Intensive Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Adherence Program During Stroke Rehabilitation

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea may improve stroke recovery, but adherence is poor. We assessed the effectiveness of an intensive CPAP adherence program during and after inpatient stroke rehabilitation on 3-month adherence and stroke recovery. Methods- In a single-arm study, 90 stroke rehabilitation patients were enrolled into an intensive CPAP adherence program. CPAP was continued after a run-in among qualifying patients with evidence of obstructive sleep apnea. The primary outcome was CPAP adherence, defined as ≥4 hours of use on ≥70% of days, over 3 months. Results- A total of 62 patients qualified for continued CPAP and 52 of these were willing to continue CPAP after discharge from rehabilitation. At 3 months, the average daily CPAP use was 4.7 hours (SD 2.6), and 32/52 (62%) patients were adherent. Factors significantly associated with adherence included more severe stroke, aphasia, and white race. Compared with nonadherent patients, adherent patients experienced greater improvements in the cognitive component of the Functional Independence Measure ( P=0.02) and in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ( P=0.03). Conclusions- This intensive CPAP adherence program initiated during stroke rehabilitation can lead to CPAP adherence in the majority of patients with evidence of obstructive sleep apnea, including those with more severe stroke and aphasia, and may promote recovery. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02809430.

Keywords: aphasia; apnea; continuous positive airway pressure; rehabilitation; sleep.

Figures

Figure.

Changes over 3 mo in stroke severity by adherence status. Participants adherent to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) had significantly greater improvements in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS; 4 [interquartile range (IQR), 2, 5] versus 2 [IQR, 0, 3], P=0.005) compared with nonadherent participants.