The Effect of Anxiety, Depression, and Optimism on Postoperative Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Patients: Cohort Study

Jaewon Lee, Hong-Sik Kim, Kyu-Dong Shim, Ye-Soo Park, Jaewon Lee, Hong-Sik Kim, Kyu-Dong Shim, Ye-Soo Park

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of depression, anxiety, and optimism on postoperative satisfaction and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent less than two-level posterior instrumented fusions for lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Methods: Preoperative psychological status of subjects, such as depression, anxiety, and optimism, was evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R). Clinical evaluation was determined by measuring changes in a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) before and after surgery. Postoperative satisfaction of subjects assessed using the North American Spine Society lumbar spine questionnaire was comparatively analyzed against the preoperative psychological status. The correlation between patient's preoperative psychological status (depression, anxiety, and optimism) and clinical outcomes (VAS and ODI) was evaluated.

Results: VAS and ODI scores significantly decreased after surgery (p < 0.001), suggesting clinically favorable outcomes. Preoperative psychological status of patients (anxiety, depression, and optimism) was not related to the degree of improvement in clinical outcomes (VAS and ODI) after surgery. However, postoperative satisfaction was moderately correlated with optimism.

Conclusions: Anxiety and optimism were more correlated with patient satisfaction than clinical outcomes. Accordingly, the surgeon can predict postoperative satisfaction of patients based on careful evaluation of psychological status before surgery.

Keywords: Clinical outcomes; Lumbar spine; Psychological status; Retrospective cohort study.

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1. Flow diagram illustrating study design.…
Fig. 1. Flow diagram illustrating study design. VAS: visual analogue scale, ODI: Oswestry Disability Index, HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, LOT-R: Revised Life Orientation Test, NASS: North American Spine Society.

References

    1. Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Martin BI. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30(12):1441–1445.
    1. Katz JN, Stucki G, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Grobler LJ, Weinstein JN. Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24(21):2229–2233.
    1. Junge A, Dvorak J, Ahrens S. Predictors of bad and good outcomes of lumbar disc surgery: a prospective clinical study with recommendations for screening to avoid bad outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20(4):460–468.
    1. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992;17(1):1–8.
    1. Hoffman RM, Wheeler KJ, Deyo RA. Surgery for herniated lumbar discs: a literature synthesis. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8(9):487–496.
    1. Ekman P, Moller H, Hedlund R. Predictive factors for the outcome of fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34(11):1204–1210.
    1. Bernard TN., Jr Repeat lumbar spine surgery: factors influencing outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18(15):2196–2200.
    1. Spengler DM, Ouellette EA, Battie M, Zeh J. Elective discectomy for herniation of a lumbar disc: additional experience with an objective method. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(2):230–237.
    1. Daubs MD, Norvell DC, McGuire R, et al. Fusion versus nonoperative care for chronic low back pain: do psychological factors affect outcomes? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36(21 Suppl):S96–S109.
    1. Huston GJ. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. J Rheumatol. 1987;14(3):644.
    1. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52(2):69–77.
    1. Glaesmer H, Rief W, Martin A, et al. Psychometric properties and population-based norms of the Life Orientation Test Revised (LOT-R) Br J Health Psychol. 2012;17(2):432–445.
    1. Steca P, Monzani D, Greco A, Chiesi F, Primi C. Item response theory analysis of the life orientation test-revised: age and gender differential item functioning analyses. Assessment. 2015;22(3):341–350.
    1. Daltroy LH, Cats-Baril WL, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Liang MH. The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment Instrument: reliability and validity tests. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21(6):741–749.
    1. Chunta KS. Expectations, anxiety, depression, and physical health status as predictors of recovery in open-heart surgery patients. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009;24(6):454–464.
    1. Cashion EL, Lynch WJ. Personality factors and results of lumbar disc surgery. Neurosurgery. 1979;4(2):141–145.
    1. Long CJ. The relationship between surgical outcome and MMPI profiles in chronic pain patients. J Clin Psychol. 1981;37(4):744–749.
    1. Herron L, Turner JA, Ersek M, Weiner P. Does the Millon Behavioral Health Inventory (MBHI) predict lumbar laminectomy outcome? A comparison with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) J Spinal Disord. 1992;5(2):188–192.
    1. Dvorak J, Gauchat MH, Valach L. The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation: I. a 4-17 years' follow-up with emphasis on somatic aspects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988;13(12):1418–1422.
    1. Pincus T, Burton AK, Vogel S, Field AP. A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain. pine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27(5):E109–E120.
    1. Chaichana KL, Mukherjee D, Adogwa O, Cheng JS, McGirt MJ. Correlation of preoperative depression and somatic perception scales with postoperative disability and quality of life after lumbar discectomy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(2):261–267.
    1. Pollock R, Lakkol S, Budithi C, Bhatia C, Krishna M. Effect of psychological status on outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Asian Spine J. 2012;6(3):178–182.
    1. Okoro T, Sell P. The prediction of outcome in somatised patients undergoing elective lumbar surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(4):517–521.
    1. Mondloch MV, Cole DC, Frank JW. Does how you do depend on how you think you'll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients' recovery expectations and health outcomes. CMAJ. 2001;165(2):174–179.
    1. Lutz GK, Butzlaff ME, Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Singer DE, Deyo RA. The relation between expectations and outcomes in surgery for sciatica. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(12):740–744.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir