Phase I study of the investigational oral mTORC1/2 inhibitor sapanisertib (TAK-228): tolerability and food effects of a milled formulation in patients with advanced solid tumours

Kathleen N Moore, Todd M Bauer, Gerald S Falchook, Swapan Chowdhury, Chirag Patel, Rachel Neuwirth, Aaron Enke, Fabian Zohren, Manish R Patel, Kathleen N Moore, Todd M Bauer, Gerald S Falchook, Swapan Chowdhury, Chirag Patel, Rachel Neuwirth, Aaron Enke, Fabian Zohren, Manish R Patel

Abstract

Background: Sapanisertib (TAK-228) is an investigational, orally available, potent and highly selective mTORC1/2 inhibitor demonstrating promise in numerous malignancies. This phase I study (NCT02412722) evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and antitumour activity of single-agent TAK-228 (milled capsules), administered daily (QD) or weekly (QW) and in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours. Pharmacokinetic comparisons of milled versus unmilled TAK-228 and the impact of food were also investigated.

Methods: Patients were enrolled to receive: TAK-228 QD, TAK-228 3 days/week plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 (TAK-228+P) or TAK-228 QW (all 28-day cycles); starting TAK‑228 doses were 4, 6 and 20 mg, respectively.

Results: Sixty-one adults were enrolled. Maximum tolerated doses for milled TAK-228 were 3 mg (TAK-228 QD), 6 mg (TAK-228+P) and 30 mg (TAK-228 QW). Most patients reported ≥1 adverse event (AE); there were no meaningful differences in drug-related AEs across regimens or doses. Three on-study deaths occurred, all considered unrelated to study drugs. TAK-228 pharmacokinetics did not differ between unmilled/milled capsules or with/without paclitaxel. However, TAK-228 Cmax decreased by ~40% in fed versus fasted patients. Objective response rates were 12% (TAK-228 QD), 18% (TAK-228+P) and 0% (TAK-228 QW). One patient receiving TAK-228+P had a complete response; three patients receiving TAK-228+P and two patients receiving TAK-228 QD had partial responses.

Conclusions: Milled TAK-228 was well tolerated with signs of antitumour activity; administration did not reduce overall exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve) but reduced Cmax, which is expected when dosed in the fed state. These promising findings warrant further investigation.

Trial registration number: NCT02412722.

Keywords: Medical Oncology; Mtor Protein; Pharmacokinetics; Safety; Tak-228.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: KNM reports honoraria for advisory board work from Astra Zeneca, Advaxis, Clovis, Tesaro, Genentech/Roche, Immunogen, VBL Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. GSF reports research funding from Millennnium for the work under consideration for publication and outside the submitted work. SC, RN, CP, AE and FZ are paid, full-time employees of Takeda Oncology, the sponsor of the clinical trial on which this manuscript is based. TMB and MRP have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Plasma concentration–time profile, relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of 4 mg TAK-228 in the single-agent QD PK run-in period, according to manufacturing process and dosing conditions. *Geometric mean; †Median; ‡Arithmetic mean. –, not available/not applicable; AUC, area under the plasma concentration–time curve; CL/F, apparent oral clearance; Cmax, maximum plasma concentration; CV, coefficient of variation; t½, plasma half-life; TAK-228+P, TAK-228 once daily 3 days/week+paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15; Tmax, time of maximum plasma concentration; QW, once weekly; Vz/F, apparent terminal phase volume of distribution.

References

    1. Laplante M, Sabatini DM. mTOR signaling at a glance. J Cell Sci 2009;122(Pt 20):3589–94. 10.1242/jcs.051011
    1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011;144:646–74. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
    1. Moschetta M, Reale A, Marasco C, et al. . Therapeutic targeting of the mTOR-signalling pathway in cancer: benefits and limitations. Br J Pharmacol 2014;171:3801–13. 10.1111/bph.12749
    1. Schenone S, Brullo C, Musumeci F, et al. . ATP-competitive inhibitors of mTOR: an update. Curr Med Chem 2011;18:2995–3014. 10.2174/092986711796391651
    1. Tabernero J, Rojo F, Calvo E, et al. . Dose- and schedule-dependent inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway with everolimus: a phase I tumor pharmacodynamic study in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:1603–10. 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.5482
    1. Harada K, Miyake H, Kumano M, et al. . Acquired resistance to temsirolimus in human renal cell carcinoma cells is mediated by the constitutive activation of signal transduction pathways through mTORC2. Br J Cancer 2013;109:2389–95. 10.1038/bjc.2013.602
    1. Ghobrial IM, Siegel DS, Vij R, et al. . TAK-228 (formerly MLN0128), an investigational oral dual TORC1/2 inhibitor: A phase I dose escalation study in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia. Am J Hematol 2016;91:400–5. 10.1002/ajh.24300
    1. Voss M, Gordon MS, Mita M, et al. . 354 Phase I study of investigational oral mTORC1/2 inhibitor MLN0128: Expansion phase in patients with renal, endometrial, or bladder cancer. Eur J Cancer 2015;51:S72 10.1016/S0959-8049(16)30217-9
    1. Khadka P, Ro J, Kim H, et al. . Pharmaceutical particle technologies: An approach to improve drug solubility, dissolution and bioavailability. Asian J Pharm 2014;9:304–16. 10.1016/j.ajps.2014.05.005
    1. Loh ZH, Samanta AK, Sia Heng PW. Overview of milling techniques for improving the solubility of poorly water-soluble drugs. Asian J Pharm 2015;10:255–74. 10.1016/j.ajps.2014.12.006
    1. Infante JR, Tabernero J, Cervantes A, et al. . Abstract C252: A phase 1, dose-escalation study of MLN0128, an investigational oral mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1/2 (mTORC1/2) catalytic inhibitor, in patients (pts) with advanced non-hematologic malignancies. Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(Suppl):C252 10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-13-C252
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228–47. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
    1. Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P, et al. . Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2271–81. 10.1056/NEJMoa066838
    1. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Oudard S, et al. . Phase 3 trial of everolimus for metastatic renal cell carcinoma : final results and analysis of prognostic factors. Cancer 2010;116:4256–65. 10.1002/cncr.25219
    1. Yao JC, Shah MH, Ito T, et al. . Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med 2011;364:514–23. 10.1056/NEJMoa1009290
    1. Hess G, Herbrecht R, Romaguera J, et al. . Phase III study to evaluate temsirolimus compared with investigator’s choice therapy for the treatment of relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:3822–9. 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.7977
    1. Xu J, Tian D. Hematologic toxicities associated with mTOR inhibitors temsirolimus and everolimus in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 2014;30:67–74. 10.1185/03007995.2013.844116
    1. Hutson TE, Escudier B, Esteban E, et al. . Randomized phase III trial of temsirolimus versus sorafenib as second-line therapy after sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:760–7. 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.3961
    1. Diamond J, Borges VF, Kabos P, et al. . Phase 1b/2 safety and efficacy of TAK-228 (MLN0128), plus exemestane (E) or fulvestrant (F) in postmenopausal women with ER + /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Annals of Oncology 2016;27(suppl_6). 10.1093/annonc/mdw365.56
    1. Juric D, Lopez J, Rasco D, et al. . A phase 1b multicenter, open-label study of investigational TAK-228 (MLN0128) plus TAK-117 (MLN1117) in adult patients with advanced nonhematologic malignancies. Eur J Cancer 2016;69:S11–S12. 10.1016/S0959-8049(16)32625-9
    1. Choueiri TK, Porta C, Suarez Rodriguez C, et al. . 925TiPA phase 2 study of investigational TORC1/2 inhibitor TAK-228 and TAK-228 plus investigational PI3Kα-selective inhibitor TAK-117 vs everolimus in adults with advanced or metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) that has progressed on VEGF-targeted therapy. Annals of Oncology 2017;28:295–329. 10.1093/annonc/mdx371.079
    1. Gökmen-Polar Y, Liu Y, Toroni RA, et al. . Investigational drug MLN0128, a novel TORC1/2 inhibitor, demonstrates potent oral antitumor activity in human breast cancer xenograft models. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;136:673–82. 10.1007/s10549-012-2298-8
    1. Baselga J, Semiglazov V, van Dam P, et al. . Phase II randomized study of neoadjuvant everolimus plus letrozole compared with placebo plus letrozole in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:2630–7. 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.8391
    1. Bachelot T, Bourgier C, Cropet C, et al. . Randomized phase II trial of everolimus in combination with tamoxifen in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer with prior exposure to aromatase inhibitors: a GINECO study. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:2718–24. 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.0708
    1. Baselga J, Campone M, Piccart M, et al. . Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2012;366:520–9. 10.1056/NEJMoa1109653
    1. Oza AM, Elit L, Tsao MS, et al. . Phase II study of temsirolimus in women with recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer: a trial of the NCIC Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:3278–85. 10.1200/JCO.2010.34.1578

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir