Fast Track intervention effects on youth arrests and delinquency

Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group, Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of the Fast Track preventive intervention on youth arrests and self-reported delinquent behavior through age 19. High-risk youth randomly assigned to receive a long-term, comprehensive preventive intervention from 1st grade through 10th grade at four sites were compared to high-risk control youth. Findings indicated that random assignment to Fast Track reduced court-recorded juvenile arrest activity based on a severity weighted sum of juvenile arrests. Supplementary analyses revealed an intervention effect on the reduction in the number of court-recorded moderate-severity juvenile arrests, relative to control children. In addition, among youth with higher initial behavioral risk, the intervention reduced the number of high-severity adult arrests relative to the control youth. Survival analyses examining the onset of arrests and delinquent behavior revealed a similar pattern of findings. Intervention decreased the probability of any juvenile arrest among intervention youth not previously arrested. In addition, intervention decreased the probability of a self-reported high-severity offense among youth with no previous self-reported high-severity offense. Intervention effects were also evident on the onset of high-severity court-recorded adult arrests among participants, but these effects varied by site. The current findings suggest that comprehensive preventive intervention can prevent juvenile arrest rates, although the presence and nature of intervention effects differs by outcome.

Figures

Appendix
Appendix
Consort flow-chart

References

    1. Achenbach TM. Manual for the child behavior checklist and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry; 1991a.
    1. Achenbach TM. Manual for the Teacher’s Report Form and 1991 Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry; 1991b.
    1. Anderson JA. Regression and ordered categorical variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B. 1984;46:1–30.
    1. Bierman KL, Greenberg MT. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. Social skills training in the Fast Track program. In: Peters RDeV, McMahon RJ, editors. Preventing childhood disorders, substance abuse, and delinquency. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1996. pp. 65–89.
    1. Boisjoli R, Vitaro F, Lacourse E, Barker ED, Tremblay RE. Impact and clinical significance of a preventive intervention for disruptive boys: 15-year follow-up. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2007;191:415–419.
    1. Brandt DE. Delinquency, development, and social policy. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2006.
    1. Butts JA, Snyder HN. Where are juvenile crime trends headed? Juvenile and Family Justice Today. 2007:16–20.
    1. Cairns RB, Cairns BD, Neckerman HJ, Gest SD, Gariepy JL. Social networks and aggressive behavior: Peer support or peer rejection? Developmental Psychology. 1988;24:815–823.
    1. Cernkovich SA, Giordano PC. Stability and change in antisocial behaviour: The transition from adolescence to early adulthood. Criminology. 2001;39:371–410.
    1. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. A developmental and clinical model for the prevention of conduct disorder: The FAST Track program. Development and Psychopathology. 1992;4:509–527.
    1. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. Initial impact of the Fast Track prevention trial for conduct problems: I. The high-risk sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1999;67:631–647.
    1. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. Evaluation of the first three years of the Fast Track prevention trial with children at high risk for adolescent conduct problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2002a;30:19–35.
    1. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. The implementation of the Fast Track program: An example of a large-scale prevention science efficacy trial. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2002b;30:1–17.
    1. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. The effects of the Fast Track program on serious problem outcomes at the end of elementary school. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 2004;33:650–661.
    1. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. The Fast Track randomized controlled trial to prevent externalizing psychiatric disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2007;46:319–333.
    1. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. The effects of the Fast Track program on disruptive behavior, deviant peer relations, and social skills during the middle school years. The Journal of Early Adolescence. (in press)
    1. Dishion TJ, Patterson GR, Griesler PC. Peer adaptations in the development of antisocial behaviour: A confluence model. In: Huesmann LR, editor. Aggressive behaviour: Current perspectives. New York: Plenum Press; 1994. pp. 61–95.
    1. Dodge KA. Home visiting manual for the Fast Track program. Nashville: 1993. Unpublished.
    1. Dodge KA, Dishion TJ, Lansford JE. Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions. New York: Guilford Press; 2006.
    1. Eddy JM, Reid JB, Stoolmiller M, Fetrow RA. Outcomes during middle school for an elementary school-based preventive intervention for conduct problems: Follow-up results from a randomized trial. Behavior Therapy. 2003;34:535–552.
    1. Elliott DS, Huizinga D, Ageton SS. Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1985.
    1. Elrod P, Ryder RS. Juvenile justice: A social, historical, and legal perspective. 2nd ed. Boston: Jones and Bartlett; 2005.
    1. Farrington D, Loeber R, Stouthamer-Loeber M, Van Kammen WB, Schmidt L. Self-reported delinquency and a combined delinquency seriousness scale based on boys, mothers, and teachers: concurrent and predictive validity for African-Americans and Caucasians. Criminology. 1996;34:493–517.
    1. Farrington DP, Jolliffe D, Loeber R, Homish DL. How many offenses are really committed per juvenile court offender? Victims & Offenders. 2007;2:227–249.
    1. Foster EM, Jones D Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. The high costs of aggression: Public expenditures resulting from conduct disorder. American Journal of Public Health. 2005;95:1767–1772.
    1. Foster EM, Jones D Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. Can a costly intervention be cost-effective? An analysis of violence prevention. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2006;63:1284–1291.
    1. Hawkins JD, Kosterman R, Catalano RF, Hill KG, Abbott RD. Promoting positive adult functioning through social development intervention in childhood. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 2005;159:25–31.
    1. Hill LG, Lochman JE, Coie JD, Greenberg MT Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. Effectiveness of early screening for externalizing problems: Issues of screening accuracy and utility. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2004;72:809–820.
    1. Hollingshead AA. Four-factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript. New Haven: Yale University; 1975.
    1. Jones DE, Godwin J, Dodge KA, Bierman KL, Coie JD, Greenberg MT, et al. The impact of the fast track prevention trial on health services utilization by youth at risk for conduct problems. Pediatrics. (in press)
    1. Kirk DS. Examining the divergence across self-report and official data sources on inferences about the adolescent life-course of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 2006;22:107–129.
    1. Kusche CA, Greenberg MT. The PATHS (Promoting alternative thinking strategies) Curriculum. Deerfield: Channing-Bete Co; 1993.
    1. Lahey BB, Loeber R, Burke JD, Applegate B. Predicting future antisocial personality disorder in males from a clinical assessment in childhood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2005;73:389–399.
    1. Lochman JE the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. Screening of child behavior problems for prevention programs at school entry. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1995;63:549–559.
    1. Lochman JE, Wells KC. Effectiveness study of Coping Power and classroom intervention with aggressive children: outcomes at a one-year follow up. Behavior Therapy. 2003;34:493–515.
    1. Lochman JE, Wells KC. The coping power program for preadolescent aggressive boys and their parents: Outcome effects at the one-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2004;72:571–578.
    1. Long JS, Freese J. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables with Stata. College Station: Stata Press; 2001.
    1. McKelvey RD, Zavoina W. A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 1975;4:103–120.
    1. McMahon RJ, Slough N. the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. Family-based intervention in the Fast Track Program. In: DeV Peters R, McMahon RJ, editors. Preventing childhood disorders, substance use, and delinquency. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1996. pp. 90–110.
    1. Olds D, Henderson CR, Cole R, Eckenrode J, Kitzman H, Luckey D, et al. Long-term effects of nurse home visitation on children's criminal and antisocial behavior: 15-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;280:1238–1244.
    1. Oyserman D. School-to-Jobs facilitators manual: After-school program. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 2000.
    1. Pellegrini AD. Perceptions and functions of play and real fighting in early adolescence. Child Development. 2003;74:1522–1533.
    1. Reinherz HZ, Tanner JL, Berger SR, Beardslee WR, Fitzmaurice GM. Adolescent suicidal ideation as predictive of psychopathology, suicidal behavior and compromised functioning at age 30. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2006;163:1226–1232.
    1. Schafer JL, Graham JW. Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods. 2002;7:147–177.
    1. Thornberry TP, Krohn MD. The development of delinquency: An interactional perspective. In: White SO, editor. Handbook of youth and justice. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2001. pp. 289–305.
    1. Vitaro F, Brendgen M, Pagani L, Tremblay RE, McDuff P. Disruptive behavior, peer association, and conduct disorder: Testing the developmental links through early intervention. Development and Psychopathology. 1999;11:287–304.
    1. Werthamer-Larsson L, Kellam SG, Wheeler L. Effects of first grade classroom environment on shy behavior, aggressive behavior, and concentration problems. American Journal of Community Psychology. 1991;19:585–602.
    1. West DJ, Farrington DP. Who becomes delinquent? Second report of the Cambridge Study in delinquent development. Oxford: Crane; 1973.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir