iStent with Phacoemulsification versus Phacoemulsification Alone for Patients with Glaucoma and Cataract: A Meta-Analysis

Monali S Malvankar-Mehta, Yiannis Iordanous, Yufeng Nancy Chen, Wan Wendy Wang, Sangita Shantilal Patel, John Costella, Cindy M L Hutnik, Monali S Malvankar-Mehta, Yiannis Iordanous, Yufeng Nancy Chen, Wan Wendy Wang, Sangita Shantilal Patel, John Costella, Cindy M L Hutnik

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) have attracted significant attention, as they have been reported to lower intra-ocular pressure (IOP) and have an excellent safety profile. The iStent is an example of a minimally invasive glaucoma device that has received particular attention due to its early and wide spread utilization. There is a growing body of evidence supporting its use at the time of phacoemulsification to help lower IOP. However, it is still not clear how much of the IOP lowering effect can be attributed to the iStent, the crystalline lens extraction or both when inserted concurrently at the time of phacoemulsification. This has been an important issue in understanding its potential role in the glaucoma management paradigm.

Purpose: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the IOP lowering effect of iStent insertion at the time of phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone for patients with glaucoma and cataracts.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted utilizing various databases. Studies examining the IOP lowering effect of iStent insertion in combination with phacoemulsification, as well as studies examining the IOP lowering effect of phacoemulsification alone were included. Thirty-seven studies, reporting on 2495 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The percentage reduction in IOP (IOPR%) and mean reduction in topical glaucoma medications after surgery were determined. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was computed as a measure of the treatment effect for continuous outcomes taking into account heterogeneity. Fixed-effect and random-effect models were applied.

Results: A 4% IOP reduction (IOPR%) from baseline occurred following phacoemulsification as a solo procedure compared to 9% following an iStent implant with phacoemulsification, and 27% following 2 iStents implants with phacoemulsification. Compared with cataract extraction alone, iStent with phacoemulsification resulted in significant reduction in the post-operative IOP (IOPR%) (SMD = -0.46, 95% CI: [-0.87, -0.06]). A weighted mean reduction in the number of glaucoma medications per patient was 1.01 following phacoemulsification alone compared to 1.33 after one iStent implant with phacoemulsification, and 1.1 after 2 iStent implants with phacoemulsification. Compared to cataract extraction alone, iStent with cataract extraction showed a significant decrease in the number of glaucoma medications (SMD = -0.65, 95% CI: [-1.18, -0.12]). Funnel plots suggested the absence of publication bias.

Conclusion: Both iStent implantation with concurrent phacoemulsification and phacoemulsification alone result in a significant decrease in IOP and topical glaucoma medications. In terms of both reductions, iStent with phacoemulsification significantly outperforms phacoemulsification alone.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. PRISMA Flow Diagram for iStent…
Fig 1. PRISMA Flow Diagram for iStent with Phacoemulsification versus Phacoemulsification alone for Patients with Glaucoma and Cataract: A Meta-Analysis.
Fig 2. Funnel plot for pre- and…
Fig 2. Funnel plot for pre- and post-operative IOPR% for studies comparing iStent insertion with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification as a solo procedure.
Fig 3. Funnel plot for pre- and…
Fig 3. Funnel plot for pre- and post-operative number of topical glaucoma medications for studies comparing iStent insertion with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification as a solo procedure.
Fig 4. Forest plot for difference in…
Fig 4. Forest plot for difference in post-operative IOPR% for studies comparing iStent insertion with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification as a solo procedure.
Fig 5. Forest plot for difference in…
Fig 5. Forest plot for difference in post-operative number of topical glaucoma medications of iStent with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification only.
Fig 6. Forest plot for pre- and…
Fig 6. Forest plot for pre- and post-operative number of topical glaucoma medications for studies examining phacoemulsification as a solo procedure.
Fig 7. Forest plot for pre- and…
Fig 7. Forest plot for pre- and post-operative number of topical glaucoma medications for studies examining iStent insertion with simultaneous phacoemulsification.
Fig 8. Forest plot for pre- and…
Fig 8. Forest plot for pre- and post-operative number of topical glaucoma medications by follow-up (months) for phacoemulsification only group.
Fig 9. Forest plot for pre- and…
Fig 9. Forest plot for pre- and post-operative number of topical glaucoma medications by follow-up (months) for iStent and simultaneous phacoemulsification group.

References

    1. The National Coalition for Vision Health (2010) Vision Loss in Canada 2011.
    1. Kingman S. (2004) Glaucoma is second leading cause of blindness globally World Health Organization. 11 p.
    1. Kingman S (2004) Glaucoma is second leading cause of blindness globally Bulletin of the World Health Organization.
    1. Quigley HA, Broman AT (2006) The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. British journal of ophthalmology 90: 262–267.
    1. Prevent Blindness America (2013) Cost of Vision Problems: The Economic Burden of Vision Loss and Eye Disorders in the United States National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago.
    1. Iskedjian M, Walker J, Vicente C, Trope GE, Buys Y, Einarson TR, et al. (2003) Cost of glaucoma in Canada: analyses based on visual field and physician's assessment. Journal of glaucoma 12: 456–462.
    1. Iordanous Y, Kent JS, Hutnik CM, Malvankar-Mehta MS (2013) Projected Cost Comparison of Trabectome, iStent, and Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation Versus Glaucoma Medication in the Ontario Health Insurance Plan. Journal of glaucoma.
    1. Wood JM, Lacherez P, Black AA, Cole MH, Boon MY, Kerr GK (2011) Risk of falls, injurious falls, and other injuries resulting from visual impairment among older adults with Age-related Macular Degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 52: 5088–5092.
    1. Rovner BW, Ganguli M (1998) Depression and disability associated with impaired vision: the MoVies Project. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society; Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
    1. Grue EV, Kirkevold M, Ranhoff AH (2009) Prevalence of vision, hearing, and combined vision and hearing impairments in patients with hip fractures. Journal of clinical nursing 18: 3037–3049. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02856.x
    1. Canadian National Institute for the Blind (CNIB) (2014) Fast Facts about Vision Loss Toronto, ON, Canada: Canadian National Institute for the Blind (CNIB).
    1. Kass MA, Gordon M, Morley RE Jr, Meltzer DW, Goldberg JJ (1987) Compliance with topical timolol treatment. American journal of ophthalmology 103: 188
    1. Okeke CO, Quigley HA, Jampel HD, Ying G- S, Plyler RJ, Jiang Y, et al. (2009) Adherence with topical glaucoma medication monitored electronically: the Travatan Dosing Aid Study. Ophthalmology 116: 191–199. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.004
    1. Robin AL, Novack GD, Covert DW, Crockett RS, Marcic TS (2007) Adherence in glaucoma: objective measurements of once-daily and adjunctive medication use. American journal of ophthalmology 144: 533–540. e532.
    1. Dreer LE, Girkin C, Mansberger SL (2012) Determinants of medication adherence to topical glaucoma therapy. Journal of glaucoma 21: 234 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31821dac86
    1. Robin AL, Covert D (2005) Does adjunctive glaucoma therapy affect adherence to the initial primary therapy? Ophthalmology 112: 863–868.
    1. Baudouin C, Liang H, Hamard P, Riancho L, Creuzot-Garcher C, Warnet JM, et al. (2008) The ocular surface of glaucoma patients treated over the long term expresses inflammatory markers related to both T-helper 1 and T-helper 2 pathways. Ophthalmology 115: 109–115.
    1. Ammar DA, Noecker RJ, Kahook MY (2011) Effects of benzalkonium chloride-and polyquad-preserved combination glaucoma medications on cultured human ocular surface cells. Advances in therapy 28: 501–510. 10.1007/s12325-011-0029-x
    1. Leung EW, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN (2008) Prevalence of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients. Journal of glaucoma 17: 350–355. 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815c5f4f
    1. Quality AfHRa (2013) Treatments for Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Review of the Research for Adults.
    1. Stone JL, Robin AL, Novack GD, Covert DW, Cagle GD (2009) An objective evaluation of eyedrop instillation in patients with glaucoma. Archives of ophthalmology 127: 732 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.96
    1. Kholdebarin R, Campbell RJ, Jin Y-P, Buys YM (2008) Multicenter study of compliance and drop administration in glaucoma. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology/Journal Canadien d'Ophtalmologie 43: 454–461.
    1. Nichamin LD (2009) Glaukos iStent trabecular micro-bypass. Middle East African journal of ophthalmology 16: 138 10.4103/0974-9233.56227
    1. Administration USAFaD (2010) U.S. FDA's Ophthalmic Device Panel meeting FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION.
    1. Malvankar-Mehta MS CY, Iordanous Y, Wang WW, Costella J, Hutnik CML (2015) iStent as a Solo Procedure for Glaucoma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLOS ONE 10.
    1. Samuelson TW, Katz LJ, Wells JM, Duh Y-J, Giamporcaro JE (2011) Randomized evaluation of the trabecular micro-bypass stent with phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma and cataract. Ophthalmology 118: 459–467. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.007
    1. Saheb H, Ahmed IIK (2012) Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: current perspectives and future directions. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 23: 96–104. 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff1e7
    1. Fea AM (2010) Phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification with micro-bypass stent implantation in primary open-angle glaucoma: randomized double-masked clinical trial. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 36: 407–412.
    1. Buchacra O, Duch S, Milla E, Stirbu O (2011) One-year analysis of the iStent trabecular microbypass in secondary glaucoma. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, NZ) 5: 321.
    1. Spiegel D, Kobuch K (2002) Trabecular meshwork bypass tube shunt: initial case series. British journal of ophthalmology 86: 1228–1231.
    1. Arriola-Villalobos P, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Diaz-Valle D, Fernandez-Perez C, Garcia-Sanchez J, Garcia-Feijoo J (2012) Combined iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation and phacoemulsification for coexistent open-angle glaucoma and cataract: a long-term study. British journal of ophthalmology 96: 645–649. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300218
    1. Poley BJ, Lindstrom RL, Samuelson TW, Schulze R Jr (2009) Intraocular pressure reduction after phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes: Evaluation of a causal relationship between the natural lens and open-angle glaucoma. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 35: 1946–1955.
    1. Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F (2001) Effect of cataract surgery on intraocular pressure control in glaucoma patients. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 27: 1779–1786.
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine 151: 264–269.
    1. Downs SH, Black N (1998) The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of epidemiology and community health 52: 377–384.
    1. Zhang W, Po ALW, Dua H, Azuara-Blanco A (2001) Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing latanoprost with timolol in the treatment of patients with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. British journal of ophthalmology 85: 983–990.
    1. Higgins J, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327: 557–560.
    1. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Bmj 315: 629–634.
    1. Fernández-Barrientos Y, García-Feijoó J, Martínez-de-la-Casa JM, Pablo LE, Fernández-Pérez C, Sánchez JG (2010) Fluorophotometric study of the effect of the glaukos trabecular microbypass stent on aqueous humor dynamics. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 51: 3327–3332.
    1. Fea AM, Pignata G, Turco D, Bartoli E, Consolandi G, Cannizzo P, et al. (2012) Long-term Outcomes of a Prospective, Randomized, Double-Masked Study of Micro-Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) with Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent and Cataract Surgery vs. Cataract Surgery Alone. Investigative Ophtalmology and Visual Science 53: 3731.
    1. Altan-Yaycioglu R, Canan H, Pelit A, Akova YA (2009) Intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification in eyes with pseudoexfoliation. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 35: 952–954.
    1. Bowling B, Calladine D (2009) Routine reduction of glaucoma medication following phacoemulsification. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 35: 406–407.
    1. Chang TC, Budenz DL, Liu A, Kim WI, Dang T, Li C, et al. (2012) Long-term effect of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure using phakic fellow eye as control. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 38: 866–870.
    1. Chihara E, Hayashi K (2011) Different modes of intraocular pressure reduction after three different nonfiltering surgeries and trabeculectomy. Japanese journal of ophthalmology 55: 107–114. 10.1007/s10384-010-0923-9
    1. Damji KF, Konstas A, Liebmann J, Hodge W, Ziakas N, Giannikakis S, et al. (2006) Intraocular pressure following phacoemulsification in patients with and without exfoliation syndrome: a 2 year prospective study. British journal of ophthalmology 90: 1014–1018.
    1. Guan H, Mick A, Porco T, Dolan BJ (2013) Preoperative Factors Associated with IOP Reduction After Cataract Surgery. Optometry & Vision Science 90: 179–184.
    1. Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F (2000) Changes in anterior chamber angle width and depth after intraocular lens implantation in eyes with glaucoma. Ophthalmology 107: 698–703.
    1. Khondkaryan AF, B. (2012) Combined Trabectome Phacoemulsification versus Phacoemulsification Alone in Open Angle Glaucoma.
    1. Klink J, Schmitz B, Lieb W, Klink T, Grein H, Sold-Darseff J, et al. (2005) Filtering bleb function after clear cornea phacoemulsification: a prospective study. British journal of ophthalmology 89: 597–601.
    1. Ismi T. YA (2013) Effects of Cataract Surgery on Intraocular Pressure in Patients with and without Glaucoma. Cataract Surgery in Glaucoma 43: 167–172.
    1. Mansberger SL, Gordon MO, Jampel H, Bhorade A, Brandt JD, Wilson B, et al. (2012) Reduction in intraocular pressure after cataract extraction: the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ophthalmology 119: 1826–1831. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.050
    1. Mathalone N, Hyams M, Neiman S, Buckman G, Hod Y, Geyer O (2005) Long-term intraocular pressure control after clear corneal phacoemulsification in glaucoma patients. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 31: 479–483.
    1. Merkur A, Damji KF, Mintsioulis G, Hodge WG (2001) Intraocular pressure decrease after phacoemulsification in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 27: 528–532.
    1. Park M, Tanito M, Nishikawa M, Hayashi K, Chichara E (2004) Combined viscocanalostomy and cataract surgery compared with cataract surgery in Japanese patients with glaucoma. Journal of glaucoma 13: 55–61.
    1. Poley BJ, Lindstrom RL, Samuelson TW, Schulze Jr RR (2010) Phacoemulsification With Artificial Lens Implantation.
    1. Pohjalainen T, Vesti E, Uusitalo RJ, Laatikainen L (2001) Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in eyes with open‐angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica 79: 313–316.
    1. Sacca S, Marletta A, Pascotto A, Barabino S, Rolando M, Giannetti R, et al. (2001) Daily tonometric curves after cataract surgery. British journal of ophthalmology 85: 24–29.
    1. Sharma TK, Nessim M, Kyprianou I, Kumar V, Shah P, O'Neil E (2008) Vitreous loss during phacoemulsification in glaucoma patients: Long-term intraocular pressure control. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 34: 831–834.
    1. Shingleton BJ, Pasternack JJ, Hung JW, O'Donoghue MW (2006) Three and five year changes in intraocular pressures after clear corneal phacoemulsification in open angle glaucoma patients, glaucoma suspects, and normal patients. Journal of glaucoma 15: 494–498.
    1. Shingleton B, Tetz M, Korber N (2008) Circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm canal (canaloplasty) with temporal clear corneal phacoemulsification cataract surgery for open-angle glaucoma and visually significant cataract: one-year results. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 34: 433–440.
    1. Shingleton BJ, Laul A, Nagao K, Wolff B, O'Donoghue M, Eagan E, et al. (2008) Effect of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure in eyes with pseudoexfoliation: single-surgeon series. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 34: 1834–1841.
    1. Slabaugh MA, Bojikian KD, Moore DB, Chen PP (2014) The Effect of Phacoemulsification on Intraocular Pressure in Medically Controlled Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients. American journal of ophthalmology 157: 26–31. 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.023
    1. Ahmed A. SH, Voskanyan L., (2012) Prospective, Randomized MIGS Study of One, Two or Three Trabecular Micro- Bypass Stents and Travoprost in Open-Angle Glaucoma European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons; Milan, Italy.
    1. Arriola-Villalobos P, Martínez-de-la-Casa JM, Díaz-Valle D, García-Vidal SE, Fernández-Pérez C, García-Sánchez J, et al. (2013) Mid-term evaluation of the new Glaukos iStent with phacoemulsification in coexistent open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and cataract. British Journal of Ophthalmology: bjophthalmol-2012-302394.
    1. Belovay GW, Naqi A, Chan BJ, Rateb M, Ahmed IIK (2012) Using multiple trabecular micro-bypass stents in cataract patients to treat open-angle glaucoma. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 38: 1911–1917.
    1. Spiegel D, García-Feijoó J, García-Sánchez J, Lamielle H (2008) Coexistent primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract: preliminary analysis of treatment by cataract surgery and the iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent. Advances in therapy 25: 453–464. 10.1007/s12325-008-0062-6
    1. Patel I, Klerk TA, Au L (2013) Manchester iStent study: early results from a prospective UK case series. Clinical & experimental ophthalmology 41: 648–652.
    1. Spiegel D, Wetzel W, Neuhann T, Sturmer J, Hoh H, Garcia-Feijoo J, et al. (2009) Coexistent primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract: interim analysis of a trabecular micro-bypass stent and concurrent cataract surgery. European journal of ophthalmology 19: 393
    1. Carrillo MM, Artes PH, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC (2005) Effect of cataract extraction on the visual fields of patients with glaucoma. Archives of ophthalmology 123: 929–932.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir