Effectiveness of an "Exclusive Intervention Strategy" to increase medical male circumcision uptake among men aged 25-49 years in South Africa

Jonathan M Grund, Candice M Chetty-Makkan, Sibuse Ginindza, Reuben Munyai, Helen Kisbey-Green, Mpho Maraisane, Salome Charalambous, Jonathan M Grund, Candice M Chetty-Makkan, Sibuse Ginindza, Reuben Munyai, Helen Kisbey-Green, Mpho Maraisane, Salome Charalambous

Abstract

Background: South Africa introduced medical male circumcision (MMC) to reduce HIV incidence. Mathematical modeling suggested that targeting MMC services to men aged 20-34 years could provide the most immediate impact on HIV incidence. However the majority of MMCs performed have been among males aged ≤25 years. We evaluated an intervention package to increase MMC uptake among men aged 25-49 years.

Methods: We conducted a pre-post study to compare the proportion of men (aged 25-49 years) presenting for MMC during the formative (Phase 1) and intervention (Phase 2) phases in Ekurhuleni, Johannesburg, South Africa. The intervention included infrastructure changes that separated adults from adolescents at the MMC site, an exclusive men's health club, adult-specific demand generation materials, and discussions with community members.

Results: Overall 2817 enrolled in the study with 1601 from Phase 1 and 1216 in Phase 2. A higher proportion of participants aged 25-49 years accessed MMC in Phase 2 compared to Phase 1 (59.4% vs. 54.9%; Prevalence Ratio = 1.08; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.01-1.15; p = 0.019). Participants with multiple partners in the past 12 months in Phase 2 were more likely to access MMC services compared to participants in Phase 1 (unadjusted Odds Ratio, 1.37; 95% CI:1.17-1.61; p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, multiple partners remained a risk factor in Phase 2 (adjusted OR, 1.39; 95% CI: 1.18-1.63; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The "Exclusive Intervention Strategy" was associated with a slight increase in the proportion of participants aged 25-49 years accessing MMC services, and an increase in those with HIV risk behaviors, during the intervention phase. These findings may provide important insights to overcoming barriers for accessing MMC services among men aged 25-49 years.

Trial registration: The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02352961 .

Keywords: Demand creation; HIV prevention; Male circumcision; South Africa.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We obtained approval for the study from the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee, University of Witwatersrand (Approval Number: M130711) and the research committee of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (protocol number 6546). The study was registered on Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

The funder of the study participated in the study design, data interpretation, and writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow of enrolment diagram for Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Imbizo study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Number of MMC clients recruited per month for Phase 1 (April–September 2014) & Phase 2 (June–November 2015)

References

    1. Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, et al. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 trial. PLoS Med. 2005:e298.
    1. Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369(9562):643–656. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60312-2.
    1. Gray RH, Kigozi K, Serwadda D, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;369(9562):657–666. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60313-4.
    1. Weiss HA, Quigley MA, Hayes RJ. Male circumcision and risk of HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2000;14:2361–2370. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200010200-00018.
    1. WHO and UNAIDS, New Data on Male Circumcision and HIV Prevention: Policy and Program Implications. WHO/UNAIDS Technical Consultation on Male Circumcision and HIV Prevention: Research Implications for Policy and Programming 2007: Montreux, Switzerland. . Accessed 10 June 2018.
    1. Njeuhmeli E, Forsythe S, Reed J, et al. Voluntary medical male circumcision: modeling the impact and cost of expanding male circumcision for HIV prevention in eastern and southern Africa. PLoS Med. 2011;8(11):e1001132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001132.
    1. WHO. Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention in 14 Priority Countries in East and Southern Africa. June 2016. WHO Progress Brief. . Accessed 10 June 2018.
    1. WHO/UNAIDS Global Report: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic 2013. . Accessed 10 June 2018.
    1. Kripke K, Chen P-A, Vazzano A, et al. Cost and impact of voluntary medical male circumcision in South Africa: focusing the program on specific age groups and provinces. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0157071. 10.1371/journal.pone.0157071. Accessed 10 June 2018.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision — Southern and Eastern Africa, 2010–2012. MMWR. 2013;62(47):953–957.
    1. Shisana O, Rehle T, Simbayi LC, et al. South African National HIV Prevalence, Incidence and Behaviour Survey, 2012. Cape Town: HSRC Press; 2014.
    1. Plotkin M, Castor D, Mziray H, et al. “Man, what took you so long?” social and individual factors affecting adult attendance at voluntary medical male circumcision services in Tanzania. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013;1(1):108–116. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-12-00037.
    1. Khumalo-Sakutukwa G, Lane T, van-Rooyen H, et al. Understanding and addressing socio-cultural barriers to medical male circumcision in traditionally non-circumcising rural communities in sub-Saharan Africa. Cult Health Sex. 2013;15(9):1085–1100. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2013.807519.
    1. Westercamp N, Bailey RC. Acceptability of male circumcision for prevention of HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa: a review. AIDS Behav. 2007;11(3):341–355. doi: 10.1007/s10461-006-9169-4.
    1. Evens E, Lanham M, Hart C, et al. Identifying and addressing barriers to uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision in Nyanza, Kenya among men 18–35: a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e98221. 10.1371/journal.pone.0098221. Accessed 10 June 2018.
    1. Herman-Roloff A, Llewellyn E, Obiero W, et al. Implementing voluntary medical male circumcision for HIV prevention in Nyanza Province, Kenya: lessons learned during the first year. PLoS One. 2014;6(4):e18299. 10.1371/journal.pone.0018299. Accessed 10 June 2018.
    1. Chetty-Makkan CM, JM Grund, R Munyai, et al. “Describing the role of women in promoting medical male circumcision to adult men (25–49 years) in a peri-urban clinic of South Africa”. Poster Presentation A-792-0297-03849 at the International AIDS Conference, Durban. 2016. . Accessed 10 June 2018.
    1. Thirumurthy H, Masters SH, Rao S, et al. Effect of providing conditional economic compensation on uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision in Kenya: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;312(7):703–711. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.9087.
    1. Wambura M, Mahler H, Grund JM, et al. Increasing voluntary medical male circumcision uptake among adult men in Tanzania. AIDS. 2017;31:1025–1034. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001440.
    1. Wilson N, Frade S, Rech D, et al. Advertising for demand creation for voluntary medical male circumcision. JAIDS. 2016;72:S293–S296.
    1. Marshall, E, Rain-Taljaard, R, Tsepe M, et al. Obtaining a male circumcision prevalence rate of 80% among adults in a short time. Medicine, 2017. vol:96 iss:4 pg:e5328

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir