Unintended Pregnancies Observed With Combined Use of the Levonorgestrel Contraceptive Implant and Efavirenz-based Antiretroviral Therapy: A Three-Arm Pharmacokinetic Evaluation Over 48 Weeks

Kimberly K Scarsi, Kristin M Darin, Shadia Nakalema, David J Back, Pauline Byakika-Kibwika, Laura J Else, Sujan Dilly Penchala, Allan Buzibye, Susan E Cohn, Concepta Merry, Mohammed Lamorde, Kimberly K Scarsi, Kristin M Darin, Shadia Nakalema, David J Back, Pauline Byakika-Kibwika, Laura J Else, Sujan Dilly Penchala, Allan Buzibye, Susan E Cohn, Concepta Merry, Mohammed Lamorde

Abstract

Background: Levonorgestrel subdermal implants are preferred contraceptives with an expected failure rate of <1% over 5 years. We assessed the effect of efavirenz- or nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) coadministration on levonorgestrel pharmacokinetics.

Methods: This nonrandomized, parallel group, pharmacokinetic evaluation was conducted in three groups of human immunodeficiency virus-infected Ugandan women: ART-naive (n = 17), efavirenz-based ART (n = 20), and nevirapine-based ART (n = 20). Levonorgestrel implants were inserted at baseline in all women. Blood was collected at 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was week 24 levonorgestrel concentrations, compared between the ART-naive group and each ART group by geometric mean ratio (GMR) with 90% confidence interval (CI). Secondary endpoints included week 48 levonorgestrel concentrations and unintended pregnancies.

Results: Week 24 geometric mean levonorgestrel concentrations were 528, 280, and 710 pg/mL in the ART-naive, efavirenz, and nevirapine groups, respectively (efavirenz: ART-naive GMR, 0.53; 90% CI, .50, .55 and nevirapine: ART-naive GMR, 1.35; 90% CI, 1.29, 1.43). Week 48 levonorgestrel concentrations were 580, 247, and 664 pg/mL in the ART-naive, efavirenz, and nevirapine groups, respectively (efavirenz: ART-naive GMR, 0.43; 90% CI, .42, .44 and nevirapine: ART-naive GMR, 1.14; 90% CI, 1.14, 1.16). Three pregnancies (3/20, 15%) occurred in the efavirenz group between weeks 36 and 48. No pregnancies occurred in the ART-naive or nevirapine groups.

Conclusions: Within 1 year of combined use, levonorgestrel exposure was markedly reduced in participants who received efavirenz-based ART, accompanied by contraceptive failures. In contrast, nevirapine-based ART did not adversely affect levonorgestrel exposure or efficacy.

Clinical trials registration: NCT01789879.

Keywords: contraceptive implant; efavirenz; levonorgestrel; nevirapine; unintended pregnancy.

© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of screened and enrolled participants who reached the primary study endpoint at 24 weeks. Abbreviations: ART, antiretroviral therapy; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Geometric mean levonorgestrel concentration–time profiles over 48 weeks for each study group. A standard-dose levonorgestrel implant (2-rod, 75 mg/rod) was placed at time 0 for all participants. Values represent the geometric mean levonorgestrel plasma concentrations at each study visit for participants in the antiretroviral therapy (ART)–naive group (solid line with closed circle), efavirenz group (dashed line with open triangles), and nevirapine group (dashed line with closed squares).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Individual levonorgestrel area under the concentration–time curve from week 0 through week 24 (AUC0–24 weeks) for each study group. Each participant's AUC0–24 weeks is represented as a diamond; the median AUC0–24 weeks by study group is shown (line). The interindividual AUC0–24 weeks coefficient of variation (CV%) is as follows: antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive group, 44.1%; efavirenz group, 43.7%; nevirapine group, 35.5%.

References

    1. World Health Organization. Global summary of the AIDS epidemic, December 2014. Available at: Accessed 14 September 2015.
    1. UNAIDS. How AIDS changed everything—MDG6: 15 years, 15 lessons of hope from the AIDS response. Available from: Accessed 5 September 2015.
    1. Reynolds HW, Janowitz B, Homan R, Johnson L. The value of contraception to prevent perinatal HIV transmission. Sex Transm Dis 2006; 33:350–6.
    1. Reynolds HW, Janowitz B, Wilcher R, Cates W. Contraception to prevent HIV-positive births: current contribution and potential cost savings in PEPFAR countries. Sex Transm Infect 2008; 84(suppl 2):ii49–53.
    1. World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 5th edition 2015. Available at: Accessed 15 September 2015.
    1. World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: recommendations for a public health approach. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013.
    1. World Health Organization. Guideline on when to start antiretroviral therapy and on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015.
    1. World Health Organization Policy Brief. Transition to new HIV treatment regimens—procurement and supply chain management issues. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
    1. Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition. Available at: Accessed 12 September 15.
    1. Jadelle [package insert]. Auckland, New Zealand: Bayer New Zealand Limited Company; August 2010.
    1. Carten ML, Kiser JJ, Kwara A, Mawhinney S, Cu-Uvin S. Pharmacokinetic interactions between the hormonal emergency contraception, levonorgestrel (plan B), and efavirenz. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2012; 2012:137192.
    1. Stuart GS, Moses A, Corbett A et al. . Combined oral contraceptives and antiretroviral PK/PD in Malawian women: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a combined oral contraceptive and a generic combined formulation antiretroviral in Malawi. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 58:e40–3.
    1. Perry SH, Swamy P, Preidis GA, Mwanyumba A, Motsa N, Sarero HN. Implementing the Jadelle implant for women living with HIV in a resource-limited setting: concerns for drug interactions leading to unintended pregnancies. AIDS 2014; 28:791–3.
    1. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed 14 September 2015.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO statement on progestogen-only implants. Geneva: World Health Organization; September 2015. Available at: Accessed 23 November 2015.
    1. World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 4th ed Geneva: World Health Organization, 2009.
    1. Uganda Ministry of Health. Addendum to the national antiretroviral treatment guidelines. Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health, December 2013.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of AIDS. Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Version 2.0. 2014. Available at: Accessed 15 September 2015.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Bioanalytical Method Validation. September 2013. Available at: Accessed 5 September 2015.
    1. Sivin I, Lahteenmaki P, Ranta S et al. . Levonorgestrel concentrations during use of levonorgestrel rod (LNG ROD) implants. Contraception 1997; 55:81–5.
    1. La Porte CJL, Back DJ, Blaschke T et al. . Updated guidelines to perform therapeutic drug monitoring for antiretroviral agents. Rev Antiviral Ther 2006; 3:4–14.
    1. Vieira CS, Bahamondes MV, de Souza RM et al. . Effect of antiretroviral therapy including lopinavir/ritonavir or efavirenz on etonogestrel-releasing implant pharmacokinetics in HIV-positive women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2014; 66:378–85.
    1. Patel RC, Onono M, Gandhi M et al. . Pregnancy rates in HIV-positive women using contraceptives and efavirenz-based or nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy in Kenya: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet HIV 2015; 2:e474–82.
    1. Leticee N, Viard JP, Yamgnane A, Karmochkine M, Benachi A. Contraceptive failure of etonogestrel implant in patients treated with antiretrovirals including efavirenz. Contraception 2012; 85:425–7.
    1. Matiluko AA, Soundararjan L, Hogston P. Early contraceptive failure of Implanon in an HIV-seropositive patient on triple antiretroviral therapy with zidovudine, lamivudine and efavirenz. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2007; 33:277–8.
    1. McCarty EJ, Keane H, Quinn K, Quah S. Implanon failure in an HIV-positive woman on antiretroviral therapy resulting in two ectopic pregnancies. Int J STD AIDS 2011; 22:413–4.
    1. Lakhi N, Govind A. Implanon failure in patients on antiretroviral medication: the importance of disclosure. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2010; 36:181–2.
    1. Sivin I, Lahteenmaki P, Mishell DR Jr et al. . First week drug concentrations in women with levonorgestrel rod or Norplant capsule implants. Contraception 1997; 56:317–21.
    1. Sivin I, Wan L, Ranta S et al. . Levonorgestrel concentrations during 7 years of continuous use of Jadelle contraceptive implants. Contraception 2001; 64:43–9.
    1. World Health Organization. Hormonal contraceptive methods for women at high risk of HIV and living with HIV: 2014 guidance statement. Geneva: World Health Organization.
    1. World Health Organization. Strategic considerations for strengthening and linkages between family planning and HIV/AIDS policies, programs, and services. Available at: Accessed 21 December 2015.
    1. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (2003). Guidance for industry: bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for orally administered drug products—general considerations. US Food and Drug Administration; Available at: . Accessed 21 December 2015.
    1. Jacobstein R, Stanley H. Contraceptive implants: providing better choice to meet growing family planning demand. Global Health Sci Pract 2013; 1:11–7.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir