A Comparison of Tissue versus Swab Culturing of Infected Diabetic Foot Wounds

Ying Huang, Ying Cao, Mengchen Zou, Xiangrong Luo, Ya Jiang, Yaoming Xue, Fang Gao, Ying Huang, Ying Cao, Mengchen Zou, Xiangrong Luo, Ya Jiang, Yaoming Xue, Fang Gao

Abstract

Objective. To compare the efficacy of swabbing versus tissue biopsy for microbiological diagnosis of diabetic foot infection. Methods. This was a prospective trial. Fifty-six patients with diabetic foot infection were divided into the following 3 groups according to the PEDIS grading system: grade 2 (n = 10), grade 3 (n = 29), and grade 4 (n = 17). Two specimens were collected from each wound for microbial culturing after debridement, including a superficial swab and a deep tissue punch biopsy specimen. Results. Swab culturing identified all of the microorganisms isolated from the corresponding deep tissue specimens in 9/10 of grade 2 wounds (90.0%), and this proportion decreased to 12/29 (41.4%) and 7/17 (41.2%) for grades 3 and 4 wounds, respectively (p = 0.02). Moreover, the sensitivity for identifying Gram-negative bacteria, such as E. coli and Citrobacter, by swabbing was low (33.3%). In addition, some Gram-negative bacteria, such as Serratia and Ralstonia pickettii, were isolated from deep tissues but not from swabs. Conclusions. Swab culturing may be reliable for identification of pathogens in diabetic foot wounds classified as grade 2. However, it is advisable to culture deep tissue specimens for wounds of grade ≥3 because swab culturing is associated with a high risk of missing pathogens, especially Gram-negative bacteria.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Concordance between culture results from swab and tissue specimens. ∗p < 0.05 versus grade 2.

References

    1. Andersen C. A., Roukis T. S. The diabetic foot. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2007;87(5):1149–1177. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.08.001.
    1. Singh N., Armstrong D. G., Lipsky B. A. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2005;293(2):217–228. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.2.217.
    1. Richard J. L., Sotto A., Lavigne J. P. New insights in diabetic foot infection. World Journal of Diabetes. 2011;2(2):24–32.
    1. Lipsky B. A., Berendt A. R., Cornia P. B., et al. 2012 Infectious diseases society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2012;54(12):e132–e173. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis346.
    1. Lipsky B. A., Aragón-Sánchez J., Diggle M., et al. IWGDF guidance on the diagnosis and management of foot infections in persons with diabetes. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews. 2016;32(supplement 1):45–74. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2699.
    1. Bowler P. G., Duerden B. I., Armstrong D. G. Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2001;14(2):244–269. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.2.244-269.2001.
    1. Sotto A., Richard J.-L., Jourdan N., Combescure C., Bouziges N., Lavigne J.-P. Miniaturized oligonucleotide arrays: a new tool for discriminating colonization from infection due to Staphylococcus aureus in diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(8):2051–2056. doi: 10.2337/dc07-0461.
    1. Lipsky B. A., Peters E. J. G., Senneville E., et al. Expert opinion on the management of infections in the diabetic foot. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews. 2012;28(supplement 1):163–178. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2248.
    1. Nelson E. A., Backhouse M. R., Bhogal M. S., et al. Concordance in diabetic foot ulcer infection. BMJ Open. 2013;3(1) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002370.e002370
    1. Nelson E. A., O'Meara S., Craig D., et al. A series of systematic reviews to inform a decision analysis for sampling and treating infected diabetic foot ulcers. Health Technology Assessment. 2006;10(12):1–86.
    1. Rondas A. A. L. M., Schols J. M. G. A., Halfens R. J. G., Stobberingh E. E. Swab versus biopsy for the diagnosis of chronic infected wounds. Advances in Skin and Wound Care. 2013;26(5):211–219. doi: 10.1097/01.asw.0000428984.58483.aa.
    1. Levine N. S., Lindberg R. B., Mason A. D., Pruitt B. A. The quantitative swab culture and smear: a quick, simple method for determining the number of viable aerobic bacteria on open wounds. Journal of Trauma—Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 1976;16(2):89–94. doi: 10.1097/00005373-197602000-00002.
    1. Gjødsbøl K., Skindersoe M. E., Christensen J. J., et al. No need for biopsies: Comparison of three sample techniques for wound microbiota determination. International Wound Journal. 2012;9(3):295–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00883.x.
    1. Demetriou M., Papanas N., Panopoulou M., Papatheodorou K., Bounovas A., Maltezos E. Tissue and swab culture in diabetic foot infections: neuropathic versus neuroischemic ulcers. International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. 2013;12(2):87–93. doi: 10.1177/1534734613481975.
    1. York M. K. Aerobic bacteriology. Quantitative cultures of wound tissues. In: Isenberg H. D., editor. Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook. 2nd. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press; 2004. pp. 3–13.
    1. Reisner B. S., Woodsand G. L., Thomson R. B., et al. Specimen processing. In: Murray P. R., Baron E. J., Pfaller M. A., Tenover F. C., Yolker R. H., editors. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 7th. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press; 1999. pp. 64–104.
    1. O'Meara S., Nelson E. A., Golder S., Dalton J. E., Craig D., Iglesias C. Systematic review of methods to diagnose infection in foot ulcers in diabetes. Diabetic Medicine. 2006;23(4):341–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01830.x.
    1. Frantz R. A. Identifying infection in chronic wounds. Nursing. 2005;35(7):p. 73.
    1. Bill T. J., Ratliff C. R., Donovan A. M., Knox L. K., Morgan R. F., Rodeheaver G. T. Quantitative swab culture versus tissue biopsy: a comparison in chronic wounds. Ostomy Wound Management. 2001;47(1):34–37.
    1. Slater R. A., Lazarovitch T., Boldur I., et al. Swab cultures accurately identify bacterial pathogens in diabetic foot wounds not involving bone. Diabetic Medicine. 2004;21(7):705–709. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01221.x.
    1. Pellizzer G., Strazzabosco M., Presi S., et al. Deep tissue biopsy vs. superficial swab culture monitoring in the microbiological assessment of limb-threatening diabetic foot infection. Diabetic Medicine. 2001;18(10):822–827. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2001.00584.x.
    1. Parvez N., Dutta P., Ray P., et al. Microbial profile and utility of soft tissue, pus, and bone cultures in diagnosing diabetic foot infections. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. 2012;14(8):669–674. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0039.
    1. Kessler L., Piemont Y., Ortega F., et al. Comparison of microbiological results of needle puncture vs. superficial swab in infected diabetic foot ulcer with osteomyelitis. Diabetic Medicine. 2006;23(1):99–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01764.x.
    1. van der Meer J. W. M., Koopmans P. P., Lutterman J. A. Antibiotic therapy in diabetic foot infection. Diabetic Medicine. 1996;13(supplement 1):S48–S51.
    1. Valencia I. C., Kirsner R. S., Kerdel F. A. Microbiologic evaluation of skin wounds: alarming trend toward antibiotic resistance in an inpatient dermatology service during a 10-year period. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2004;50(6):845–849. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2003.11.064.
    1. Mendes J. J., Marques-Costa A., Vilela C., et al. Clinical and bacteriological survey of diabetic foot infections in Lisbon. Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice. 2012;95(1):153–161. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.10.001.
    1. Lipsky B. A., Pecoraro R. E., Larson S. A., Hanley M. E., Ahroni J. H. Outpatient management of uncomplicated lower-extremity infections in diabetic patients. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1990;150(4):790–797. doi: 10.1001/archinte.150.4.790.
    1. Tentolouris N., Petrikkos G., Vallianou N., et al. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in infected and uninfected diabetic foot ulcers. Clinical Microbiology & Infection. 2006;12(2):186–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01279.x.
    1. Sharp C. S., Bessman A. N., Wagner F. W., Jr., Garland D. Microbiology of deep tissue in diabetic gangrene. Diabetes Care. 1978;1(5):289–292. doi: 10.2337/diacare.1.5.289.
    1. Shen Q., Lin D., Zhu H., et al. Clinical distribution and antimicrobial resistance analysis of 754 pathogenic bacteria in diabetic foot infection. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014;94(12):889–894.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir