Retention of Endogenous Viable Cells Enhances the Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Cryopreserved Amnion

Yi Duan-Arnold, Alexandra Gyurdieva, Amy Johnson, Thomas E Uveges, Douglas A Jacobstein, Alla Danilkovitch, Yi Duan-Arnold, Alexandra Gyurdieva, Amy Johnson, Thomas E Uveges, Douglas A Jacobstein, Alla Danilkovitch

Abstract

Objective: Human amniotic membrane (hAM) has been used to treat wounds for more than 100 years. However, widespread use of fresh hAM has been limited due to its short shelf life and safety concerns. To overcome these concerns, different preservation methods have been introduced. The majority of these methods result in devitalized hAM (dev-hAM). Recently, we developed a cryopreservation method that retains all hAM components intact (int-hAM), including viable endogenous cells. To understand the advantages of retaining viable cells in preserved hAM, we compared the anti-inflammatory properties of int-hAM and dev-hAM. Approach: The tissue composition of int-hAM and dev-hAM was compared with fresh hAM through histology and cell viability analysis. We also evaluated the ability of int-hAM and dev-hAM to regulate tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1α (IL-1α), and IL-10 release when co-cultured with immune cells; to produce prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) on TNF-α stimulation; and to inhibit proteases. Results: Int-hAM maintained the structural and cellular integrity of fresh hAM. Int-hAM had >80% cell viability post-thaw and remained viable for at least a week in culture. Viable cells were not detected in dev-hAM. Compared with dev-hAM, int-hAM showed significantly greater downregulation of TNF-α and IL-1α, upregulation of PGE2 and IL-10, and stronger inhibition of collagenase. Innovation and Conclusion: A new cryopreservation method has been developed to retain all native components of hAM. For the first time, we show that viable endogenous cells significantly augment the anti-inflammatory activity of cryopreserved hAM.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4529089/bin/fig-7.jpg
Yi Duan-Arnold, PhD
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and collagen IV (Col IV) staining of human amniotic membranes (hAMs). H&E staining of (A) fresh hAM, (B) viable intact cryopreserved hAM (int-hAM), and (C) devitalized cryopreserved hAM (dev-hAM). Layers of hAM are shown in (A): (i) epithelial layer, (ii) basement membrane, (iii) compact layer, and (iv) stromal layer. Intracytoplasmic vacuoles in the epithelial cells (arrows) are shown in (C). Brown-colored stained Col IV in the basement membrane of (D) fresh-hAM, (E) int-hAM, and (F) dev-hAM. Scale bars: 50 μm (H&E) and 20 μm (Col IV).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Live and dead endogenous cell staining of human amniotic membrane (hAM). Live and dead cells in epithelial and stromal layers of fresh hAM (A, B), viable intact cryopreserved hAM (int-hAM) post-thaw (C, D), and devitalized cryopreserved hAM (dev-hAM) post-thaw (E, F) were visualized microscopically using the LIVE/DEAD® viability/cytotoxicity kit. Live cells stained green with calcein AM. Dead cells stained red with ethidium homodimer-1. Live and dead cells in int-hAM after 7 days in culture are shown in (G, H). All images were taken at 10× magnification.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Effects of human amniotic membrane (hAM) on human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (hPBMC)-induced pro-inflammatory factor release. Inhibition of activated hPBMC-derived tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (A) and interleukin-1α (IL-1α) (B) in the presence of viable intact cryopreserved hAM (int-hAM) and devitalized cryopreserved hAM (dev-hAM). Negative (Neg) and positive (Pos) controls were unstimulated and anti-cluster of differentiation (CD)3 and anti-CD28-activated hPBMCs, respectively. Levels of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) released from int-hAM and dev-hAM following TNF-α stimulation are shown in (C). PGE2 levels were calculated as % of PGE2 released in cultures without TNF-α (% of control). Data shown represent the mean±SD of one experiment performed in triplicate. Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis. *p<0.05 and ***p<0.001.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Effects of human amniotic membrane (hAM) on human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (hPBMC)-induced anti-inflammatory factor interleukin-10 (IL-10) release. IL-10 levels in conditioned medium were measured after 24 h co-cultures of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated hPBMCs with viable intact cryopreserved hAM (int-hAM) and devitalized cryopreserved hAM (dev-hAM). Negative (Neg) and positive (Pos) controls were unstimulated and LPS-activated hPBMCs, respectively. Data shown represent the mean±SD of one experiment performed in triplicate. Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis. ***p<0.001.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Effects of human amniotic membrane (hAM) on protease activities. Substrate cleavage by (A) Collagenase Type IV and (B) neutrophil elastase in the presence of viable intact cryopreserved hAM (int-hAM) and devitalized cryopreserved hAM (dev-hAM) was measured spectrophotometrically and presented in absorbance. Proteases hydrolyze substrates and yield soluble colored peptides in proportion to enzyme activity. Collagenase Type IV activity was assayed using azocoll as a substrate. Elastase activity was assayed using methoxysuccinyl-ala-ala-pro-val-p-nitroanilide as a substrate. Negative (Neg) and positive (Pos) controls were substrates alone and substrates incubated with proteases, respectively. Data shown represent the mean±SD of one experiment performed in triplicate. Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis.*p<0.05 and ***p<0.001.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Summary of viable intact cryopreserved human amniotic membrane (int-hAM) and devitalized cryopreserved human amniotic membrane (dev-hAM) properties. The magnitude of effect between int-hAM and dev-hAM was calculated using the following formula: ((% change of int-hAM)/(% change of dev-hAM))*100. In instances where the % change was negative, magnitude of effect of int-hAM relative to dev-hAM, expressed as % of dev-hAM, was calculated using the following formula: ([(% change of int-hAM)−(% change of dev-hAM)]/[absolute value of (% change of dev-hAM)])*100.

References

    1. Mast BA, Schultz GS. Interactions of cytokines, growth factors, and proteases in acute and chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen 1996;4:411–420
    1. Davis JW. Skin transplantation with a review of 550 cases at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Johns Hopkins Med J 1910;15:307
    1. Akle CA, Adinolfi M, Welsh KI, Leibowitz S, McColl I. Immunogenicity of human amniotic epithelial cells after transplantation into volunteers. Lancet 1981;2:1003–1005
    1. Robson MC, Duke WF, Krizek TJ. Rapid bacterial screening in the treatment of civilian wounds. J Surg Res 1973;14:426–430
    1. Niknejad H, Peirovi H, Jorjani M, et al. Properties of the amniotic membrane for potential use in tissue engineering. Eur Cell Mater 2008;15:88–99
    1. Adds PJ, Hunt CJ, Dart JK. Amniotic membrane grafts, “fresh” or frozen? A clinical and in vitro comparison. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:905–907
    1. Rodriguez-Ares MT, Lopez-Valladares MJ, Tourino R, et al. . Effects of lyophilization on human amniotic membrane. Acta Ophthalmol 2009;87:396–403
    1. Thomasen H, Pauklin M, Steuhl KP, Meller D. Comparison of cryopreserved and air-dried human amniotic membrane for ophthalmologic applications. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009;247:1691–1700
    1. Cooke M, Tan EK, Mandrycky C, He H, O'Connell J, Tseng SC. Comparison of cryopreserved amniotic membrane and umbilical cord tissue with dehydrated amniotic membrane/chorion tissue. J Wound Care 2014;23:465–474, 476
    1. Kubo M, Sonoda Y, Muramatsu R, Usui M. Immunogenicity of human amniotic membrane in experimental xenotransplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:1539–1546
    1. Rama P, Giannini R, Bruni A, Gatto C, Tiso R, Ponzin D. Further evaluation of amniotic membrane banking for transplantation in ocular surface diseases. Cell Tissue Bank 2001;2:155–163
    1. Kruse FE, Joussen AM, Rohrschneider K, et al. . Cryopreserved human amniotic membrane for ocular surface reconstruction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;238:68–75
    1. Amniox Medical, Inc. CRYOTEK process. (last accessed January19, 2015)
    1. Yan G, Sun H, Wang F, et al. . Topical application of hPDGF-A-modified porcine BMSC and keratinocytes loaded on acellular HAM promotes the healing of combined radiation-wound skin injury in minipigs. Int J Radiat Biol 2011;87:591–600
    1. Maxson S, Lopez EA, Yoo D, Danilkovitch-Miagkova A, Leroux MA. Concise review: role of mesenchymal stem cells in wound repair. Stem Cells Transl Med 2012;1:142–149
    1. Jiang N, Tan NS, Ho B, Ding JL. Azocoll protease activity assay. Protocol Exchange 2007. [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2007.484
    1. Bourne G. The Foetal membranes a review of the anatomy of normal amnion and chorion and some aspects of their function. Postgrad Med J 1962;38:193–201
    1. Fukuda K, Chikama T, Nakamura M, Nishida T. Differential distribution of subchains of the basement membrane components type IV collagen and laminin among the amniotic membrane, cornea, and conjunctiva. Cornea 1999;18:73–79
    1. Parolini O, Alviano F, Bagnara GP, et al. . Concise review: isolation and characterization of cells from human term placenta: outcome of the first international Workshop on Placenta Derived Stem Cells. Stem Cells 2008;26:300–311
    1. Sebbag M, Parry SL, Brennan FM, Feldmann M. Cytokine stimulation of T lymphocytes regulates their capacity to induce monocyte production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, but not interleukin-10: possible relevance to pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Immunol 1997;27:624–632
    1. Harris SG, Padilla J, Koumas L, Ray D, Phipps RP. Prostaglandins as modulators of immunity. Trends Immunol 2002;23:144–150
    1. Silini A, Parolini O, Huppertz B, Lang I. Soluble factors of amnion-derived cells in treatment of inflammatory and fibrotic pathologies. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2013;8:6–14
    1. Simpson KL, Keelan JA, Mitchell MD. Labour-associated changes in the regulation of production of immunomodulators in human amnion by glucocorticoids, bacterial lipopolysaccharide and pro-inflammatory cytokines. J Reprod Fertil 1999;116:321–327
    1. Eming SA, Krieg T, Davidson JM. Inflammation in wound repair: molecular and cellular mechanisms. J Invest Dermatol 2007;127:514–525
    1. Tan EK, Cooke M, Mandrycky C, et al. . Structural and biological comparison of cryopreserved and fresh amniotic membrane tissues. J Biomater Tissue Eng 2014;4:379–388
    1. Liu T, Zhai H, Xu Y, et al. . Amniotic membrane traps and induces apoptosis of inflammatory cells in ocular surface chemical burn. Mol Vis 2012;18:2137–2146
    1. Rossi D, Pianta S, Magatti M, Sedlmayr P, Parolini O. Characterization of the conditioned medium from amniotic membrane cells: prostaglandins as key effectors of its immunomodulatory activity. PLoS One 2012;7:e46956.
    1. Hao Y, Ma DH, Hwang DG, Kim WS, Zhang F. Identification of antiangiogenic and antiinflammatory proteins in human amniotic membrane. Cornea 2000;19:348–352
    1. Trengove NJ, Stacey MC, MacAuley S, et al. . Analysis of the acute and chronic wound environments: the role of proteases and their inhibitors. Wound Repair Regen 1999;7:442–452
    1. Herrick S, Ashcroft G, Ireland G, Horan M, McCollum C, Ferguson M. Up-regulation of elastase in acute wounds of healthy aged humans and chronic venous leg ulcers are associated with matrix degradation. Lab Invest 1997;77:281–288
    1. Grinnell F, Ho CH, Wysocki A. Degradation of fibronectin and vitronectin in chronic wound fluid: analysis by cell blotting, immunoblotting, and cell adhesion assays. J Invest Dermatol 1992;98:410–416
    1. Lauer G, Sollberg S, Cole M, et al. . Expression and proteolysis of vascular endothelial growth factor is increased in chronic wounds. J Invest Dermatol 2000;115:12–18
    1. Schreml S, Szeimies RM, Prantl L, Karrer S, Landthaler M, Babilas P. Oxygen in acute and chronic wound healing. Br J Dermatol 2010;163:257–268
    1. Litwiniuk M, Bikowska B, Niderla-Bielinska J, et al. . Potential role of metalloproteinase inhibitors from radiationsterilized amnion dressings in the healing of venous leg ulcers. Mol Med Rep 2012;6:723–728
    1. Wlaschek M, Peus D, Achterberg V, Meyer-Ingold W, Scharffetter-Kochanek K. Protease inhibitors protect growth factor activity in chronic wounds. Br J Dermatol 1997;137:646.
    1. King AE, Kelly RW, Sallenave JM, Bocking AD, Challis JR. Innate immune defences in the human uterus during pregnancy. Placenta 2007;28:1099–1106
    1. Ashcroft GS, Lei K, Jin W, et al. . Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor mediates non-redundant functions necessary for normal wound healing. Nat Med 2000;6:1147–1153
    1. Sorensen OE, Cowland JB, Theilgaard-Monch K, Liu L, Ganz T, Borregaard N. Wound healing and expression of antimicrobial peptides/polypeptides in human keratinocytes, a consequence of common growth factors. J Immunol 2003;170:5583–5589
    1. Regulski M, Jacobstein DA, Petranto RD, Migliori VJ, Nair G, Pfeiffer D. A retrospective analysis of a human cellular repair matrix for the treatment of chronic wounds. Ostomy Wound Manage 2013;59:38–43
    1. Lavery LA, Fulmer J, Shebetka KA, et al. . The efficacy and safety of Grafix((R)) for the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: results of a multi-centre, controlled, randomised, blinded, clinical trial. Int Wound J 2014;11:554–560

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir