Alternating electric fields (TTFields) inhibit metastatic spread of solid tumors to the lungs

Eilon D Kirson, Moshe Giladi, Zoya Gurvich, Aviran Itzhaki, Daniel Mordechovich, Rosa S Schneiderman, Yoram Wasserman, Bernhard Ryffel, Dorit Goldsher, Yoram Palti, Eilon D Kirson, Moshe Giladi, Zoya Gurvich, Aviran Itzhaki, Daniel Mordechovich, Rosa S Schneiderman, Yoram Wasserman, Bernhard Ryffel, Dorit Goldsher, Yoram Palti

Abstract

Tumor treating fields (TTFields) are low intensity, intermediate frequency, alternating electric fields used to treat cancerous tumors. This novel treatment modality effectively inhibits the growth of solid tumors in vivo and has shown promise in pilot clinical trials in patients with advanced stage solid tumors. TTFields were tested for their potential to inhibit metastatic spread of solid tumors to the lungs in two animal models: (1) Mice injected with malignant melanoma cells (B16F10) into the tail vein, (2) New Zealand White rabbits implanted with VX-2 tumors within the kidney capsule. Mice and rabbits were treated using two-directional TTFields at 100-200 kHz. Animals were either monitored for survival, or sacrificed for pathological and histological analysis of the lungs. The total number of lung surface metastases and the absolute weight of the lungs were both significantly lower in TTFields treated mice then in sham control mice. TTFields treated rabbits survived longer than sham control animals. This extension in survival was found to be due to an inhibition of metastatic spread, seeding or growth in the lungs of TTFields treated rabbits compared to controls. Histologically, extensive peri- and intra-tumoral immune cell infiltration was seen in TTFields treated rabbits only. These results raise the possibility that in addition to their proven inhibitory effect on the growth of solid tumors, TTFields may also have clinical benefit in the prevention of metastatic spread from primary tumors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Placement of electrodes on mice (a) and rabbits (b). The four insulated electrodes were attached to the skin using hydrogel after depilation. The electrodes were wrapped with leucoplast and electrodes wires were connected to the TTFields generating system or to the sham control system. The four electrodes were functionally divided into two pairs each generating one field direction through the animal. The electrode pairs were placed so as to create two perpendicular field directions at the center of body. Sham electrodes were placed in the same configuration
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Malignant melanoma metastases as seen on the surface of the lungs of mice treated with TTFields. Exemplary photos of lungs of mice treated with TTFields (a) or sham control (b) are shown after removal of the pulmonary blood by perfusion with saline. Average number of surface metastases (±SD) in treated and control mice (c). Average lung weight (±SD) of treated and control mice
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Metastases number and size distribution in mice treated with TTFields (openbars) and sham control (closedbars). The mice were treated for 7 days followed by 7 days of recovery
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
T1 weighted MRI images (post gadolinium) of the maximal cross-sectional area of a TTFields treated (a) versus sham control tumor (b) in rabbit kidneys. Arrows indicate tumor location. Scalebar 1 cm
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Kaplan–Meier survival curve of rabbits treated with TTFields (n = 23; redline) versus sham controls (n = 20; blackline). The median survivals of 70 vs. 57 days, respectively, are indicated by dottedlines
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Exemplary photos of surface lung metastases in TTFields treated (a) versus sham control rabbits (b). Treatment was initiated on day 12 from implantation of the kidney tumor. The average total number (±SD) of surface metastases (c) and the average number of large metastases (±SD) (d) in control versus treated rabbits
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Discrete intra-tumoral infiltration of CD45 positive T cells in control tumours (a) and abundant intra-tumoral CD45 positive T cells in TTFields treated tumours (b). Scale bar 100 μm

References

    1. Friedel G. Pulmonary metastasectomy: specific surgical considerations and prognostic factors. In: Schil P, editor. Lung metastases and isolated lung perfusion. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc.; 2007. pp. 45–60.
    1. Sternberg DI, Sonett JR. Surgical therapy of lung metastases. Semin Oncol. 2007;34(3):186–196. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2007.03.004.
    1. Billingsley KG, Burt ME, Jara E, et al. Pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcoma: analysis of patterns of diseases and postmetastasis survival. Ann Surg. 1999;229(5):602–610. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199905000-00002.
    1. Friedel G, Pastorino U, Buyse M, et al. Resection of lung metastases: long-term results and prognostic analysis based on 5,206 cases—the International registry of lung metastases. Zentralbl Chir. 1999;124(2):96–103.
    1. Khan JH, McElhinney DB, Rahman SB, et al. Pulmonary metastases of endocrine origin: the role of surgery. Chest. 1998;114(2):526–534. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.2.526.
    1. Zhang S, Zeng Z, Tang Z, et al. Prognostic analysis of pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Intl. 2008;2(2):237–243. doi: 10.1007/s12072-008-9052-7.
    1. Pastorino U, Buyse M, Friedel J, et al. Long-term results of lung metastasectomy: prognostic analyses based on 5,206 cases. The International registry of lung metastases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;113(1):37–49. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70397-0.
    1. Sardari N, Colpaert C. Lung metastases: epidemiology, clinical presentation and imaging. In: Schil P, editor. Lung metastases and isolated lung perfusion. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc.; 2007. pp. 3–25.
    1. Rose SC, Thistlethwaite PA, Sewell PE, et al. Lung cancer and radiofrequency ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17(6):927–951.
    1. Lavrenkov K, Man S, Geffen DB, et al. Experience of hormonal therapy with anastrozole for previously treated metastatic breast cancer. Isr Med Assoc J. 2002;4(3):176–177.
    1. Suh R, Reckamp K, Zeidler M, et al. Radiofrequency ablation in lung cancer: promising results in safety and efficacy. Oncology. 2005;19(11, Suppl 4):12–21.
    1. VanSonnenberg E, Shankar S, Morrison PR, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of thoracic lesions: part 2, initial clinical experience—technical and multidisciplinary considerations in 30 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(2):381–390.
    1. Atzpodien J, Kirchner H, Illiger HJ, et al. IL-2 in combination with IFN- alpha and 5-FU versus tamoxifen in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: long-term results of a controlled randomized clinical trial. Br J Cancer. 2001;85(8):1130–1136. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2076.
    1. Zitvogel L, Apetoh L, Ghiringhelli F, et al. The anticancer immune response: indispensable for therapeutic success? J Clin Invest. 2008;118(6):1991–2001. doi: 10.1172/JCI35180.
    1. Whiteside TL. The tumor microenvironment and its role in promoting tumor growth. Oncogene. 2008;27(45):5904–5912. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.271.
    1. McMillan TJ, Hart IR. Can cancer chemotherapy enhance the malignant behaviour of tumours? Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1987;6(4):503–519. doi: 10.1007/BF00047465.
    1. Walton B. Effects of anaesthesia and surgery on immune status. Br J Anaesth. 1979;51(1):37–43. doi: 10.1093/bja/51.1.37.
    1. Kirson ED, Dbaly V, Tovarys F, et al. Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(24):10152–10157. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702916104.
    1. Kirson ED, Gurvich Z, Schneiderman R, et al. Disruption of cancer cell replication by alternating electric fields. Cancer Res. 2004;64(9):3288–3295. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0083.
    1. Kirson ED, Schneiderman RS, Dbaly V, et al. Chemotherapeutic treatment efficacy and sensitivity are increased by adjuvant alternating electric fields (TTFields) BMC Med Phys. 2009;9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1756-6649-9-1.
    1. Nakada SY, Jerde TJ, Warner T, et al. Comparison of cryotherapy and nephrectomy in treating implanted VX-2 carcinoma in rabbit kidneys. BJU Int. 2004;94(4):632–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05015.x.
    1. Suresh S. Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. Acta Biomater. 2007;3(4):413–438. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.04.002.
    1. Dunn GP, Bruce AT, Ikeda H, et al. Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape. Nat Immunol. 2002;3(11):991–998. doi: 10.1038/ni1102-991.
    1. Hayes AL, Smith C, Foxwell BM, et al. CD45-induced tumor necrosis factor alpha production in monocytes is phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent and nuclear factor-kappaB-independent. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(47):33455–33461. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.47.33455.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir