Health and environmental consequences of the world trade center disaster

Philip J Landrigan, Paul J Lioy, George Thurston, Gertrud Berkowitz, L C Chen, Steven N Chillrud, Stephen H Gavett, Panos G Georgopoulos, Alison S Geyh, Stephen Levin, Frederica Perera, Stephen M Rappaport, Christopher Small, NIEHS World Trade Center Working Group, Philip J Landrigan, Paul J Lioy, George Thurston, Gertrud Berkowitz, L C Chen, Steven N Chillrud, Stephen H Gavett, Panos G Georgopoulos, Alison S Geyh, Stephen Levin, Frederica Perera, Stephen M Rappaport, Christopher Small, NIEHS World Trade Center Working Group

Abstract

The attack on the World Trade Center (WTC) created an acute environmental disaster of enormous magnitude. This study characterizes the environmental exposures resulting from destruction of the WTC and assesses their effects on health. Methods include ambient air sampling; analyses of outdoor and indoor settled dust; high-altitude imaging and modeling of the atmospheric plume; inhalation studies of WTC dust in mice; and clinical examinations, community surveys, and prospective epidemiologic studies of exposed populations. WTC dust was found to consist predominantly (95%) of coarse particles and contained pulverized cement, glass fibers, asbestos, lead, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and polychlorinated furans and dioxins. Airborne particulate levels were highest immediately after the attack and declined thereafter. Particulate levels decreased sharply with distance from the WTC. Dust pH was highly alkaline (pH 9.0-11.0). Mice exposed to WTC dust showed only moderate pulmonary inflammation but marked bronchial hyperreactivity. Evaluation of 10,116 firefighters showed exposure-related increases in cough and bronchial hyperreactivity. Evaluation of 183 cleanup workers showed new-onset cough (33%), wheeze (18%), and phlegm production (24%). Increased frequency of new-onset cough, wheeze, and shortness of breath were also observed in community residents. Follow-up of 182 pregnant women who were either inside or near the WTC on 11 September showed a 2-fold increase in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants. In summary, environmental exposures after the WTC disaster were associated with significant adverse effects on health. The high alkalinity of WTC dust produced bronchial hyperreactivity, persistent cough, and increased risk of asthma. Plausible causes of the observed increase in SGA infants include maternal exposures to PAH and particulates. Future risk of mesothelioma may be increased, particularly among workers and volunteers exposed occupationally to asbestos. Continuing follow-up of all exposed populations is required to document the long-term consequences of the disaster.

References

    1. Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Jul;110(7):703-14
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Jun;111(7):972-80
    1. J Urban Health. 2002 Sep;79(3):340-53
    1. N Engl J Med. 2002 Sep 12;347(11):806-15
    1. N Engl J Med. 2002 Sep 12;347(11):840-2
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Sep 15;166(6):785-6
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Sep 15;166(6):797-800
    1. Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2002 Summer;4(3):143-55
    1. Am J Ind Med. 2002 Dec;42(6):532-8
    1. Am J Ind Med. 2002 Dec;42(6):539-42
    1. Am J Ind Med. 2002 Dec;42(6):543-4
    1. Am J Ind Med. 2002 Dec;42(6):545-7
    1. Am J Ind Med. 2002 Dec;42(6):548-9
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Jun;111(7):981-91
    1. JAMA. 2003 Aug 6;290(5):595-6
    1. Ambul Pediatr. 2003 Nov-Dec;3(6):304-11
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Dec;111(16):1906-11
    1. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1972 Mar;33(3):178-91
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Nov 1;126(5):555-64
    1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991 Dec 31;643:53-60
    1. Child Dev. 1992 Jun;63(3):711-24
    1. Lancet. 2002 Dec;360 Suppl:s37-8
    1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Dec;982:160-76
    1. Environ Sci Technol. 2003 Feb 1;37(3):502-8
    1. Epidemiology. 2000 Sep;11(5):502-11
    1. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2000 Nov-Dec;10(6 Pt 1):566-78
    1. Epidemiology. 2001 May;12(3):358-9
    1. Hum Reprod Update. 2001 May-Jun;7(3):331-9
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Sep;109(9):915-9
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Nov;109(11):A514-5
    1. N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 28;346(13):982-7
    1. J Urban Health. 2002 Mar;79(1):2-5
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Jun 1;155(11):988-96
    1. Psychiatr Serv. 2002 Jul;53(7):815-22
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Feb 1;147(3):309-14
    1. N Engl J Med. 1998 May 28;338(22):1565-71
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jun;107(6):475-80
    1. JAMA. 2002 Aug 7;288(5):581-8

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir