A fresh look at tobacco harm reduction: the case for the electronic cigarette

Riccardo Polosa, Brad Rodu, Pasquale Caponnetto, Marilena Maglia, Cirino Raciti, Riccardo Polosa, Brad Rodu, Pasquale Caponnetto, Marilena Maglia, Cirino Raciti

Abstract

Smokers of any age can reap substantial health benefits by quitting. In fact, no other single public health effort is likely to achieve a benefit comparable to large-scale smoking cessation. Surveys document that most smokers would like to quit, and many have made repeated efforts to do so. However, conventional smoking cessation approaches require nicotine addicted smokers to abstain from tobacco and nicotine entirely. Many smokers are unable--or at least unwilling--to achieve this goal, and so they continue smoking in the face of impending adverse health consequences. In effect, the status quo in smoking cessation presents smokers with just two unpleasant alternatives: quit or suffer the harmful effects of continuing smoking. But, there is a third choice for smokers: tobacco harm reduction. It involves the use of alternative sources of nicotine, including modern smokeless tobacco products like snus and the electronic cigarette (E-cig), or even pharmaceutical nicotine products, as a replacement for smoking. E-cigs might be the most promising product for tobacco harm reduction to date, because, besides delivering nicotine vapour without the combustion products that are responsible for nearly all of smoking's damaging effect, they also replace some of the rituals associated with smoking behaviour. Thus it is likely that smokers who switch to E-cigs will achieve large health gains. The focus of this article is on the health effects of using an E-cig, with consideration given to the acceptability, safety and effectiveness of this product as a long-term substitute for smoking.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Snus smoke-free tobacco. Snus is an oral tobacco product that comes in a pouch of some sort, designed to be placed between the gums and upper lip. Snus is not chewed and requires no spitting. The standard pouch holds 1 gram of finely ground tobacco. Snus is regulated as a food in Sweden, and thus held to strict quality standards. Swedish snus was developed to greatly reduce TSNA content, and research shows that snus does not increase the risks of cancer of any type.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structure of a standard entry model electronic-cigarette (e-Cigarette). The e-Cigarette is a battery-powered electronic nicotine delivery device (ENDD) resembling a cigarette designed for the purpose of providing inhaled doses of nicotine by way of a vaporized solution. The product provides a flavor and physical sensation similar to that of inhaled tobacco smoke, while no smoke or combustion is actually involved in its operation. It is composed of the following key components: (1) the inhaler – also known as 'cartridge’ (a disposable plastic mouthpiece - resembling a tobacco cigarette’s filter containing an absorbent material saturated with a liquid solution of propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin in which it may be dissolved nicotine); (2) the atomizing device (the heating element that vaporizes the liquid in the mouthpiece and generates the mist with each puff); (3) the battery component (the body of the device - resembling a tobacco cigarette – which houses a lithium-ion re-chargeable battery to power the atomizer). The body of the device also houses an electronic airflow sensor to automatically activate the heating element upon inhalation and to light up a red LED indicator to signal activation of the device with each puff. The LED indicator also signals low battery charge.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Medical Infograph. This Infograph compares the potential health risks of cigarette smoke with the health risks of vapor. Since e-cigarette liquid contains only propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, flavorings, and nicotine, the resulting vapor is unlikely to present any more disease risk than medicinal nicotine products -- the risk of nicotine addiction. The many more toxic and carcinogenic ingredients in tobacco smoke are linked to numerous health problems.

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO) Tobacco Fact Sheet N339. 2011.
    1. Doll R, Peto R, Boreham J, Sutherland I. Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years' observations on male British doctors. BMJ. 2004;328(7436):1519–1528.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking: a report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2004.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva: WHO Press; 2003. ISBN: 9241591013.
    1. Hughes JR, Keely J, Naud S. Shape of the relapse curve and long-term abstinence among untreated smokers. Addiction. 2004;99:29–38.
    1. Casella G, Caponnetto P, Polosa R. Therapeutic advances in the treatment of nicotine addiction: present and future. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2010;1(3):95–106.
    1. NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on Tobacco Use. Prevention, Cessation, and Control. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:839–844.
    1. Etter JF, Burri M, Stapleton J. The impact of pharmaceutical company funding on results of randomized trials of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2007;102(5):815–822.
    1. Hays JT, Ebbert JO. Adverse effects and tolerability of medications for the treatment of tobacco use and dependence. Drugs. 2010;70(18):2357–2372.
    1. Tobacco Advisory Group of the Royal College of Physicians. Harm reduction in nicotine addiction: Helping people who can’t quit. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2007.
    1. Bridgehead International, EQUIPP. Europe Quitting: Progress and Pathways. London; 2011. Equip Report available at: .
    1. Sweanor D, Alcabes P, Drucker E. Tobacco harm reduction: how rational public policy could transform a pandemic. Int J Drug Pol. 2007;18:70–74.
    1. Russell MAH. Realistic goals for smoking and health: a case for safer smoking. Lancet. 1974;1:254–258.
    1. Chapman S. Public health advocacy and tobacco Control: making smoking history. Oxford: Blackwell; 2007.
    1. Stratton K, Shetty P, Wallace R, Clearing the smoke: assessing the science base for tobacco harm reduction. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine National Academies Press; 2001.
    1. Caponnetto P, Polosa R. Common predictors of smoking cessation in clinical practice. Respir Med. 2008;102(8):1182–1192.
    1. Bullen C, McRobbie H, Thornley S. et al.Working with what we have before getting into bed with the tobacco industry. N Z Med J. 2006;119(1240):U2139.
    1. Jorenby DE, Fiore MC, Smith SS. et al.Treating cigarette smoking with smokeless tobacco: a flawed recommendation. Am J Med. 1998;104:499–500.
    1. Vogt F, Hall S, Marteau TM. General practitioners’ and family physicians’ negative beliefs and attitudes towards discussing smoking cessation with patients: a systematic review. Addiction. 2005;100(10):1423–1431.
    1. Polosa R, Benowitz NL. Treatment of nicotine addiction: present therapeutic options and pipeline developments. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2011;32(5):281–289.
    1. Mottillo S, Filion KB, Bélisle P, Joseph L. et al.Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(6):718–730.
    1. Britton J. Smokeless tobacco: friend or foe? Addiction. 2003;98:1199–1201. discussion 1204–1197.
    1. Russell MAH, Jarvis MJ, Devitt G, Feyerabend C. Nicotine intake by snuff users. BMJ. 1981;283:814–817.
    1. CDC, USDHHS. The Health Consequences of Smoking: Nicotine Addiction. Rockville, MD: A Report of the Surgeon General Volume Chapter V. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Contro; 1988. Tobacco use compared to other drug dependencies.
    1. Gehricke JG, Loughlin SE, Whalen CK. et al.Smoking to self-medicate attentional and emotional dysfunctions. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007;9(Suppl 4):S523–S536.
    1. Benowitz N. Nicotine Safety and Toxicity. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 1998.
    1. Coleman T, Chamberlain C, Cooper S. et al.Efficacy and safety of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation in pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2011;106(1):52–61.
    1. Forinash AB, Pitlick JM, Clark K. et al.Nicotine replacement therapy effect on pregnancy outcomes. Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44(11):1817–1821.
    1. Osadchy A, Kazmin A, Koren G. Nicotine replacement therapy during pregnancy: recommended or not recommended? J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009;31(8):744–747.
    1. McGrath J, McDonald JW, Macdonald JK. Transdermal nicotine for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;18(4):CD004722.
    1. Silver AA, Shytle RD, Philipp MK. et al.Transdermal nicotine and haloperidol in Tourette's disorder: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(9):707–714.
    1. Mihailescu S, Drucker-Colín R. Nicotine, brain nicotinic receptors, and neuropsychiatric disorders. Arch Med Res. 2000;31(2):131–144.
    1. Multi-criteria Decision Analysis. A new approach to evaluating the harm caused by nicotine delivery products.
    1. Henningfield JE. Nicotine medications for smoking cessation. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(18):1196–1203.
    1. Dale LC, Hurt RD, Offord KP, Lawson GM, Croghan IT, Schroeder DR. High dose nicotine patch therapy: percentage of replacement and smoking cessation. JAMA. 1995;274:1353–1358.
    1. Österdahl B-G, Jansson C, Paccou A. Decreased levels of tobacco specific N-nitrosamines in moist snuff on the Swedish market. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52:5085–5088.
    1. St Helen G, Novalen M, Heitjan DF. Reproducibility of the nicotine metabolite ratio in cigarette smokers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21(7):1105–1114.
    1. Norberg M, Lundqvist G, Nilsson M. Changing patterns of tobacco use in a middle-aged population: the role of snus, gender, age, and education. Glob Health Action. 2011;4 doi:10.3402/gha.v4i0.5613.
    1. Stegmayr B, Eliasson M, Rodu B. The decline of smoking in northern Sweden. Scand J Public Health. 2005;33(4):321–324.
    1. Foulds J, Ramström L, Burke M. et al.Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden. Tob Control. 2003;12:349–359.
    1. Ten years of Swedish public health policy – Summary report. Swedish National Institute of Public Health. 2013.
    1. Furberg H, Lichtenstein P, Pedersen NL. et al.Cigarettes and oral snuff use in Sweden: Prevalence and transitions. Addiction. 2006;101(10):1509–1515.
    1. Ramström LM, Foulds J. Role of snus in initiation and cessation of tobacco smoking in Sweden. Tob Control. 2006;15:210–214.
    1. Peto R, Lopez AD, Boreham J, Thun M. Mortality from smoking in developed countries 1950–2000: Sweden. 2. 2006. .
    1. Roth D, Roth AB, Liu X. Health risks of smoking compared with Swedish snus. Inhal Toxicol. 2005;17:741–748.
    1. Lund KE, Scheffels J, McNeill A. The association between use of snus and quit rates for smoking: results from seven Norwegian cross-sectional studies. Addiction. 2011;106:162–167.
    1. Timberlake DS. Are smokers receptive to using smokeless tobacco as a substitute? Prev Med. 2009;49(2–3):229–232.
    1. Bahreinifar S, Sheon NM, Ling PM. Is snus the same as dip? Smokers’ perceptions of new smokeless tobacco advertising. Tob Control. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050022.
    1. Phillips CV, Wang C, Guenzel B. You might as well smoke; the misleading and harmful public message about smokeless tobacco. BMC Public Health. 2005;5:31.
    1. O'Connor RJ, McNeill A, Borland R. et al.Smokers' beliefs about the relative safety of other tobacco products: findings from the ITC collaboration. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007;9(10):1033–1042.
    1. Peiper N, Stone R, van Zyl R. et al.University faculty perceptions of the health risks related to cigarettes and smokeless tobacco. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010;29:121–130.
    1. Hatsukami DK, Lemmonds C, Zhang Y. et al.Evaluation of carcinogen exposure in people who used 'reduced exposure’ tobacco products. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:844–852.
    1. Fagerström K, Eissenberg T. Dependence on tobacco and nicotine products: a case for product-specific assessment. Nic Tob Res. 2012;14(11):1382–1390.
    1. Gilljam H, Galanti MR. Role of snus (oral moist snuff) in smoking cessation and smoking reduction in Sweden. Addiction. 2003;98(9):1183–1189.
    1. Mendoza-Baumgart MI, Tulunay OE, Hecht SS. et al.Pilot study on lower nitrosamine smokeless tobacco products compared with medicinal nicotine. Nic Tob Res. 2007;12:1309–1323.
    1. Caldwell B, Burgess C, Crane J. Randomized crossover trial of the acceptability of snus, nicotine gum, and Zonnic therapy for smoking reduction in heavy smokers. Nic Tob Res. 2010;12:179–183.
    1. Carpenter MJ, Gray KM. A pilot randomized study of smokeless tobacco use among smokers not interested in quitting: changes in smoking behavior and readiness to quit. Nic Tob Res. 2010;12:136–143.
    1. Caponnetto P, Campagna D, Cibella F, Morjaria JB, Caruso M, Russo C, Polosa R. EffiCiency and Safety of an eLectronic cigAreTte (ECLAT) as Tobacco Cigarettes Substitute: A Prospective 12-Month Randomized Control Design Study. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e66317.
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Brief in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Washington DC: United States Food and Drug Administration; 2009. .
    1. Polosa R, Caponnetto P, Morjaria JB. et al.Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e-Cigarette) on smoking cessation and reduction: a prospective pilot study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:786.
    1. Cahn Z, Siegel M. Electronic cigarettes as a harm reduction strategy for tobacco control: a step forward or a repeat of past mistakes? J Public Health Policy. 2011;32(1):16–31. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
    1. Miura K, Kikukawa Y, Nakao T. Safety assessment of electronic cigarettes in smokers. SEIKATSU EISEI (Journal of Urban Living and Health Association) 2011;55(1):59–64.
    1. Trehy M, Ye W, Hadwiger M, Moore T, Allgire JF. et al.Analysis of electronic cigarette cartridges, refill solutions and smoke for nicotine and nicotine related impurities. Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies. 2011;34:1442–1458.
    1. Laugesen M. Ruyan e-cigarette bench-top tests. Dublin: Poster: Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco; 2009. .
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA News Release, FDA and Public Health Experts Warn About Electronic Cigarettes. 2009. .
    1. Chen IL. FDA summary of adverse events on electronic cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(2):615–616.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Final Report on FDA Analyses. 2009. .
    1. Westenberger B. Evaluation of e-cigarettes. Rockville, MD: US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Division of Pharmaceutical Analysis; 2009.
    1. Etter J-F, Zäther E, Svensson S. Analysis of refill liquids for electronic cigarettes. Addiction. 2013. online first - doi:10.1111/add.12235.
    1. Kim H-J, Shin H-S. Determination of tobacco-specific nitrosamines in replacement liquids of electronic cigarettes by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2013;1291:48–55.
    1. Goniewicz M, Kuma T, Gawron M, Knysak J, Kosmider L. Nicotine levels in electronic cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;15:158–166.
    1. Goniewicz ML, Knysak J, Gawron M, Kosmider L, Sobczak A, Kurek J, Prokopowicz A, Jablonska-Czapla M, Rosik-Dulewska C, Havel C, Jacob P, III, Benowitz N. Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tob Control. 2013. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050859.
    1. Williams M, Villarreal A, Bozhilov K, Lin S, Talbot P. Metal and silicate particles including nanoparticles are present in electronic cigarettes cartomizer fluid and aerosol. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e57087. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057987.
    1. Bullen C, McRobbie H, Thornley S. et al.Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e cigarette) on desire to smoke and withdrawal, user preferences and nicotine delivery: randomised cross-over trial. Tob Control. 2010;19(2):98–103.
    1. Eissenberg T. Electronic nicotine delivery devices: ineffective nicotine delivery and craving suppression after acute administration. Tob Control. 2010;19(1):87–88.
    1. Keller E. Known fact: electronic cigarettes deliver nicotine more slowly. Tob Control. 2010;19(1):87–88.
    1. Vansickel AR, Cobb CO, Weaver MF. A clinical laboratory model for evaluating the acute effects of electronic "cigarettes": nicotine delivery profile and cardiovascular and subjective effects. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(8):1945–1953. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
    1. Vansickel AR, Eissenberg T. Electronic cigarettes: effective nicotine delivery after acute administration. Nic Tob Res. 2013;15(1):267–270.
    1. Darredeau C, Campbell M, Temporale K. Subjective and reinforcing effects of electronic cigarettes in male and female smokers. Bath, UK: 12th annual meeting of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco Europe; 2010.
    1. Caponnetto P, Cibella F, Mancuso S. Effect of a nicotine free inhalator as part of a smoking cessation program. Eur Respir J. 2011;38(5):1005–1011.
    1. Polosa R, Morjaria JB, Caponnetto P. Effectiveness and tolerability of electronic cigarette in real-life: a 24-month prospective observational study. Intern Emerg Med. 2013. in press.
    1. Bullen C, Howe C, Laugesen M, McRobbie H, Parag V, Williman J, Walker N. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a randomised controlled trial, in press. Published online . Lancet. 2013. September 7, 2013. (13)61842-5.
    1. Bullen C, Williman J, Howe C, Laugesen M, McRobbie H, Parag V, Walker N. Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of electronic cigarettes versus nicotine patch for smoking cessation. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:210.
    1. Etter JF. Electronic cigarettes: a survey of users. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:231.
    1. Heavner K, Dunworth J, Bergen P. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) as potential tobacco harm reduction products: results of an online survey of e-cigarette users. Tob Harm Reduction [Internet]; working paper 011: [about 15 pp] Available from: .
    1. Etter JF, Bullen C. Electronic cigarette: users profile, utilization, satisfaction and perceived efficacy. Addiction. 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03505.x. abstract.
    1. Baker RR. Smoke generation inside a burning cigarette: Modifying combustion to develop cigarettes that may be less hazardous to health. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2006;32(4):373–385.
    1. Joksic G, Spasojevic-Tisma V, Antic R. et al.Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of Swedish snus for smoking reduction and cessation. Harm Reduct J. 2011;8(1):25.
    1. Detroit Free Press. Harvard Medical School Adviser: Are e-cigarettes a safe alternative? 2011. .
    1. Foulds J, Veldheer S, Berg A. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigs): views of aficionados and clinical/public health perspectives. Int J Clin Pract. 2011;65(10):1037–1042.
    1. Noel JK, Rees VW, Connolly GN. Electronic cigarettes: a new 'tobacco' industry? Tob Control. 2011;20(1):81. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
    1. Polosa R, Caponnetto P. Regulation of e-cigarettes: the users' perspective. Lancet Res Medicine. 2013;1(7):e26. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70175-9.
    1. Foulds J, Veldheer S. Commentary on Etter & Bullen (2011): Could E-cigs become the ultimate nicotine maintenance device? Addiction. 2011;106:2029–2030.
    1. Piasecki TM, Fiore MC, Baker TB. Profiles in discouragement: two studies of variability in the time course of smoking withdrawal symptoms. J Abnorm Psychol. 1998;107(2):238–251.
    1. Rodu B. Tobacco Truth: The Proven Positive Effects of Nicotine and Tobacco. .
    1. Electronic nicotine delivery systems: adult use and awareness of the 'e-cigarette’ in the USA. .

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir