Simplification of ankle-brachial-index measurement using Doppler-waveform classification in symptomatic patients suspected of lower extremity artery disease

Antoine Métairie, Quentin Tollenaere, Damien Lanéelle, Alexis Le Faucheur, Estelle Le Pabic, Loukman Omarjee, Guillaume Mahé, Antoine Métairie, Quentin Tollenaere, Damien Lanéelle, Alexis Le Faucheur, Estelle Le Pabic, Loukman Omarjee, Guillaume Mahé

Abstract

Objectives: Ankle-brachial index (ABI) is commonly used for screening lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) according to the international guidelines. Arterial Doppler waveform recordings is a tool to diagnose and assess PAD severity. We hypothesized that ABI measurement could be simplified by measuring only the pressure where the best arterial flow is recorded. The aim of this study was to evaluate the concordance between ABI performed according to the American Heart Association guidelines (AHA-ABI) and ABI measured according to best arterial waveform (FLOW-ABI).

Design: This was a monocentric cross-sectional study.

Methods: We included patients with exertional limb symptoms suspected of PAD. Arterial Doppler waveforms and ABI were acquired on both lower extremities at the pedis and tibial posterior arteries. Each arterial waveform was classified using the Saint-Bonnet classification. Concordances were analyzed with the kappa coefficient (confidence interval 95%). Exercise PAD study was registered n° NCT03186391.

Results: In total, one hundred and eighty-eight patients (62+/-12 years and 26.8+/-4.5 kg/m2) with exertional limb symptoms were included from May 2016 to June 2019. On each extremity, FLOW-ABI had excellent concordance for the diagnosis of PAD with the AHA-ABI with a kappa of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.99) in the right extremity and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.97) in the left extremity.

Conclusion: There is almost perfect concordance between AHA-ABI and FLOW-ABI. Thus, ABI can be simplified into five pressure measurements instead of seven in patient suspected of PAD with exertional limb symptoms. The question remains in patients with chronic limb ischemia.

Keywords: Doppler waveforms; ankle-brachial index; claudicant; lower extremity artery disease; peripheral arterial disease.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Métairie, Tollenaere, Lanéelle, Le Faucheur, Le Pabic, Omarjee and Mahé.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram flow of the study. This figure shows the selection process of the study. Patients were excluded if there were missing ABI and missing arterial Doppler waveform. ABI means ankle brachial index.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distal pressures according to Doppler waveforms. This graph shows the mean arterial pressure (and the standard deviation) according to the Doppler waveform in each lower extremity artery from both legs. We can observe a trend of decreasing pressure with flow alteration. TPA, tibial posterior artery (RTPA,right TPA; LTPA, left TPA); DPA, dorsalis pedis artery (RDPA, right DPA; LDPA, left DPA).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlation plots for each lower extremity between AHA-ABI and FLOW-ABI. PAD means lower extremity peripheral artery disease. FLOW-ABI corresponds to the ABI calculated according to the best arterial flow. AHA-ABI corresponds to the ABI calculated according to the American Heart Association guidelines. (A) Relationship between AHA-ABI and FLOW-ABI for the right limbs. (B) Relationship between AHA-ABI and FLOW-ABI for the left limbs. (C) Relationship between AHA-ABI and FLOW-ABI for the right limbs with two different Doppler arterial waveforms. (D) Relationship between AHA-ABI and FLOW-ABI for the left limbs with two different Doppler arterial waveforms.

References

    1. Criqui MH, Aboyans V. Epidemiology of peripheral artery disease. Circ Res. (2015) 116:1509–26. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303849
    1. Song P, Rudan D, Zhu Y, Fowkes FJI, Rahimi K, Fowkes FGR, et al. . Global, regional, and national prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2015: an updated systematic review and analysis. Lancet Glob Health. (2019) 7:e1020–30. 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30255-4
    1. Fowkes FGR, Rudan D, Rudan I, Aboyans V, Denenberg JO, McDermott MM, et al. . Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet. (2013) 382:1329–40. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61249-0
    1. Grenon SM, Gagnon J, Hsiang Y. Ankle–Brachial index for assessment of peripheral arterial disease. N Engl J Med. (2009) 361:e40. 10.1056/NEJMvcm0807012
    1. WINSOR T. Influence of arterial disease on the systolic blood pressure gradients of the extremity. Am J Med Sci. (1950) 220:117–26.
    1. Aboyans V, Ricco J-B, Bartelink M-LEL, Björck M, Brodmann M, Cohnert T, et al. . editor's choice - 2017 esc guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial diseases, in collaboration with the European society for vascular surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. (2018) 55:305–68. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.07.018
    1. Mahé G, Boge G, Bura-Rivière A, Chakfé N, Constans J, Goueffic Y, et al. . Disparities between international guidelines (AHA/ESC/ESVS/ESVM/SVS) concerning lower extremity arterial disease: consensus of the french society of vascular medicine (SFMV) and the French society for vascular and endovascular surgery (SCVE). Ann Vasc Surg. (2021) 72:1–56. 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.11.011
    1. Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, Barshes NR, Corriere MA, Drachman DE, et al. . 2016 AHA/ACC guideline on the management of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease: executive summary: a report of the American college of cardiology/american heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2017) 69:1465–508. 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.008
    1. Ankle brachial index combined with framingham risk score to predict cardiovascular events and mortality: a meta-analysis . JAMA. (2008) 300:197–208. 10.1001/jama.300.2.197
    1. Hiatt WR, Hoag S, Hamman RF. Effect of diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease. Circulation. (1995) 91:1472–9. 10.1161/01.CIR.91.5.1472
    1. Aboyans V, Criqui MH, Abraham P, Allison MA, Creager MA, Diehm C, et al. . Measurement and interpretation of the ankle-brachial index: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation. (2012) 126:2890–909. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318276fbcb
    1. Mohler ER, Treat-Jacobson D, Reilly MP, Cunningham KE, Miani M, Criqui MH, et al. . Utility and barriers to performance of the ankle-brachial index in primary care practice. Vasc Med. (2004) 9:253–60. 10.1191/1358863x04vm559oa
    1. Deveugele M, Derese A, Brink-Muinen A. van den, Bensing J, Maeseneer JD. Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countries. BMJ. (2002) 325:472. 10.1136/bmj.325.7362.472
    1. Iacobucci G. GP appointments last less than five minutes for half the world's population. BMJ. (2017) 359:5172. 10.1136/bmj.j5172
    1. Irving G, Neves AL, Dambha-Miller H, Oishi A, Tagashira H, Verho A, et al. . International variations in primary care physician consultation time: a systematic review of 67 countries. BMJ Open. (2017) 7:e017902. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017902
    1. Deveugele M, Derese A, De Bacquer D, van den Brink-Muinen A, Bensing J, De Maeseneer J. Consultation in general practice: a standard operating procedure? Patient Educ Couns. (2004) 54:227–33. 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00239-8
    1. Mahé G, Boulon C, Désormais I, Lacroix P, Bressollette L, Guilmot JL, et al. . College of the French vascular medicine teachers (CEMV) statement: arterial Doppler waveforms analysis (simplified Saint-Bonnet classification). J Med Vasc. (2018) 43:255–61. 10.1016/j.jdmv.2018.05.002
    1. Mahé G, Boulon C, Desormais I, Lacroix P, Bressollette L, Guilmot J-L, et al. . Statement for Doppler waveforms analysis. VASA. (2017) 46:337–45. 10.1024/0301-1526/a000638
    1. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FGR. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). Eu J Vasc Endovasc Surg. (2007) 33:S1–S75. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.09.024
    1. Brownrigg JRW, Schaper NC, Hinchliffe RJ. Diagnosis and assessment of peripheral arterial disease in the diabetic foot. Diab Med. (2015) 32:738–47. 10.1111/dme.12749
    1. Halliday A, Bax JJ. The 2017 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial diseases, in collaboration with the European society for vascular surgery (ESVS). Eu J Vasc Endovasc Surg. (2018) 55:301–2. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.03.004
    1. Stivalet O, Paisant A, Belabbas D, Omarjee L, Le Faucheur A, Landreau P, et al. . Exercise testing criteria to diagnose lower extremity peripheral artery disease assessed by computed-tomography angiography. PLoS ONE. (2019) 14:e0219082. 10.1371/journal.pone.0219082
    1. Chaudru S, de Müllenheim P-Y, Le Faucheur A, Kaladji A, Jaquinandi V, Mahé G. Training to perform ankle-brachial index: systematic review and perspectives to improve teaching and learning. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. (2016) 51:240–7. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.09.005
    1. Guilcher A, Lanéelle D, Hoffmann C, Guillaumat J, Constans J, Bressollette L, et al. . Comparison of the use of arterial doppler waveform classifications in clinical routine to describe lower limb flow. J Clin Med. (2021) 10:e464: 10.3390/jcm10030464
    1. Kim ES, Sharma AM, Scissons R, Dawson D, Eberhardt RT, Gerhard-Herman M, et al. . Interpretation of peripheral arterial and venous Doppler waveforms: a consensus statement from the society for vascular medicine and society for vascular ultrasound. Vasc Med. (2020) 25:484–506. 10.1177/1358863X20937665
    1. Wen C, Gao M, Fu Y, Zhao R, Tong Y, Scissons R, et al. . high variability of arterial Doppler waveform descriptions exists in China. Vasc Med. (2020) 25:221–2. 10.1177/1358863X20903808
    1. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. (1977) 33:159–74.
    1. Nicoloff AD, Taylor LM, Sexton GJ, Schuff RA, Edwards JM, Yeager RA, et al. . Homocysteine and progression of atherosclerosis study investigators. Relationship between site of initial symptoms and subsequent progression of disease in a prospective study of atherosclerosis progression in patients receiving long-term treatment for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. (2002) 35:38–46. 10.1067/mva.2002.120381
    1. Cronenwett JL, Warner KG, Zelenock GB, Whitehouse WM, Jr, Graham LM, Lindenauer SM, et al. . Intermittent claudication: current results of non-operative management. Arch Surg. (1984) 119:430–6. 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390160060012
    1. Collins TC, Suarez-Almazor M, Petersen NJ. An absent pulse is not sensitive for the early detection of peripheral arterial disease. Fam Med. (2006) 38:5. Available online at:
    1. Hageman D, Pesser N, Gommans LNM, Willigendael EM, Sambeek MRHM., van, Huijbers E, et al. . Limited adherence to peripheral arterial disease guidelines and suboptimal ankle brachial index reliability in dutch primary care. Eu J Vasc Endovasc Surg. (2018) 55:867–73. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.02.011
    1. Catillon F, Tuffier S, Guilcher A, Tollenaere Q, Métairie A, Miossec A, Mauger C. Proficiency of medical students at obtaining pressure measurement readings using automated ankle and toe measuring devices for diagnosis of lower extremity peripheral artery disease. Annals Vasc Surg. (2019) 65:183–8. 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.10.092
    1. Bendermacher BL, Teijink JA, Willigendael EM, Bartelink M-L, Peters RJ, Langenberg M, et al. . Applicability of the ankle-brachial-index measurement as screening device for high cardiovascular risk: an observational study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. (2012) 12:59. 10.1186/1471-2261-12-59
    1. Donnou C, Chaudru S, Stivalet O, Paul E, Charasson M, Selli J-M, et al. . How to become proficient in performance of the resting ankle-brachial index results of the first randomized controlled trial. Vascular Medicine. (2018) 23:109. 10.1177/1358863X17740993
    1. Omarjee L, Donnou C, Chaudru S, Locher C, Paul E, Charasson M, et al. . Impact of an educational intervention on ankle-brachial index performance among medical students and fidelity assessment at 6 months. Ann Vasc Surg. (2019) 56:246–53. 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.07.044
    1. Lanéelle D, Scissons R, Mahé G. Inter-observer reliability of a 4-item Doppler ultrasound waveforms classification. Vasa. (2020) 49:518–9. 10.1024/0301-1526/a000906
    1. Omarjee L, Stivalet O, Hoffmann C, Scissons R, Bressollette L, Mahé G, et al. . Heterogeneity of Doppler waveform description is decreased with the use of a dedicated classification. Vasa. (2018) 47:471–4. 10.1024/0301-1526/a000724
    1. Zhao R, Lanéelle D, Gao M, Fu Y, Tong Y, Scissons R, Wen C, Mahé G. Inter-rater reliability of 4-item arterial doppler waveform classification system for description of arterial doppler waveforms. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2020) 7:8274. 10.3389/fcvm.2020.584274
    1. Czyzewska D, Ustymowicz A, Krysiuk K, Witkowski P, Zonenberg M, Dobrzycki K, et al. . Ultrasound assessment of the caliber of the arteries in the lower extremities in healthy persons – the dependency on age, sex and morphological parameters of the subjects. J Ultrason. (2012) 12:420–7. 10.15557/JoU.2012.0030
    1. Lorbeer R, Grotz A, Dörr M, Völzke H, Lieb W, Kühn J-P, et al. . Reference values of vessel diameters, stenosis prevalence, and arterial variations of the lower limb arteries in a male population sample using contrast-enhanced MR angiography. PLoS ONE. (2018) 13:e0197559. 10.1371/journal.pone.0197559
    1. Montgomery PS, Gardner AW. Comparison of three blood pressure methods used for determining ankle/brachial index in patients with intermittent claudication. Angiology. (1998) 49:723–8. 10.1177/000331979804901003
    1. AbuRahma AF, Adams E, AbuRahma J, Mata LA, Dean LS, Caron C, et al. . Critical analysis and limitations of resting ankle-brachial index in the diagnosis of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease patients and the role of diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. J Vasc Surg. (2020) 71:937–45. 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.05.050

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir