molBV reveals immune landscape of bacterial vaginosis and predicts human papillomavirus infection natural history

Mykhaylo Usyk, Nicolas F Schlecht, Sarah Pickering, LaShanda Williams, Christopher C Sollecito, Ana Gradissimo, Carolina Porras, Mahboobeh Safaeian, Ligia Pinto, Rolando Herrero, Howard D Strickler, Shankar Viswanathan, Anne Nucci-Sack, Angela Diaz, Costa Rica HPV Vaccine Trial (CVT) Group, Robert D Burk, Bernal Cortés, Paula González, Silvia E Jiménez, Ana Cecilia Rodríguez, Allan Hildesheim, Aimée R Kreimer, Douglas R Lowy, Mark Schiffman, John T Schiller, Mark Sherman, Sholom Wacholder, Troy J Kemp, Mary K Sidawy, Wim Quint, Leen-Jan van Doorn, Linda Struijk, Joel M Palefsky, Teresa M Darragh, Mark H Stoler, Mykhaylo Usyk, Nicolas F Schlecht, Sarah Pickering, LaShanda Williams, Christopher C Sollecito, Ana Gradissimo, Carolina Porras, Mahboobeh Safaeian, Ligia Pinto, Rolando Herrero, Howard D Strickler, Shankar Viswanathan, Anne Nucci-Sack, Angela Diaz, Costa Rica HPV Vaccine Trial (CVT) Group, Robert D Burk, Bernal Cortés, Paula González, Silvia E Jiménez, Ana Cecilia Rodríguez, Allan Hildesheim, Aimée R Kreimer, Douglas R Lowy, Mark Schiffman, John T Schiller, Mark Sherman, Sholom Wacholder, Troy J Kemp, Mary K Sidawy, Wim Quint, Leen-Jan van Doorn, Linda Struijk, Joel M Palefsky, Teresa M Darragh, Mark H Stoler

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a highly prevalent condition that is associated with adverse health outcomes. It has been proposed that BV's role as a pathogenic condition is mediated via bacteria-induced inflammation. However, the complex interplay between vaginal microbes and host immune factors has yet to be clearly elucidated. Here, we develop molBV, a 16 S rRNA gene amplicon-based classification pipeline that generates a molecular score and diagnoses BV with the same accuracy as the current gold standard method (i.e., Nugent score). Using 3 confirmatory cohorts we show that molBV is independent of the 16 S rRNA region and generalizable across populations. We use the score in a cohort without clinical BV states, but with measures of HPV infection history and immune markers, to reveal that BV-associated increases in the IL-1β/IP-10 cytokine ratio directly predicts clearance of incident high-risk HPV infection (HR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.19-2.9). Furthermore, we identify an alternate inflammatory BV signature characterized by elevated TNF-α/MIP-1β ratio that is prospectively associated with progression of incident infections to CIN2 + (OR = 2.81, 95% CI: 1.62-5.42). Thus, BV is a heterogeneous condition that activates different arms of the immune response, which in turn are independent risk factors for HR-HPV clearance and progression. Clinical Trial registration number: The CVT trial has been registered under: NCT00128661.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1. Microbial community features of bacterial…
Fig. 1. Microbial community features of bacterial vaginosis.
Panel A shows a heatmap of the 15 most prevalent bacterial species that are indicated to the right of the heatmap. Each column represents a participant. Hierarchical clustering separates samples into two primary clades: one dominated by Lactobacillus and one with polymicrobialism. There is a significant tendency of the BV-positive cases to be found in the polymicrobial clade and BV-negative in the one dominated by Lactobacillus based on either the Amsel or Nugent diagnosis (see the “Methods” section) (p < 0.001 for both). Panel B shows the alpha diversity differences between BV diagnosed by either Amsel or Nugent criteria and the microbial communities based on the Chao1, Fisher, and Shannon diversity indices (all p < 0.001), as indicated at the right of the panels. Panels C and D show beta diversity analyses using PCoA and the Jensen–Shannon diversity index for the Amsel BV (panel C) (R2 = 0.25, p < 0.001) and Nugent BV diagnosis (panel D) (R2 = 0.59, p < 0.001). Panel E shows the top 20 microbial markers (based on W-stat) for detecting BV using the “clean” BV status sample set (Amsel+/Nugent+ vs. Amsel−/Nugent−). The y-axis represents the ANCOM W-stat, while the x-axis represents the mean relative abundance difference between BV+ and BV− cases for each bacterial taxon. The size of the circles represents relative abundance. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 2. Cytokines associated with molBV categorical…
Fig. 2. Cytokines associated with molBV categorical states in the CVT dataset.
Panel A forest plot showing the OR and 95% confidence intervals computed using a linear model between the cytokine quartiles and the three ordinal states of molBV (i.e., BV-negative, BV-intermediate, and BV-positive) derived using 431 biologically independent CVM samples. Only cytokines with an adjusted q-value < 0.001 are presented. ORs in panel A represent the odds of moving to the immediate next ordinal BV state. Panel B shows the correlation network between all cytokines with a Pearson correlation >0.6 using all baseline samples. Panel C is a volcano plot showing the ORs on the x-axis when comparing molecular BV-negative vs. BV-positive and the –log(q-value) on the y-axis. The ratios that had a q-value < 3.77*10-44 (i.e., −log(q-value)>100) are indicated and labeled in red. Panel D shows the pairwise Pearson correlation of the highly significant ratios presented in panel C (colored red). Ratios that had an OR < 1.0 were inverted for symmetry of data presentation. Clusters from the strongest molBV-associated cytokine ratios appear to fall into two primary groups; ones that include IL-1β and those with TNF-α. Panel E presents a box and violin plot for the log(IL-1β/IP-10) ratio for BV-negative (colored in blue), BV-intermediate (colored in yellow), and BV-positive (colored in red) samples. Panel F shows the bacterial species identified by ANCOM predicting IL-1β/IP-10 inflammation (i.e., above the median) in women within the BV-negative group shown in the small figure below with a red border. Comparison is between samples above the median vs. below the median. Panel G shows the ORs and 95% confidence intervals for the top 10 ratio combinations of the 32-cytokines (based on adjusted q-value) when comparing BV-negative to BV-positive women that had IL-1β/IP-10 levels below the cohort median (n = 171 biologically independent samples). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3. Molecular BV, inflammation, and HR-HPV…
Fig. 3. Molecular BV, inflammation, and HR-HPV clearance.
Panel A shows the Kaplan–Meier curves for HR-HPV clearance colored by sustained BV status (i.e., having a molBV value above (red) or below (blue) the cohort median for both measured visits) with the unadjusted p-value presented in the bottom left corner of the plot and number of women at risk at each time point presented in the accompanying table directly below the plot. Panel B shows the Kaplan–Meier curves comparing women with either sustained high (red) or low (blue) IL-1β/IP-10 inflammation markers across the two analyzed visits. Sustained high and low IL-1β/IP-10 refers to women that had IL-1β/IP-10 levels above or below the cohort median for both measured visits, respectively, with the unadjusted p-value presented in the bottom left corner of the plot and number of women at risk at each time point presented in the accompanying table directly below the plot. Time is shown in days at the bottom of the figures and tables. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

References

    1. Ravel J, Moreno I, Simon C. Bacterial vaginosis and its association with infertility, endometritis, and pelvic inflammatory disease. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021;224:251–257.
    1. Redelinghuys MJ, Geldenhuys J, Jung H, Kock MM. Bacterial vaginosis: current diagnostic avenues and future opportunities. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020;10:354.
    1. Onderdonk AB, Delaney ML, Fichorova RN. The human microbiome during bacterial vaginosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2016;29:223–238.
    1. Koumans EH, et al. The prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in the United States, 2001–2004; associations with symptoms, sexual behaviors, and reproductive health. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2007;34:864–869.
    1. Allsworth JE, Peipert JF. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis: 2001–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007;109:114–120.
    1. Peebles K, Velloza J, Balkus JE, McClelland RS, Barnabas RV. High global burden and costs of bacterial vaginosis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2019;46:304–311.
    1. Bradshaw CS, Sobel JD. Current treatment of bacterial vaginosis-limitations and need for innovation. J. Infect. Dis. 2016;214:S14–S20.
    1. Salah RM, Allam AM, Magdy AM, Mohamed A. Bacterial vaginosis and infertility: cause or association? Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2013;167:59–63.
    1. Brabant G. [Bacterial vaginosis and spontaneous preterm birth] J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. 2016;45:1247–1260.
    1. Tellapragada C, et al. Risk factors for preterm birth and low birth weight among pregnant Indian women: a hospital-based prospective study. J. Prev. Med. Public Health. 2016;49:165.
    1. Bautista CT, et al. Bacterial vaginosis: a synthesis of the literature on etiology, prevalence, risk factors, and relationship with chlamydia and gonorrhea infections. Mil. Med. Res. 2016;3:4.
    1. Rumyantseva T, Khayrullina G, Guschin A, Donders G. Prevalence of Ureaplasma spp. and Mycoplasma hominis in healthy women and patients with flora alterations. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019;93:227–231.
    1. Eastment MC, McClelland RS. Vaginal microbiota and susceptibility to HIV. AIDS. 2018;32:687–698.
    1. McKinnon LR, et al. The evolving facets of bacterial vaginosis: implications for HIV transmission. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses. 2019;35:219–228.
    1. King CC, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and the natural history of human papillomavirus. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011;2011:319460.
    1. Usyk M, et al. Cervicovaginal microbiome and natural history of HPV in a longitudinal study. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16:e1008376.
    1. Quan L, et al. Simultaneous detection and comprehensive analysis of HPV and microbiome status of a cervical liquid-based cytology sample using Nanopore MinION sequencing. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1–13.
    1. Champer M, et al. The role of the vaginal microbiome in gynaecological cancer. BJOG. 2018;125:309–315.
    1. Moscicki AB, Shi B, Huang H, Barnard E, Li H. Cervical-vaginal microbiome and associated cytokine profiles in a prospective study of HPV 16 acquisition, persistence, and clearance. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020;10:569022.
    1. Brusselaers N, Shrestha S, van de Wijgert J, Verstraelen H. Vaginal dysbiosis and the risk of human papillomavirus and cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019;221:9–18 e18.
    1. Brookheart RT, Lewis WG, Peipert JF, Lewis AL, Allsworth JE. Association between obesity and bacterial vaginosis as assessed by Nugent score. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019;220:476 e471–476 e411.
    1. Amsel R, et al. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am. J. Med. 1983;74:14–22.
    1. Schwiertz A, Taras D, Rusch K, Rusch V. Throwing the dice for the diagnosis of vaginal complaints? Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2006;5:4.
    1. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1991;29:297–301.
    1. Chaijareenont K, Sirimai K, Boriboonhirunsarn D, Kiriwat O. Accuracy of Nugent’s score and each Amsel’s criteria in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. J. Med. Assoc. Thail. 2004;87:1270–1274.
    1. Hilbert DW, et al. Development and validation of a highly accurate quantitative real-time PCR assay for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016;54:1017–1024.
    1. Mohanty S, Sood S, Kapil A, Mittal S. Interobserver variation in the interpretation of Nugent scoring method for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Indian J. Med. Res. 2010;131:88–91.
    1. Coleman JS, Gaydos CA. Molecular diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: an update. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018;56:e00342–00318.
    1. Mitchell C, Marrazzo J. Bacterial vaginosis and the cervicovaginal immune response. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2014;71:555–563.
    1. Alcaide ML, et al. A bio-behavioral intervention to decrease intravaginal practices and bacterial vaginosis among HIV infected Zambian women, a randomized pilot study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017;17:1–10.
    1. Turovskiy Y, Sutyak Noll K, Chikindas ML. The aetiology of bacterial vaginosis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011;110:1105–1128.
    1. Dabee, S., Passmore, J. -A. S., Heffron R. & Jaspan, H. B. The complex link between the female genital microbiota, genital infections and inflammation. Infect. Immun.89, e00487-20 (2021).
    1. Kenyon C, Colebunders R, Crucitti T. The global epidemiology of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013;209:505–523.
    1. Denney JM, Culhane JF. Bacterial vaginosis: a problematic infection from both a perinatal and neonatal perspective. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;14:200–203.
    1. Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, Kuivaniemi H, Tromp G. Bacterial vaginosis, the inflammatory response and the risk of preterm birth: a role for genetic epidemiology in the prevention of preterm birth. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004;190:1509–1519.
    1. Gillet E, et al. Bacterial vaginosis is associated with uterine cervical human papillomavirus infection: a meta-analysis. BMC Infect. Dis. 2011;11:1–9.
    1. Van Der Pol WJ, et al. In silico and experimental evaluation of primer sets for species-level resolution of the vaginal microbiota using 16s ribosomal rna gene sequencing. J. Infect. Dis. 2018;219:305–314.
    1. Usyk M, Zolnik CP, Patel H, Levi MH, Burk RD. Novel ITS1 fungal primers for characterization of the mycobiome. mSphere. 2017;2:e00488–00417.
    1. Fredricks DN, Fiedler TL, Marrazzo JM. Molecular identification of bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;353:1899–1911.
    1. Ravel J, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108(Suppl. 1):4680–4687.
    1. Kacerovsky M, et al. Cervical Gardnerella vaginalis in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0245937.
    1. Lennard, K., et al. Microbial composition predicts genital tract inflammation and persistent bacterial vaginosis in South African adolescent females. Infect. Immun. 86, e00410-17 (2018).
    1. Burton JP, Reid G. Evaluation of the bacterial vaginal flora of 20 postmenopausal women by direct (Nugent score) and molecular (polymerase chain reaction and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis) techniques. J. Infect. Dis. 2002;186:1770–1780.
    1. Dabee S, et al. Defining characteristics of genital health in South African adolescent girls and young women at high risk for HIV infection. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0213975.
    1. Herrero R, et al. Rationale and design of a community-based double-blind randomized clinical trial of an HPV 16 and 18 vaccine in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Vaccine. 2008;26:4795–4808.
    1. Morton JT, et al. Establishing microbial composition measurement standards with reference frames. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2719.
    1. Masson L, et al. Inflammatory cytokine biomarkers to identify women with asymptomatic sexually transmitted infections and bacterial vaginosis who are at high risk of HIV infection. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2016;92:186–193.
    1. Mitchell CM, et al. Vaginal microbiota and mucosal immune markers in women with vulvovaginal discomfort. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2020;47:269–274.
    1. Srinivasan S, et al. Bacterial communities in women with bacterial vaginosis: high resolution phylogenetic analyses reveal relationships of microbiota to clinical criteria. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37818.
    1. Cartwright CP, Pherson AJ, Harris AB, Clancey MS, Nye MB. Multicenter study establishing the clinical validity of a nucleic-acid amplification-based assay for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018;92:173–178.
    1. France MT, et al. VALENCIA: a nearest centroid classification method for vaginal microbial communities based on composition. Microbiome. 2020;8:166.
    1. Coleman, J. S. & Gaydos, C. A. Molecular diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: an update. J. Clin. Microbiol.56, e00342-18 (2018).
    1. Fettweis JM, et al. Differences in vaginal microbiome in African American women versus women of European ancestry. Microbiology. 2014;160:2272–2282.
    1. Łaniewski P, et al. Features of the cervicovaginal microenvironment drive cancer biomarker signatures in patients across cervical carcinogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1–14.
    1. van de Wijgert J. The vaginal microbiome and sexually transmitted infections are interlinked: consequences for treatment and prevention. PLoS Med. 2017;14:e1002478.
    1. Petrova MI, Reid G, Vaneechoutte M, Lebeer S. Lactobacillus iners: friend or Foe? Trends Microbiol. 2017;25:182–191.
    1. Vaneechoutte M. Lactobacillus iners, the unusual suspect. Res. Microbiol. 2017;168:826–836.
    1. Schiffman M, et al. Carcinogenic human papillomavirus infection. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2016;2:16086.
    1. Menard JP, Fenollar F, Henry M, Bretelle F, Raoult D. Molecular quantification of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae loads to predict bacterial vaginosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008;47:33–43.
    1. Schiffman M, Wentzensen N. From human papillomavirus to cervical cancer. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010;116:177–185.
    1. Mitra A, et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia disease progression is associated with increased vaginal microbiome diversity. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:1–11.
    1. Piyathilake CJ, et al. Cervical microbiota associated with higher grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women infected with high-risk human papillomaviruses. Cancer Prev. Res. 2016;9:357–366.
    1. Laniewski P, et al. Features of the cervicovaginal microenvironment drive cancer biomarker signatures in patients across cervical carcinogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:7333.
    1. Schlecht NF, et al. Cervical, anal and oral HPV in an adolescent inner-city health clinic providing free vaccinations. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37419.
    1. Schlecht NF, et al. Risk of delayed human papillomavirus vaccination in inner-city adolescent women. J. Infect. Dis. 2016;214:1952–1960.
    1. Gutman RE, Peipert JF, Weitzen S, Blume J. Evaluation of clinical methods for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005;105:551–556.
    1. Caporaso JG, et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 2012;6:1621.
    1. Wang Y, Qian PY. Conservative fragments in bacterial 16S rRNA genes and primer design for 16S ribosomal DNA amplicons in metagenomic studies. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e7401.
    1. Rosenbaum J, et al. Evaluation of oral cavity DNA extraction methods on bacterial and fungal microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1531.
    1. Schmieder R, Edwards R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:863–864.
    1. Hercus, C. Novocraft Short Read Alignment Package. Website (2009).
    1. Bolyen E, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37:852–857.
    1. Callahan BJ, et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods. 2016;13:581–583.
    1. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007;73:5261–5267.
    1. DeSantis TZ, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;72:5069–5072.
    1. Chen, T. et al. The Human Oral Microbiome Database: a web accessible resource for investigating oral microbe taxonomic and genomic information. Database2010, baq013 (2010).
    1. Group NHW, et al. The NIH human microbiome project. Genome Res. 2009;19:2317–2323.
    1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990;215:403–410.
    1. Koljalg U, et al. UNITE: a database providing web-based methods for the molecular identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi. N. Phytol. 2005;166:1063–1068.
    1. McDonald D, et al. The Biological Observation Matrix (BIOM) format or: how I learned to stop worrying and love the ome-ome. GigaScience. 2012;1:7.
    1. Team, R. C. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014).
    1. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61217.
    1. Team R. C. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013).
    1. Oksanen J., et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 1.17-4. Acesso em 23, 2010 (2010).
    1. Robin X, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinforma. 2011;12:77.
    1. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, 2016).
    1. Mandal S, et al. Analysis of composition of microbiomes: a novel method for studying microbial composition. Micro. Ecol. Health Dis. 2015;26:27663.
    1. Dabney, A., Storey, J. D. & Warnes, G. qvalue: Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control. R package version 1. (2010).
    1. May S, Hosmer DW. A cautionary note on the use of the Grønnesby and Borgan goodness-of-fit test for the Cox proportional hazards model. Lifetime Data Anal. 2004;10:283–291.
    1. Kemp TJ, et al. Evaluation of two types of sponges used to collect cervical secretions and assessment of antibody extraction protocols for recovery of neutralizing anti-human papillomavirus type 16 antibodies. Clin. Vaccin. Immunol. 2008;15:60–64.
    1. Koshiol J, et al. Evaluation of a multiplex panel of immune-related markers in cervical secretions: a methodologic study. Int. J. Cancer. 2014;134:411–425.
    1. Amaro-Filho SM, et al. HPV73 a nonvaccine type causes cervical cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 2020;146:731–738.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir