Patient Education for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Preliminary Experience Using 3D-Printed Clinical Imaging Data

Ian M Sander, Taimi T Liepert, Evan L Doney, W Matthew Leevy, Douglas R Liepert, Ian M Sander, Taimi T Liepert, Evan L Doney, W Matthew Leevy, Douglas R Liepert

Abstract

Within the Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) medical space, a relatively small fraction of patients follow through with elective surgeries to fix ailments such as a deviated septum or occluded sinus passage. Patient understanding of their diagnosis and treatment plan is integral to compliance, which ultimately yields improved medical outcomes and better quality of life. Here we report the usage of advanced, polyjet 3D printing methods to develop a multimaterial replica of human nasal sinus anatomy, derived from clinical X-ray computed tomography (CT) data, to be used as an educational aid during physician consultation. The final patient education model was developed over several iterations to optimize material properties, anatomical accuracy and overall display. A two-arm, single-center, randomized, prospective study was then performed in which 50 ENT surgical candidates (and an associated control group, n = 50) were given an explanation of their anatomy, disease state, and treatment options using the education model as an aid. Statistically significant improvements in patient ratings of their physician's explanation of their treatment options (p = 0.020), self-rated anatomical understanding (p = 0.043), self-rated understanding of disease state (p = 0.016), and effectiveness of the visualization (p = 0.007) were noted from the population that viewed the 3D education model, indicating it is an effective tool which ENT surgeons may use to educate and interact with patients.

Keywords: 3D printing; ENT; clinical education; sinonasal anatomy.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Nasal cavity model generation and fabrication. (A) 3D surface maps generated from CT scan slices of patient nasal cavity used to generate a 3D-printed model; (B) 3D-printed, sliced model, printed with two distinct polymers to represent hard and soft tissues; (C) Single coronal model slice with specific anatomical details highlighted.

References

    1. Ha J.F., Longnecker N. Doctor-patient communication: A review. Ochsner J. 2010;10:38–43. doi: 10.1043/toj-09-0040.1.
    1. Stewart M.A. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: A review. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 1995;152:1423–1433.
    1. Cordasco K.M. Making Health Care Safer II: An Updated Critical Analysis of the Evidence for Patient Safety Practices. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Rockville, MD, USA: 2013. Obtaining informed consent from patients: Brief update review.
    1. Sanjay P., Dodds A., Miller E., Arumugam P.J., Woodward A. Cancelled elective operations: An observational study from a district general hospital. J. Health Org. Manag. 2007;21:54–58. doi: 10.1108/14777260710732268.
    1. Trace A.P., Ortiz D., Deal A., Retrouvey M., Elzie C., Goodmurphy C., Morey J., Hawkins C.M. Radiology’s emerging role in 3-D printing applications in health care. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2016;13:856–862. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.03.025.
    1. Stratasys Corp. Polyjet Materials: A Range of Possibilities. [(accessed on 28 April 2016)];2015 :1–16. Available online: .
    1. Ionita C.N., Mokin M., Varble N., Bednarek D.R., Xiang J.P., Snyder K.V., Siddiqui A.H., Levy E.I., Meng H., Rudin S. Challenges and limitations of patient-specific vascular phantom fabrication using 3D Polyjet printing. Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 2014;13:9038. doi: 10.1117/12.2042266.
    1. Xiao J.R., Huang W.D., Yang X.H., Yan W.J., Song D.W., Wei H.F., Liu T.L., Wu Z.P., Yang C. En bloc resection of primary malignant bone tumor in the cervical spine based on 3-dimensional printing technology. Orthop. Surg. 2016;8:171–178. doi: 10.1111/os.12234.
    1. Nyberg E.L., Farris A.L., Hung B.P., Dias M., Garcia J.R., Dorafshar A.H., Grayson W.L. 3D-printing technologies for craniofacial rehabilitation, reconstruction, and regeneration. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2016;13:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10439-016-1668-5.
    1. Mulford J.S., Babazadeh S., Mackay N. Three-dimensional printing in orthopaedic surgery: Review of current and future applications. ANZ J. Surg. 2016;86:648–653. doi: 10.1111/ans.13533.
    1. Oshiro Y., Mitani J., Okada T., Ohkohchi N. A novel three-dimensional print of liver vessels and tumors in hepatectomy. Surg. Today. 2017;47:521–524. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1383-8.
    1. Al Jabbari O., Abu Saleh W.K., Patel A.P., IGO S.R., Reardon M.J. Use of three-dimensional models to assist in the resection of malignant cardiac tumors. J. Card. Surg. 2016;31:581–583. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12812.
    1. Baskaran V., Strkalj G., Strkalj M., di Ieva A. Current application and future perspectives on the use of 3D printing in anatomical training and neurosurgery. Front. Neuroanat. 2016;10:69. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2016.00069.
    1. Raos P., Klapan I., Galeta T. Additive manufacturing of medical models—Applications in rhinology. Coll. Antropologorum. 2015;39:667–673.
    1. Mitchell M. Patient anxiety and modern elective surgery: A literature review. J. Clin. Nurs. 2003;12:806–815.
    1. Phelan E.A., Deyo R.A., Cherkin D.C., Weinstein J.N., Ciol M.A., Kreuter W., Howe J.F. Helping patients decide about back surgery: A randomized trial of an interactive video program. Spine. 2001;26:206–212. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200101150-00016.
    1. O’Connor A.M., Bennett C.L., Stacey D., Barry M., Col N.F., Eden K.B., Entwistle V.A., Fiset V., Holmes-Rovner M., Khangura S., et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Sys. Rev. 2009;3:CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2.
    1. 3DSlicer. [(accessed on 22 August 2016)]; Available online: .
    1. MeshLab. [(accessed on 24 August 2016)]; Available online:
    1. Autodesk Netfabb. [(accessed on 27 August 2016)]; Available online: .

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir