Prediction of large vessel occlusion for ischaemic stroke by using the machine learning model random forests

Jianan Wang, Jungen Zhang, Xiaoxian Gong, Wenhua Zhang, Ying Zhou, Min Lou, Jianan Wang, Jungen Zhang, Xiaoxian Gong, Wenhua Zhang, Ying Zhou, Min Lou

Abstract

Backgrounds: The timely identification of large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the prehospital stage is extremely important given the disease morbidity and narrow time window for intervention. The current evaluation strategies still remain challenging. The goal of this study was to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict LVO using prehospital accessible data.

Methods: Consecutive acute ischaemic stroke patients who underwent CT or MR angiography and received reperfusion therapy within 8 hours from symptom onset in the Computer-based Online Database of Acute Stroke Patients for Stroke Management Quality Evaluation-II dataset from January 2016 to August 2021 were included. We developed eight ML models to integrate National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) items with demographics, medical history and vascular risk factors to identify LVO and validate its efficiency.

Results: Finally, 15 365 patients were included in the training set and 4215 patients were included in the test set. On the test set, random forests (RF), gradient boosting machine and extreme gradient boosting presented area under the curve (AUC) of 0.831 (95% CI 0.819 to 0.843), which were higher than other models, and RF presented the highest specificity (0.827). In addition, the AUC of RF was higher than other scales, and the accuracy of the model was improved by 6.4% compared with NIHSS. We also found the top five items of identifying LVO were total NIHSS score, gaze deviation, level of consciousness (LOC), LOC commands and motor left leg.

Conclusions: Our proposed model could be a useful screening tool to predict LVO based on the prehospital accessible medical data.

Trial registration number: NCT04487340.

Keywords: arteries; stroke.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the study population and process. AIS, acute ischaemic stroke; CTA, CT angiography; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; TOF-MRA, time of flight MR angiography.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Illustration of features contributing to identification of LVO by Gini importance values. Gini importance is a measurement of the feature importance in the model, the higher the value of Gini importance is, the more important the feature is. LOC, level of consciousness; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

References

    1. Campbell BCV, De Silva DA, Macleod MR, et al. . Ischaemic stroke. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2019;5:70. 10.1038/s41572-019-0118-8
    1. Fassbender K, Walter S, Grunwald IQ, et al. . Prehospital stroke management in the thrombectomy era. Lancet Neurol 2020;19:601–10. 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30102-2
    1. Patel P, Yavagal D, Khandelwal P. Hyperacute Management of Ischemic Strokes: JACC Focus Seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:1844–56. 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.006
    1. Rai AT, Seldon AE, Boo S, et al. . A population-based incidence of acute large vessel occlusions and thrombectomy eligible patients indicates significant potential for growth of endovascular stroke therapy in the USA. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:722–6. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012515
    1. Waqas M, Mokin M, Primiani CT, et al. . Large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke patients: a Dual-Center estimate based on a broad definition of occlusion site. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2020;29:104504. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104504
    1. Aguiar de Sousa D, von Martial R, Abilleira S, et al. . Access to and delivery of acute ischaemic stroke treatments: a survey of national scientific societies and stroke experts in 44 European countries. Eur Stroke J 2019;4:13–28. 10.1177/2396987318786023
    1. Singer OC, Dvorak F, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, et al. . A simple 3-item stroke scale: comparison with the National Institutes of health stroke scale and prediction of middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2005;36:773–6. 10.1161/01.STR.0000157591.61322.df
    1. Scheitz JF, Abdul-Rahim AH, MacIsaac RL, et al. . Clinical selection strategies to identify ischemic stroke patients with large anterior vessel occlusion: results from SITS-ISTR (safe implementation of thrombolysis in stroke international stroke thrombolysis registry). Stroke 2017;48:290–7. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014431
    1. Katz BS, McMullan JT, Sucharew H, et al. . Design and validation of a prehospital scale to predict stroke severity: Cincinnati prehospital stroke severity scale. Stroke 2015;46:1508–12. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008804
    1. Harbison J, Hossain O, Jenkinson D, et al. . Diagnostic accuracy of stroke referrals from primary care, emergency room physicians, and ambulance staff using the face arm speech test. Stroke 2003;34:71–6. 10.1161/01.STR.0000044170.46643.5E
    1. Lima FO, Silva GS, Furie KL, et al. . Field assessment stroke triage for emergency destination: a simple and accurate prehospital scale to detect large vessel occlusion strokes. Stroke 2016;47:1997–2002. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013301
    1. Ollikainen JP, Janhunen HV, Tynkkynen JA, et al. . The Finnish prehospital stroke scale detects thrombectomy and thrombolysis Candidates-A propensity score-matched study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2018;27:771–7. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.10.015
    1. Noorian AR, Sanossian N, Shkirkova K, et al. . Los Angeles motor scale to identify large vessel occlusion: prehospital validation and comparison with other screens. Stroke 2018;49:565–72. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019228
    1. Hastrup S, Damgaard D, Johnsen SP, et al. . Prehospital acute stroke severity scale to predict large artery occlusion: design and comparison with other scales. Stroke 2016;47:1772–6. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012482
    1. Pérez de la Ossa N, Carrera D, Gorchs M, et al. . Design and validation of a prehospital stroke scale to predict large arterial occlusion: the rapid arterial occlusion evaluation scale. Stroke 2014;45:87–91. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003071
    1. Fothergill RT, Williams J, Edwards MJ, et al. . Does use of the recognition of stroke in the emergency room stroke assessment tool enhance stroke recognition by ambulance clinicians? Stroke 2013;44:3007–12. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.13.000851
    1. Teleb MS, Ver Hage A, Carter J, et al. . Stroke vision, aphasia, neglect (van) assessment-a novel emergent large vessel occlusion screening tool: pilot study and comparison with current clinical severity indices. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:122–6. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012131
    1. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. . 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart Association/American stroke association. Stroke 2018;49:e46–110. 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158
    1. Purrucker JC, Härtig F, Richter H, et al. . Design and validation of a clinical scale for prehospital stroke recognition, severity grading and prediction of large vessel occlusion: the shortened NIH stroke scale for emergency medical services. BMJ Open 2017;7:e016893. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016893
    1. Turc G, Maïer B, Naggara O, et al. . Clinical scales do not reliably identify acute ischemic stroke patients with large-artery occlusion. Stroke 2016;47:1466–72. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013144
    1. Smith EE, Kent DM, Bulsara KR, et al. . Accuracy of prediction instruments for diagnosing large vessel occlusion in individuals with suspected stroke: a systematic review for the 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2018;49:e111–22. 10.1161/STR.0000000000000160
    1. Chen Z, Zhang R, Xu F, et al. . Novel prehospital prediction model of large vessel occlusion using artificial neural network. Front Aging Neurosci 2018;10:181. 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00181
    1. Beume L-A, Hieber M, Kaller CP, et al. . Large vessel occlusion in acute stroke. Stroke 2018;49:2323–9. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022253
    1. Hendrix P, Sofoluke N, Adams MD, et al. . Risk factors for acute ischemic stroke caused by anterior large vessel occlusion. Stroke 2019;50:1074–80. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023917
    1. Inoue M, Noda R, Yamaguchi S, et al. . Specific factors to predict large-vessel occlusion in acute stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2018;27:886–91. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.10.021
    1. Venthur B, Dähne S, Höhne J, et al. . Wyrm: a brain-computer interface toolbox in python. Neuroinformatics 2015;13:471–86. 10.1007/s12021-015-9271-8
    1. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. . Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res 2011;12:2825–30.
    1. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn 2001;45:5–32. 10.1023/A:1010933404324
    1. Pride GL, Fraser JF, Gupta R, et al. . Prehospital care delivery and triage of stroke with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO): report of the standards and guidelines Committee of the Society of Neurointerventional surgery. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:802–12. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012699
    1. Jeffery G. Distribution and trajectory of uncrossed axons in the optic nerves of pigmented and albino rats. J Comp Neurol 1989;289:462–6. 10.1002/cne.902890310
    1. Vidale S, Agostoni E. Prehospital stroke scales and large vessel occlusion: a systematic review. Acta Neurol Scand 2018;138:24–31. 10.1111/ane.12908
    1. Pagola J, Juega J, Francisco-Pascual J, et al. . Large vessel occlusion is independently associated with atrial fibrillation detection. Eur J Neurol 2020;27:1618–24. 10.1111/ene.14281
    1. V Martins-Filho RKdo, Dias FA, Alves FFA, et al. . Large vessel occlusion score: a screening tool to detect large vessel occlusion in the acute stroke setting. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2019;28:869–75. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.12.003
    1. Schwamm LH, Ntaios G. Short cuts make long delays: getting it right from the start in prehospital stroke triage. Neurology 2020;94:341–2. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008994

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir