Anti-interleukin-6 Antibody Clazakizumab in Antibody-mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection: Effect on Donor-derived Cell-free DNA and C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 10

Katharina A Mayer, Konstantin Doberer, Philip F Halloran, Klemens Budde, Susanne Haindl, Jakob Mühlbacher, Farsad Eskandary, Thierry Viard, Silvia Casas, Bernd Jilma, Georg A Böhmig, Katharina A Mayer, Konstantin Doberer, Philip F Halloran, Klemens Budde, Susanne Haindl, Jakob Mühlbacher, Farsad Eskandary, Thierry Viard, Silvia Casas, Bernd Jilma, Georg A Böhmig

Abstract

Targeting interleukin-6 (IL-6) was shown to counteract donor-specific antibody production and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) activity. It is not known whether, or to what extent, IL-6 antagonism modulates biomarkers indicative of tissue damage (donor-derived cell-free DNA [dd-cfDNA]) and parenchymal inflammation (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand [CXCL] 10).

Methods: We report a secondary endpoint analysis of a phase 2 trial of anti-IL-6 antibody clazakizumab in late AMR (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03444103). Twenty kidney transplant recipients were randomized to treatment with clazakizumab or placebo over 12 wk (part A), followed by an extension in which all recipients received clazakizumab through week 52 (part B). Biomarkers were evaluated at day 0 and after 12 and 52 wk, respectively.

Results: Fractional dd-cfDNA (dd-cfDNA[%]) did not significantly change under clazakizumab, with no differences between study arms (clazakizumab versus placebo) at week 12 (1.65% [median; interquartile range: 0.91%-2.78%] versus 0.97% [0.56%-2.30%]; P = 0.25) and no significant decrease from weeks 12 to 52 (1.15% [0.70%-2.38%] versus 1.0% [0.61%-1.70%]; P = 0.25). Similarly, urine CXCL10 was not different between groups at week 12 (55.7 [41.0-91.4] versus 60.2 [48.8-208.7.0] pg/mg creatinine; P = 0.44) and did not change over part B (CXCL10 [pg/mg creatinine]: from 58 [46.3-93.1] to 67.4 [41.5-132.0] pg/mL creatinine; P = 0.95). Similar results were obtained for serum CXCL10. There was no association between biomarker levels and resolution of molecular and morphologic AMR activity.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that IL-6 blockade does not significantly affect levels of dd-cfDNA[%] and CXCL10. Subtle responses to this therapeutic principle may be overlooked by early biomarker surveillance.

Conflict of interest statement

T.V. and S.C. are employed by CareDx Inc., Brisbane, San Francisco, CA. G.A.B. is member of the steering committee for an ongoing pivotal phase 3 trial evaluating clazakizumab in chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03744910; sponsored by CSL Behring). The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Trial protocol. Twenty kidney allograft recipients with late DSA-positive AMR were randomized 1:1 to receive clazakizumab or placebo for 12 wk (part A). After 12 wk, all patients were scheduled to receive clazakizumab (part B). Two patients allocated to receive clazakizumab were withdrawn from the study because of serious adverse events (diverticular disease complications). Both completed part A. One was withdrawn shortly before, the other after the first dose of clazakizumab in part B. At day 0 and after 12 and 52 wk, biologic material was collected and stored for biomarker evaluation (secondary endpoint analysis). Tested biomarkers included plasma dd-cfDNA and CXCL10 in urine and serum. AMR, antibody-mediated rejection; CXCL, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand; dd-cfDNA, donor-derived cell-free DNA; DSA, donor-specific antibody; MMDx, Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Biomarkers in relation to clazakizumab treatment. Fractions of dd-cfDNA[%] (A) and concentrations of CXCL10 in urine (B) and serum (C) are shown after 12 wk (end of part A; clazakizumab [Claza] vs placebo) and from week 12 to week 52 in the open-label extension (part B; all patients on clazakizumab), respectively. Box plots indicate the median, interquartile range, and the minimum and maximum of the measures (outliers are indicated by circles and extreme outliers by asterisks). The unpaired Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparisons between study arms and the paired Wilcoxon test to test for differences over time in the overall cohort. Cr, creatinine; CXCL, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand; dd-cfDNA, donor-derived cell-free DNA.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Individual course of biomarker levels in relation to treatment allocation. Biomarkers included (A) fractions of % and concentrations of CXCL10 in urine (B) and serum (C). Two patients in the Claza arm were withdrawn from the trial, and for week 52 no biomarker results are available. Two samples did not yield valid dd-cfDNA results (1 collected at day 0, the other at week 52). Claza, clazakizumab; Cr, creatinine; CXCL, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand; dd-cfDNA, donor-derived cell-free DNA; Pcb, placebo.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Biomarkers in relation to persistent molecular or morphologic AMR persistence. Fractions of dd-cfDNA[%] (A) and concentrations of CXCL10 in urine (B) and serum (C) are shown at the end of the trial, in relation to molecular (AMR score U test was used. AMR, antibody-mediated rejection; Cr, creatinine; CXCL, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand; dd-cfDNA, donor-derived cell-free DNA.

References

    1. Loupy A, Lefaucheur C. Antibody-mediated rejection of solid-organ allografts. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1150–1160.
    1. Mayrdorfer M, Liefeldt L, Wu K, et al. . Exploring the complexity of death-censored kidney allograft failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32:1513–1526.
    1. Böhmig GA, Eskandary F, Doberer K, et al. . The therapeutic challenge of late antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection. Transpl Int. 2019;32:775–788.
    1. Schinstock CA, Mannon RB, Budde K, et al. . Recommended treatment for antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: The 2019 Expert Consensus from the Transplantion Society Working Group. Transplantation. 2020;104:911–922.
    1. Choi J, Aubert O, Vo A, et al. . Assessment of tocilizumab (anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal) as a potential treatment for chronic antibody-mediated rejection and transplant glomerulopathy in HLA-sensitized renal allograft recipients. Am J Transplant. 2017;17:2381–2389.
    1. Doberer K, Duerr M, Halloran PF, et al. . A randomized clinical trial of anti-IL-6 antibody clazakizumab in late antibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32:708–722.
    1. Jordan SC, Ammerman N, Choi J, et al. . Evaluation of clazakizumab (anti-Interleukin-6) in patients with treatment-resistant chronic active antibody-mediated rejection of kidney allografts. Kidney Int Rep. 2022;7:720–731.
    1. Mayer KA, Budde K, Jilma B, et al. . Emerging drugs for antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: a focus on phase II & III trials. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2022;27:151–167.
    1. Eskandary F, Regele H, Baumann L, et al. . A randomized trial of bortezomib in late antibody-mediated rejection (BORTEJECT). J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29:591–605.
    1. Moreso F, Crespo M, Ruiz JC, et al. . Treatment of chronic antibody mediated rejection with intravenous immunoglobulins and rituximab: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Am J Transplant. 2018;18:927–935.
    1. Brunet M, Shipkova M, van Gelder T, et al. . Barcelona consensus on biomarker-based immunosuppressive drugs management in solid organ transplantation. Ther Drug Monit. 2016;38(Suppl 1):S1–S20.
    1. Naesens M, Anglicheau D. Precision transplant medicine: biomarkers to the rescue. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29:24–34.
    1. Oellerich M, Sherwood K, Keown P, et al. . Liquid biopsies: donor-derived cell-free DNA for the detection of kidney allograft injury. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021;17:591–603.
    1. Kant S, Brennan DC. Donor derived cell free DNA in kidney transplantation: the Circa 2020-2021 update. Transpl Int. 2022;35:10448.
    1. Bloom RD, Bromberg JS, Poggio ED, et al. ; Circulating Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Blood for Diagnosing Active Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients (DART) Study Investigators. Cell-free DNA and active rejection in kidney allografts. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:2221–2232.
    1. Jordan SC, Bunnapradist S, Bromberg JS, et al. . Donor-derived cell-free DNA identifies antibody-mediated rejection in donor specific antibody positive kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Direct. 2018;4:e379.
    1. Mayer KA, Doberer K, Tillgren A, et al. . Diagnostic value of donor-derived cell-free DNA to predict antibody-mediated rejection in donor-specific antibody-positive renal allograft recipients. Transpl Int. 2021;34:1689–1702.
    1. Halloran PF, Reeve J, Madill-Thomsen KS, et al. ; Trifecta Investigators. The Trifecta Study: comparing plasma levels of donor-derived cell-free DNA with the molecular phenotype of kidney transplant biopsies. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;33:387–400.
    1. Oellerich M, Shipkova M, Asendorf T, et al. . Absolute quantification of donor-derived cell-free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: results from a prospective observational study. Am J Transplant. 2019;19:3087–3099.
    1. Kant S, Bromberg J, Haas M, et al. . Donor-derived cell-free DNA and the prediction of BK virus-associated nephropathy. Transplant Direct. 2020;6:e622.
    1. Bu L, Gupta G, Pai A, et al. . Clinical outcomes from the Assessing Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Monitoring Insights of Kidney Allo Grafts with Longitudinal Surveillance (ADMIRAL) study. Kidney Int. 2022;101:793–803.
    1. Wolf-Doty TK, Mannon RB, Poggio ED, et al. . Dynamic response of donor-derived cell-free DNA following treatment of acute rejection in kidney allografts. Kidney360. 2021;2:729–736.
    1. Steggerda JA, Pizzo H, Garrison J, et al. . Use of a donor-derived cell-free DNA assay to monitor treatment response in pediatric renal transplant recipients with allograft rejection. Pediatr Transplant. 2022;26:e14258.
    1. Gupta G, Moinuddin I, Kamal L, et al. . Correlation of donor-derived cell-free DNA with histology and molecular diagnoses of kidney transplant biopsies. Transplantation. 2022;106:1061–1070.
    1. Panzer U, Steinmetz OM, Reinking RR, et al. . Compartment-specific expression and function of the chemokine IP-10/CXCL10 in a model of renal endothelial microvascular injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:454–464.
    1. Schaub S, Nickerson P, Rush D, et al. . Urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 levels correlate with the extent of subclinical tubulitis. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:1347–1353.
    1. Jackson JA, Kim EJ, Begley B, et al. . Urinary chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 are noninvasive markers of renal allograft rejection and BK viral infection. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:2228–2234.
    1. Rabant M, Amrouche L, Lebreton X, et al. . Urinary C-X-C motif chemokine 10 independently improves the noninvasive diagnosis of antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26:2840–2851.
    1. Ho J, Schaub S, Wiebe C, et al. . Urinary CXCL10 chemokine is associated with alloimmune and virus compartment-specific renal allograft inflammation. Transplantation. 2018;102:521–529.
    1. Millan O, Budde K, Sommerer C, et al. . Urinary miR-155-5p and CXCL10 as prognostic and predictive biomarkers of rejection, graft outcome and treatment response in kidney transplantation. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83:2636–2650.
    1. Mühlbacher J, Doberer K, Kozakowski N, et al. . Non-invasive chemokine detection: improved prediction of antibody-mediated rejection in donor-specific antibody-positive renal allograft recipients. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:114.
    1. Weseslindtner L, Hedman L, Wang Y, et al. . Longitudinal assessment of the CXCL10 blood and urine concentration in kidney transplant recipients with BK polyomavirus replication-a retrospective study. Transpl Int. 2020;33:555–566.
    1. Millan O, Rovira J, Guirado L, et al. . Advantages of plasmatic CXCL-10 as a prognostic and diagnostic biomarker for the risk of rejection and subclinical rejection in kidney transplantation. Clin Immunol. 2021;229:108792.
    1. Blydt-Hansen TD, Sharma A, Gibson IW, et al. . Validity and utility of urinary CXCL10/Cr immune monitoring in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2021;21:1545–1555.
    1. Tinel C, Devresse A, Vermorel A, et al. . Development and validation of an optimized integrative model using urinary chemokines for noninvasive diagnosis of acute allograft rejection. Am J Transplant. 2020;20:3462–3476.
    1. Ho J, Sharma A, Kroeker K, et al. . Multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol of urine CXCL10 monitoring strategy in kidney transplant recipients. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e024908.
    1. Eskandary F, Dürr M, Budde K, et al. . Clazakizumab in late antibody-mediated rejection: study protocol of a randomized controlled pilot trial. Trials. 2019;20:37.
    1. Schwaiger E, Wahrmann M, Bond G, et al. . Complement component C3 activation: the leading cause of the prozone phenomenon affecting HLA antibody detection on single-antigen beads. Transplantation. 2014;97:1279–1285.
    1. Haas M, Loupy A, Lefaucheur C, et al. . The Banff 2017 Kidney Meeting Report: revised diagnostic criteria for chronic active T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and prospects for integrative endpoints for next-generation clinical trials. Am J Transplant. 2018;18:293–307.
    1. Halloran PF, Reeve J, Akalin E, et al. . Real time central assessment of kidney transplant indication biopsies by microarrays: the INTERCOMEX study. Am J Transplant. 2017;17:2851–2862.
    1. Reeve J, Böhmig GA, Eskandary F, et al. . Precision molecular phenotyping of kidney transplant biopsies using archetypal analysis. JCI Insight. 2017;2:e94197.
    1. Mayer KA, Omic H, Weseslindtner L, et al. . Levels of donor-derived cell-free DNA and chemokines in BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy. Clin Transplant. 2022:e14785.
    1. Halloran PF, Reeve J, Madill-Thomsen KS, et al. . Combining donor-derived cell-free DNA fraction and quantity to detect kidney transplant rejection using molecular diagnoses and histology as confirmation. Transplantation. 2022.
    1. Osmanodja B, Akifova A, Budde K, et al. . Absolute or relative quantification of donor-derived cell-free DNA in kidney transplant recipients: case series. Transplant Direct. 2021;7:e778.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir