When glycaemic targets can no longer be achieved with basal insulin in type 2 diabetes, can simple intensification with a modern premixed insulin help? Results from a subanalysis of the PRESENT study

H C Jang, S Guler, M Shestakova, PRESENT Study Group, H C Jang, S Guler, M Shestakova, PRESENT Study Group

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of intensifying insulin therapy from a basal-only regimen to biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in patients with type 2 diabetes previously failing to reach glycaemic targets.

Methods and patients: The analysis is based on data from a subpopulation of the Physicians' Routine Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of NovoMix 30 Therapy (PRESENT) study, which was a 6-month observational study in 15 countries. This subanalysis included patients previously receiving long-acting analogue insulin (AB; n = 348), or human basal insulin (long and intermediate acting) (HB; n = 3414), who were transferred to BIAsp 30. Efficacy end-points included change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), from baseline to the end of the study. Episodes of hypoglycaemia, adverse events, and physician and patient satisfaction were also recorded. End-points were considered separately by previous basal regimen (AB or HB).

Results: After 6 months' treatment with BIAsp 30, HbA(1c) was significantly lowered in both groups (-1.60% and -1.42% in the AB and HB groups; p < 0.0001 compared with baseline). Reductions in FPG and PPG were also statistically significant in both groups. The rate (events/patient/year) of overall hypoglycaemia remained relatively constant in patients switching from AB, but it was statistically lower in patients switching from HB (change from baseline -3.8; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In routine clinical practice, patients with type 2 diabetes who are failing to reach glycaemic targets on basal insulin can achieve better glycaemic control without an increase in overall hypoglycaemia by intensifying with BIAsp 30.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rate of daytime (A; 06:00–00:00 hours) and nocturnal (B; 00:00–06:00 hours) hypoglycaemia by type of previous basal insulin treatment at baseline and at the end of the study. *p

References

    1. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321:405–12.
    1. Wright A, Burden AC, Paisey RB, Cull CA, Holman RR. Sulfonylurea inadequacy: efficacy of addition of insulin over 6 years in patients with type 2 diabetes in the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 57) Diabetes Care. 2002;25:330–6.
    1. Nathan DM. Finding new treatments for diabetes – how many, how fast… how good? N Engl J Med. 2007;356:437–40.
    1. Philis-Tsimikas A, Charpentier G, Clauson P, Martinez Ravn G, Roberts VL, Thorsteinsson B. Comparison of once-daily insulin detemir with NPH insulin added to a regimen of oral antidiabetic drugs in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Clin Ther. 2006;28:1569–81.
    1. Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Gerich J. Insulin Glargine 4002 Study Investigators. The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:3080–6.
    1. Raskin P, Allen E, Hollander P, et al. for the INITIATE study group Initiating insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of biphasic and basal insulin analogs. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:260–5.
    1. Garber A, Wahlen J, Wahl T, et al. For the 1-2-3 study group. Attainment of glycaemic goals in type 2 diabetes with once-, twice-, or thrice-daily dosing with biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (The 1-2-3 study) Diabetes Obes Metab. 2006;8:58–66.
    1. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study 16. Overview of 6 years’ therapy of type II diabetes: a progressive disease. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Diabetes. 1995;44:1249–58.
    1. IDF Clinical Guidelines Task Force. Global Guideline for Type 2 Diabetes. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2005. [January 2008]. .
    1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(Suppl. 1):S1–85.
    1. Khutsoane D, Sharma SK, Almustafa M, et al. Biphasic insulin aspart 30 treatment improves glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes in a clinical practice setting: experience from the PRESENT study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008;10:212–22.
    1. Polonsky KS, Sturis J, Bell GI. Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus – a genetically programmed failure of the beta cell to compensate for insulin resistance. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:777–83.
    1. Kann P, Wascher T, Zackova V, et al. Starting insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 plus metformin versus once-daily insulin glargine plus glimepiride. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2006;114:527–32.
    1. Davidson J, Vexiau P, Cucinotta D, Vaz J, Kawamori R. Biphasic insulin aspart 30: literature review of adverse events associated with treatment. Clin Ther. 2005;27(Suppl. B):S75–88.
    1. Kitzmiller JL, Main E, Ward B, Theiss T, Peterson DL. Insulin lispro and the development of proliferative diabetic retinopathy during pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:874–6.
    1. Roysarkar TK, Gupta A, Dash RJ, Dogra MR. Effect of insulin therapy on progression of retinopathy in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:560–74.
    1. Henricsson M, Janzon L, Groop L. Progression of retinopathy after change of treatment from oral antihyperglycemic agents to insulin in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:1571–6.
    1. Llewelyn JG, Thomas PK, Fonseca V, King RHM, Dandona P. Acute painful diabetic neuropathy precipitated by strict glycemic control. Acta Neuropathol. 1986;72:157–63.
    1. Ligthelm RJ, Borzi V, Gumprecht J, Kawamori R, Wenying Y, Valensi P. Importance of observational studies in clinical practice. Clin Ther. 2007;29:1284–92.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir