Assessing the effectiveness of household-level focal mass drug administration and community-wide mass drug administration for reducing malaria parasite infection prevalence and incidence in Southern Province, Zambia: study protocol for a community randomized controlled trial

Thomas P Eisele, Kafula Silumbe, Timothy Finn, Victor Chalwe, Mukalwa Kamuliwo, Busiku Hamainza, Hawela Moonga, Adam Bennett, Josh Yukich, Joseph Keating, Richard W Steketee, John M Miller, Thomas P Eisele, Kafula Silumbe, Timothy Finn, Victor Chalwe, Mukalwa Kamuliwo, Busiku Hamainza, Hawela Moonga, Adam Bennett, Josh Yukich, Joseph Keating, Richard W Steketee, John M Miller

Abstract

Background: Mass drug administration (MDA) and focal MDA (fMDA) using dihydroartemisinin plus piperaquine (DHAp), represent two strategies to maximize the use of existing information to achieve greater clearance of human infection and reduce the parasite reservoir, and provide longer chemoprophylactic protection against new infections. The primary aim of this study is to quantify the relative effectiveness of MDA and fMDA with DHAp against no mass treatment (standard of care) for reducing Plasmodium falciparum prevalence and incidence.

Methods/design: The study will be conducted along Lake Kariba in Southern Province, Zambia; an area of low to moderate malaria transmission and high coverage of vector control. A community randomized controlled trial (CRCT) of 60 health facility catchment areas (HFCAs) will be used to evaluate the impact of two rounds of MDA and fMDA interventions, relative to a control of no mass treatment, stratified by high and low transmission. Community residents in MDA HFCAs will be treated with DHAp at the end of the dry season (round one: November to December 2014) and the beginning of the rainy season (round two: February to March 2015). Community residents in fMDA HFCAs will be tested during the same two rounds for malaria parasites with a rapid diagnostic test; all positive individuals and all individuals living in their household will be treated with DHAp. Primary outcomes include malaria parasite prevalence (n = 5,640 children aged one month to under five-years-old), as measured by pre- and post-surveys, and malaria parasite infection incidence (n = 2,250 person-years among individuals aged three months and older), as measured by a monthly longitudinal cohort. The study is powered to detect approximately a 50 % relative reduction in these outcomes between each intervention group versus the control.

Discussion: Strengths of this trial include: a robust study design (CRCT); cross-sectional parasite surveys as well as a longitudinal cohort; and stratification of high and low transmission areas. Primary limitations include: statistical power to detect only a 50 % reduction in primary outcomes within high and low transmission strata; potential for contamination; and potential for misclassification of exposure.

Trial registration: Identifier: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02329301 . Registration date: 30 December 2014.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Map of the study area, divided into 60 health facility catchment areas that serve as the unit of randomization
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Participant flow chart to determine antimalarial treatment regimen under MDA-DHAp. Women of reproductive age (WRA): those 15 to 49-years-old; RDT: rapid diagnostic test; HF: health facility; MDA: mass drug administration; DHAp: dihydroartemisinin plus piperaquine
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Participant flow chart to determine antimalarial treatment regimen under fMDA-DHAp. Women of reproductive age (WRA): those 15 to 49-years-old; RDT: rapid diagnostic test; HF: health facility; MDA: mass drug administration; DHAp: dihydroartemisinin plus piperaquine
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Flow chart for cohort enrollment and follow-up visit for both high and low transmission strata. AL: Artemether-lumefantrine; DHAp: Dihydroartemisinin plus piperaquine; MDA: Mass drug administration; fMDA: focal mass drug administration; RDT: Rapid diagnostic test; DBL: Dried blood spots
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Study timeline for major activities. MDA: mass drug administration; fMDA: Focal mass drug administration; LLIN: Long-lasting insecticide-treated nets; IRS: Indoor residual spraying; HFCA: Health facility catchment area; HMIS: Health management information system

References

    1. Zambia Ministry of Health. National Malaria Control Programme Strategic Plan for FY 2011–2015: Consolidating malaria gains for impact. Lusaka: Zambia Ministry of Public Health; 2011
    1. Chizema-Kawesha E, Miller JM, Steketee RW, Mukonka VM, Mukuka C, Mohamed AD, et al. Scaling up malaria control in Zambia: progress and impact 2005–2008. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83(3):480–8. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0035.
    1. Larsen DA, Bennett A, Silumbe K, Hamainza B, Yukich JO, Keating J, et al. Population-wide malaria testing and treatment with rapid diagnostic tests and artemether-lumefantrine in southern zambia: a community randomized step-wedge control trial design. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92(5):913–21. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0347.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. 2. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
    1. Cook J, Xu W, Msellem M, Vonk M, Bergstrom B, Gosling R, et al. Mass screening and treatment on the basis of results of a Plasmodium falciparum-specific rapid diagnostic test did not reduce malaria incidence in Zanzibar. J Infect Dis. 2015;211(9):1476–83.
    1. Ashley EA, Stepniewska K, Lindegardh N, McGready R, Annerberg A, Hutagalung R, et al. Pharmacokinetic study of artemether-lumefantrine given once daily for the treatment of uncomplicated multidrug-resistant falciparum malaria. Trop Med Int Health. 2007;12(2):201–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01785.x.
    1. Zani B, Gathu M, Donegan S, Olliaro PL, Sinclair D. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for treating uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;1:CD010927.
    1. Sawa P, Shekalaghe SA, Drakeley CJ, Sutherland CJ, Mweresa CK, Baidjoe AY, et al. Malaria transmission after artemether-lumefantrine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine: a randomized trial. J Infect Dis. 2013;207(11):1637–45. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit077.
    1. Poirot E, Skarbinski J, Sinclair D, Kachur SP, Slutsker L, Hwang J. Mass drug administration for malaria. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;12:CD008846.
    1. Okell LC, Bousema T, Griffin JT, Ouedraogo AL, Ghani AC, Drakeley CJ. Factors determining the occurrence of submicroscopic malaria infections and their relevance for control. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1237. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2241.
    1. McMorrow ML, Aidoo M, Kachur SP. Malaria rapid diagnostic tests in elimination settings--can they find the last parasite? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(11):1624–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03639.x.
    1. von Seidlein L, Greenwood BM. Mass administrations of antimalarial drugs. Trends Parasitol. 2003;19(10):452–60. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2003.08.003.
    1. Bejon P, Williams TN, Liljander A, Noor AM, Wambua J, Ogada E, et al. Stable and unstable malaria hotspots in longitudinal cohort studies in Kenya. PLoS Med. 2010;7(7):e1000304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000304.
    1. Zambia Ministry of Health. Guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of malaria in Zambia, 4th ed. Lusaka: Zambia Ministry of Public Health; 2014.
    1. RBM. Guidelines for Core Population-based Indicators Calverton, Maryland, Roll Back Malaria, MEASURE Evaluation, World Health Organization, UNICEF: 2009.
    1. Hayes RJ, Moulton LH. Cluster randomised trials. London, UK: Chapman & Hall/CRC Biostatistics Series; 2009.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir