Standardised proformas improve patient handover: Audit of trauma handover practice

Nicholas A Ferran, Andrew J Metcalfe, Declan O'Doherty, Nicholas A Ferran, Andrew J Metcalfe, Declan O'Doherty

Abstract

Background: The implementation of the European Working Time Directive has meant the introduction of shift patterns of working for junior doctors. Patient handover between shifts has become a necessary part of practice in order to reduce the risk of medical errors. Data handed over between shifts are used to prioritise clinical jobs outstanding, and to create theatre lists. We present a closed-loop audit of handover practice to assess whether standardised proformas improve clinical data transfer between shifts during handover in our Orthopaedic Unit.

Methods: We collected data handed over between shifts for a period of one week at our department. The data were in the form of hand written data on plain paper used to assist verbal handover. Data were analysed and a standardised handover sheet was trialled. After feedback from juniors the sheet was revised and implemented. A re-audit, of handover data, was then undertaken using the revised standardised proforma during a period of 1 week.

Results: Forty-eight patients were handed over in week 1 while 55 patients were handed over during re-audit. The standardised proformas encouraged use of pre-printed patient labels which contained legible patient identifiers, use of labels increased from 72.9% to 93.4%. Handover of outstanding jobs increased from 31.25% to 100%. Overall data handed over increased from 72.6% to 93.2%. Handover of relevant blood results showed little improvement from 18.8% to 20.7%

Conclusion: This audit highlights the issue of data transfer between shifts. Standardised proformas encourage filling of relevant fields and increases the data transferred between shifts thereby reducing the potential for clinical error cause by shift patterns.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bar chart of percentage of patient data transferred pre/post proforma.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bar chart of percentage of patient data transferred pre/post proforma.

References

    1. Borowitz SM, Waggoner-Fountain LA, Bass EJ, Sledd RM. Adequacy of information transferred at resident sign-out (in-hospital handover of care): a prospective survey. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:6–10. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019273.
    1. Whitt N, Harvey R, McLeod G, Child S. How many health professionals does a patient see during an average hospital stay? N Z Med J. 2007;120:U2517.
    1. Tokode M, O'Riordan B, Barthelmes L. "That's all I got handed over": missed opportunities and opportunity for near misses in Wales. BMJ. 2006;332:610. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7541.610-a.
    1. Bhabra G, Mackeith S, Monteiro P, Pothier DD. An experimental comparison of handover methods. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89:298–300. doi: 10.1308/003588407X168352.
    1. British Medical Association Safe Handover: Safe Patients – Guidance on Clinical Handover for Clinicians and Managers. 2004.
    1. Royal College of Surgeons of England Safe Handover: Guidance from the Working Time Directive working party. 2007.
    1. Ferran NA, Metcalfe AJ. Comment on: Audit of handover practice. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90:350. doi: 10.1308/003588408X285838.
    1. McCann L, McHardy K, Child S. Passing the buck: clinical handovers at a tertiary hospital. N Z Med J. 2007;120:U2778.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir