Stress-relaxation and tension relief system for immediate primary closure of large and huge soft tissue defects: an old-new concept: new concept for direct closure of large defects
Moris Topaz, Narin Nard Carmel, Guy Topaz, Mingsen Li, Yong Zhong Li, Moris Topaz, Narin Nard Carmel, Guy Topaz, Mingsen Li, Yong Zhong Li
Abstract
Stress-relaxation is a well-established mechanism for laboratory skin stretching, with limited clinical application in conventional suturing techniques due to the inherent, concomitant induction of ischemia, necrosis and subsequent suture failure. Skin defects that cannot be primarily closed are a common difficulty during reconstructive surgery. The TopClosure tension-relief system (TRS) is a novel device for wound closure closure, providing secured attachment to the skin through a wide area of attachment, in an adjustable manner, enabling primary closure of medium to large skin defects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of the TopClosure TRS as a substitute for skin grafting and flaps for primary closure of large soft tissue defects by stress-relaxation. We present three demonstrative cases requiring resection of large to huge tumors customarily requiring closure by skin graft or flaps. TRS was applied during surgery serving as a tension-relief platform for tension sutures, to enable primary skin-defect closure by cycling of stress-relaxation, and following surgery as skin-secure system until complete wound closure. All skin defects ranging from 7 to 26 cm in width were manipulated by the TRS through stress-relaxation, without undermining of skin, enabling primary skin closure and eliminating the need for skin grafts and flaps. Immediate wound closure ranged 26 to 135 min. TRS was applied for 3 to 4 weeks. Complications were minimal and donor site morbidity was eliminated. Surgical time, hospital stay and costs were reduced and wound aesthetics were improved. In this case series we present a novel technology that enables the utilization of the viscoelastic properties of the skin to an extreme level, extending the limits of primary wound closure by the stress-relaxation principle. This is achieved via a simple device application that may aid immediate primary wound closure and downgrade the complexity of surgical procedures for a wide range of applications on a global scale.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
- Liang MD, Briggs P, Heckler FR, Futrell JW. Presuturing. A new technique for closing large skin defects: clinical and experimental studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 81:694–702.
- Bajoghli AA, Yoo JY, Faria DT. Utilization of a new tissue expander in the closure of a large Mohs surgical defect. J Drugs Dermatol 2010; 9:149–151.
- Topaz M, Carmel NN, Silberman A, et al. The TopClosure® 3S System, for skin stretching and a secure wound closure. Eur J Plast Surg 2012; 35:533–543.
- Topaz M, Carmel NN, Topaz G, Zilinsky I. A substitute for skin grafts, flaps, or internal tissue expanders in scalp defects following tumor ablative surgery. J Drugs Dermatol 2014; 13:48–55.
- Liu Z, Yeung K. The preconditioning and stress relaxation of skin tissue. J Biomed Pharm Eng 2008; 2:22–28.
- Hussain SH, Limthongkul B, Humphreys TR. The biomechanical properties of the skin. Dermatol Surg 2013; 39:193–203.
- Silver FH, Freeman JW, DeVore D. Viscoelastic properties of human skin and processed dermis. Skin Res Technol 2001; 7:18–23.
- Hirshowitz B, Linden Baum E, Har-Shai Y. A skin-stretching device for harnessing of the visco-elastic properties of skin. J Plast Reconst Surg 1994; 92:260.
- Barnea Y, Gur E, Amir A, et al. Our experience with Wisebands: a new skin and soft-tissue stretch device. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113:862–869.
- Santiago GF, Bograd B, Basile PL, et al. Soft tissue injury management with a continuous external tissue expander. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69:418–421.
- Formby P1, Flint J, Gordon WT, et al. Use of a continuous external tissue expander in the conversion of a type IIIB fracture to a type IIIA fracture. Orthopedics 2013; 36:e249–e251.
Source: PubMed