Effect of a simple information booklet on pain persistence after an acute episode of low back pain: a non-randomized trial in a primary care setting

Emmanuel Coudeyre, Florence Tubach, François Rannou, Gabriel Baron, Fernand Coriat, Sylvie Brin, Michel Revel, Serge Poiraudeau, Emmanuel Coudeyre, Florence Tubach, François Rannou, Gabriel Baron, Fernand Coriat, Sylvie Brin, Michel Revel, Serge Poiraudeau

Abstract

Objective: Mass-media campaigns have been known to modify the outcome of low back pain (LBP). We assessed the impact on outcome of standardized written information on LBP given to patients with acute LBP.

Design: A 3-month pragmatic, multicenter controlled trial with geographic stratification.

Setting: Primary care practice in France.

Participants: 2752 patients with acute LBP.

Intervention: An advice book on LBP (the "back book").

Main outcome measures: The main outcome measure was persistence of LBP three months after baseline evaluation.

Results: 2337 (85%) patients were assessed at follow-up and 12.4% of participants reported persistent LBP. The absolute risk reduction of reporting persistent back pain in the intervention group was 3.6% lower than in the control group (10.5% vs. 14.1%; 95% confidence interval [-6.3% ; -1.0%]; p value adjusted for cluster effect = 0.01). Patients in the intervention group were more satisfied than those in the control group with the information they received about physical activities, when to consult their physician, and how to prevent a new episode of LBP. However, the number of patients who had taken sick leave was similar, as was the mean sick-leave duration, in both arms, and, among patients with persistent pain at follow-up, the intervention and control groups did not differ in disability or fear-avoidance beliefs.

Conclusions: The level of improvement of an information booklet is modest, but the cost and complexity of the intervention is minimal. Therefore, the implications and generalizability of this intervention are substantial.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00343057.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Honoria from Sanofi-Aventis

Figures

Figure 1. Flow of general practitioners and…
Figure 1. Flow of general practitioners and patients through the trial.

References

    1. Anderson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low back pain. Lancet. 1999;354:581–5.
    1. Waddell G. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1998. The back pain revolution. p. 266.
    1. Druss BG, Rosenheck RA, Sledge WH. Health and disability costs of depressive illness in a major US Corporation. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:1274–78.
    1. Feurstein M, Beatie P. Behavioral factors affecting pain and disability in low back pain: mechanisms and assessment. Phys Ther. 1995;4:267–80.
    1. Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. A Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain. 1993;52:157–68.
    1. Buchbinder R, Jolley D, Wyatt M. Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs and disability: three part evaluation. BMJ. 2001;322:1516–1520.
    1. Burton AK, Waddell G, Tillotson KM, Summerton N. Information and advise to patients with low back pain can have a positive effect: a randomized controlled trial of a novel educational booklet in primary care. Spine. 1999;24:2484–91.
    1. Recommendations of the Agence Nationale d'Accreditation et d'Evaluation en Sante. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of common lumbago and sciatica of less than 3 months of duration. J Radiol. 2000. 2000;81:1665–6.
    1. Abenhaim L, Rossignol M, Valat JP, Nordin M, Avouac B, et al. The role of activity in the therapeutic management of back pain. Report of the International Paris Task Force on Back Pain. Spine. 2000;25:1–33.
    1. Ostelo RWJG, van Tulder MW, Vlaeyen JWS, Linton SJ, Morley SJ, et al. Behavioural treatment for chronic low-back pain. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 2 2005
    1. Hagen KB, Hilde G, Jamtvedt G, Winnem M. Bed rest for acute low-back pain and sciatica. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 2 2005
    1. Hagen KB, Hilde G, Jamvedt G, Winnem MF. The Cochrane review of advice to stay active as a single treatment for low back pain and sciatica. Spine. 2002;27:1736–41.
    1. Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Thomas S. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. BMJ. 2006;332:1430–4.
    1. Malmivaara A, Koes BW, Bouter LM, van Tulder MW. Applicability and clinical relevance of results in randomized controlled trials: the Cochrane review on exercise therapy for low back pain as an example. Spine. 2006;31:1405–9.
    1. Wessels T, van Tulder M, Sigl T, Ewert T, Limm H, et al. What predicts outcome in non-operative treatments of chronic low back pain? A systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:1633–44.
    1. van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T, Breen A, del Real MT, et al. On behalf of the COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain in Primary Care. Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:S169–91.
    1. van Tulder MW, Koes B, Malmivaara A. Outcome of non-invasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:S64–81.
    1. Heymans MW, van Tulder MW, Esmail R, Bombardier C, Koes BW. Back schools for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine. 2005;30:2153–63.
    1. Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, Koes BW. Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 3 2005
    1. Breen AC, van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Jensen I, Reardon R, et al. Mono-disciplinary or multidisciplinary back pain guidelines? How can we achieve a common message in primary care? Eur Spine J. 2006;15:641–7.
    1. Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Tomlinson G. Systematic review: strategies for using exercise therapy to improve outcomes in chronic low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:776–85.
    1. Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara AV, Koes BW. Meta-analysis: exercise therapy for nonspecific low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:765–75.
    1. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Street JH, Hunt M, Barlow W. Pitfalls of patient education. Limited success of a program for back pain in primary care. Spine. 1996;21:345–55.
    1. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Battie M, Street J, Barlow W. A comparison of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, and provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with low back pain. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1021–9.
    1. Roberts L, Little P, Chapman J, Cantrell T, Pickering R, et al. The back home trial: general practitioner-supported leaflets may change back pain behavior. Spine. 2002;27:1821–8.
    1. Royal College of General Practitioners. London: RCGP; 1996. Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain.
    1. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Battie M, Street J, Barlow W. A comparison of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, and provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with low back pain. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1021–9.
    1. Udermann BE, Spratt KF, Donelson RG, Mayer J, Graves JE, et al. Can a patient educational book change behavior and reduce pain in chronic low back pain patients? Spine J. 2004;4:425–35.
    1. Hazard RG, Reid S, Haugh LD, McFarlane G. A controlled trial of an educational pamphlet to prevent disability after occupational low back injury. Spine. 2000;25:1419–23.
    1. Coudeyre E, Givron P, Gremeaux V, Lavit P, Herisson C, et al. French translation and cultural adaptation of the “Back Book”. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2003;46:553–7.
    1. Breart G, Bouyer J. Epidemiological methods in evaluation. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1991;39:S5–14.
    1. Pfingsten M, Kroner-Herwig B, Leibing E, Kronshage U, Hildebrandt J. Validation of the German version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Eur J Pain. 2000;4:259–66.
    1. Chaory K, Fayad F, Rannou F, Fermanian J, Revel M, et al. Validation of the French version of the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Spine 14. 2004;29:908–13.
    1. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, Abenhaim L, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Measurement properties. Spine. 1995;20:341–52.
    1. Valat JP, Goupille P, Rozenberg S, Urbinelli R, Allaert F. Acute low back pain: predictive index of chronicity from a cohort of 2487 subjects. Spine Group of the Societe Francaise de Rhumatologie. Joint Bone Spine. 2000;67:456–61.
    1. Linton SJ, Vlaeyen J, Ostelo R. The back pain beliefs of health care providers: are we fear-avoidant? J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12:223–32.
    1. Roland M, Dixon M. Randomized controlled trial of an educational booklet for patients presenting with back pain in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989;39:244–6.
    1. Buchbinder R, Jolley D. Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs: three year follow up population survey. BMJ. 2004;328:321.
    1. Orr CJ. How to minimize litigation. Br J Hosp Med. 1989;42:439.
    1. De Jong JR, Vlaeyen JW, Onghena P, Goossens MF, Geilen M, et al. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain: education or exposure in vivo as mediator to fear reduction. Clin J Pain. 2005;21:9–17.
    1. Raspe H, Matthis C, Croft P, O'Neill T. Variation in back pain between countries. Spine. 2004;29:1017–21.
    1. Prescott RJ, Counsell CE, Gillespie WJ, Grant AM, Russell IT, et al. Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3:1–143.
    1. Godwin M, Ruhland L, Casson I, MacDonald S, Delva D, et al. Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:28.
    1. Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:361–6.
    1. Harris AD, Bradham DD, Baumgarten M, Zuckerman IH, Fink JC, et al. The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in infectious diseases. CID. 2004;38:1586–1591.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir