The Importance of Personal Protective Equipment Design and Donning and Doffing Technique in Mitigating Infectious Disease Spread: A Technical Report

Robert McCarthy, Bruno Gino, Philip d'Entremont, Ahmad Barari, Tia S Renouf, Robert McCarthy, Bruno Gino, Philip d'Entremont, Ahmad Barari, Tia S Renouf

Abstract

During the current coronavirus pandemic, significant emphasis has been placed on the importance of mitigating nosocomial spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). One important consideration involves the appropriate use of effective personal protective equipment (PPE), which may reduce a healthcare provider's likelihood of becoming infected while simultaneously minimizing exposure to other patients that they care for. This may reduce demands placed on the healthcare system and help to preserve the workforce. First, the importance of PPE design cannot be underestimated, as the manufacturing process must strive to maximize protection of the user while ensuring adequate comfort. Second, it has been demonstrated that inadequate education and training can significantly impact compliance with PPE recommendations. Technique regarding donning and doffing of PPE is crucial to the protection of those who don it. The purpose of this technical report is two-fold: first, to describe some important considerations in the manufacturing and design process of face shields to maximize protection for healthcare providers, and second, to describe a simulation scenario that may be used to train healthcare workers in the appropriate donning and doffing of PPE.

Keywords: covid 19; novel coronavirus; personal protective equipment (ppe); sars-cov-2; simulation in medical education; simulation medicine.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Copyright © 2020, McCarthy et al.

Figures

Figure 1. Computational Dynamics Modelling of COVID-19…
Figure 1. Computational Dynamics Modelling of COVID-19 Transmission From Infected Patient to Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) User via Air at 10 ms, 20 ms and 50 ms (Left to Right) Following a Sneezing Event.
Figure 2. Comparing the Efficiency of Three…
Figure 2. Comparing the Efficiency of Three Designs of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).
Figure 3. Diagram Demonstrating Appropriate Donning of…
Figure 3. Diagram Demonstrating Appropriate Donning of Personal Protective Equipment.
Artwork Acknowledgement: Mirna Nogueira de Alencar, Fashion Design, Pontifical Catholic University of Parana, Brazil
Figure 4. Diagram Demonstrating Appropriate Doffing of…
Figure 4. Diagram Demonstrating Appropriate Doffing of Personal Protective Equipment.
Artwork Acknowledgement: Mirna Nogueira de Alencar, Fashion Design, Pontifical Catholic University of Parana, Brazil

References

    1. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a primer for emergency physicians. Chavez S, Long B, Koyfman A, Liang SY. Am J Emerg Med. 2020
    1. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1564–1567.
    1. Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) position statement: recommendations for PPE in the emergency department during COVID-19. [Oct;2020 ]; 2020
    1. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019): using personal protective equipment. [Apr;2020 ];Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCOV) infection control: Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Using Personal Protective Equipment. . 2020
    1. Interim guidance for basic and advanced life support in adults, children and neonates with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Edelson DP, Sasson C, Chan PS, et al. Circulation. 2020;141:0.
    1. Molloy J. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): Donning and Removal of PPE. St. John's: Eastern Health Infection Prevention and Control; 2017. Eastern Health Infection Prevention and Control. Policy: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) - Donning and Removal of PPE.
    1. Personal protective equipment and improving compliance among healthcare workers in high-risk settings. Honda H, Iwata K. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2016;29:400–406.
    1. Interim guidance: infection prevention and control during healthcare when coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is suspected or confirmed. World Health Organization. WHO. 2020:1–13.
    1. Practical considerations for critical care and anesthesiology teams caring for novel coronavirus (2019-nCOV) patients. Wax RS, Christian MD. Can J Anesth. 2020;67:568–576.
    1. Safety guidelines for sterility of face shields during COVID 19 pandemic. Khan MM, Parab SR. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020:1–2.
    1. Regulatory and safety considerations in deploying a locally fabricated, reusable face shield in a hospital responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. Mostaghimi A, Antonini MJ, Plana D, et al. Med (NY) 2020;1:1–13.
    1. Simulation as a tool for assessing and evolving your current personal protective equipment: lessons learned during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Lockhart SL, Naidu JJ, Badh CS, Duggan LV. Can J Anesth. 2020;67:895–896.
    1. Helicopter evacuation following a rural trauma: an emergency medicine simulation scenario using innovative simulation technology. Whelan D, Harty C, Ravalia M, Renouf TS, Alani S, Brown R, Dubrowski A. Cureus. 2016;8:524.
    1. Simulation based training in ebola personal protective equipment for healthcare workers: experience from King Abdulaziz university hospital in Saudi Arabia. Abualenain JT, Al-Alawi MM. J Infect Public Health. 2018;11:796–800.
    1. Reducing rigidity by implementing closed-loop engineering in adaptable design and manufacturing systems. Barari A, Pop-Iliev R. Journal Manuf Syst. 2009;28:47–54.
    1. Debriefing with good judgement: combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Rivard P, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007;25:361–376.
    1. Two techniques to safely remove contaminated nitrile gloves. [Aug;2020 ]; 2017

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir