Simultaneous comparison of depth of sedation performance between SedLine and BIS during general anesthesia using custom passive interface hardware: study protocol for a prospective, non-blinded, non-randomized trial

James Harvey Jones, Vinay Ravikumar Nittur, Neal Fleming, Richard L Applegate 2nd, James Harvey Jones, Vinay Ravikumar Nittur, Neal Fleming, Richard L Applegate 2nd

Abstract

Background: Intraoperative brain function monitoring with processed electroencephalogram (EEG) indices, such as the bispectral index (BIS) and patient state index (PSI), may improve characterization of the depth of sedation or anesthesia when compared to conventional physiologic monitors, such as heart rate and blood pressure. However, the clinical assessment of anesthetic depth may not always agree with available processed EEG indices. To concurrently compare the performance of BIS and SedLine monitors, we present a data collection system using shared individual generic sensors connected to a custom-built passive interface box.

Methods: This prospective, non-blinded, non-randomized study will enroll 100 adult American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I-III patients presenting for elective procedures requiring general anesthesia. BIS and SedLine electrodes will be placed preoperatively according to manufacturer recommendations and their respective indices tracked throughout anesthesia induction, maintenance and emergence. The concordance between processed EEG indices and clinical assessments of anesthesia depth will be analyzed with chi-square and kappa statistic.

Discussion: Prior studies comparing brain function monitoring devices have applied both sensors on the forehead of study subjects simultaneously. With limited space and common sensor locations between devices, it is not possible to place both commercial sensor arrays according to the manufacturer's recommendations, thus compromising the validity of these comparisons. This trial utilizes a custom interface allowing signals from sensors to be shared between BIS and SedLine monitors to provide an accurate comparison. Our results will also characterize the degree of agreement between processed EEG indices and clinical assessments of anesthetic depth as determined by the anesthesiologists' interpretations of acute changes in blood pressure and heart rate as well as the administration, or change to the continuous delivery, of medications at these timepoints. Patient factors (such as burst suppression state or low power EEG conditions from aging brain), surgical conditions (such as use of electrocautery), artifacts (such as electromyography), and anesthesia medications and doses (such as end-tidal concentration of volatile anesthetic or hypnotic infusion dose) that lead to lack of agreement will be explored as well.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials ( ClinicalTrials.gov ), NCT03865316 . Registered on 4 February 2019 - retrospectively registered.

Sponsor: Masimo Corporation.

Keywords: Bispectral index (BIS); Brain function monitoring; Burst suppression state; Depth of anesthesia; Depth of sedation; Electromyography (EMG); Patient state index (PSI); Processed electroencephalogram (EEG); SedLine.

Conflict of interest statement

Two authors (NF and RLA) have served as Principal Investigators sponsored by Masimo and one (RLA) has served as a Scientific Advisory Committee Consultant for Masimo. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Proper placement of 11 EEG electrodes to allow for simultaneous recording of BIS and PSI indices
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Custom interface adapter to allow for concurrent connection of EEG sensors to both BIS and SedLine modules
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mobile data collection station showing laptop computer with data collection software; custom interface adapter with ports for connection to sensory electrodes and cables to BIS and SedLine monitors; BIS monitor; and SedLine Root monitor
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Timeline of Events and Experimental Recordings
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Changes in BIS and PSI indices during general anesthesia induction for 5 different patients

References

    1. Practice advisory for intraoperative awareness and brain function monitoring: a report by the american society of anesthesiologists task force on intraoperative awareness. Anesthesiology. 2006;104(4):847–64.
    1. Avidan MS, Jacobsohn E, Glick D, Burnside BA, Zhang L, Villafranca A, Karl L, Kamal S, Torres B, O'Connor M, Evers AS, Gradwohl S, Lin N, Palanca BJ, Mashour GA. Prevention of intraoperative awareness in a high-risk surgical population. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(7):591–600. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1100403.
    1. Avidan MS, Zhang L, Burnside BA, Finkel KJ, Searleman AC, Selvidge JA, Saager L, Turner MS, Rao S, Bottros M, Hantler C, Jacobsohn E, Evers AS. Anesthesia awareness and the bispectral index. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(11):1097–1108. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707361.
    1. Brown EN, Lydic R, Schiff ND. General anesthesia, sleep, and coma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2638–2650. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0808281.
    1. Purdon PL, Sampson A, Pavone KJ, Brown EN. Clinical electroencephalography for anesthesiologists: part I: background and basic signatures. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(4):937–960. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000841.
    1. Bennett C, Voss LJ, Barnard JP, Sleigh JW. Practical use of the raw electroencephalogram waveform during general anesthesia: the art and science. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(2):539–550. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a9fc38.
    1. Fritz BA, Kalarickal PL, Maybrier HR, Muench MR, Dearth D, Chen Y, Escallier KE, Ben Abdallah A, Lin N, Avidan MS. Intraoperative electroencephalogram suppression predicts postoperative delirium. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(1):234–242. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000989.
    1. Soehle M, Dittmann A, Ellerkmann RK, Baumgarten G, Putensen C, Guenther U. Intraoperative burst suppression is associated with postoperative delirium following cardiac surgery: a prospective, observational study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015;15(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0051-7.
    1. Watson PL, Shintani AK, Tyson R, Pandharipande PP, Pun BT, Ely EW. Presence of electroencephalogram burst suppression in sedated, critically ill patients is associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(12):3171–3177. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186b9ce.
    1. Tasbihgou SR, Vogels MF, Absalom AR. Accidental awareness during general anaesthesia - a narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2018;73(1):112–122. doi: 10.1111/anae.14124.
    1. Graham M, Owen AM, Çipi K, Weijer C, Naci L. Minimizing the harm of accidental awareness under general anesthesia: new perspectives from patients misdiagnosed as being in a vegetative state. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(3):1073–1076. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002495.
    1. Sebel PS, Bowdle TA, Ghoneim MM, Rampil IJ, Padilla RE, Gan TJ, Domino KB. The incidence of awareness during anesthesia: a multicenter United States study. Anesth Analg. 2004;99(3):833–839. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130261.90896.6C.
    1. Schneider G, Jordan D, Schwarz G, Bischoff P, Kalkman CJ, Kuppe H, Rundshagen I, Omerovic A, Kreuzer M, Stockmanns G, Kochs EF, European Multicenter EEGAEP Anesthesia Monitoring Study Group and Research Group Knowledge-based Signal Processing Monitoring depth of anesthesia utilizing a combination of electroencephalographic and standard measures. Anesthesiology. 2014;120(4):819–828. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000151.
    1. Cascella M. Mechanisms underlying brain monitoring during anesthesia: limitations, possible improvements, and perspectives. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016;69(2):113–120. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.2.113.
    1. Sigl JC, Chamoun NG. An introduction to bispectral analysis for the electroencephalogram. J Clin Monit. 1994;10(6):392–404. doi: 10.1007/BF01618421.
    1. Rampil IJ. A primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1998;89(4):980–1002. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199810000-00023.
    1. Drover D, Ortega HR. Patient state index. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006;20(1):121–128. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2005.07.008.
    1. Bruhn J, Bouillon TW, Shafer SL. Electromyographic activity falsely elevates the bispectral index. Anesthesiology. 2000;92(5):1485–1487. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200005000-00042.
    1. Dahaba AA. Different conditions that could result in the bispectral index indicating an incorrect hypnotic state. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(3):765–773. doi: 10.1213/.
    1. Sengupta S, Ghosh S, Rudra A, Kumar P, Maitra G, Das T. Effect of ketamine on bispectral index during propofol--fentanyl anesthesia: a randomized controlled study. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2011;21(3):391–395.
    1. Purdon PL, Pavone KJ, Akeju O, Smith AC, Sampson AL, Lee J, Zhou DW, Solt K, Brown EN. The Ageing Brain: Age-dependent changes in the electroencephalogram during propofol and sevoflurane general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(Suppl 1):i46–i57. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev213.
    1. Soehle M, Ellerkmann RK, Grube M, Kuech M, Wirz S, Hoeft A, Bruhn J. Comparison between bispectral index and patient state index as measures of the electroencephalographic effects of sevoflurane. Anesthesiology. 2008;109(5):799–805. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181895fd0.
    1. Soehle M, Kuech M, Grube M, Wirz S, Kreuer S, Hoeft A, Bruhn J, Ellerkmann RK. Patient state index vs bispectral index as measures of the electroencephalographic effects of propofol. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105(2):172–178. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq155.
    1. Masimo Corporation. SedLine Sedation Monitor. Operator’s Manual. 2018:4. .

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir