Predictive value of amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) after rescue hypothermic neuroprotection for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy: a meta-analysis

M Chandrasekaran, B Chaban, P Montaldo, S Thayyil, M Chandrasekaran, B Chaban, P Montaldo, S Thayyil

Abstract

Objective: Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) is a useful bedside tool in predicting the neurodevelopmental outcome after neonatal encephalopathy; however, the prognostic accuracy may be altered by rescue hypothermic neuroprotection. The objective of this study is to examine the prognostic accuracy of aEEG for predicting long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in term newborn infants undergoing therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy.

Study design: We examined all studies (Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and the Cochrane Library; 2000 to 2014) comparing aEEG (6, 24, 48 or 72 h) in term encephalopathic babies undergoing therapeutic hypothermia, with neurodevelopmental outcome at 1 year or more. We extracted individual patient data from the eligible studies to calculate prognostic indices with exact confidence intervals (CIs). We considered continuous normal voltage as normal aEEG pattern and discontinuous normal voltage, burst suppression, flat trace and persistently low voltage as abnormal, and defined adverse outcome as death or moderate/severe disability at 1 year.

Results: We reviewed a total of 70 articles, 17 of which met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies were excluded and 9 studies (N=520) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for an abnormal trace at 6 h of age to predict adverse outcome were 96% (95% CI 91 to 98%) and 39% (95% CI 32 to 46%). The diagnostic odds ratio of an abnormal trace was highest at 48 h (66.9 (95% CI 19.7, 227.2)).

Conclusions: A persistantly abnormal aEEG at 48 h or more is associated with an adverse neurodevelopmal outcome. The positive prognostic value of 6 h aEEG is poor and good outcome may occur despite abnormal aEEG. Conversely, a normal 6 h aEEG has a good negative predictive value although do not exclude adverse outcomes.

References

    1. Pediatrics. 2011 Jul;128(1):e112-20
    1. Acta Paediatr. 2013 Jul;102(7):707-11
    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 May;90(3):F201-7
    1. Pediatr Neurol. 2006 Nov;35(5):335-42
    1. Neonatology. 2012;102(3):197-202
    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995 Jan;72(1):F34-8
    1. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan;127(1):285-96
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Nov;56(11):1129-35
    1. Brain Dev. 2013 Jan;35(1):26-31
    1. Pediatrics. 2010 Jul;126(1):e131-9
    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014 May;99(3):F219-24
    1. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36
    1. J Pediatr. 2011 Aug;159(2):232-7
    1. J Perinatol. 2008 Feb;28(2):117-22
    1. Pediatr Res. 2013 Aug;74(2):180-5
    1. Pediatrics. 2007 May;119(5):912-21
    1. Pediatrics. 2013 Jan;131(1):88-98
    1. Acta Paediatr. 2010 Apr;99(4):531-6
    1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD003311
    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999 Jul;81(1):F19-23
    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 May;90(3):F245-51
    1. Lancet. 2005 Feb 19-25;365(9460):663-70
    1. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1984 Jul;73(4):433-40
    1. Pediatrics. 2010 Oct;126(4):e771-8
    1. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009 Jan;51(1):46-52
    1. N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 1;361(14):1349-58
    1. J Child Neurol. 2007 Sep;22(9):1069-78
    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014 Jan;99(1):F80-2
    1. Brain Dev. 2012 Apr;34(4):280-6
    1. Pediatrics. 1999 Jun;103(6 Pt 1):1263-71
    1. J Paediatr Child Health. 2015 Feb;51(2):180-5
    1. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2008;28(3):267-82
    1. Neurology. 2013 Jul 16;81(3):249-55

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir