Ekelund U, Brage S, Mbanya JC, Wareham NJ. Urbanization, physical activity, and metabolic health in sub-Saharan Africa. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34 (2): 491– 6.
    1. Ayabe M, Yahiro T, Yoshioka M, Higuchi H, Higaki Y, Tanaka H. Objectively measured age-related changes in the intensity distribution of daily physical activity in adults. J Phys Act Health. 2009; 6 (4): 419– 25.
    1. Baptista F, Santos DA, Silva AM, et al. Prevalence of the Portuguese population attaining sufficient physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 44 (3): 466– 73.
    1. Bento TC, Romero F, Leitão JC, Mota MP. Portuguese adults’ physical activity during different periods of the year. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014; 14: S352– 60.
    1. Buman MP, Hekler EB, Haskell WL, et al. Objective light-intensity physical activity associations with rated health in older adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2010; 172 (10): 1155– 65.
    1. Burgoine T, Forouhi NG, Griffin SJ, Wareham NJ, Monsivais P. Associations between exposure to takeaway food outlets, takeaway food consumption, and body weight in Cambridgeshire, UK: population based, cross sectional study. BMJ. 2014; 348: g1464.
    1. Chastin SF, Schwarz U, Skelton DA. Development of a consensus taxonomy of sedentary behaviors (SIT): report of Delphi Round 1. PLoS One. 2013; 8 (12): e82313.
    1. Christensen DL, Faurholt-Jepsen D, Boit MK, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity in Luo, Kamba, and Maasai of rural Kenya. Am J Hum Biol. 2012; 26 (6): 723– 9.
    1. Coleman KJ, Rosenberg DE, Conway TL, et al. Physical activity, weight status, and neighborhood characteristics of dog walkers. Prev Med. 2008; 47 (3): 309– 12.
    1. Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J, Tremblay MS. Physical activity of Canadian adults: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep. 2011; 22 (1): 7– 14.
    1. Coulon SM, Wilson DK, Egan BM. Associations among environmental supports, physical activity, and blood pressure in African-American adults in the PATH trial. Soc Sci Med. 2013; 87: 108– 15.
    1. da Silva IC, van Hees VT, Ramires VV, et al. Physical activity levels in three Brazilian birth cohorts as assessed with raw triaxial wrist accelerometry. Int J Epidemiol. 2014; 43: 1959– 68.
    1. Dahl-Petersen IK, Bjerregaard P, Brage S, Jørgensen ME. Physical activity energy expenditure is associated with 2-h insulin independently of obesity among Inuit in Greenland. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013; 102 (3): 242– 9.
    1. Dalkey N, Helmer O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manage Sci. 1963; 9 (3): 458– 67.
    1. Dallal CM, Brinton LA, Matthews CE, et al. Accelerometer-based measures of active and sedentary behavior in relation to breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 134 (3): 1279– 90.
    1. de Mutsert R, den Heijer M, Rabelink TJ, et al. The Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity (NEO) study: study design and data collection. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013; 28 (6): 513– 23.
    1. den Hoed M, Brage S, Zhao JH, et al. Heritability of objectively assessed daily physical activity and sedentary behavior. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013; 98 (5): 1317– 25.
    1. Denkinger MD, Lukas A, Herbolsheimer F, Peter R, Nikolaus T. Physical activity and other health-related factors predict health care utilisation in older adults: the ActiFE Ulm study. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2012; 45 (4): 290– 7.
    1. Dunstan DW, Thorp AA, Healy GN. Prolonged sitting: is it a distinct coronary heart disease risk factor? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011; 26 (5): 412– 9.
    1. Ekelund U, Luan J, Sherar LB, et al. Moderate to vigorous physical activity and sedentary time and cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents. JAMA. 2012; 307 (7): 704– 12.
    1. Evenson KR, Sotres-Alvarez D, Deng Y, et al. Accelerometer adherence and performance in a cohort study of US Hispanic adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014; 47 (4): 725– 34.
    1. Fraser A, Macdonald-Wallis C, Tilling K, et al. Cohort profile: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children: ALSPAC mothers cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2013; 42 (1): 97– 110.
    1. Gando Y, Yamamoto K, Murakami H, et al. Longer time spent in light physical activity is associated with reduced arterial stiffness in older adults. Hypertension. 2010; 56 (3): 540– 6.
    1. Garcia-Ortiz L, Recio-Rodriguez JI, Martin-Cantera C, et al. Physical exercise, fitness and dietary pattern and their relationship with circadian blood pressure pattern, augmentation index and endothelial dysfunction biological markers: EVIDENT study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10: 233.
    1. Glazer NL, Lyass A, Esliger DW, et al. Sustained and shorter bouts of physical activity are related to cardiovascular health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 45 (1): 109– 15.
    1. Golubic R, Martin KR, Ekelund U, et al. Levels of physical activity among a nationally representative sample of people in early old age: results of objective and self-reported assessments. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014; 11: 58.
    1. Gordon-Larsen P, Boone-Heinonen J, Sidney S, Sternfeld B, Jacobs DR, Jr, Lewis CE. Active commuting and cardiovascular disease risk: the CARDIA study. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169 (13): 1216– 23.
    1. Hagströmer M, Oja P, Sjöström M. Physical activity and inactivity in an adult population assessed by accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 39 (9): 1502– 8.
    1. Hamer M, Venuraju SM, Urbanova L, Lahiri A, Steptoe A. Physical activity, sedentary time, and pericardial fat in healthy older adults. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012; 20 (10): 2113– 7.
    1. Hansen BH, Kolle E, Dyrstad SM, Holme I, Anderssen SA. Accelerometer-determined physical activity in adults and older people. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 44 (2): 266– 72.
    1. Harris T, Kerry SM, Victor CR, et al. PACE-UP (pedometer and consultation evaluation—UP)—a pedometer-based walking intervention with and without practice nurse support in primary care patients aged 45–75 years: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013; 14: 418.
    1. Hayat SA, Luben R, Keevil VL, et al. Cohort profile: a prospective cohort study of objective physical and cognitive capability and visual health in an ageing population of men and women in Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk 3). Int J Epidemiol. 2014; 43 (4): 1063– 72.
    1. Henson J, Yates T, Biddle SJ, et al. Associations of objectively measured sedentary behaviour and physical activity with markers of cardiometabolic health. Diabetologia. 2013; 56 (5): 1012– 20.
    1. Hesketh KR, Goodfellow L, Ekelund U, et al. Activity levels in mothers and their preschool children. Pediatrics. 2014; 133 (4): e973– 80.
    1. Howard VJ, Rhodes JD, Hutto B, et al. Successful use of telephone and mail for obtaining usable accelerometer data from a national cohort: the experience of the Reasons for Geographical and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. Circulation. 2013; 127: AP145.
    1. Hsu C, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007; 12 (10): 1– 8.
    1. Husu P, Suni J, Vähä-Ypyä H, et al. Suomalaisten aikuisten kiihtyvyysmittarilla mitattu fyysinen aktiivisuus ja liikkumattomuus. Suomen lääkärilehti (Finnish Med J). 2014; 69 (25–32): 1871– 7.
    1. Inoue S, Ohya Y, Odagiri Y, et al. Characteristics of accelerometry respondents to a mail-based surveillance study. J Epidemiol. 2010; 20 (6): 446– 52.
    1. Jefferis BJ, Sartini C, Lee IM, et al. Adherence to physical activity guidelines in older adults, using objectively measured physical activity in a population-based study. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14: 382.
    1. Kang B, Moudon AV, Hurvitz PM, Reichley L, Saelens BE. Walking objectively measured: classifying accelerometer data with GPS and travel diaries. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 45 (7): 1419– 28.
    1. Katzmarzyk PT. Standing and mortality in a prospective cohort of Canadian adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014; 46 (5): 940– 6.
    1. Kerr J, Sallis JF, Owen N, et al. Advancing science and policy through a coordinated international study of physical activity and built environments: IPEN adult methods. J Phys Act Health. 2013; 10 (4): 581– 601.
    1. Kim J, Tanabe K, Yokoyama N, Zempo H, Kuno S. Association between physical activity and metabolic syndrome in middle-aged Japanese: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11: 624.
    1. Kozàkovà M, Palombo C, Morizzo C, Nolan JJ, Konrad T, Balkau B. Effect of sedentary behaviour and vigorous physical activity on segment-specific carotid wall thickness and its progression in a healthy population. Eur Heart J. 2010; 31 (12): 1511– 9.
    1. Kwon S, Janz KF, International Children’s Accelerometry Database C. Tracking of accelerometry-measured physical activity during childhood: ICAD pooled analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9: 68.
    1. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ. Using accelerometers to measure physical activity in large-scale epidemiological studies: issues and challenges. Br J Sports Med. 2014; 48 (3): 197– 201.
    1. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012; 380 (9838): 219– 29.
    1. Lee PH, Yu YY, McDowell I, Leung GM, Lam TH. A cluster analysis of patterns of objectively measured physical activity in Hong Kong. Public Health Nutr. 2013; 16 (8): 1436– 44.
    1. Loprinzi PD. Objectively measured light and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity is associated with lower depression levels among older US adults. Aging Ment Health. 2013; 17 (7): 801– 5.
    1. Luke A, Bovet P, Forrester TE, et al. Protocol for the modeling the epidemiologic transition study: a longitudinal observational study of energy balance and change in body weight, diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11: 927.
    1. Moore C, Sambrook J, Walker M, et al. The INTERVAL trial to determine whether intervals between blood donations can be safely and acceptably decreased to optimise blood supply: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014; 15: 363.
    1. Murakami H, Iemitsu M, Sanada K, et al. Associations among objectively measured physical activity, fasting plasma homocysteine concentration, and MTHFR C677T genotype. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011; 111 (12): 2997– 3005.
    1. Oakes JM, Forsyth A, Schmitz KH. The effects of neighborhood density and street connectivity on walking behavior: the Twin Cities walking study. Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2007; 4: 16.
    1. Ostbye T, Stroo M, Brouwer RJ, et al. The steps to health employee weight management randomized control trial: rationale, design and baseline characteristics. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013; 35 (2): 68– 76.
    1. Panter J, Griffin S, Ogilvie D. Correlates of reported and recorded time spent in physical activity in working adults: results from the commuting and health in Cambridge study. PLoS One. 2012; 7 (7): e42202.
    1. Paul DR, Kramer M, Stote KS, et al. Estimates of adherence and error analysis of physical activity data collected via accelerometry in a large study of free-living adults. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008; 8: 38.
    1. Peters T, Brage S, Westgate K, et al. Validity of a short questionnaire to assess physical activity in 10 European countries. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012; 27 (1): 15– 25.
    1. Peters TM, Moore SC, Xiang YB, et al. Accelerometer-measured physical activity in Chinese adults. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 38 (6): 583– 91.
    1. Schram MT, Sep SJ, van der Kallen CJ, et al. The Maastricht study: an extensive phenotyping study on determinants of type 2 diabetes, its complications and its comorbidities. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014; 29 (6): 439– 51.
    1. Shephard RJ, Park H, Park S, Aoyagi Y. Objectively measured physical activity and progressive loss of lean tissue in older Japanese adults: longitudinal data from the Nakanojo study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013; 61 (11): 1887– 93.
    1. Sherar LB, Griew P, Esliger DW, et al. International children’s accelerometry database (ICAD): design and methods. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11: 485.
    1. Sigmund E, De Ste Croix M, Miklánkova L, Frömel K. Physical activity patterns of kindergarten children in comparison to teenagers and young adults. Eur J Public Health. 2007; 17 (6): 646– 51.
    1. Smitherman TA, Dubbert PM, Grothe KB, et al. Validation of the Jackson heart study physical activity survey in African Americans. J Phys Act Health. 2009; 6: S124– 32.
    1. Sundquist K, Eriksson U, Kawakami N, Skog L, Ohlsson H, Arvidsson D. Neighborhood walkability, physical activity, and walking behavior: the Swedish Neighborhood and Physical Activity (SNAP) study. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 72 (8): 1266– 73.
    1. Tanamas SK, Magliano DJ, Lynch BM, et al. The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study. Melbourne (Australia): Baker IDI; 2013.
    1. Thorp AA, Owen N, Neuhaus M, Dunstan DW. Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults: a systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996–2011. Am J Prev Med. 2011; 41 (2): 207– 15.
    1. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Mâsse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40 (1): 181– 8.
    1. Troiano RP, McClain JJ, Brychta RJ, Chen KY. Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research. Br J Sports Med. 2014; 48 (13): 1019– 23.
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Johnson WD, Katzmarzyk PT. Accelerometer-determined steps per day in US adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009; 41 (7): 1384– 91.
    1. Van Dyck D, Cardon G, Deforche B, Sallis JF, Owen N, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Neighborhood SES and walkability are related to physical activity behavior in Belgian adults. Prev Med. 2010; 50 (1 Suppl): S74– 9.
    1. Webber LS, Rice JC, Johnson CC, Rose D, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. Cardiovascular risk factors and physical activity behavior among elementary school personnel: baseline results from the ACTION! worksite wellness program. J Sch Health. 2012; 82 (9): 410– 6.
    1. Witten K, Blakely T, Bagheri N, et al. Neighborhood built environment and transport and leisure physical activity: findings using objective exposure and outcome measures in New Zealand. Environ Health Perspect. 2012; 120 (7): 971– 7.
    1. Yoshioka M, Ayabe M, Yahiro T, et al. Long-period accelerometer monitoring shows the role of physical activity in overweight and obesity. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005; 29 (5): 502– 8.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir