Fluid resuscitation practices in cardiac surgery patients in the USA: a survey of health care providers

Solomon Aronson, Paul Nisbet, Martin Bunke, Solomon Aronson, Paul Nisbet, Martin Bunke

Abstract

Background: Fluid resuscitation during cardiac surgery is common with significant variability in clinical practice. Our goal was to investigate current practice patterns of fluid volume expansion in patients undergoing cardiac surgeries in the USA.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of 124 cardiothoracic surgeons, cardiovascular anesthesiologists, and perfusionists. Survey questions were designed to assess clinical decision-making patterns of intravenous (IV) fluid utilization in cardiovascular surgery for five types of patients who need volume expansion: (1) patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) without bleeding, (2) patients undergoing CPB with bleeding, (3) patients undergoing acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH), (4) patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or use of a ventricular assist device (VAD), and (5) patients undergoing either off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCABG) surgery or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). First-choice fluid used in fluid boluses for these five patient types was requested. Descriptive statistics were performed using Kruskal-Wallis test and follow-up tests, including t tests, to evaluate differences among respondent groups.

Results: The most commonly preferred indicators of volume status were blood pressure, urine output, cardiac output, central venous pressure, and heart rate. The first choice of fluid for patients needing volume expansion during CPB without bleeding was crystalloids, whereas 5% albumin was the most preferred first choice of fluid for bleeding patients. For volume expansion during ECMO or VAD, the respondents were equally likely to prefer 5% albumin or crystalloids as a first choice of IV fluid, with 5% albumin being the most frequently used adjunct fluid to crystalloids. Surgeons, as a group, more often chose starches as an adjunct fluid to crystalloids for patients needing volume expansion during CPB without bleeding. Surgeons were also more likely to use 25% albumin as an adjunct fluid than were anesthesiologists. While most perfusionists reported using crystalloids to prime the CPB circuit, one third preferred a mixture of 25% albumin and crystalloids. Less interstitial edema and more sustained volume expansion were considered the most important colloid traits in volume expansion.

Conclusions: Fluid utilization practice patterns in the USA varied depending on patient characteristics and clinical specialties of health care professionals.

Keywords: Albumin; Cardiopulmonary bypass; Cardiovascular surgery; Colloids; Crystalloids; Fluid resuscitation; Intraoperative volume expansion; Survey.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

SA has received an honorarium as a medical advisor from Grifols. MB is an employee of Grifols, a manufacturer of albumin. PN has no competing interests relevant to this manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Use of volume status indicators/diagnostic tools in assessing fluid needsa (n = 124b). aResponses to the following question: Which of the following indicators (diagnostic tools) of volume status and the need for volume expansion do you use? (Please select all that apply.) bSample included 52 anesthesiologists, 47 surgeons, and 25 perfusionists
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
First choice of intravenous fluid for patients needing volume expansion during CPB when not experiencing significant blood lossa (scenario 1, n = 124). CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; HES, hydroxyethyl starch. Superscript S denotes the difference between specialties that are statistically significant at P  <  .05. aResponses to the following question: Which of the following is your first choice for a patient who needs volume expansion during cardiovascular surgery with CPB who is not experiencing significant blood loss?
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
First choice of IV fluid for patients needing volume expansion in the presence of blood loss during CPB when blood transfusion is not indicated (adequate Hb)a (scenario 2, n = 124). CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; Hb, hemoglobin; HES, hydroxyethyl starch; IV, intravenous. Superscript A denotes the difference between specialties that are statistically significant at P < .05. aResponses to the following question: Which of the following is your first choice for a patient who needs volume expansion in the presence of blood loss when blood transfusion is not indicated (adequate Hb) during cardiovascular surgery with CPB?
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
First choice of IV fluid for maintenance during ANH (autologous blood collection)a (scenario 3, n = 119b). ANH, acute normovolemic hemodilution; HES, hydroxyethyl starch; IV, intravenous; n/a, not available. Superscript A and S denote differences between specialties that are statistically significant at P <  .05. aResponses to the following question: Which of the following is your first choice for a patient for volume replacement maintenance during ANH (autologous blood collection)? bA total of 119 HCPs responded to this question; five respondents (two anesthesiologists, one surgeon, two perfusionists) indicated the patient type was “not applicable” to their practice
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
First choice of IV fluid for volume expansion during ECMO or VADa (scenario 4, n = 124). ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; HES, hydroxyethyl starch; IV, intravenous; VAD, ventricular assist device. aResponses to the following question: Which of the following is your first choice for a patient who needs volume expansion during ECMO or VAD? bResponse was only available to perfusionists
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
First choice of IV fluid for intraoperative volume expansion for OPCABG or TAVRa (scenario 5, n = 124). HES, hydroxyethyl starch; IV, intravenous; OPCAB, off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery; TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement. aResponses to the following question: Which of the following is your first choice for a patient who needs intraoperative volume expansion for OPCAB or TAVR? bResponse was only available to perfusionists
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Importance of colloid traits when colloids were used for volume expansiona (n = 124). Superscripts A–E on y-axis labels represent the respective trait for statistical comments. Letters following values represent the traits from which the trait’s percentage differs significantly. aResponses to the following question: Using the scale below, please indicate how important each of the following is in terms of your reasons for using colloids for volume expansion (5-point scale: not important, somewhat important, important, very important, absolutely essential). Data presented in this graph are the proportions of respondents indicating colloid trait is “very important” or “absolutely essential” when used for volume expansion
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
First choice of solutions for priming the CPB circuit among perfusionistsa (n = 25). CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; HES, hydroxyethyl starch. aResponses to the following question: Which of the following solutions is your first choice for priming the CPB circuit?

References

    1. Aditianingsih D, George YW. Guiding principles of fluid and volume therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014;28(3):249–260. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2014.07.002.
    1. Ait-Oufella H, Maury E, Lehoux S, Guidet B, Offenstadt G. The endothelium: physiological functions and role in microcirculatory failure during severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(8):1286–1298. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1893-6.
    1. Annane D, Siami S, Jaber S, Martin C, Elatrous S, Declere AD, et al. Effects of fluid resuscitation with colloids vs crystalloids on mortality in critically ill patients presenting with hypovolemic shock: the CRISTAL randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310(17):1809–1817. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.280502.
    1. Becker BF, Chappell D, Jacob M. Endothelial glycocalyx and coronary vascular permeability: the fringe benefit. Basic Res Cardiol. 2010;105(6):687–701. doi: 10.1007/s00395-010-0118-z.
    1. Cherpanath TG, Aarts LP, Groeneveld JA, Geerts BF. Defining fluid responsiveness: a guide to patient-tailored volume titration. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014;28(3):745–754. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.12.025.
    1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(2):165–228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Hydroxyethyl-starch solutions (HES) no longer to be used in patients with sepsis or burn injuries or in critically ill patients. 2013. . Accessed 30 Jun 2016.
    1. Finfer S, McEvoy S, Bellomo R, McArthur C, Myburgh J, Norton R. Impact of albumin compared to saline on organ function and mortality of patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(1):86–96. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2039-6.
    1. Hirleman E, Larson DF. Cardiopulmonary bypass and edema: physiology and pathophysiology. Perfusion. 2008;23(6):311–322. doi: 10.1177/0267659109105079.
    1. Hoeft A, Korb H, Mehlhorn U, Stephan H, Sonntag H. Priming of cardiopulmonary bypass with human albumin or Ringer lactate: effect on colloid osmotic pressure and extravascular lung water. Br J Anaesth. 1991;66(1):73–80. doi: 10.1093/bja/66.1.73.
    1. Jacob M, Chappell D. Reappraising Starling: the physiology of the microcirculation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2013;19(4):282–289. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283632d5e.
    1. Jacob M, Chappell D, Hofmann-Kiefer K, Helfen T, Schuelke A, Jacob B, et al. The intravascular volume effect of Ringer’s lactate is below 20%: a prospective study in humans. Crit Care. 2012;16(3):R86. doi: 10.1186/cc11344.
    1. Johansson PI, Stensballe J, Rasmussen LS, Ostrowski SR. A high admission syndecan-1 level, a marker of endothelial glycocalyx degradation, is associated with inflammation, protein C depletion, fibrinolysis, and increased mortality in trauma patients. Ann Surg. 2011;254(2):194–200. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318226113d.
    1. Kuitunen AH, Hynynen MJ, Vahtera E, Salmenpera MT. Hydroxyethyl starch as a priming solution for cardiopulmonary bypass impairs hemostasis after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004;98(2):291–297. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000096006.60716.F6.
    1. Lange M, Ertmer C, Van Aken H, Westphal M. Intravascular volume therapy with colloids in cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25(5):847–855. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2010.06.005.
    1. Lee EH, Kim WJ, Kim JY, Chin JH, Choi DK, Sim JY, et al. Effect of exogenous albumin on the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery with a preoperative albumin level of less than 4.0 g/dl. Anesthesiology. 2016;124(5):1001–1011. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001051.
    1. Morin J-F, Mistry B, Langlois Y, Ma F, Chamoun P, Holcroft C. Fluid overload after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery increases the incidence of post-operative complications. World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery. 2011;01(02):18–23. doi: 10.4236/wjcs.2011.12004.
    1. Myburgh JA, Finfer S, Bellomo R, Billot L, Cass A, Gattas D, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(20):1901–1911. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209759.
    1. Myburgh JA, Mythen MG. Resuscitation fluids. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(13):1243–1251. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208627.
    1. Ortega-Loubon C, Hinojal YC, Carreras EF, Nunez GL, Pelaez PP, Saez MB, et al. Extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery inflammatory response, controversies and future directions. Intl Arch Med. 2015;8(19):1–13.
    1. Perner A, Haase N, Guttormsen AB, Tenhunen J, Klemenzson G, Aneman A, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer’s acetate in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(2):124–134. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1204242.
    1. Protsyk V, Rasmussen BS, Guarracino F, Erb J, Turton E, Ender J. Fluid management in cardiac surgery: results of a survey in European Cardiac Anesthesia Departments. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Apr 13; 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.04.017. [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Rabin J, Meyenburg T, Lowery AV, Rouse M, Gammie JS, Herr D. Restricted albumin utilization is safe and cost effective in a cardiac surgery intensive care unit. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104(1):42–48.
    1. Rehm M, Bruegger D, Christ F, Conzen P, Thiel M, Jacob M, et al. Shedding of the endothelial glycocalyx in patients undergoing major vascular surgery with global and regional ischemia. Circulation. 2007;116(17):1896–1906. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.684852.
    1. Roger C, Muller L, Deras P, Louart G, Nouvellon E, Molinari N, et al. Does the type of fluid affect rapidity of shock reversal in an anaesthetized-piglet model of near-fatal controlled haemorrhage? A randomized study. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112(6):1015–1023. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet375.
    1. Russell JA, Navickis RJ, Wilkes MM. Albumin versus crystalloid for pump priming in cardiac surgery: meta-analysis of controlled trials. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18(4):429–437. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.05.019.
    1. Sade RM, Stroud MR, Crawford FA, Jr, Kratz JM, Dearing JP, Bartles DM. A prospective randomized study of hydroxyethyl starch, albumin, and lactated Ringer’s solution as priming fluid for cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;89(5):713–722.
    1. Sedrakyan A, Gondek K, Paltiel D, Elefteriades JA. Volume expansion with albumin decreases mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Chest. 2003;123(6):1853–1857. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.6.1853.
    1. Skhirtladze K, Base EM, Lassnigg A, Kaider A, Linke S, Dworschak M, et al. Comparison of the effects of albumin 5%, hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 6%, and Ringer’s lactate on blood loss and coagulation after cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112(2):255–264. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet348.
    1. Steppan J, Hofer S, Funke B, Brenner T, Henrich M, Martin E, et al. Sepsis and major abdominal surgery lead to flaking of the endothelial glycocalix. J Surg Res. 2011;165(1):136–141. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.04.034.
    1. United States Food and Drug Administration. FDA Safety Communication: Boxed Warning on increased mortality and severe renal injury, and additional warning on risk of bleeding, for use of hydroxyethyl starch solutions in some settings 2013. . Accessed 9 Jun 2016.
    1. van Haren F, Zacharowski K. What’s new in volume therapy in the intensive care unit? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014;28(3):275–283. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2014.06.004.
    1. Verheij J, van Lingen A, Beishuizen A, Christiaans HM, de Jong JR, Girbes AR, et al. Cardiac response is greater for colloid than saline fluid loading after cardiac or vascular surgery. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(7):1030–1038. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0195-5.
    1. Weinbaum S, Tarbell JM, Damiano ER. The structure and function of the endothelial glycocalyx layer. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9:121–167. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.151959.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir