Safety and efficacy of regorafenib in patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in Turkey: the single-arm, open-label REGARD study

Faysal Dane, Kirhan Ozgurdal, Şuayib Yalçın, Mustafa Benekli, Nuri Faruk Aykan, İdris Yücel, Metin Özkan, Turkkan Evrensel, Alper Sevinç, Hasan Şenol Coskun, Ulus Ali Sanli, Ismail Oguz Kara, Perran Fulden Yumuk, Faysal Dane, Kirhan Ozgurdal, Şuayib Yalçın, Mustafa Benekli, Nuri Faruk Aykan, İdris Yücel, Metin Özkan, Turkkan Evrensel, Alper Sevinç, Hasan Şenol Coskun, Ulus Ali Sanli, Ismail Oguz Kara, Perran Fulden Yumuk

Abstract

Objectives: Regorafenib improved overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard therapies in two randomised, phase III trials, but has not been evaluated in Turkey. REGARD evaluated the safety and efficacy of regorafenib in Turkish patients with treatment-refractory mCRC.

Design: Open-label, single-arm, phase IIIb study conducted between July 2013 and April 2015.

Setting: 11 tertiary centres in Turkey.

Participants: Eligible patients were adults with mCRC who had disease progression within 3 months after receiving their last dose of approved standard therapies and who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1. Patients were excluded if they had previously received regorafenib. Of 139 patients screened, 100 were treated and completed the study, and all 100 were analysed. Fifty-eight per cent were male.

Interventions: Patients received oral regorafenib, 160 mg once daily, for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary endpoint was safety, assessed by incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator was the primary efficacy endpoint. There were no secondary endpoints.

Results: The median treatment duration was 2.5 months (range 0.1 to 20.6). Ninety-six per cent of patients had at least one TEAE and 77% had a grade ≥3 TEAE. The most common grade ≥3 regorafenib-related TEAEs were hypophosphataemia (11%), fatigue (8%), hyperbilirubinaemia (6%), hand-foot skin reaction (5%), hypertension (5%), anorexia (5%) and increased alanine aminotransferase (5%). TEAEs led to dose reduction in 30% of patients. Regorafenib-related TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 17% of patients. Median PFS was 3.1 months (95% CI 2.9 to 3.8).

Conclusion: The regorafenib safety profile and PFS in REGARD were consistent with the results of previous trials of regorafenib in mCRC. Regorafenib is an option for patients in Turkey with treatment-refractory mCRC.

Trial registration number: NCT01853319, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Keywords: Turkey; clinical trial; multikinase inhibitor; progression-free survival; toxicities.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: KO is an employee of Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals; ŞY has received personal fees from Bayer, Roche, Sanofi, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck Serono, and has received grants from Celgene; FD, MB, NFA, İY, MÖ, TE, AS, HŞC, UAS, IOK and PFY have no conflicts of interest to declare.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier plot of progression-free survival (full analysis set). PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier plot of progression-free survival by KRAS mutation status (A) and baseline ECOG PS (B) (full analysis set). ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; PFS, progression-free survival; wt, wild type.

References

    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN guidelines): colon cancer. version 4, 2018. Available: [Accessed 30 Sep 2019].
    1. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, et al. . ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2016;27:1386–422. 10.1093/annonc/mdw235
    1. Abou-Elkacem L, Arns S, Brix G, et al. . Regorafenib inhibits growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis in a highly aggressive, orthotopic colon cancer model. Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12:1322–31. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-1162
    1. Wilhelm SM, Dumas J, Adnane L, et al. . Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506): a new oral multikinase inhibitor of angiogenic, stromal and oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases with potent preclinical antitumor activity. Int J Cancer 2011;129:245–55. 10.1002/ijc.25864
    1. Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, et al. . Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2013;381:303–12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61900-X
    1. Li J, Qin S, Xu R, et al. . Regorafenib plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care in Asian patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CONCUR): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:619–29. 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70156-7
    1. Van Cutsem E, Martinelli E, Cascinu S, et al. . Regorafenib for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed after standard therapy: results of the large, single-arm, open-label phase IIIB CONSIGN study. Oncologist 2019;24:185–92. 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0072
    1. STIVARGA (regorafenib) tablets Prescribing information. Whippany, NJ 07981 USA: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc, 2017.
    1. Falcone A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, et al. . Regorafenib dose modifications in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in the phase III CORRECT study. Eur J Cancer 2013;49:S546.
    1. Bekaii-Saab TS, Ou F-S, Ahn DH, et al. . Regorafenib dose-optimisation in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (ReDOS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2019;20:1070–82. 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30272-4
    1. Ducreux M, Petersen LN, Öhler L, et al. . Safety and effectiveness of regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice in the prospective, observational CORRELATE study. Eur J Cancer 2019;123:146–54. 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.09.015
    1. Mayer RJ, Van Cutsem E, Falcone A, et al. . Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1909–19. 10.1056/NEJMoa1414325
    1. Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. . PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2509–20. 10.1056/NEJMoa1500596
    1. Le DT, Durham JN, Smith KN, et al. . Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade. Science 2017;357:409–13. 10.1126/science.aan6733
    1. Overman MJ, McDermott R, Leach JL, et al. . Nivolumab in patients with metastatic DNA mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer (CheckMate 142): an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:1182–91. 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30422-9
    1. Martinelli E, Troiani T, Sforza V, et al. . Sequential HER2 blockade as effective therapy in chemorefractory, HER2 gene-amplified, RAS wild-type, metastatic colorectal cancer: learning from a clinical case. ESMO Open 2018;3:e000299 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000299
    1. Sartore-Bianchi A, Trusolino L, Martino C, et al. . Dual-targeted therapy with trastuzumab and lapatinib in treatment-refractory, KRAS codon 12/13 wild-type, HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer (HERACLES): a proof-of-concept, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:738–46. 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00150-9

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir