End-of-life quality metrics among medicare decedents at minority-serving cancer centers: A retrospective study

Garrett T Wasp, Shama S Alam, Gabriel A Brooks, Inas S Khayal, Nirav S Kapadia, Donald Q Carmichael, Andrea M Austin, Amber E Barnato, Garrett T Wasp, Shama S Alam, Gabriel A Brooks, Inas S Khayal, Nirav S Kapadia, Donald Q Carmichael, Andrea M Austin, Amber E Barnato

Abstract

Background: We calculated the performance of National Cancer Institute (NCI)/National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) cancer centers' end-of-life (EOL) quality metrics among minority and white decedents to explore center-attributable sources of EOL disparities.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries with poor-prognosis cancers who died between April 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016 and had any inpatient services in the last 6 months of life. We attributed patients' EOL treatment to the center at which they received the preponderance of EOL inpatient services and calculated eight risk-adjusted metrics of EOL quality (hospice admission ≤3 days before death; chemotherapy last 14 days of life; ≥2 emergency department (ED) visits; intensive care unit (ICU) admission; or life-sustaining treatment last 30 days; hospice referral; palliative care; advance care planning last 6 months). We compared performance between patients across and within centers.

Results: Among 126,434 patients, 10,119 received treatment at one of 54 NCI/NCCN centers. In aggregate, performance was worse among minorities for ED visits (10.3% vs 7.4%, P < .01), ICU admissions (32.9% vs 30.4%, P = .03), no hospice referral (39.5% vs 37.0%, P = .03), and life-sustaining treatment (19.4% vs 16.2%, P < .01). Despite high within-center correlation for minority and white metrics (0.61-0.79; P < .01), five metrics demonstrated worse performance as the concentration of minorities increased: ED visits (P = .03), ICU admission (P < .01), no hospice referral (P < .01), and life-sustaining treatments (P < .01).

Conclusion: EOL quality metrics vary across NCI/NCCN centers. Within center, care was similar for minority and white patients. Minority-serving centers had worse performance on many metrics.

Keywords: cancer; end-of-life quality; minority; treatment intensity.

© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Geographic distribution, size, and minority concentration of NCI/NCCI cancer centers. Each bubble is a cancer center. The size of the bubble is proportionate to the total number of decedents assigned to the cancer center in 2016 and the shading of the bubble is proportionate to the concentration of minorities (low: 30%). For an interactive version of this figure, visit [Dartmouth Atlas URL TBD]. [NCI – National Cancer Institute; NCCN – National Comprehensive Cancer Network]
Figure 2
Figure 2
Panels A‐H. Correlation between white and minority‐specific end‐of‐life treatment intensity metrics, by NCI/NCCN cancer center. Panel A represents chemotherapy administration in the last 14 d of life, Panel B two or more emergency department visits in the last 30 d of life, Panel C ICU admissions in the last 30 d of life, Panel D late hospice referrals, Panel E no hospice referrals, Panel F life‐sustaining treatment in last 30 d, Panel G palliative care codes in last 6 mo of life, and Panel H advance care planning codes in the last 6 mo of life. Each bubble is a single cancer center; an “x” mark along the x‐axis represents cancer centers with insufficient sample size to calculate a minority‐specific measure. The y‐axis is the measure among minority decedents and the x‐axis is the measure among white decedents. Those centers with insufficient sample size to calculate either a white or minority‐specific measure are excluded from the panel. Listed in the upper left corner of each panel is N, the numbers of centers with sufficient sample size to calculate minority‐specific metrics. Below that is the correlation (rho) between cancer centers’ minority and white EOL measure and its P‐value. Next is the minority mean and standard deviation (SD) in parenthesis, followed by white mean and SD in parenthesis. The final P‐value is of the mean difference between minority and white EOL measure Reporting full information was restricted to metrics with white and minority‐specific metrics calculable for least 10 centers. [NCI – National Cancer Institute; NCCN – National Comprehensive Cancer Network]

References

    1. Institute of Medicine . Dying in America. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press; 2015. 10.17226/18748.
    1. National Quality Forum . National quality forum quality positioning system. . Published 2018.Accessed March 7, 2019.
    1. Goodman DC, Fisher ES, Chang C‐H, et al. Quality of End‐of‐Life Cancer Care for Medicare Beneficiaries: Regional and Hospital‐Specific Analyses. Lebanon, NH; 2010. . Accessed March 7, 2019.
    1. Morden NE, Chang C‐H, Jacobson JO, et al. End‐of‐life care for medicare beneficiaries with cancer is highly intensive overall and varies widely. Health Aff. 2012;31(4):786‐796.
    1. Check DK, Samuel CA, Rosenstein DL, Dusetzina SB. Investigation of racial disparities in early supportive medication use and end‐of‐life care among medicare beneficiaries with stage IV breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(19):2265‐2270.
    1. Barnato AE, Chang C‐CH, Lave JR, Angus DC. The paradox of end‐of‐life hospital treatment intensity among black patients: a retrospective cohort study. J Palliat Med. 2018;21(1):69‐77.
    1. Byhoff E, Harris JA, Langa KM, Iwashyna TJ. Racial and ethnic differences in end‐of‐life medicare expenditures. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(9):1789‐1797.
    1. Barnato AE, Berhane Z, Weissfeld LA, Chang C‐CH, Linde‐Zwirble WT, Angus DC. Racial variation in end‐of‐life intensive care use: a race or hospital effect? Health Serv Res. 2006;41(6):2219‐2237.
    1. Barnato AE, Anthony DL, Skinner J, Gallagher PM, Fisher ES. Racial and ethnic differences in preferences for end‐of‐life treatment. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(6):695‐701.
    1. Barnato AE, Chang C‐CH, Saynina O, Garber AM. Influence of race on inpatient treatment intensity at the end of life. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(3):338‐345.
    1. Jang RW, Krzyzanowska MK, Zimmermann C, Taback N, Alibhai SMH. Palliative care and the aggressiveness of end‐of‐life care in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(3):424.
    1. Temel JS, Greer JA, El‐Jawahri A, et al. Effects of early integrated palliative care in patients with lung and gi cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(8):834‐841.
    1. Bischoff KE, Sudore R, Miao Y, Boscardin WJ, Smith AK. Advance care planning and the quality of end‐of‐life care in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(2):209‐214.
    1. Wennberg JE, Fisher ES, Stukel TA, Skinner JS, Sharp SM, Bronner KK. Use of hospitals, physician visits, and hospice care during last six months of life among cohorts loyal to highly respected hospitals in the United States. BMJ. 2004;328(7440):607.
    1. Iezzoni LI, Heeren T, Foley SM, Daley J, Hughes J, Coffman GA. Chronic conditions and risk of in‐hospital death. Health Serv Res. 1994;29(4):435‐460.
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services . ICD‐10. . Published 2018. Accessed March 7, 2019.
    1. Boyd AD, Li JJ, Burton MD, et al. The discriminatory cost of ICD‐10‐CM transition between clinical specialties: metrics, case study, and mitigating tools. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2013;20(4):708‐717.
    1. Berke EM, Smith T, Song Y, Halpern MT, Goodman DC. Cancer care in the united states: identifying end‐of‐life cohorts. J Palliat Med. 2009;12(2):128‐132.
    1. Network National Comprehensive Cancer. NCCN Member Institutions; . Published 2018. Accessed March 7, 2019.
    1. National Cancer Institute . Cancer Center List.Office of Cancer Centers. . Published 2019. Accessed March 7, 2019.
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality . Clinical Classification Software (CCS) for ICD‐9‐CM. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). . Published 2017.Accessed March 7, 2019.
    1. Earle CC, Neville BA, Landrum MB, et al. Evaluating claims‐based indicators of the intensity of end‐of‐life cancer care. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2005;17(6):505‐509.
    1. Earle CC, Landrum MB, Souza JM, Neville BA, Weeks JC, Ayanian JZ. Aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life: is it a quality‐of‐care issue? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(23):3860‐3866.
    1. Barnato AE, Mohan D, Lane RK, et al. Advance care planning norms may contribute to hospital variation in end‐of‐life ICU use. Med Decis Mak. 2014;34(4):473‐484.
    1. Barnato AE, Tate JA, Rodriguez KL, Zickmund SL, Arnold RM. Norms of decision making in the ICU: a case study of two academic medical centers at the extremes of end‐of‐life treatment intensity. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(11):1886‐1896.
    1. Barnato AE, Herndon MB, Anthony DL, et al. Are regional variations in end‐of‐life care intensity explained by patient preferences? Med Care. 2007;45(5):386‐393.
    1. Bach PB, Schrag D, Begg CB. Resurrecting treatment histories of dead patients. JAMA. 2004;292(22):2765.
    1. Falchook AD, Dusetzina SB, Tian F, Basak R, Selvam N, Chen RC. Aggressive end‐of‐life care for metastatic cancer patients younger than age 65 years J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109(9). 10.1093/jnci/djx028.
    1. Wright AA, Keating NL, Ayanian JZ, et al. Family perspectives on aggressive cancer care near the end of life. JAMA. 2016;315(3):284.
    1. Kumar P, Wright AA, Hatfield LA, Temel JS, Keating NL. Family perspectives on hospice care experiences of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(4):432‐439.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir