Early photocoagulation in patients with either type I or type II diabetes

F Ferris, F Ferris

Abstract

Objective: To determine the benefits of early photocoagulation in patients with type I versus type II diabetes.

Design: One eye of each of 3,711 patients was randomly assigned to early photocoagulation; the other was assigned to deferral of photocoagulation, with follow-up visits scheduled every 4 months and photocoagulation to be carried out promptly if high-risk proliferative retinopathy developed. Patients were categorized by age and type of diabetes.

Main outcome measures: Best corrected visual acuity was measured at each study visit scheduled at 4-month intervals. Stereoscopic fundus photographs were taken and evaluated at baseline, 4 months, and yearly thereafter. Retinopathy severity was assessed from fundus photographs. Severe visual loss was defined as visual acuity of worse than 5/200 for at least two consecutive study visits.

Results: Previously published results of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) demonstrated a statistically significant benefit of early photocoagulation in preventing severe vision loss. Further analyses demonstrate that this benefit of early photocoagulation is greater in patients with type II diabetes than in those with type I. The relative benefit of early photocoagulation in patients with type II diabetes is also seen for other outcomes (development of high-risk proliferative retinopathy, development of the combined end point [severe visual loss or vitrectomy], development of moderate visual loss, or development of legal blindness). The patients most likely to benefit from early photocoagulation had severe nonproliferative retinopathy or early proliferative retinopathy. Analyses from the Diabetic Retinopathy Study confirm the relative benefit of scatter photocoagulation for type II patients. Because of the high correlation between age and type of diabetes, analyses sub-grouped by age show similar results.

Conclusion: These analyses suggest that patients with type II diabetes, or older patients with diabetes, are more likely to benefit from early scatter photocoagulation than patients with type I diabetes. The current standard of care is to initiate scatter photocoagulation as the severity of retinopathy approaches or reaches the high-risk stage, Provided careful follow-up is possible, ETDRS data do not show that initiating scatter photocoagulation prior to the development of high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy in patients with type I diabetes will reduce the risk of severe visual loss. ETDRS analyses do indicate that for patients with type II diabetes, it is especially important to consider scatter photocoagulation at the time of the development of severe nonproliferative or early proliferative retinopathy.

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 1994 Dec 1;331(22):1480-7
    1. Int Ophthalmol. 1988 Feb;11(4):239-51
    1. Diabetes. 1974 Feb;23(2):105-11
    1. Ophthalmology. 1992 Apr;99(4):509-14
    1. Ophthalmology. 1991 May;98(5 Suppl):741-56
    1. J Clin Invest. 1993 Dec;92(6):2620-5
    1. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1972 Jul-Aug;76(4):984-9
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1970 Mar;83(3):261-72
    1. Ophthalmology. 1983 May;90(5):488-506
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1977 Jul;106(1):17-32
    1. Stat Med. 1994 Nov 15;13(21):2233-47
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 1975 Jul;59(7):345-9
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989 Feb;107(2):244-9
    1. Diabetes. 1967 Oct;16(10):728-33
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 1970 Aug;54(8):535-9
    1. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1993 Aug;40(4):279-93
    1. Diabetes. 1963 Sep-Oct;12:389-97
    1. R I Med J. 1972 Sep;55(9):275-81
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1950 Aug;33(8):1187-99
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1971 Feb;71(2):437-45
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989 Jan;73(1):1-5
    1. Ophthalmology. 1987 Nov;94(11):1410-5
    1. Diabetes. 1980 Jul;29(7):501-8
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1971 Aug;72(2):299-321
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1952 Aug;37(2):273-89
    1. JAMA. 1993 Mar 10;269(10):1290-1
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984 Apr;102(4):527-32
    1. Diabetes. 1982 Oct;31(10):874-82
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 1963 Sep;47:513-20
    1. Q J Med. 1968 Apr;37(146):303-17
    1. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1972 Jul-Aug;76(4):990-1004
    1. Diabetes. 1968 Mar;17(3):121-3
    1. J Cell Biol. 1980 Feb;84(2):298-304
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 1986 Jan;70(1):43-6
    1. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1970 Jan-Feb;74(1):85-97
    1. Ophthalmology. 1989 Oct;96(10):1518-22
    1. J Clin Pathol. 1989 May;42(5):542-7
    1. Ophthalmology. 1981 Jul;88(7):601-12
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 1963 Sep;47:521-38
    1. Ophthalmology. 1982 Jan;89(1):7-13
    1. Diabetes. 1980 Oct;29(10):841-51
    1. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966 Mar;50(3):163-70
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982 Jul;94(1):91-6
    1. Ophthalmology. 1981 Jul;88(7):619-23
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 Sep;112(9):1217-28
    1. Acta Med Scand. 1955 Dec 20;153(2):81-101
    1. Am Fam Physician. 1995 Mar;51(4):785-96
    1. Ophthalmology. 1986 May;93(5):590-5
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991 Jul;109(7):1005-11
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1980 Jul;112(1):100-12
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994 Apr 15;117(4):429-41
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984 Apr;102(4):520-6
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974 Jul;78(1):58-67
    1. Surv Ophthalmol. 1975 Mar-Apr;19(5):267-86
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989 Feb;107(2):237-43
    1. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1972;50(3):351-6
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 1963 Oct;47:611-9

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir