Growth analysis among adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis receiving upadacitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids in Japan: A case study series from a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial (Rising Up)

Toshiaki Tanaka, Takuya Sasaki, Kimitoshi Ikeda, Jianzhong Liu, Allan R Tenorio, Yukihiro Ohya, Toshiaki Tanaka, Takuya Sasaki, Kimitoshi Ikeda, Jianzhong Liu, Allan R Tenorio, Yukihiro Ohya

Abstract

Background: Treatment options for adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited. Oral corticosteroid therapies are used to treat children and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD; however, long-term use is not recommended because of potential growth impairment. Upadacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, is approved to treat moderate-to-severe AD in the United States, Japan, and Europe. To investigate potential effects of upadacitinib on growth, we analyzed height and height velocity in 6 adolescent patients in the phase 3 Rising Up study who were in the decline phase of pubertal growth at the time of study entry.

Methods: The randomized, double-blind, Rising Up (NCT03661138) study compared upadacitinib plus topical corticosteroids (TCS) to placebo plus TCS in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD in Japan. Eligible adolescents (aged 12-17 years) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive once-daily upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg, or placebo in combination with TCS for 16 weeks. After 16 weeks, patients randomized to receive placebo were rerandomized 1:1 to receive upadacitinib 15 mg or upadacitinib 30 mg. Historical height measurements were obtained when available. Individual growth and growth velocity curves were compared with standard curves for Japanese youths. This non-prespecified analysis used 52-week data.

Results: Of the 29 adolescents enrolled, 6 were in the decline phase of pubertal growth at enrollment. Growth curves and growth velocity curves for these 6 patients remained within the normal range for Japanese adolescents throughout the study. Biomarkers of bone metabolism generally remained stable over the course of the study. No musculoskeletal adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: No cases suggested that upadacitinib negatively affected adolescent growth. Ongoing studies will continue to assess height and adverse effects related to bone growth to further inform on this patient group.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03661138.

Keywords: Atopic dermatitis; Growth; Janus kinase inhibitors; Reference growth curves; Upadacitinib.

© 2022 The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient 1 (male, aged 14 years) in the upadacitinib 15-mg dose group. A. Growth curve vs. standard growth curves for Japanese males, with red line indicating on-study measurements. Grey shading indicates periods of oral steroid use. B. Growth velocity curve vs. standard growth velocity curves for Japanese males, with red points indicating on-study measurements. Grey shading indicates periods of oral steroid use. C. EASI score (blue) and percent EASI score reduction (orange) by visit. D. Baseline characteristics. AD, atopic dermatitis; BMI, body mass index; BMI-SDS, body mass index standard deviation score; EASI, Eczema Area and Severity Index; PBO, placebo; UPA, upadacitinib.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient 2 (female, aged 13 years) in the upadacitinib 15-mg dose group. A. Growth curve vs. standard growth curves for Japanese females, with red line indicating on-study measurements.B. Growth velocity curve vs. standard growth velocity curves for Japanese females, with red points indicating on-study measurements. C. EASI score (blue) and percent EASI score reduction (orange) by visit. D. Baseline characteristics. AD, atopic dermatitis; BMI, body mass index; BMI-SDS, body mass index standard deviation score; EASI, Eczema Area and Severity Index; UPA, upadacitinib.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Patient 3 (female, aged 16 years) in the upadacitinib 15-mg dose group. A. Growth curve vs. standard growth curves for Japanese females, with red line indicating on-study measurements.B. Growth velocity curve vs. standard growth velocity curves for Japanese females, with red points indicating on-study measurements. C. EASI score (blue) and percent EASI score reduction (orange) by visit (C). D. Baseline characteristics. AD, atopic dermatitis; BMI, body mass index; BMI-SDS, body mass index standard deviation score; EASI, Eczema Area and Severity Index; UPA, upadacitinib.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Patient 4 (male, aged 13 years) in the upadacitinib 30-mg dose group. A. Growth curve vs. standard growth curves for Japanese males, with red line indicating on-study measurements,B. Growth velocity curve vs. standard growth velocity curves for Japanese males, with red points indicating on-study measurements. C. EASI score (blue) and percent EASI score reduction (orange) by visit. D. Baseline characteristics. AD, atopic dermatitis; BMI, body mass index; BMI-SDS, body mass index standard deviation score; EASI, Eczema Area and Severity Index; UPA, upadacitinib.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Patient 5 (male, aged 14 years) in the upadacitinib 15-mg dose group. A. Growth curve vs. standard growth curves for Japanese males, with red line indicating on-study measurements.B. Growth velocity curve vs. standard growth velocity curves for Japanese males, with red point indicating on-study measurement. C. EASI score (blue) and percent EASI score reduction (orange) by visit. D. Baseline characteristics. AD, atopic dermatitis; BMI, body mass index; BMI-SDS, body mass index standard deviation score; EASI, Eczema Area and Severity Index; UPA, upadacitinib.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Patient 6 (male, aged 14 years) in the placebo (16-week)/upadacitinib 15-mg dose group. A. Growth curve vs. standard growth curves for Japanese males, with red line indicating on-study measurements.B. Growth velocity curve vs. standard growth velocity curves for Japanese males, with red points indicating on-study measurements. C. EASI score (blue) and percent EASI score reduction (orange) by visit. D. Baseline characteristics. AD, atopic dermatitis; BMI, body mass index; BMI-SDS, body mass index standard deviation score; EASI, Eczema Area and Severity Index; PBO, placebo; UPA, upadacitinib.

References

    1. Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis. Ann Dermatol. 2010;22:125–137.
    1. Langan S.M., Irvine A.D., Weidinger S. Atopic dermatitis. Lancet. 2020;396:345–360.
    1. Takeuchi S., Esaki H., Furue M. Epidemiology of atopic dermatitis in Japan. J Dermatol. 2014;41:200–204.
    1. Mortz C.G., Andersen K.E., Dellgren C., Barington T., Bindslev-Jensen C. Atopic dermatitis from adolescence to adulthood in the TOACS cohort: prevalence, persistence and comorbidities. Allergy. 2015;70:836–845.
    1. Eichenfield L.F., Tom W.L., Chamlin S.L., et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 1. Diagnosis and assessment of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70:338–351.
    1. Holm J.G., Agner T., Clausen M.L., Thomsen S.F. Quality of life and disease severity in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30:1760–1767.
    1. Silverberg J.I., Gelfand J.M., Margolis D.J., et al. Pain is a common and burdensome symptom of atopic dermatitis in United States adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7:2699–26706 e7.
    1. Silverberg J.I., Paller A.S. Association between eczema and stature in 9 US population-based studies. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:401–409.
    1. Wollenberg A., Barbarot S., Bieber T., et al. Consensus-based European guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: part II. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32:850–878.
    1. Katoh N., Ohya Y., Ikeda M., et al. Japanese guidelines for atopic dermatitis 2020. Allergol Int. 2020;69:356–369.
    1. Boguniewicz M., Fonacier L., Guttman-Yassky E., Ong P.Y., Silverberg J., Farrar J.R. Atopic dermatitis yardstick: practical recommendations for an evolving therapeutic landscape. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018;120:10–22.e2.
    1. Olumiiant® Tablets [package Insert] Chuou-ku, Kobe: Eli Lilly; Japan K.K.: December 2020.
    1. Dupixent® S.C. Injection [package Insert] Sanofi K.K.; Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo: November 2020.
    1. Sidbury R., Davis D.M., Cohen D.E., et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 3. Management and treatment with phototherapy and systemic agents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71:327–349.
    1. Stanbury R.M., Graham E.M. Systemic corticosteroid therapy--side effects and their management. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:704–708.
    1. Ahmed S.F., Tucker P., Mushtaq T., Wallace A.M., Williams D.M., Hughes I.A. Short-term effects on linear growth and bone turnover in children randomized to receive prednisolone or dexamethasone. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2002;57:185–191.
    1. Daley-Yates P.T., Richards D.H. Relationship between systemic corticosteroid exposure and growth velocity: development and validation of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model. Clin Therapeut. 2004;26:1905–1919.
    1. Montilla A.M., Gomez-Garcia F., Gomez-Arias P.J., et al. Scoping review on the use of drugs targeting JAK/STAT pathway in atopic dermatitis, vitiligo, and alopecia areata. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2019;9:655–683.
    1. Guttman-Yassky E., Teixeira H.D., Simpson E.L., et al. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2): results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2021;397:2151–2168.
    1. Reich K., Teixeira H.D., de Bruin-Weller M., et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD Up): results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;397:2169–2181.
    1. Katoh N., Ohya Y., Murota H., et al. A phase 3 randomized, multicenter, double-blind study to evaluate the safety of upadacitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids in adolescent and adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in Japan (Rising Up): an interim 24-week analysis. JAAD Int. 2022;6:27–36.
    1. Rinvoq® [package insert] AbbVie, Inc.; North Chicago, IL: January 2022.
    1. European Commission Approves RINVOQ(R) (Upadacitinib) as First JAK Inhibitor in the European Union for the Treatment of Both Adults and Adolescents with Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis. 24 Aug 2021. [press release]
    1. Rinvoq® Tablets [package insert] AbbVie GK; Minato-ku, Tokyou: August 2021.
    1. Cibinqo® Tablets [package Insert] Pfizer KK; Shibuya-ku, Tokyo: October 2021.
    1. Cibinqo [summary of Product Characteristics] Pfizer Europe MA EEIG; December 2021.
    1. PMDA Review Report: RINVOQ for Atopic Dermatitis. July 2021.
    1. Li J. vol. 2. Jakstat; 2013. JAK-STAT and Bone Metabolism.
    1. Isojima T., Kato N., Ito Y., Kanzaki S., Murata M. Growth standard charts for Japanese children with mean and standard deviation (SD) values based on the year 2000 national survey. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol. 2016;25:71–76.
    1. Suwa S.T.K., Maesaka H., Tanaka T., Yokoya S. Longitudinal standards for height and height velocity for Japanese children from birth to maturity. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol. 1992;1:5–13.
    1. Adam S., Simon N., Steffen U., et al. JAK inhibition increases bone mass in steady-state conditions and ameliorates pathological bone loss by stimulating osteoblast function. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12
    1. Carter-Su C., Rui L., Herrington J. Role of the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in signal transduction by growth hormone. Pediatr Nephrol. 2000;14:550–557.
    1. Olney R.C. Regulation of bone mass by growth hormone. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2003;41:228–234.
    1. Silverberg J.I., Kleiman E., Lev-Tov H., et al. Association between obesity and atopic dermatitis in childhood: a case-control study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127:1180–1186 e1.
    1. Aksglaede L., Juul A., Olsen L.W., Sorensen T.I. Age at puberty and the emerging obesity epidemic. PLoS One. 2009;4
    1. Yoshii K., Isojima T., Piedvache A., Morisaki N., Tanaka T., Nagata S. Reduced pubertal growth in children with obesity regardless of pubertal timing. Endocr J. 2020;67:477–484.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir