Comparing the detection of transdermal and breath alcohol concentrations during periods of alcohol consumption ranging from moderate drinking to binge drinking

Donald M Dougherty, Nora E Charles, Ashley Acheson, Samantha John, R Michael Furr, Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak, Donald M Dougherty, Nora E Charles, Ashley Acheson, Samantha John, R Michael Furr, Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak

Abstract

Binge drinking is a public health concern due to its association with negative health outcomes as well as increased legal and social consequences. Previous studies have frequently used self-reported alcohol consumption to classify binge drinking episodes; however, these measures are often limited in both detail and accuracy. Some researchers have begun using additional measures such as blood (BAC) and breath (BrAC) alcohol concentrations to supplement self-report data. Transdermal alcohol testing, or the detection of alcohol expiration through the skin, offers advantages over BAC and BrAC measures by allowing for continuous and noninvasive monitoring of an individual's drinking behavior in real time. Despite these advantages, this technology has not been widely used or studied outside of forensic applications. The present research compares transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) and BrAC readings during the consumption of alcohol ranging from moderate drinking to binge drinking in 22 adult regular drinkers in order to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of the TAC monitors. We observed that BrAC and TAC measures were broadly consistent. Additionally, we were able to develop an equation that could predict BrAC results using TAC data, indicating TAC data would be an appropriate substitute in research and clinical contexts where BrAC readings are typically used. Finally, we were able to determine a cutoff point for peak TAC data that could reliably predict whether a participant had engaged in moderate or more-than-moderate drinking, suggesting TAC monitors could be used in settings where moderate or reduced drinking is the goal.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
a. Mean peak TAC in g/dl (± SE) and mean peak BrAC in g/dl (± SE) for each drinking condition among male participants. b. Mean peak TAC in g/dl (± SE) and mean peak BrAC in g/dl (± SE) for each drinking condition among female participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatterplot of association between predicted and actual peak BrAC (g/dl), across all participants in all drinking conditions. Circles with numbers inside represent a data point from a female and the number of beers. Numbers represent a data point from a male and numbers of beers.
Figure 3
Figure 3
a-b. ROC curves indicating the sensitivity and specificity associated with cutoffs on peakTAC (g/dl) as they predict whether a participant has consumed more than one drink (3a) and more than two drinks (3b).
Figure 3
Figure 3
a-b. ROC curves indicating the sensitivity and specificity associated with cutoffs on peakTAC (g/dl) as they predict whether a participant has consumed more than one drink (3a) and more than two drinks (3b).

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir