Changes in the Perceptions of Self-weighing Across Time in a Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention

Margaret C Fahey, Robert C Klesges, Mehmet Kocak, G Wayne Talcott, Rebecca A Krukowski, Margaret C Fahey, Robert C Klesges, Mehmet Kocak, G Wayne Talcott, Rebecca A Krukowski

Abstract

Objective: Changes in beliefs about self-weighing were examined across time in a behavioral weight loss intervention.

Methods: Active duty military personnel (n = 248) enrolled in a 12-month counselor-initiated or self-paced intervention based on the Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) Intensive Lifestyle Intervention. Using an electronic scale, participants were asked to self-weigh daily. Self-weighing perceptions were compared from baseline to 4 months (weight loss phase), from 4 months to 12 months (weight maintenance phase), and from baseline to 12 months (full intervention), as well as across time by behavioral and demographic characteristics.

Results: Overall, participants perceived self-weighing as more helpful and positive, less frustrating, and making them less self-conscious after the weight loss phase. After weight maintenance, individuals believed self-weighing was less helpful and positive, more frustrating and anxiety provoking, and making them more self-conscious. However, after the intervention, participants still viewed self-weighing as more helpful and positive and less frustrating than at baseline. Weight change, self-weighing behavior prior to the intervention, and intervention condition were associated with perception change. Controlling for these influencing factors, differences in gender, BMI, age, ethnicity, and race were observed in how beliefs changed across time.

Conclusions: Results suggest engaging in a weight loss intervention promoting daily self-weighing increases positive and decreases negative beliefs about self-weighing.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02063178.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

The opinions expressed on this document are solely those of the authors and do not represent an endorsement by or the views of the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the United States Government. The views or materials of BodyTrace™ are not necessarily the official views of, or endorsed by the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the United States Government.

© 2018 The Obesity Society.

Figures

Figure 1.. Modeling Change in Self-Weighing Perceptions…
Figure 1.. Modeling Change in Self-Weighing Perceptions across the Intervention
Random Coefficient models observed change in self-weighing perceptions by behavioral and demographic factors. Self-weighing perceptions (x-axis) in order: Helpful, Positive, Frustrating, Anxiety-Provoking, Makes You Self-Conscious Factors of interest (y-axis) in order: overall sample, previous self-weighing frequency (i.e., 40), ethnicity (i.e., non-Hispanic/Latino, Hispanic/Latino), race (i.e., Caucasian, African American, Other) Models of demographic differences (i.e., BMI, gender, age, ethnicity, and race) adjusted for baseline covariates (i.e., intervention condition, previous self-weighing frequency) A higher score indicates a more positive (i.e., helpful, positive) perception of self-weighing. Scores for negative beliefs were reverse scored, such that, a higher score indicates a more negative (i.e., frustrating, anxiety provoking, making self-conscious) perception of self-weighing.

References

    1. Burke LE, Choo J, Music E, Warziski M, Styn MA, Kim Y, Sevick MA. PREFER study: A randomized clinical trial testing treatment preference and two dietary options in behavioral weight management — rationale, design and baseline characteristics. Contemp Clin Trials 2006; 27: 34–4.
    1. Linde JA, Jeffery RW, French SA, Pronk NP, Boyle RG Self-Weighing in Weight Gain Prevention and Weight Loss. Trials Ann Behav Med 2005; 3 (3): 210–216.
    1. Steinberg DM, Tate DF, Bennett GG, Ennett S, Samuel-Hodge C, Ward DS. The efficacy of a daily self-weighing weight loss intervention using smart scales and email. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013; 21 (9), 1789–1797.
    1. VanWormer JJ, French SA, Pereira MA, Welsh EM. The impact of regular self-weighing on weight management: A systematic literature review. Int J of Behav Nutr and Phys Act 2008; 5 (54): 1–10.
    1. Shieh C, Knisley MR, Clark D., Carpenter JS Self-Weighing in Weight Management Interventions: A Systematic Review of Literature. Obes Res & Clin Pract 2016; 10 (5): 493–519.
    1. Zheng Y, Klem ML, Sereika SM, Danford CA, Ewing LJ, Burke LE. Self-weighing in weight management: A systematic literature review. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2015; 23 (2): 256–265.
    1. Pacanowski CR, Levitsky DA. Frequent Self-Weighing and Visual Feedback for Weight Loss in Overweight Adults. J Obes 2015; 2015: 1–9.
    1. Helander EE, Vuorinen AL, Wansink B, Korhonen IKJ. Are Breaks in Daily Self-Weighing Associated with Weight Gain? PLoS One 2014; 9 (11): e113164.
    1. Benn Y, Webb TL, Chang BPI, Harkin B. What is the psychological impact of self- weighing? A meta-analysis. Health Psychol Review 2016; 10 (2), 187–203.
    1. Welsh EM, Sherwood NE, VanWormer JJ, Hotop AM, Jeffery RW. Is frequent self-weighing associated with poorer body satisfaction? Findings from phone-based weight loss trial. J Nutr Educ Behav 2009; 41 (6): 425–428.
    1. Steinberg DM, Tate DF, Bennett GG, Ennett S, Samuel-Hodge C, Ward DS. Daily self-weighing and adverse psychological outcomes: A randomized controlled trial. Am J of Prev Med 2014; 4 (46): 24–29.
    1. Linde JA, Jeffery RW. Testing a brief self-directed behavioral weight control program. Behav Med 2011; 37 (2): 47–53.
    1. Valle CG, Deal AM, Tate DF. Preventing weight gain in African American breast cancer survivors using smart scales and activity trackers: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Cancer Surviv 2017; 11, 133–148.
    1. Gokee LaRose J, Tate DF, Gorin AM, Wing RR. Preventing weight gain in young adults: A randomized controlled pilot study. Am J of Prev Med 2010; 39 (1), 63–68.
    1. Krukowski RA, Hare ME, Talcott GW, Johnson KC, Richey PA, Kocak M, et al. Dissemination of the Look AHEAD intensive lifestyle intervention in the United States Air Force: Study rationale, design, and methods. Contemp Clin Trials 2015; 40:232–239.
    1. Krukowski RA, Hare ME, Talcott GW, Gladney LA, Johnson KC, Richey PA, Kocak M, Keller PL, Hryshko-Mullen A, Klesges RC. Dissemination of the Look AHEAD Intensive Lifestyle Intervention in the United States Military: A Randomized Controlled Trial. In press.
    1. Ross KM, Wing RR. Concordance of in-home ‘smart’ scale measurement with body weight measured in-person. Obesity Science & Practice 2016: 224–2248.
    1. Wing RR, Tate DF, Gorin AA, Raynor HA, Fava JL. A self-regulation program for maintenance of weight loss. N Engl J Med 2006; 355 (15): 1563–1571.
    1. Zheng Y, Terry MA, Danford CA, Ewing LJ, Sereika SM, Goode RW, Mori A, Burke LE. Experiences of daily weighing among successful weight loss individuals during a 12-moth weight loss study. West J Nurs Res 2018; 40 (4):462–480.
    1. Quester George H. Demographic trends and military recruitment: Surprising possibilities. Parameters 2005; 35 (1): 27–40.
    1. Dall TM, Zhang Y, Chen YJ, Askarinam Wagner RC, Hogan PF, Fagan NK, et al. Cost associated with being overweight and with obesity, high alcohol consumption, and tobacco use within the military health system’s TRICARE prime-enrolled population. Am J Health Promot 2007; 22: 120–139.
    1. Tanofsky-Kraff M, Sbrocco T, Theim KR, Cohen LA, Mackey ER, Stice E, Henderson JL, McCreight SJ, Bryant EJ, Stepehens MB. Obesity and the US military family. Obesity 2013; 21: 2205–2220.
    1. Stevens J, Truesdale KP, McClain JE, Cai J. The definition of weight maintenance. Int J Obes 2006; 30 (3): 391–399.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir