Urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda

Roger C L Feneley, Ian B Hopley, Peter N T Wells, Roger C L Feneley, Ian B Hopley, Peter N T Wells

Abstract

For more than 3500 years, urinary catheters have been used to drain the bladder when it fails to empty. For people with impaired bladder function and for whom the method is feasible, clean intermittent self-catheterization is the optimal procedure. For those who require an indwelling catheter, whether short- or long-term, the self-retaining Foley catheter is invariably used, as it has been since its introduction nearly 80 years ago, despite the fact that this catheter can cause bacterial colonization, recurrent and chronic infections, bladder stones and septicaemia, damage to the kidneys, the bladder and the urethra, and contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance. In terms of medical, social and economic resources, the burden of urinary retention and incontinence, aggravated by the use of the Foley catheter, is huge. In the UK, the harm resulting from the use of the Foley catheter costs the National Health Service between £1.0-2.5 billion and accounts for ∼2100 deaths per year. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of an alternative indwelling catheter system. The research agenda is for the new catheter to be easy and safe to insert, either urethrally or suprapubically, to be retained reliably in the bladder and to be withdrawn easily and safely when necessary, to mimic natural physiology by filling at low pressure and emptying completely without damage to the bladder, and to have control mechanisms appropriate for all users.

Keywords: Urinary catheters; adverse events; biomaterials; infection; research agenda.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Tubular silver catheters devised by Ambroise Paré (1510–1590), with long gentle curves (they are known as coudé catheters) to permit easier insertion [8].
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Urinary catheterization in the middle ages [17].
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The urinary tract.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
A typical Foley catheter. This catheter is size 16 Fr. Its overall length is ∼400 mm and the volume of the fully-inflated balloon is ∼10 ml. The catheter has two channels. When the catheter has been inserted, the retaining balloon is inflated with sterile water from a syringe via the inflation connector and one of the channels. The inflation connector incorporates a valve to prevent the sterile water from escaping when the syringe is detached. The other channel allows the free flow of urine from the drainage eye to the drainage funnel. To remove the catheter, the retaining balloon is first deflated by withdrawing the water from it with a syringe, which opens the valve in the inflation connector when it is attached.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
The Foley catheter, introduced (a) Urethrally and (b) Suprapubically. In both cases, the bladder is shown to be draining continuously into a urine collection bag attached to the leg: this bag can be emptied when necessary by opening a valve. Alternatively, the bladder can be drained intermittently if a catheter valve is inserted into the drainage funnel of the catheter.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
A section through a Foley catheter that has become blocked during use by the formation of struvite. The smaller patent lumen is the channel for the inflation and deflation of the retaining balloon. The length of the scale bar is 1 mm.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
A catheter incorporating some of the concepts in the research agenda. The catheter is retained by wings which spring open after insertion through the suprapubic tract to the bladder: this traps less urine than the balloon of a Foley catheter and the catheter can be withdrawn transurethrally after cutting through it at the external suprapubic port. Multiple drainage eyes in the section of the catheter within the bladder minimize the risk of the formation of pseudopolyps, and this risk is further reduced by a collapsible section (shown stippled) of the catheter situated close to the external meatus of the urethra. The elastic reservoir at the suprapubic end of the catheter and strapped to the abdominal wall expands to accommodate urine from the bladder during spasmodic bladder contraction and returns it to the bladder when it relaxes after the spasm, thus minimizing the possibility of kidney damage. Periodic drainage of the bladder into a leg bag is actuated by a pinch valve beyond the collapsible section of the catheter, under manual or timed automatic control.

References

    1. Hanafy H.M., Saad S.M., Al-Ghorab M.M. Ancient Egyptian Medicine. Contribution to urology. Urology. 1974;4:114–120.
    1. Milne J.S. Surgical instruments in Greek and Roman times. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1907.
    1. Nacey J., Delahunt B. The evolution and development of the urinary catheter. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery. 1993;63:815–819.
    1. Hanafy H.M., Saad S.M., El-Rafaie M., Al-Ghorab M.M. Early Arabian medicine. Contribution to urology. Urology. 1976;8:63–67.
    1. Herman J.R. Urology: A view through the retrospectoscope. Maryland: Harper and Rowe; 1973.
    1. Hume E.H. Medicine in China, old and new. Annals of Medical History. 1930;2:272–280.
    1. Murphy L.J.T. The history of urology. Springfield: C.C. Thomas; 1972.
    1. Paré A.1564Dix livres de la chirurgie Paris: Jean le Royer; The Collected Works of Ambroise Paré
    1. Mattelaer J.J., Billiet L. Catheters and sounds: The history of bladder catheterisation. Paraplegia. 1995;33:429–433.
    1. Petit J.J. Traité des maladies chirurgicales. Paris: M. Lesne; 1790.
    1. de Garengeot J.C. Traité des operations de chirurgie. Paris: G. Cavalier; 1731.
    1. Thomas G.J. History of Urology. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1933.
    1. Reybard J.F.1855Traité pratique des rétrécissements du canal de l’utère
    1. Foley F.E.B. A hemostatic bag catheter. Journal of Urology. 1937;38:137–139.
    1. Mangelson N.L., Kado R.T., Cockett A.T.K. Silicone rubber uses in the lower urinary tract. Journal of Urology. 1968;100:573–577.
    1. Maki D.G., Tambyah P.A. Engineering out the risk for infection with urinary catheters. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2001;7:342–347.
    1. Greenspan R.E. Medicine: Perspectives in history and art. Alexandria: Ponteverde Press; 2007.
    1. Zhang D., Zhang G., Hayden M.S., Greenblatt M.B., Bussey C., Flavell R.A., Ghosh H. A Toll-like receptor that prevents infection by uropathogenic bacteria. Science. 2014;303:1522–1526.
    1. Lapides J., Dionko A.C., Sibler S.J., Lowe B.S. Clean intermittent self-catheterisation in the treatment of urinary tract disease. Journal of Urology. 1972;107:458–461.
    1. Webb R.J., Lawson A.L., Neal D.E. Clean intermittent self-catheterisation in 172 adults. British Journal of Urology. 1990;65:20–23.
    1. Ouslander J.G., Greengold B., Chen S. External catheter use and urinary tract infections among incontinent male nursing home patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1987;35:1063–1070.
    1. Golji H. Complications of external condom drainage. Paraplegia. 1981;19:189–197.
    1. Armstrong E.P., Ferguson T.A. Urinary incontinence: Healthcare resource consumption in Veterans Affairs medical centers. Veterans Health Systems Journal. 1988;October:37–42.
    1. Pel J.J.M., van Mastrigt R. Development of the condom catheter method for non-invasive measurement of bladder pressure. Urodinamica. 2006;16:270–278.
    1. Willette P.A., Coffield S. Current trends in the management of difficult urinary catheterizations. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2012;13:472–478.
    1. Ahluwalia R.S., Johal N., Kouriefs C., Kooiman G., Montgomery B.S.I., Plail R.O. The surgical risk of suprapubic catheter insertion and long-term sequelae. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2006;88:210–213.
    1. Harrison S.C., Lawrence W.T., Morley R., Pearce I., Taylor J. British Association of Urological Surgeons’ suprapubic catheter practice. BJU International. 2011;107:77–85.
    1. McGill S. Catheter management: It’s the size that’s important. Nursing Mirror. 1982;154:48–49.
    1. Ruutu M., Alfthan O., Talja M., Andersson L.C. Cytotoxicity of latex urinary catheters. British Journal of Urology. 1985;57:82–87.
    1. Shenot P., Rivas D.A., Kalman D.D., Staas W.E., Chancellor M.B. Latex allergy manifested in urological surgery and care of adult spinal cord injured patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1994;75:1263–1265.
    1. Stensballe J., Looms D., Nielsen P.N., Tvede M. Hydrophilic-coated catheters for intermittent catheterisation reduce urethral micro trauma: A prospective, randomised, participant-blinded, crossover study of three different types of catheters. European Urology. 2005;48:978–983.
    1. Lawrence E.L., Turner I.G. Kink, flow and retention properties of urinary catheters part 1: Conventional Foley catheters. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2006;17:147–152.
    1. Stickler D., Young R., Jones G., Sabbuba N., Morris N. Why are Foley catheters so vulnerable to encrustation and blockage by crystalline bacterial biofilm? Urological Research. 2003;31:306–311.
    1. Johnson J.R., Kuskowski M.A., Wilt T.J. Systematic review: Antimicrobial urinary catheters to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection in hospitalized patients. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2006;144:116–126.
    1. Stickler D.J. Clinical complications of urinary catheters caused by crystalline biofilms: Something needs to be done. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2014;276:120–129.
    1. Pickard R., Lam T., Maclennan G., Starr K., Kilonzo M., McPherson G., Gillies K., McDonlad A., Walton K., Buckley B., Glazener C., Boachie C., Burr J., Norrie J., Vale L., Grant A., N’dow J. Types of urethral catheter for reducing symptomatic urinary tract infections in hospitalised adults requiring short-term catheterisation: Multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of antimicrobial- and antiseptic-impregnated urethral catheters (the CATHETER trial). Health Technology Assessment. 2012;16:1–197.
    1. Riley D.K., Classen D.C., Stevens L.E., Burke J.P. A large randomized clinical trial on a silver-impregnated urinary catheter: Lack of efficacy and staphyllococal superinfection. American Journal of Medicine. 1995;98:349–356.
    1. Kunin C.M. Can we build a better urinary catheter? New England Journal of Medicine. 1988;319:365–366.
    1. European Commission 2010Guidelines on Medical Devices: Serious Adverse Event Reporting. MEDDEV 2.7/3
    1. Laver C.H. An automatic bladder irrigator. Guy’s Hospital Gazette. 1917;31:71–74.
    1. Munro D. The activity of the urinary bladder as measured by a new and inexpensive cystometer. New England Journal of Medicine. 1936;214:617–624.
    1. Riches E.W. The methods and results of treatment in cases of paralysis of the bladder following spinal injury. British Journal of Surgery. 1943;31:135–146.
    1. World Health Organisation . Antimicrobial Resistance Global Report on Surveillance. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
    1. Garcia M.M., Gulati S., Liepmann D., Stackhouse G.B., Greene K., Stoller M.L. Traditional Foley drainage systems – do they drain the bladder? Journal of Urology. 2007;177:203–207.
    1. Stickler D.J., Feneley R.C.L. The encrustation and blockage of long-term indwelling bladder catheters: A way forward in prevention and control. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:784–790.
    1. Stickler D.J., Morgan S.D. Modulation of crystalline Proteus mirabilis biofilm development in urinary catheters. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2006;55:489–494.
    1. Khan A., Housami I., Melloti R., Timoney A., Stickler D. Strategy to control catheter encrustation with citrated drinks: A randomized crossover study. Journal of Urology. 2010;183:1390–1394.
    1. Samson G., Cardenas D.D. Neurogenic bladder in spinal cord injury. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America. 2007;18:255–274.
    1. Kunin C.M. Blockage of urinary catheters: Role of microorganisms and constituents of the urine on formation of encrustations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1989;42:835–842.
    1. Williams G.J., Stickler D.J. Effect of triclosan on the formation of crystalline biofilms by mixed communities of urinary tract pathogens on urinary catheters. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2008;57:1135–1140.
    1. Stickler D.J., Jones G.L. Reduced susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis to triclosan. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2008;52:991–994.
    1. Feneley R.C.L., Painter D., Evans A., Stickler D.J. Bladder catheterisation. British Journal of General Practice. 2002;52:500.
    1. Glahn B.E. Influence of drainage conditions on mucosal bladder damage by indwelling catheters. I. Pressure study. Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology. 1988;22:87–92.
    1. Milles G. Catheter-induced hemorrhagic pseudopolyps of the urinary bladder. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1965;193:968–969.
    1. Russell J.A. The current management of septic shock. Minerva Medica. 2008;99:431–458.
    1. Kashefi C., Messer K., Barden R., Sexton C., Parsons J.K. Incidence and prevention of iatrogenic urethral injuries. Journal of Urology. 2008;179:2254–2258.
    1. Parkin J., Scanlan J., Woolley M., Grover D., Evans A., Feneley R.C. Urinary catheter “deflation cuff” formation: Clinical audit and in vitro analysis. BJU International. 2002;90:666–671.
    1. Crisp J.M., Nacey J.N. Foley catheter balloon fracture and the risk of free fragment formation. British Journal of Urology. 1990;66:500–502.
    1. Meddings J., Rogers M.A.M., Krein S.L., Fakih M.G., Olmsted R.N., Saint S. Reducing unnecessary urinary catheter use and other strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: An integrative review. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2014;23:277–289.
    1. Nicolle L.E. Catheter associated urinary tract infections. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control. 2014;3:23–29.
    1. Lee Y.Y., Tsay W.L., Lou M.F., Dai Y.T. The effectiveness of implementing a bladder ultrasound programme in neurosurgical units. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2007;57:192–200.
    1. Elsamra S.E., Gordon Z., Ellsworth P.I. The pitfalls of BladderScanTM PVR in evaluating bladder volume in adolescent females. Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2011;7:95–97.
    1. All Party Parliamentary Group for Continence Care: Survey Report2013
    1. Thom D.H., Haan N.M., van den Eeden S.K. Medically recognized urinary incontinence and risks of hospitalization, nursing home admission and mortality. Age and Ageing. 1997;26:367–374.
    1. Ouslander J.G., Palmer M.H., Rovner B.W., German P.S. Urinary incontinence in nursing homes: Incidence, remission and associated factors. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1993;41:1083–1089.
    1. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2005. Report of the National Audit of Continence Care for Older People (65 years and above) in England, Wales and Northern Ireland .
    1. Klevens R.M., Edwards J.R., Richards C.L, Horan T.C., Gaynes R.P., Pollock D.A., Cardo D.M. Estimating health care-associated infections and deaths in U.S. hospitals, 2002. Public Health Reports. 2007;122:160–166.
    1. Kohler-Ockmore J., Feneley R.C. Long-term catheterisation of the bladder: Prevalence and morbidity. British Journal of Urology. 1996;77:347–351.
    1. Vaishali: Koncept Analytics; 2009. Urinary Incontinence Devices Market: An Analysis .
    1. Foxman B.2002Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: Incidence, morbidity, and economic costs. American Journal of Medicine 113(Suppl 1A5S–13S.
    1. Ruden H., Gastmeier P., Daschner F.D., Schumacher M. Nosocomial and community acquired infections in Germany. Summary of the results of the First National Prevalence Study (NIDEP). Infection. 1997;25:199–202.
    1. Patton J.P., Nash D.B., Abrutyn E. Urinary tract infection: Economic considerations. Medical Clinics of North America. 1991;75:495–513.
    1. Bennett G., Dealey C., Posnett J. The cost of pressure ulcers in the UK. Age and Ageing. 2004;33:230–235.
    1. Health & Social Care Information Centre, 2013.
    1. Plowman R., Graves N., Griffin M.A.S., Roberts J.A., Swan A.V., Cookson B., Taylor N. The rate and cost of hospital-acquired infections occurring in patients admitted to selected specialties of a district general hospital in England and the national burden imposed. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2001;47:198–209.
    1. Office of National Statistics . 2015. ( )
    1. Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) Surveillance. Health Protection Scotland, 2004. (
    1. Kennedy E.H., Greene M.T., Saint S. Estimating the cost of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2013;8:519–522.
    1. Saint S., Meddings J.A., Calfee D., Kowalsk i C.P., Krein S.L. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection and the Medicare rule changes. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2009;150:877–884.
    1. Reid M. Spinal Column: My Performance Review. London: The Times; 2011.
    1. Dellimore K.H., Heyler A.R., Franklin S.E. A scoping review of important urinary catheter induced complications. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2013;24:1825–1835.
    1. Feneley R.C.L., Kunin C.M., Stickler D.J. An indwelling urinary catheter for the 21st century. BJU International. 2011;109:1746–1749.
    1. Carr H.A. A short history of the Foley catheter: From handmade instrument to infection-prevention device. Journal of Endourology. 2000;14:5–8.
    1. Ahmed N., Al-Lamee K. A hydrophilic technology for intermittent urinary catheters. Medical Device Technology. 2008;19:17–19.
    1. Wu A.K., Blaschko S.D., Garcia M., McAninch J.W., Aaronson D.S. Safer urethral catheters: How study of catheter balloon pressure and force can aid design. BJU International. 2012;109:1110–1114.
    1. Stickler D.J., Morgan S.D. Observations on the development of the crystalline bacterial biofilms that encrust and block Foley catheters. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2008;69:350–360.
    1. Morgan S.D., Rigby D., Stickler D.J. A study of the structure of the crystalline biofilms encrust and block silver Foley catheters. Urological Research. 2009;37:89–93.
    1. Stickler D.J., Jones S.M., Adusei G.O., Waters M.G., Cloete J., Mathur S., Feneley R.C. A clinical assessment of the performance of a sensor to detect crystalline biofilm formation on indwelling bladder catheters, BJU International. 2006;98:1244–1249.
    1. Jacob P., Rai B.P., Todd A.W. Suprapubic catheter insertion using an ultrasound-guided technique and literature review. BJU International. 2012;110:779–784.
    1. Mitrofanoff P. Trans-appendicular continent cystostomy in the management of the neurogenic bladder (in French). Chirurgie Pédiatrique. 1980;21:297–305.
    1. Hitchcock R.J., Sadiq M.J. Button vesicostomy: A continent urinary stoma. Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2007;3:1004–1008.
    1. Lee S.M., Short T.D., Unsworth A. Design and development of a novel automatic valve system for long-term catheterized urinary incontinence patients. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers [H] 2007;221:665–676.
    1. PCT/GB2010/001523; Europe: 10807469.1; USA: 13/391866
    1. PCT/GB2012/000132; Europe: 12704522.7; USA; 13/985771
    1. UK: 1314140.3; PCT/2014/052277

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir