Effectiveness of a clinical decision support system for hypertension management in primary care: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial

Jiali Song, Xiuling Wang, Bin Wang, Yan Gao, Jiamin Liu, Haibo Zhang, Xi Li, Jing Li, Ji-Guang Wang, Jun Cai, Jeph Herrin, Jane Armitage, Harlan M Krumholz, Xin Zheng, LIGHT Collaborative Group, Jiali Song, Xiuling Wang, Bin Wang, Yan Gao, Jiamin Liu, Haibo Zhang, Xi Li, Jing Li, Ji-Guang Wang, Jun Cai, Jeph Herrin, Jane Armitage, Harlan M Krumholz, Xin Zheng, LIGHT Collaborative Group

Abstract

Background: Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are low-cost, scalable tools with the potential to improve guideline-based antihypertensive treatment in primary care, but their effectiveness needs to be tested, especially in low- and middle-income countries such as China.

Methods: The Learning Implementation of Guideline-based decision support system for Hypertension Treatment (LIGHT) trial is a pragmatic, four-stage, cluster-randomized trial conducted in 94 primary care sites in China. For each city-based stage, sites are randomly assigned to either implementation of the CDSS for hypertension management (which guides doctors' treatment recommendations based on measured blood pressure and patient characteristics), or usual care. Patients are enrolled during the first 3 months after site randomization and followed for 9 months. The primary outcome is the proportion of hypertension management visits at which guideline-based treatment is provided. In a nested trial conducted within the CDSS, with the patient as the unit of randomization, the LIGHT-ACD trial, patients are randomized to receive different initial mono- or dual-antihypertensive therapy. The primary outcome of the LIGHT-ACD trial is the changes in blood pressure.

Discussion: The LIGHT trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness of a CDSS for improving guideline adherence for hypertension management in primary care in China. The nested trial, the LIGHT-ACD trial, will provide data on the effect of different initial antihypertensive regimens for blood pressure management in this setting.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: LIGHT (NCT03636334) and LIGHT-ACD (NCT03587103). Registered on 3 July 2018.

Keywords: Clinical decision support system; Hypertension; Pragmatic trial.

Conflict of interest statement

In the past three years, Dr. Harlan Krumholz received expenses and/or personal fees from UnitedHealth, Element Science, Aetna, Reality Labs, Tesseract/4Catalyst, F-Prime, the Siegfried and Jensen Law Firm, Arnold and Porter Law Firm, and Martin/Baughman Law Firm. He is a co-founder of Refactor Health and HugoHealth, and is associated with contracts, through Yale New Haven Hospital, from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and through Yale University from Johnson & Johnson. Dr. Jing Li discloses that she is a recipient of research grants from the government of China, through Fuwai Hospital, for research to improve the management of hypertension and blood lipids, and to improve care quality and patient outcomes of cardiovascular disease; is a recipient of research agreements with Amgen, through National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases (NCCD) and Fuwai Hospital, for a multi-center trial to assess the efficacy and safety of Omecamtiv Mecarbil, and for dyslipidemic patient registration; is a recipient of a research agreement with Sanofi, through Fuwai Hospital, for a multi-center trial on the effects of sotagliflozin; is a recipient of a research agreement with University of Oxford, through Fuwai Hospital, for a multi-center trial of empagliflozin; and was a recipient of a research agreement, through NCCD, from AstraZeneca for clinical research methods training.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Infrastructure of the LIGHT and LIGHT-ACD trials
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schedule of enrollment, intervention allocation and assessment of the LIGHT trial using Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT)

References

    1. Stanaway JD, Afshin A, Gakidou E, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet (London, England) 2018;392(10159):1923–1994. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32225-6.
    1. Zhou B, Bentham J, Cesare Mariachiara D, et al. Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: a pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19·1 million participants. Lancet. 2017;389(10064):37–55. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31919-5.
    1. Wang Z, Chen Z, Zhang L, et al. Status of Hypertension in China. Circulation. 2018;137(22):2344–2356. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032380.
    1. Li X, Krumholz HM, Yip W, et al. Quality of primary health care in China: challenges and recommendations. Lancet. 2020;395(10239):1802–1812. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30122-7.
    1. Chen Z. Launch of the health-care reform plan in China. Lancet (London, England) 2009;373(9672):1322. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60753-4.
    1. Lu J, Lu Y, Wang X, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in China: data from 1·7 million adults in a population-based screening study (China PEACE Million Persons Project) Lancet (London, England) 2017;390(10112):2549. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32478-9.
    1. Su M, Zhang Q, Bai X, et al. Availability, cost, and prescription patterns of antihypertensive medications in primary health care in China: a nationwide cross-sectional survey. Lancet (London, England) 2017;390(10112):2559–2568. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32476-5.
    1. Gu H, Li W, Yang J, Wang Y, Bo J, Liu L. Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control among Han and four ethnic minorities (Uygur, Hui, Mongolian and Dai) in China. J Hum Hypertens. 2015;29(9):555–560. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2014.123.
    1. Li X, Lu J, Hu S, et al. The primary health-care system in China. Lancet (London, England) 2017;390(10112):2584. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33109-4.
    1. Rowe AK, Rowe SY, Peters DH, Holloway KA, Chalker J, Ross-Degnan D. Effectiveness of strategies to improve health-care provider practices in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(11):e1163–e1175. doi: 10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30398-x.
    1. Liang W, Binns CW, Lee AH. Computerised clinical decision support in rural China. Lancet. 2009;373(9657):30. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61955-8.
    1. Roshanov PS, Misra S, Gerstein HC, et al. Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):1–16. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-1.
    1. Anchala R, Pinto MP, Shroufi A, et al. The role of Decision Support System (DSS) in prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047064.
    1. Anchala R, Kaptoge S, Pant H, Di Angelantonio E, Franco OH, Prabhakaran D. Evaluation of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a clinical decision support system in managing hypertension in resource constrained primary health care settings: results from a cluster randomized trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(1):e001213. doi: 10.1161/jaha.114.001213.
    1. Prabhakaran D, Jha D, Prieto-Merino D, et al. Effectiveness of an mHealth-based electronic decision support system for integrated management of chronic conditions in primary care. Circulation. 2019;139(3):380–391. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.118.038192.
    1. Groenhof TKJ, Asselbergs FW, Groenwold RHH, Grobbee DE, Visseren FLJ, Bots ML. The effect of computerized decision support systems on cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19(1). 10.1186/s12911-019-0824-x.
    1. Wright JM, Musini VM, Gill R. First-line drugs for hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. 10.1002/14651858.cd001841.pub3.
    1. The Allhat O, Coordinators for the Allhat Collaborative Research G Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) JAMA. 2002;288(23):2981–2997. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.23.2981.
    1. Office for Management of Hypertension in Primary Health Care NEPHSP. National Hypertension Prevention and Management Guidelines for Primary Health Care. Chin Circ J. 2017;11.
    1. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex : 1979) 2018;71(6):1269–1324. doi: 10.1161/hyp.0000000000000066.
    1. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, et al. 2014 Evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8) JAMA. 2014;311(5):507–520. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284427.
    1. Meng L, Zhao D, Pan Y, Ding W, Wei Q, Li H, Gao P, Mi J. Validation of Omron HBP-1300professional blood pressure monitor based on auscultation in children and adults. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016;16:9. 10.1186/s12872-015-0177-z.
    1. Kwan JL, Lo L, Ferguson J, et al. Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2020:m3216. 10.1136/bmj.m3216.
    1. Shojania KG, Jennings A, Mayhew A, Ramsay C, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Effect of point-of-care computer reminders on physician behaviour: a systematic review. Cmaj. 2010;182(5):E216–E225. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090578.
    1. Campbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. Bmj. 2012;345:e5661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5661.
    1. Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1975;31(1):103–15.
    1. Shahu A, Herrin J, Dhruva SS, et al. Disparities in socioeconomic context and association with blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes in ALLHAT. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(15). 10.1161/jaha.119.012277.
    1. ZK. Š. Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J Am Stat Assoc. 1967;62(318):626–633.
    1. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ. 2005;330(7494):765. 10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F.
    1. Bright TJ, Wong A, Dhurjati R, et al. Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(1):29–43. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00450.
    1. Jamerson K, Weber MA, Bakris GL, et al. Benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(23):2417–2428. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa0806182.
    1. Frieden TR, King SMC, Wright JS. Protocol-Based Treatment of Hypertension. JAMA. 2014;311(1):21. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282615.
    1. Suchard MA, Schuemie MJ, Krumholz HM, et al. Comprehensive comparative effectiveness and safety of first-line antihypertensive drug classes: a systematic, multinational, large-scale analysis. Lancet. 2019;394(10211):1816–1826. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32317-7.
    1. Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M, et al. Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial. Lancet. 2004;363(9426):2022–2031. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16451-9.
    1. Matsuzaki M, Ogihara T, Umemoto S, et al. Prevention of cardiovascular events with calcium channel blocker-based combination therapies in patients with hypertension: a randomized controlled trial. J Hypertens. 2011;29(8):1649–1659. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328348345d.
    1. Ford I, Norrie J. Pragmatic Trials. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(5):454–463. doi: 10.1056/nejmra1510059.
    1. Mentz RJ, Hernandez AF, Berdan LG, et al. Good Clinical Practice Guidance and Pragmatic Clinical Trials. Circulation. 2016;133(9):872–880. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.115.019902.
    1. Horwitz LI, Kuznetsova M, Jones SA. Creating a Learning Health System through Rapid-Cycle, Randomized Testing. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(12):1175–9. 10.1056/NEJMsb1900856.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir