Oxytocin enhances neural approach towards social and non-social stimuli of high personal relevance

Kaat Alaerts, Aymara Taillieu, Nicky Daniels, Javier R Soriano, Jellina Prinsen, Kaat Alaerts, Aymara Taillieu, Nicky Daniels, Javier R Soriano, Jellina Prinsen

Abstract

Oxytocin (OT) plays a pivotal role in a variety of complex social behaviors by modulating approach-avoidance motivational tendencies, but recently, its social specificity has been challenged. Here, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted with forty young adult men, investigating the effect of a single-dose of OT (24 IU) on behavioral and neural approach-avoidance. Frontal alpha asymmetry, indexing neurophysiological approach-avoidance, was obtained from electroencephalographic recordings while participants were presented with a series of pictures, individually rated in terms of personal relevance (i.e., high versus low positive/negative emotional evocativeness) and categorized as social or non-social. Additionally, participants could prolong (approach) or shorten (avoid) the viewing-time of each picture, providing a measure of behavioral approach-avoidance. Intranasal OT enhanced both behavioral and neural approach (increased viewing-time), particularly towards negatively valenced pictures of both social and non-social nature, thus challenging the notion that OT's effects are specific to social stimuli. Neurally, OT specifically amplified approach-related motivational salience of stimuli that were self-rated to have high personal relevance, but irrespective of their social nature or rated affective valence (positive/negative). Together, these findings provide support to the General Approach-Avoidance Hypothesis of OT, suggesting a role of OT in amplifying the motivational salience of environmental stimuli with high (personal) relevance, but irrespective of their social/non-social nature.Clinical Trial Number: The study design was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04443647; 23/06/2020; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04443647 ).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of differential picture ratings among two exemplary subjects. Participants individually rated the ‘sociality’ and ‘valence’ of a set of 36 stimulus pictures (here, only 8 exemplary pictures are shown; see Supplementary Fig. 1 for the full stimulus set) to obtain a person-dependent scoring of the perceived social/non-social nature of the presented stimuli, as well as the stimuli’s perceived emotional evocativeness (high, low) in terms of positive/negative valence. For example, a picture of a winning football team can be anticipated to be rated with high positive valence by a person who loves sports (exemplary subject X), whereas the same picture may be rated more neutral (low positive valence) by another subject (exemplary subject Y). Likewise, for a person who owns a cat, a picture of a dead cat may evoke stronger negative valence than the picture of the dirty toilet (exemplary subject X), whereas for others, this may be the other way around (exemplary subject Y). All pictures were selected from the publicly available Nencki Affective Picture System database (NAPS).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of oxytocin on approach/avoidance as a function of self-rated stimulus characteristics. (A) visualizes pre-to-post changes in behavioral approach-avoidance (key press task, KPT) with positive scores indexing increased approach (prolongation of viewing time by pressing the ‘up’ key) and negative scores indexing increased avoidance (shortening of viewing time by pressing the ‘down’ key). (B) visualizes pre-to-post changes in EEG frontal alpha asymmetry scores, with positive scores indicating an increase in approach-related left-sided frontal alpha asymmetry. Pre-to-post change scores are visualized separately for each treatment group (oxytocin, placebo), as a function of self-rated sociality (social, non-social), affective valence (negative, positive) and valence intensity (high, low evocativeness). Vertical bars denote  ± standard errors.

References

    1. Bartz JA, Zaki J, Bolger N, Ochsner KN. Social effects of oxytocin in humans: Context and person matter. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011;15:301–309.
    1. Shamay-Tsoory SG, Fischer M, Dvash J, Harari H, Perach-Bloom N, Levkovitz Y. Intranasal administration of oxytocin increases envy and schadenfreude (gloating) Biol. Psychiatry. 2009;66:864–870. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.06.009.
    1. De Dreu CK, et al. The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science. 2010;328:1408–1411. doi: 10.1126/science.1189047.
    1. Shamay-Tsoory SG, Abu-Akel A. The social salience hypothesis of oxytocin. Biol. Psychiatry. 2016;79:194–202. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.07.020.
    1. Kemp AG, Guastella AJ. The role of oxytocin in human affect: A novel hypothesis. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2011;20:222–231. doi: 10.1177/0963721411417547.
    1. Neumann ID, Wigger A, Torner L, Holsboer F, Landgraf R. Brain oxytocin inhibits basal and stress-induced activity of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in male and female rats: Partial action within the paraventricular nucleus. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2000;12:235–243. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2826.2000.00442.x.
    1. Eckstein M, et al. Oxytocin increases eye-gaze towards novel social and non-social stimuli. Soc. Neurosci. 2019;14:594–607. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2018.1542341.
    1. Harari-Dahan O, Bernstein A. A general approach-avoidance hypothesis of oxytocin: Accounting for social and non-social effects of oxytocin. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2014;47:506–519. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.007.
    1. Izuma K, Saito DN, Sadato N. Processing of social and monetary rewards in the human striatum. Neuron. 2008;58:284–294. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.020.
    1. Lin A, Adolphs R, Rangel A. Social and monetary reward learning engage overlapping neural substrates. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2012;7:274–281. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr006.
    1. Norman GJ, et al. Selective influences of oxytocin on the evaluative processing of social stimuli. J. Psychopharmacol. 2011;25:1313–1319. doi: 10.1177/0269881110367452.
    1. Quintana DS, Guastella AJ. An allostatic theory of oxytocin. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2020;24:515–528. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.03.008.
    1. Harari-Dahan O, Bernstein A. Oxytocin attenuates social and non-social avoidance: Re-thinking the social specificity of Oxytocin. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017;81:105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.04.005.
    1. Harmon-Jones E, Gable PA, Peterson CK. The role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in emotion-related phenomena: A review and update. Biol. Psychol. 2010;84:451–462. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.08.010.
    1. Harmon-Jones E, Gable PA. On the role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in approach and withdrawal motivation: An updated review of the evidence. Psychophysiology. 2018 doi: 10.1111/psyp.12879.
    1. Gable P, Harmon-Jones E. Relative left frontal activation to appetitive stimuli: Considering the role of individual differences. Psychophysiology. 2008;45:275–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00627.x.
    1. Schöne B, Schomberg J, Gruber T, Quirin M. Event-related frontal alpha asymmetries: Electrophysiological correlates of approach motivation. Exp. Brain Res. 2016;234:559–567. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4483-6.
    1. Hietanen JK, Leppanen JM, Peltola MJ, Linna-Aho K, Ruuhiala HJ. Seeing direct and averted gaze activates the approach-avoidance motivational brain systems. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46:2423–2430. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.029.
    1. Davidson RJ, Ekman P, Saron CD, Senulis JA, Friesen WV. Approach-withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry: Emotional expression and brain physiology I. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1990;58:330–341. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.330.
    1. Soriano, J.R.R.L., J.; & Alaerts, K. Cross-frequency dynamics of neural, cardiac and respiratory rhythms in the context of effortful cognition and breath focus meditation. In: Virtual Event: Society for Neuroscience (January 2021) (2021).
    1. Marchewka A, Zurawski Ł, Jednoróg K, Grabowska A. The Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS): Introduction to a novel, standardized, wide-range, high-quality, realistic picture database. Behav. Res. Methods. 2014;46:596–610. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0379-1.
    1. Leppanen J, Ng KW, Tchanturia K, Treasure J. Meta-analysis of the effects of intranasal oxytocin on interpretation and expression of emotions. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017;78:125–144. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.010.
    1. Shahrestani S, Kemp AH, Guastella AJ. The impact of a single administration of intranasal oxytocin on the recognition of basic emotions in humans: A meta-analysis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38:1929–1936. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.86.
    1. Olff M, et al. The role of oxytocin in social bonding, stress regulation and mental health: An update on the moderating effects of context and interindividual differences. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38:1883–1894. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.06.019.
    1. Adolph D, von Glischinski M, Wannemüller A, Margraf J. The influence of frontal alpha-asymmetry on the processing of approach- and withdrawal-related stimuli—A multichannel psychophysiology study. Psychophysiology. 2017;54:1295–1310. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12878.
    1. Harmon-Jones E, Lueck L, Fearn M, Harmon-Jones C. The effect of personal relevance and approach-related action expectation on relative left frontal cortical activity. Psychol. Sci. 2006;17:434–440. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01724.x.
    1. Oettl LL, et al. Oxytocin enhances social recognition by modulating cortical control of early olfactory processing. Neuron. 2016;90:609–621. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.03.033.
    1. Owen SF, Tuncdemir SN, Bader PL, Tirko NN, Fishell G, Tsien RW. Oxytocin enhances hippocampal spike transmission by modulating fast-spiking interneurons. Nature. 2013;500:458–462. doi: 10.1038/nature12330.
    1. Ooi YP, Weng SJ, Kossowsky J, Gerger H, Sung M. Oxytocin and autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2017;50:5–13.
    1. APA . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5. American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
    1. Mazurek MO, et al. Anxiety, sensory over-responsivity, and gastrointestinal problems in children with autism spectrum disorders. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 2013;41:165–176. doi: 10.1007/s10802-012-9668-x.
    1. Bernaerts S, Boets B, Bosmans G, Steyaert J, Alaerts K. Behavioral effects of multiple-dose oxytocin treatment in autism: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial with long-term follow-up. Mol. Autism. 2020;11:6. doi: 10.1186/s13229-020-0313-1.
    1. Zink CF, Meyer-Lindenberg A. Human neuroimaging of oxytocin and vasopressin in social cognition. Horm. Behav. 2012;61:400–409. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.01.016.
    1. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191–2194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
    1. Aharon I, Etcoff N, Ariely D, Chabris CF, O'Connor E, Breiter HC. Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron. 2001;32:537–551. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00491-3.
    1. Jung TP, Makeig S, Westerfield M, Townsend J, Courchesne E, Sejnowski TJ. Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000;111:1745–1758. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00386-2.
    1. Allen JJ, Coan JA, Nazarian M. Issues and assumptions on the road from raw signals to metrics of frontal EEG asymmetry in emotion. Biol. Psychol. 2004;67:183–218. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.007.
    1. Jensen O, Mazaheri A. Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: Gating by inhibition. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2010;4:186. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00186.
    1. Guastella AJ, MacLeod C. A critical review of the influence of oxytocin nasal spray on social cognition in humans: Evidence and future directions. Horm. Behav. 2012;61:410–418. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.01.002.
    1. Guastella AJ, et al. Recommendations for the standardisation of oxytocin nasal administration and guidelines for its reporting in human research. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38:612–625. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.11.019.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir