Prevention of sickness absence through early identification and rehabilitation of at-risk patients with musculoskeletal pain (PREVSAM): a randomised controlled trial protocol

Meh Larsson, L Nordeman, K Holmgren, A Grimby-Ekman, G Hensing, C Björkelund, S Bergman, A Ekhammar, M Dottori, S Bernhardsson, Meh Larsson, L Nordeman, K Holmgren, A Grimby-Ekman, G Hensing, C Björkelund, S Bergman, A Ekhammar, M Dottori, S Bernhardsson

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal pain is globally a leading cause of physical disability. Many musculoskeletal-related pain conditions, such as low back pain, often resolve spontaneously. In some individuals, pain may recur or persist, leading to ong-term physical disability, reduced work capacity, and sickness absence. Early identification of individuals in which this may occur, is essential for preventing or reducing the risk of developing persistent musculoskeletal pain and long-term sickness absence. The aim of the trial described in this protocol is to evaluate effects of an early intervention, the PREVSAM model, on the prevention of sickness absence and development of persistent pain in at-risk patients with musculoskeletal pain.

Methods: Eligible participants are adults who seek health care for musculoskeletal pain and who are at risk of developing persistent pain, physical disability, and sickness absence. Participants may be recruited from primary care rehabilitation centres or primary care healthcare centres in Region Västra Götaland. Participants will be randomised to treatment according to the PREVSAM model (intervention group) or treatment as usual (control group). The PREVSAM model comprises an interdisciplinary, person-centred rehabilitation programme, including coordinated measures within primary health care, and may include collaboration with participants' employers. The primary outcome sickness absence is operationalised as the number and proportion of individuals who remain in full- or part-time work, the number of gross and net days of sickness absence during the intervention and follow-up period, and time to first sickness absence spell. Secondary outcomes are patient-reported short-term sickness absence, work ability, pain, self-efficacy, health-related quality of life, risk for sickness absence, anxiety and depression symptoms and physical disability at 1 and 3 months after inclusion (short-term follow-up), and at 6 and 12 months (long-term follow-up). A cost-effectiveness analysis is planned and drug consumption will be investigated.

Discussion: The study is expected to provide new knowledge on the effectiveness of a comprehensive rehabilitation model that incorporates early identification of patients with musculoskeletal pain at risk for development of sickness absence and persistent pain. The study findings may contribute to more effective rehabilitation processes of this large patient population, and potentially reduce sickness absence and costs.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol ID: NCT03913325 , Registered April 12, 2019. Version 2, 10 July 2020. Version 2 changes: Clarifications regarding trial aim and inclusion process.

Keywords: Interdisciplinary; Intervention; Musculoskeletal; Prevention; Randomised; Rehabilitation; Sick leave.

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors of this study protocol has any competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of participants through the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments. TAU, Treatment as usual

References

    1. Murray CJ, Atkinson C, Bhalla K, Birbeck G, Burstein R, Chou D, et al. The state of US health, 1990-2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA. 2013;310(6):591–608. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.13805.
    1. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, et al. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 2):S192–S300. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1.
    1. Salen BA, Spangfort EV, Nygren AL, Nordemar R. The disability rating index: an instrument for the assessment of disability in clinical settings. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(12):1423–1435. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90086-8.
    1. Försäkringskassan (The Swedish Social Insurance Agency). Sjukpenningtalet i november 2017. Press release Dec 22, 2017 [Available from: .].
    1. Landmark T, Romundstad P, Dale O, Borchgrevink PC, Vatten L, Kaasa S. Chronic pain: one year prevalence and associated characteristics (the HUNT pain study) Scand J Pain. 2013;4(4):182–187. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2013.07.022.
    1. MacKay C, Canizares M, Davis AM, Badley EM. Health care utilization for musculoskeletal disorders. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62(2):161–169.
    1. SBU. Preventiva insatser vid akut smärta från rygg och nacke . En systematisk översikt och utvärdering av medicinska, hälsoekonomiska och etiska aspekter. Stockholm: Statens beredning för medicinsk och social utvärdering (SBU); 2016.
    1. Bergstrom G, Hagberg J, Busch H, Jensen I, Bjorklund C. Prediction of sickness absenteeism, disability pension and sickness presenteeism among employees with back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(2):278–286. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9454-9.
    1. Gatchel RJ, Peng YB, Peters ML, Fuchs PN, Turk DC. The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(4):581–624. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581.
    1. Gatchel RJ, McGeary DD, McGeary CA, Lippe B. Interdisciplinary chronic pain management: past, present, and future. Am Psychol. 2014;69(2):119–130. doi: 10.1037/a0035514.
    1. Morgan S, Yoder LH. A concept analysis of person-centered care. J Holist Nurs. 2012;30(1):6–15. doi: 10.1177/0898010111412189.
    1. Yun D, Choi J. Person-centered rehabilitation care and outcomes: a systematic literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;93:74–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.012.
    1. Fors A, Ekman I, Taft C, Bjorkelund C, Frid K, Larsson ME, et al. Person-centred care after acute coronary syndrome, from hospital to primary care - a randomised controlled trial. Int J Cardiol. 2015;187:693–699. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.336.
    1. Lotzke H, Brisby H, Gutke A, Hagg O, Jakobsson M, Smeets R, et al. A person-centered Prehabilitation program based on cognitive-behavioral physical therapy for patients scheduled for lumbar fusion surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2019;99(8):1069–1088. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz020.
    1. Jackson T, Wang Y, Wang Y, Fan H. Self-efficacy and chronic pain outcomes: a meta-analytic review. J Pain. 2014;15(8):800–814. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.05.002.
    1. Bernhardsson S, Larsson MEH, Johansson K, Öberg B. “In the physio we trust”: a qualitative study on patients’ preferences for physiotherapy. Physiother Theory Pract. 2017;33(7):535–549. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1328720.
    1. Larsson ME, Kreuter M, Nordholm L. Is patient responsibility for managing musculoskeletal disorders related to self-reported better outcome of physiotherapy treatment? Physiother Theory Pract. 2010;26(5):308–317. doi: 10.3109/09593980903082136.
    1. Larsson ME, Nordholm LA, Ohrn I. Patients’ views on responsibility for the management of musculoskeletal disorders--a qualitative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-103.
    1. Andersson J, Ahgren B, Axelsson SB, Eriksson A, Axelsson R. Organizational approaches to collaboration in vocational rehabilitation—an international literature review. Int J Integr Care. 2011;11:e137. doi: 10.5334/ijic.670.
    1. Nilsing E, Söderberg E, Öberg B. Sickness certificates in Sweden: did the new guidelines improve their quality? BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):907. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-907.
    1. Cullen KL, Irvin E, Collie A, Clay F, Gensby U, Jennings PA, et al. Effectiveness of workplace interventions in return-to-work for musculoskeletal, pain-related and mental health conditions: an update of the evidence and messages for practitioners. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9690-x.
    1. Brunner E, De Herdt A, Minguet P, Baldew SS, Probst M. Can cognitive behavioural therapy based strategies be integrated into physiotherapy for the prevention of chronic low back pain? A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(1):1–10. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.683848.
    1. Wilson S, Cramp F. Combining a psychological intervention with physiotherapy: a systematic review to determine the effect on physical function and quality of life for adults with chronic pain. Phys Ther Rev. 2018;23(3):214–226. doi: 10.1080/10833196.2018.1483550.
    1. Hoffman BM, Papas RK, Chatkoff DK, Kerns RD. Meta-analysis of psychological interventions for chronic low back pain. Health Psychol. 2007;26(1):1–9. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.1.1.
    1. Williams AC, Eccleston C, Morley S. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD007407.
    1. Linton SJ, Nicholas M, MacDonald S. Development of a short form of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36(22):1891–1895. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f8f775.
    1. Ekman I, Swedberg K, Taft C, Lindseth A, Norberg A, Brink E, et al. Person-centered care--ready for prime time. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011;10(4):248–251. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2011.06.008.
    1. Karlson B, Jonsson P, Palsson B, Abjornsson G, Malmberg B, Larsson B, et al. Return to work after a workplace-oriented intervention for patients on sick-leave for burnout--a prospective controlled study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:301. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-301.
    1. Sennehed CP, Holmberg S, Axen I, Stigmar K, Forsbrand M, Petersson IF, et al. Early workplace dialogue in physiotherapy practice improved work ability at 1-year follow-up-WorkUp, a randomised controlled trial in primary care. Pain. 2018;159(8):1456–1464. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001216.
    1. Hägglund P, Johansson P. Sjukskrivningarnas anatomi – en ESO-rapport om drivkrafterna i sjukförsäkringssystemet. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet, Finansdepartementet; 2006.
    1. Swedish, Social, Insurance, Agency Förslag på utfallsmått för att mäta återgång i arbete efter sjukskrivning [in Swedish] Social Insurance Report. 2016;9:2016.
    1. Ilmarinen J. The work ability index (WAI) Occup Med. 2007;57(2):160. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqm008.
    1. Ahlstrom L, Grimby-Ekman A, Hagberg M, Dellve L. The work ability index and single-item question: associations with sick leave, symptoms, and health--a prospective study of women on long-term sick leave. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010;36(5):404–412. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2917.
    1. Farrar JT, Young JP, Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94(2):149–158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.
    1. Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, et al. Studies comparing numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2011;41(6):1073–1093. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016.
    1. Nicholas MK. Self-efficacy and chronic pain, in paper presented at the annual conference of the British Psychological Society, St. Andrews, Scotland. 1989.
    1. Nicholas MK, McGuire BE, Asghari A. A 2-item short form of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire: development and psychometric evaluation of PSEQ-2. J Pain. 2015;16(2):153–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.11.002.
    1. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25(24):3186–3191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
    1. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Self-efficacy measurement and generalized self-efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, editors. Measure in health psychology: a user’s portfolio. Casual and control beliefs (pp. 33-39) Windsor: NFER-NELSON; 1995.
    1. Love J, Moore CD, Hensing G. Validation of the Swedish translation of the general self-efficacy scale. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(7):1249–1253. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0030-5.
    1. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37(1):53–72. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6.
    1. Soer R, Reneman MF, Speijer BL, Coppes MH, Vroomen PC. Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 2012;12(11):1035–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.030.
    1. Linton SJ, Boersma K. Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain questionnaire. Clin J Pain. 2003;19(2):80–86. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200303000-00002.
    1. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
    1. Lisspers J, Nygren A, Soderman E. Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HAD): some psychometric data for a Swedish sample. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997;96(4):281–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb10164.x.
    1. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52(2):69–77. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00296-3.
    1. Hensing G. Swedish council on technology assessment in health care (SBU). Chapter 4. Methodological aspects in sickness-absence research. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;63:44–48. doi: 10.1080/14034950410021844.
    1. Holmgren K, Hensing G, Bultmann U, Hadzibajramovic E, Larsson MEH. Does early identification of work-related stress, combined with feedback at GP-consultation, prevent sick leave in the following 12 months? A randomized controlled trial in primary health care. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1110. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7452-3.
    1. Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J, Team RS. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006;332(7538):413–416. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413.
    1. Busch H, Bjork Bramberg E, Hagberg J, Bodin L, Jensen I. The effects of multimodal rehabilitation on pain-related sickness absence - an observational study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(14):1646–1653. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1305456.
    1. Hellman T, Bonnevier H, Jensen I, Hagberg J, Busch H, Björk Brämberg E, et al. En processutvärdering av multimodala team inom för rehabiliteringsgarantin. Slutrapport Stockholm. 2014.
    1. Severinsson Y, Nordeman L, Holmgren K, Dottori M, Larsson ME. Delrapport 1. Verksamhetsuppföljning av multimodal rehabilitering i primärvård, Västra Götalandsregionen, år 2013. Göteborg: Multimodala teamens organisation, struktur, innehåll och åtgärder samt rutiner för utvärdering, avslut och uppföljning; 2014.
    1. Saha S, Grahn B, Gerdtham UG, Stigmar K, Holmberg S, Jarl J. Structured physiotherapy including a work place intervention for patients with neck and/or back pain in primary care: an economic evaluation. Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20(2):317–327. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-1003-1.
    1. Desiron HA, de Rijk A, Van Hoof E, Donceel P. Occupational therapy and return to work: a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:615. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-615.
    1. Nazarov S, Manuwald U, Leonardi M, Silvaggi F, Foucaud J, Lamore K, et al. Chronic diseases and employment: which interventions support the maintenance of work and return to work among workers with chronic illnesses? A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(10):1864. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101864.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir