Effects on cardiovascular disease risk of a web-based health risk assessment with tailored health advice: a follow-up study
Ersen B Colkesen, Bart S Ferket, Jan G P Tijssen, Roderik A Kraaijenhagen, Coenraad K van Kalken, Ron J G Peters, Ersen B Colkesen, Bart S Ferket, Jan G P Tijssen, Roderik A Kraaijenhagen, Coenraad K van Kalken, Ron J G Peters
Abstract
Introduction: A large proportion of the cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden can potentially be prevented by primary prevention programs addressing major causal risk factors. A Web-based health risk assessment (HRA) with tailored feedback for individual health promotion is a promising strategy. We evaluated the effect on CVD risk of such a program among employees of a Dutch worksite.
Methods: We conducted a prospective follow-up study among 368 employees who voluntarily participated in a Web-based HRA program at a single Dutch worksite in 2008. The program included a multicomponent HRA through a Web-based electronic questionnaire, biometrics, and laboratory evaluation. The results were combined with health behavior change theory to generate tailored motivational and educational health advice. On request, a health counseling session with the program physician was available. Follow-up data on CVD risk were collected 1 year after initial participation. The primary outcome was a change in Framingham CVD risk at 6 months relative to baseline. We checked for a possible background effect of an increased health consciousness as a consequence of program introduction at the worksite by comparing baseline measurements of early program participants with baseline measurements of participants who completed the program 6 months later.
Results: A total of 176 employees completed follow-up measurements after a mean of 7 months. There was a graded relation between CVD risk changes and baseline risk, with a relative reduction of 17.9% (P = 0.001) in the high-risk category (baseline CVD risk ≥ 20%). Changes were not explained by additional health counseling, medication, or an increase in health consciousness within the company.
Conclusions: Voluntary participation in a Web-based HRA with tailored feedback at the worksite reduced CVD risk by nearly 18% among participants at high CVD risk and by nearly 5% among all participants. Web-based HRA could improve CVD risk in similar populations. Future research should focus on the persistence of the effects underlying the CVD risk reduction.
Keywords: cardiovascular disease risk; health risk assessment; primary prevention.
Figures
References
- Allender S, Scarborough P, Peto V, et al. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2008. Oxford, UK: Department of Public Health, University of Oxford; 2008. British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group.
- Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364:937–952.
- World Health Organization . Preventing Chronic Diseases: a Vital Investment – WHO global report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2005.
- Yach D, Hawkes C, Gould CL, Hofman KJ. The global burden of chronic diseases: overcoming impediments to prevention and control. JAMA. 2004;291:2616–2622.
- Carnethon M, Whitsel LP, Franklin BA, et al. Worksite wellness programs for cardiovascular disease prevention: a policy statement from the american heart association. Circulation. 2009;120:1725–1741.
- Goetzel RZ, Ozminkowski RJ. The health and cost benefits of work site health-promotion programs. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:303–323.
- Soler RE, Leeks KD, Razi S, et al. A systematic review of selected interventions for worksite health promotion. The assessment of health risks with feedback. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38:S237–S262.
- Anderson DR, Staufacker MJ. The impact of worksite-based health risk appraisal on health-related outcomes: a review of the literature. Am J Health Promot. 1996;10:499–508.
- Cowdery JE, Suggs LS, Parker S. Application of a Web-based tailored health risk assessment in a work-site population. Health Promot Pract. 2007;8:88–95.
- Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ. Do tailored behavior change messages enhance the effectiveness of health risk appraisal? Results from a randomized trial. Health Educ Res. 1996;11:97–105.
- Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ, Glassman B. One size does not fit all: the case for tailoring print materials. Ann Behav Med. 1999;21:276–283.
- Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull. 2007;133:673–693.
- Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12:38–48.
- Floyd DL, Prentice-Dunn S, Rogers RW. A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2000;30:407–429.
- Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the Exercise of Control. New York, NY, USA: WH Freeman and Co; 1997.
- The Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement CBO and Dutch College of General Practitioners . Multidisciplinary Guideline Cardiovascular Risk Management. Utrecht, the Netherlands: van Zuiden Communications; 2006.
- Graham I, Atar D, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2375–2414.
- Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381–1395.
- Van den Brink CL, Ocke MC, Houben AW, et al. Validering van Standaardvraagstelling Voeding voor Lokale en National Monitor Volksgezondheid (RIVM Rapport 260854008) [Validation of a Community Health Services Food Consumption Questionnaire in the Netherlands] Bilthoven, the Netherlands: Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM); 2005.
- Mudde AN, Willemsen MC, Kremers S, de Vries H. Meetinstrumenten voor Onderzoek Naar Roken en Stoppen met Roken [Measurements for Research on Smoking and Smoking Cessation] Den Haag, the Netherlands: STIVORO; 2000.
- D’Agostino RB, Sr, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008;117:743–753.
- Cooper AR, Moore LA, McKenna J, Riddoch CJ. What is the magnitude of blood pressure response to a programme of moderate intensity exercise? Randomised controlled trial among sedentary adults with unmedicated hypertension. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50:958–962.
- Ebrahim S, Smith GD. Lowering blood pressure: a systematic review of sustained effects of non-pharmacological interventions. J Public Health Med. 1998;20:441–448.
- John JH, Ziebland S, Yudkin P, et al. Effects of fruit and vegetable consumption on plasma antioxidant concentrations and blood pressure: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1969–1974.
- Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, et al. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:3–10.
- Ebrahim S, Beswick A, Burke M, Davey SG. Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006:CD001561.
- Heaney CA, Goetzel RZ. A review of health-related outcomes of multi-component worksite health promotion programs. Am J Health Promot. 1997;11:290–307.
- Pelletier KR. A review and analysis of the clinical and cost-effectiveness studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease management programs at the worksite: update VII 2004–2008. J Occup Environ Med. 2009;51:822–837.
- Ellsworth DL, O’Dowd SC, Salami B, et al. Intensive lifestyle modification: impact on cardiovascular disease risk factors in subjects with and without clinical cardiovascular disease. Prev Cardiol. 2004;7:168–175.
- Maruthur NM, Wang NY, Appel LJ. Lifestyle interventions reduce coronary heart disease risk: results from the PREMIER trial. Circulation. 2009;119:2026–2031.
- Mendivil CO, Cortes E, Sierra ID, et al. Reduction of global cardiovascular risk with nutritional versus nutritional plus physical activity intervention in Colombian adults. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006;13:947–955.
- Richardson G, van Woerden HC, Morgan L, et al. Healthy hearts: a community-based primary prevention programme to reduce coronary heart disease. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2008;8:18.
- Wister A, Loewen N, Kennedy-Symonds H, et al. One-year follow-up of a therapeutic lifestyle intervention targeting cardiovascular disease risk. CMAJ. 2007;177:859–865.
- Dobbins TA, Simpson JM, Oldenburg B, et al. Who comes to a workplace health risk assessment? Int J Behav Med. 1998;5:323–334.
- Robroek SJ, van Lenthe FJ, van EP, Burdorf A. Determinants of participation in worksite health promotion programmes: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:26.
- Lerman Y, Shemer J. Epidemiologic characteristics of participants and nonparticipants in health-promotion programs. J Occup Environ Med. 1996;38:535–538.
Source: PubMed