A novel experience-based internet intervention for smoking cessation: feasibility randomised controlled trial

John Powell, Nikki Newhouse, Angela Martin, Sena Jawad, Ly-Mee Yu, Mina Davoudianfar, Louise Locock, Sue Ziebland, John Powell, Nikki Newhouse, Angela Martin, Sena Jawad, Ly-Mee Yu, Mina Davoudianfar, Louise Locock, Sue Ziebland

Abstract

Background: The internet is frequently used to share experiences of health and illness, but this phenomenon has not been harnessed as an intervention to achieve health behaviour change. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of a randomised trial assessing the effects of a novel, experience-based website as a smoking cessation intervention. The secondary aim was to measure the potential impact on smoking behaviour of both the intervention and a comparator website.

Methods: A feasibility randomised controlled single-blind trial assessed a novel, experience-based website containing personal accounts of quitting smoking as a cessation intervention, and a comparator website providing factual information. Feasibility measures including recruitment, and usage of the interventions were recorded, and the following participant-reported outcomes were also measured: Smoking Abstinence Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, the single-item Motivation to Stop Scale, self-reported abstinence, quit attempts and health status outcomes. Eligible smokers from two English regions were entered into the trial and given access to their allocated website for two weeks.

Results: Eighty-seven smokers were randomised, 65 completed follow-up (75 %). Median usage was 15 min for the intervention, and 5 min for the comparator (range 0.5-213 min). Median logins for both sites was 2 (range 1-20). All participant-reported outcomes were similar between groups.

Conclusions: It was technically feasible to deliver a novel intervention harnessing the online sharing of personal experiences as a tool for smoking cessation, but recruitment was slow and actual use was relatively low, with attrition from the trial. Future work needs to maximize engagement and to understand how best to assess the value of such interventions in everyday use, rather than as an isolated 'dose of information'.

Trial registration: ISRCTN29549695 DOI 10.1186/ISRCTN29549695 . Registered 17/05/2013.

Keywords: Internet intervention; Randomised controlled trial; Smoking cessation.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT flow diagram

References

    1. Borrelli B. Smoking cessation: next steps for special populations research and innovative treatments. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010;78:1–12. doi: 10.1037/a0018327.
    1. Brown J, Michie S, Raupach T, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of smokers interested in internet-based smoking cessation interventions: cross-sectional findings from a national household survey. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2342.
    1. Shahab L, McEwen A. Online support for smoking cessation: a systematic review of the literature. Addiction. 2009;104:1792–804. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02710.x.
    1. Civljak M, Stead L, Hartmann-Boyce J, et al. Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD007078.
    1. Ziebland S, Wyke S. Health and illness in a connected world: How might sharing experiences on the internet affect People’s health? Milbank Q. 2012;90:219–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00662.x.
    1. Ashton CM, Houston TK, Williams JH, Larkin D, Trobaugh J, Crenshaw K, et al. A stories-based interactive DVD intended to help people with hypertension achieve blood pressure control through improved communication with their doctors. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79(2):245–50. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.021.
    1. Perez M, Sefko JA, Ksiazek D, Golla B, Casey C, Margenthaler JA, et al. A novel intervention using interactive technology and personal narratives to reduce cancer disparities: African American breast cancer survivor stories. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(1):21–30. doi: 10.1007/s11764-013-0308-4.
    1. Kreuter MW, Holmes K, Alcaraz K, Kalesan B, Rath S, Richert M, et al. Comparing narrative and informational videos to increase mammography in low-income African American women. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81:S6–14. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.008.
    1. Schweier R, Romppel M, Richter C, Hoberg E, Hahmann H, Scherwinski I, et al. A web-based peer-modeling intervention aimed at lifestyle changes in patients with coronary heart disease and chronic back pain: sequential controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(7):e177. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3434.
    1. Brothers B, Borrelli B. Motivating Latino smokers to quit: does type of social support matter? Am J Health Promot. 2011;25:S96–102. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.100628-QUAN-220.
    1. May S, West R. Do social support interventions (“buddy systems”) aid smoking cessation? A review. Tob Control. 2000;9:415–22. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.4.415.
    1. Webel A, Okonsky J, Trompeta J, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of peer-based interventions on health-related behaviors in adults. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:247–53. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.149419.
    1. Ford P, Clifford A, Gussy K, et al. A systematic review of peer-support programs for smoking cessation in disadvantaged groups. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10:5507–22. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10115507.
    1. Herbec A, Beard E, Brown J, et al. The needs and preferences of pregnant smokers regarding tailored Internet-based smoking cessation interventions: a qualitative interview study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1070. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1070.
    1. Cheung YTD, Chan CHH, Lai C-KJ, et al. Using WhatsApp and facebook online social groups for smoking relapse prevention for recent quitters: a pilot pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(10):e238.
    1. Wiltshire S, Bancroft A, Parry O, et al. ‘I came back here and started smoking again’: perceptions and experiences of quitting among disadvantaged smokers. Health Educ Res. 2003;18:292–303. doi: 10.1093/her/cyf031.
    1. Brandt C, Dalum P, Skov-Ettrup L, et al. ‘After all - It doesn’t kill you to quit smoking’: an explorative analysis of the blog in a smoking cessation intervention. Scand J Public Health. 2013;41:655–61. doi: 10.1177/1403494813489602.
    1. Durkin S, Brennan E, Wakefield M. Mass media campaigns to promote smoking cessation among adults: an integrative review. Tob Control. 2012;21(2):127–38. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050345.
    1. Ziebland S, McPherson A. Making sense of qualitative data analysis: an introduction with illustrations from DIPEx (personal experiences of health and illness) Med Educ. 2006;40:405–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02467.x.
    1. Ziebland S, Powell J, Briggs P, Jenkinson C, Wyke S, Sillence E, et al. Examining the role of patients’ experiences as a resource for choice and decision-making in healthcare: a creative, inter-disciplinary mixed method study in digital health. Programme Grants Appl Res 2016 (in press).
    1. Kelly L, Jenkinson C, Ziebland S. Measuring the effects of online health information for patients: item generation for an e-health impact questionnaire. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93:433–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.03.012.
    1. Kelly L, Ziebland S, Jenkinson C. Measuring the effects of online health information: scale validation for the e-health impact questionnaire. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98:1418–24. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.008.
    1. Heffner JL, Wyszynski CM, Comstock B, Mercer LD, Bricker J. Overcoming recruitment challenges of web-based interventions for tobacco use: the case of web-based acceptance and commitment therapy for smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 2013;38(10):2473–6. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.05.004.
    1. Brown J, Michie S, Geraghty AWA, Yardley L, Gardner B, Shahab L, et al. Internet-based intervention for smoking cessation (StopAdvisor) in people with low and high socioeconomic status: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(12):997–1006. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70195-X.
    1. Wangberg SC, Bergmo TS, Johnsen JA. Adherence in internet-based interventions. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2008;2:57–65.
    1. Geraghty A, Torres L, Leykin Y, et al. Understanding attrition from international internet health interventions: a step towards global eHealth. Health Promot Int. 2012;28:442–52. doi: 10.1093/heapro/das029.
    1. Kohl LF, Crutzen R, de Vries NK. Online Prevention Aimed at Lifestyle Behaviors: A Systematic Review of Reviews. Eysenbach G, ed. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2013;15(7):e146. doi:10.2196/jmir.2665
    1. McClure JB, Shortreed SM, Bogart A, Derry H, Riggs K, St John J, Nair V, An L. The effect of program design on engagement with an internet-based smoking intervention: randomized factorial trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(3):e69. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2508.
    1. Burri M, Baujard V, Etter J. A qualitative analysis of an Internet discussion forum for recent ex-smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006;8:13–9. doi: 10.1080/14622200601042513.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir