The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale modified for palliative care inpatients (RASS-PAL): a pilot study exploring validity and feasibility in clinical practice

Shirley H Bush, Pamela A Grassau, Michelle N Yarmo, Tinghua Zhang, Samantha J Zinkie, José L Pereira, Shirley H Bush, Pamela A Grassau, Michelle N Yarmo, Tinghua Zhang, Samantha J Zinkie, José L Pereira

Abstract

Background: The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), which assesses level of sedation and agitation, is a simple observational instrument which was developed and validated for the intensive care setting. Although used and recommended in palliative care settings, further validation is required in this patient population. The aim of this study was to explore the validity and feasibility of a version of the RASS modified for palliative care populations (RASS-PAL).

Methods: A prospective study, using a mixed methods approach, was conducted. Thirteen health care professionals (physicians and nurses) working in an acute palliative care unit assessed ten consecutive patients with an agitated delirium or receiving palliative sedation. Patients were assessed at five designated time points using the RASS-PAL. Health care professionals completed a short survey and data from semi-structured interviews was analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: The inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficient range of the RASS-PAL was 0.84 to 0.98 for the five time points. Professionals agreed that the tool was useful for assessing sedation and was easy to use. Its role in monitoring delirium however was deemed problematic. Professionals felt that it may assist interprofessional communication. The need for formal education on why and how to use the instrument was highlighted.

Conclusion: This study provides preliminary validity evidence for the use of the RASS-PAL by physicians and nurses working in a palliative care unit, specifically for assessing sedation and agitation levels in the management of palliative sedation. Further validity evidence should be sought, particularly in the context of assessing delirium.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Health Care Professional (HCP) survey results.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Model of RASS-PAL themes.

References

    1. Cherny NI, Radbruch L. European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework for the use of sedation in palliative care. Palliat Med. 2009;23:581–593. doi: 10.1177/0269216309107024.
    1. de Graeff A, Dean M. Palliative sedation therapy in the last weeks of life: a literature review and recommendations for standards. J Palliat Med. 2007;10:67–85. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.0139.
    1. Dean MM, Cellarius V, Henry B, Oneschuk D, Librach SL. Canadian Society of Palliative Care Physicians Taskforce. Framework for continuous palliative sedation therapy in Canada. J Palliat Med. 2012;15:870–879. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0498.
    1. Brinkkemper T, van Norel AM, Szadek KM, Loer SA, Zuurmond WW, Perez RS. The use of observational scales to monitor symptom control and depth of sedation in patients requiring palliative sedation: a systematic review. Palliat Med. 2013;27:54–67. doi: 10.1177/0269216311425421.
    1. Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O'Neal PV, Keane KA, Tesoro EP, Elswick RK. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:1338–1344. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107138.
    1. Ely EW, Truman B, Shintani A, Thomason JW, Wheeler AP, Gordon S, Francis J, Speroff T, Gautam S, Margolin R, Sessler CN, Dittus RS, Bernard GR. Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients: reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) JAMA. 2003;289:2983–2991. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.22.2983.
    1. Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med. 2006;119(166):e7–e16.
    1. Arevalo JJ, Brinkkemper T, van der Heide A, Rietjens JA, Ribbe M, Deliens L, Loer SA, Zuurmond WW, Perez RS. AMROSE Site Study Group. Palliative sedation: reliability and validity of sedation scales. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012;44:704–714. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.11.010.
    1. Chester JG, Beth Harrington M, Rudolph JL. VA Delirium Working Group. Serial administration of a modified Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale for delirium screening. J Hosp Med. 2012;7:450–453. doi: 10.1002/jhm.1003.
    1. Elsayem A, Curry E III, Boohene J, Munsell MF, Calderon B, Hung F, Bruera E. Use of palliative sedation for intractable symptoms in the palliative care unit of a comprehensive cancer center. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17:53–59. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0459-4.
    1. Maltoni M, Miccinesi G, Morino P, Scarpi E, Bulli F, Martini F, Canzani F, Dall'Agata M, Paci E, Amadori D. Prospective observational Italian study on palliative sedation in two hospice settings: differences in casemixes and clinical care. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:2829–2836. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1407-x.
    1. Benitez-Rosario MA, Castillo-Padrós M, Garrido-Bernet B, Ascanio-León B. Quality of care in palliative sedation: audit and compliance monitoring of a clinical protocol. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012;44:532–541. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.10.029.
    1. Benitez-Rosario MA, Castillo-Padrós M, Garrido-Bernet B, González-Guillermo T, Martínez-Castillo LP, González A. Members of the Asocación Canaria de Cuidados Paliativos (CANPAL) Research Network. Appropriateness and reliability testing of the modified Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale in Spanish patients with advanced cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013;45:1112–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.05.015.
    1. Maltoni M, Scarpi E, Rosati M, Derni S, Fabbri L, Martini F, Amadori D, Nanni O. Palliative sedation in end-of-life care and survival: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1378–1383. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.3795.
    1. Gaudreau JD, Gagnon P, Harel F, Tremblay A, Roy MA. Fast, systematic, and continuous delirium assessment in hospitalized patients: the nursing delirium screening scale. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005;29:368–375. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.07.009.
    1. Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method: a new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:941–948. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-12-941.
    1. Bush SH, Palacios M, Yarmo MN, Sinden D, Pereira J. Pilot testing of a Modified Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) instrument on a palliative care inpatient unit. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(Suppl 3):S156–S157.
    1. Boyatzis R. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1998.
    1. Fossey E, Harvey C, McDermott F, Davidson L. Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2002;36:717–732. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x.
    1. Guba E, Lincoln Y. In: Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3. Denzin N, Lincoln Y, editor. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2005. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences; pp. 191–215.
    1. Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage; 1985.
    1. Downing GM, Wainright W. Victoria Hospice: Palliative Performance Scale (PPSv2) version 2. 4. Vancouver: Victoria Hospice Society: Learning Centre for Palliative Care; 2006. pp. 120–121. (Medical Care of the Dying).
    1. Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care. 1991;7:6–9.
    1. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310.
    1. Sessler CN. Proceedings from The Sixth Conference, Center for Safety and Clinical Excellence, 2005. San Diego: Sedation therapy: Improving safety and quality of care; 2005. Use of sedation assessment scales in the ICU: Paying attention to what we are doing; pp. 6–9.
    1. Mirski MA, LeDroux SN, Lewin JJ III, Thompson CB, Mirski KT, Griswold M. Validity and reliability of an intuitive conscious sedation scoring tool: the nursing instrument for the communication of sedation. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:1674–1684. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181e7c73e.
    1. Egerod I. Uncertain terms of sedation in ICU: how nurses and physicians manage and describe sedation for mechanically ventilated patients. J Clin Nurs. 2002;11:831–840. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2002.00725.x.
    1. Agar M, Draper B, Phillips PA, Phillips J, Collier A, Harlum J, Currow D. Making decisions about delirium: a qualitative comparison of decision making between nurses working in palliative care, aged care, aged care psychiatry, and oncology. Palliat Med. 2012;26:887–896. doi: 10.1177/0269216311419884.
    1. Meagher D, Adamis D, Trzepacz P, Leonard M. Features of subsyndromal and persistent delirium. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;200:37–44. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.095273.
    1. Jacobi J, Fraser GL, Coursin DB, Riker RR, Fontaine D, Wittbrodt ET, Chalfin DB, Masica MF, Bjerke HS, Coplin WM, Crippen DW, Fuchs BD, Kelleher RM, Marik PE, Nasraway SA Jr, Murray MJ, Peruzzi WT, Lumb PD. Task Force of the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP), American College of Chest Physicians. Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:119–141. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200201000-00020.
    1. Sessler CN, Grap MJ, Ramsay MA. Evaluating and monitoring analgesia and sedation in the intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2008;12(Suppl 3):S2. doi: 10.1186/cc6148.
    1. Morita T, Tei Y, Tsunoda J, Inoue S, Chihara S. Underlying pathologies and their associations with clinical features in terminal delirium of cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;22:997–1006. doi: 10.1016/S0885-3924(01)00360-8.
    1. Morita T, Tsunoda J, Inoue S, Chihara S, Oka K. Communication Capacity Scale and Agitation Distress Scale to measure the severity of delirium in terminally ill cancer patients: a validation study. Palliat Med. 2001;15:197–206. doi: 10.1191/026921601678576185.
    1. Trzepacz PT, Mittal D, Torres R, Kanary K, Norton J, Jimerson N. Validation of the Delirium Rating Scale-revised-98: comparison with the delirium rating scale and the cognitive test for delirium. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001;13:229–242. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.13.2.229.
    1. Breitbart W, Rosenfeld B, Roth A, Smith MJ, Cohen K, Passik S. The Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997;13:128–137. doi: 10.1016/S0885-3924(96)00316-8.
    1. Mistraletti G, Pelosi P, Mantovani ES, Berardino M, Gregoretti C. Delirium: clinical approach and prevention. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2012;26:311–326. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2012.07.001.
    1. Soden K, Ali S, Alloway L, Barclay D, Perkins P, Barker S. How do nurses assess and manage breakthrough pain in specialist palliative care inpatient units? A multicentre study. Palliat Med. 2010;24:294–298. doi: 10.1177/0269216309355918.
    1. Pun BT, Gordon SM, Peterson JF, Shintani AK, Jackson JC, Foss J, Harding SD, Bernard GR, Dittus RS, Ely EW. Large-scale implementation of sedation and delirium monitoring in the intensive care unit: a report from two medical centers. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:1199–1205. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Ramaswamy R, Dix EF, Drew JE, Diamond JJ, Inouye SK, Roehl BJ. Beyond grand rounds: a comprehensive and sequential intervention to improve identification of delirium. Gerontologist. 2011;51:122–131. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq075.
    1. Farquhar MC, Ewing G, Booth S. Using mixed methods to develop and evaluate complex interventions in palliative care research. Palliat Med. 2011;25:748–757. doi: 10.1177/0269216311417919.
    1. Downing SM. Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 2003;37:830–837. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01594.x.
    1. De Jonghe B, Cook D, Appere-De-Vecchi C, Guyatt G, Meade M, Outlin H. Using and understanding sedation scoring systems: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26:275–285. doi: 10.1007/s001340051150.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir