Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 12: Low Umbilical artery pH (
1.13. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.13. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.13. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 13: Caesarean section
1.14. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.14. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.14. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 14: Maternal satisfaction: 'Disappointed or lack of care'
1.15. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.15. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.15. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 15: Pain as defined by trial authors
1.16. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.16. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.16. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 16: General anaesthesia
1.17. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.17. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.17. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 17: Time from randomisation to delivery (mins)
1.18. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.18. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.18. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 18: Urinary incontinence
1.19. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.19. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.19. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 19: Flatus incontinence
1.20. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.20. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.20. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 20: Faecal incontinence
1.21. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.21. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.21. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 21: Perineal pain
1.22. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.22. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.22. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 22: Pain during sexual intercourse
1.23. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.23. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.23. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 23: Scalp injury
1.24. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.24. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.24. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 24: Facial injury
1.25. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.25. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.25. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 25: Intracranial injury
1.26. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.26. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.26. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 26: Cephalhematoma
1.27. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.27. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.27. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 27: Retinal haemorrhage
1.28. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.28. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.28. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 28: Jaundice
1.29. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.29. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.29. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 29: Admission to neonatal intensive care unit
1.30. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.30. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.30. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 30: Neonatal encephalopathy
1.31. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.31. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.31. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 31: Death
1.32. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.32. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.32. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 32: Analgesia: none
1.33. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.33. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.33. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 33: Analgesia: perineal infiltration
1.34. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.34. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.34. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 34: Analgesia: pudendal
1.35. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.35. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.35. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 35: Analgesia: Saddle block
1.36. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.36. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.36. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 36: Analgesia: pudendal and perineal
1.37. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.37. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.37. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 37: Analgesia: epidural
1.38. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.38. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.38. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 38: Analgesia: Trilene inh
1.39. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of…
1.39. Analysis
Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome…
1.39. Analysis Comparison 1: Any type of forceps versus any type of vacuum cup, Outcome 39: Analgesia: Trilene inh + local
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps…
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 1: Failed delivery…
2.1. Analysis Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 1: Failed delivery with allocated instrument (primary)
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps…
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 2: Failed delivery…
2.2. Analysis Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 2: Failed delivery with allocated instrument (subgroup by epidural)
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps…
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 3: Failed delivery…
2.3. Analysis Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 3: Failed delivery by allocated instrument (subgroup by Country PMR)
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps…
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 4: Failed delivery…
2.4. Analysis Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 4: Failed delivery by allocated instrument (subgroup by rotational or non‐rotational delivery)
2.5. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps…
2.5. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 5: Any maternal…
2.5. Analysis Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 5: Any maternal trauma (primary)
2.6. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps…
2.6. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 6: Any maternal…
2.6. Analysis Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 6: Any maternal trauma (subgroup by epidural)
2.7. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps…
2.7. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 7: Any maternal…
2.7. Analysis Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 7: Any maternal trauma (subgroup by Country PMR)
2.8. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps…
2.8. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 8: Any maternal…
2.8. Analysis Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 8: Any maternal trauma (subgroup by rotational or non‐rotational delivery)
2.9. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps…
2.9. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 9: Third‐ or…
2.9. Analysis Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 9: Third‐ or fourth‐degree perineal tear (with or without episiotomy)
2.10. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps…
2.10. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 10: Scalp injury
2.10. Analysis Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 10: Scalp injury
2.11. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps…
2.11. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 11: Cephalhematoma
2.11. Analysis Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 11: Cephalhematoma
2.12. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps…
2.12. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 12: Jaundice
2.12. Analysis Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 12: Jaundice
2.13. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps…
2.13. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 13: Anaemia
2.13. Analysis Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 13: Anaemia
2.14. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps…
2.14. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 14: Death
2.14. Analysis Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 14: Death
2.15. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps…
2.15. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 15: Analgesia: none
2.15. Analysis Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 15: Analgesia: none
2.16. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps…
2.16. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 16: Analgesia: perineal…
2.16. Analysis Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 16: Analgesia: perineal infiltration only
2.17. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps…
2.17. Analysis
Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 17: Analgesia: perineal…
2.17. Analysis Comparison 2: Low cavity forceps versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 17: Analgesia: perineal infiltration + pudendal
4.1. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.1. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 1: Failed delivery with allocated…
4.1. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 1: Failed delivery with allocated instrument (primary)
4.2. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.2. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 2: Failed delivery with allocated…
4.2. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 2: Failed delivery with allocated instrument (subgroup by epidural)
4.3. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.3. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 3: Failed delivery with allocated…
4.3. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 3: Failed delivery with allocated instrument (subgroup by Country PMR)
4.4. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.4. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 4: Failed delivery with allocated…
4.4. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 4: Failed delivery with allocated instrument (subgroup by rotational or non‐rotational delivery))
4.5. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.5. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 5: Any maternal trauma (primary)
4.5. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 5: Any maternal trauma (primary)
4.6. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.6. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 6: Any maternal trauma (subgroup…
4.6. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 6: Any maternal trauma (subgroup by epidural)
4.7. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.7. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 7: Any maternal trauma (subgroup…
4.7. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 7: Any maternal trauma (subgroup by Country PMR)
4.8. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.8. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 8: Any maternal trauma (subgroup…
4.8. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 8: Any maternal trauma (subgroup by rotational or non‐rotational delivery)
4.9. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.9. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 9: Third‐ or fourth‐degree perineal…
4.9. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 9: Third‐ or fourth‐degree perineal tear (with or without episiotomy)
4.10. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.10. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 10: Postpartum haemorrhage (>/=…
4.10. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 10: Postpartum haemorrhage (>/= 500 mL or as defined by trial authors))
4.11. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.11. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 11: Low Apgar score at…
4.11. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 11: Low Apgar score at 5 minutes (less than 7 or as defined by trial authors)
4.12. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.12. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 12: Low Umbilical artery pH…
4.12. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 12: Low Umbilical artery pH (
4.13. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.13. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 13: Caesarean section
4.13. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 13: Caesarean section
4.14. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.14. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 14: Episiotomy
4.14. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 14: Episiotomy
4.15. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.15. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 15: Scalp injury
4.15. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 15: Scalp injury
4.16. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.16. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 16: Cephalhematoma
4.16. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 16: Cephalhematoma
4.17. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.17. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 17: Retinal haemorrhage
4.17. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 17: Retinal haemorrhage
4.18. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.18. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 18: Jaundice
4.18. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 18: Jaundice
4.19. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.19. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 19: Admission to neonatal intensive…
4.19. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 19: Admission to neonatal intensive care unit
4.20. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.20. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 20: Death
4.20. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 20: Death
4.21. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.21. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 21: Analgesia: local infiltration
4.21. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 21: Analgesia: local infiltration
4.22. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.22. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 22: Analgesia: epidural
4.22. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 22: Analgesia: epidural
4.23. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.23. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 23: Analgesia: pudendal
4.23. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 23: Analgesia: pudendal
4.24. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus…
4.24. Analysis
Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 24: Analgesia: paracervical block
4.24. Analysis Comparison 4: Soft cup versus rigid cup, Outcome 24: Analgesia: paracervical block
5.1. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.1. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 1: Failed delivery with…
5.1. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 1: Failed delivery with allocated instrument (primary)
5.2. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.2. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 2: Failed delivery with…
5.2. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 2: Failed delivery with allocated instrument (subgroup by epidural)
5.3. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.3. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 3: Failed delivery with…
5.3. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 3: Failed delivery with allocated instrument (subgroup by Country PMR)
5.4. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.4. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 4: Failed delivery with…
5.4. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 4: Failed delivery with allocated instrument (subgroup by rotational or non‐rotational delivery))
5.5. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.5. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 5: Any maternal trauma…
5.5. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 5: Any maternal trauma (primary)
5.6. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.6. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 6: Any maternal trauma…
5.6. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 6: Any maternal trauma (subgroup by epidural)
5.7. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.7. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 7: Any maternal trauma…
5.7. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 7: Any maternal trauma (subgroup by Country PMR)
5.8. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.8. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 8: Any maternal trauma…
5.8. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 8: Any maternal trauma (subgroup by rotational or non‐rotational delivery)
5.9. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.9. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 9: Third‐ or fourth‐degree…
5.9. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 9: Third‐ or fourth‐degree perineal tear (with or without episiotomy)
5.10. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.10. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 10: Postpartum haemorrhage (…
5.10. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 10: Postpartum haemorrhage (>/= 500 mL)
5.11. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.11. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 11: Low Apgar score…
5.11. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 11: Low Apgar score at 5 minutes (less than 7 or as defined by trial authors)
5.12. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.12. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 12: Low Umbilical artery…
5.12. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 12: Low Umbilical artery pH (
5.13. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.13. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 13: Caesarean section
5.13. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 13: Caesarean section
5.14. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.14. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 14: Episiotomy
5.14. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 14: Episiotomy
5.15. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.15. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 15: Perineal pain
5.15. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 15: Perineal pain
5.16. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.16. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 16: Scalp injury
5.16. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 16: Scalp injury
5.17. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.17. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 17: Cephalhematoma
5.17. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 17: Cephalhematoma
5.18. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.18. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 18: Subaponeurotic haemorrhage
5.18. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 18: Subaponeurotic haemorrhage
5.19. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.19. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 19: Admission to neonatal…
5.19. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 19: Admission to neonatal intensive care unit
5.20. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.20. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 20: Death
5.20. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 20: Death
5.21. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.21. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 21: Analgesia: none
5.21. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 21: Analgesia: none
5.22. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.22. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 22: Analgesia: entonox
5.22. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 22: Analgesia: entonox
5.23. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus…
5.23. Analysis
Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 23: Analgesia: local anaesthetic
5.23. Analysis Comparison 5: Handheld vacuum versus any vacuum cup, Outcome 23: Analgesia: local anaesthetic
6.1. Analysis
Comparison 6: Regular forceps versus…
6.1. Analysis
Comparison 6: Regular forceps versus soft forceps, Outcome 1: Severe facial markings
6.1. Analysis Comparison 6: Regular forceps versus soft forceps, Outcome 1: Severe facial markings
6.2. Analysis
Comparison 6: Regular forceps versus…
6.2. Analysis
Comparison 6: Regular forceps versus soft forceps, Outcome 2: Other facial markings
6.2. Analysis Comparison 6: Regular forceps versus soft forceps, Outcome 2: Other facial markings
7.1. Analysis
Comparison 7: Any soft cup…
7.1. Analysis
Comparison 7: Any soft cup versus any soft vacuum cup, Outcome 1: Third‐…
7.1. Analysis Comparison 7: Any soft cup versus any soft vacuum cup, Outcome 1: Third‐ or fourth‐degree perineal tear (with or without episiotomy)
7.2. Analysis
Comparison 7: Any soft cup…
7.2. Analysis
Comparison 7: Any soft cup versus any soft vacuum cup, Outcome 2: Scalp…
7.2. Analysis Comparison 7: Any soft cup versus any soft vacuum cup, Outcome 2: Scalp injury
7.3. Analysis
Comparison 7: Any soft cup…
7.3. Analysis
Comparison 7: Any soft cup versus any soft vacuum cup, Outcome 3: Cephalhematoma
7.3. Analysis Comparison 7: Any soft cup versus any soft vacuum cup, Outcome 3: Cephalhematoma
7.4. Analysis
Comparison 7: Any soft cup…
7.4. Analysis
Comparison 7: Any soft cup versus any soft vacuum cup, Outcome 4: Anaemia
7.4. Analysis Comparison 7: Any soft cup versus any soft vacuum cup, Outcome 4: Anaemia
7.5. Analysis
Comparison 7: Any soft cup…
7.5. Analysis
Comparison 7: Any soft cup versus any soft vacuum cup, Outcome 5: Admission…
7.5. Analysis Comparison 7: Any soft cup versus any soft vacuum cup, Outcome 5: Admission to neonatal intensive care unit
8.1. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup…
8.1. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 1: Any maternal…
8.1. Analysis Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 1: Any maternal trauma (primary)
8.2. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup…
8.2. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 2: Any maternal…
8.2. Analysis Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 2: Any maternal trauma (subgroup by epidural)
8.3. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup…
8.3. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 3: Any maternal…
8.3. Analysis Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 3: Any maternal trauma (subgroup by Country PMR)
8.4. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup…
8.4. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 4: Any maternal…
8.4. Analysis Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 4: Any maternal trauma (subgroup by rotational or non‐rotational delivery)
8.5. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup…
8.5. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 5: Third‐ or…
8.5. Analysis Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 5: Third‐ or fourth‐degree perineal tear (with or without episiotomy)
8.6. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup…
8.6. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 6: Postpartum haemorrhage…
8.6. Analysis Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 6: Postpartum haemorrhage (>/= 500 mL)
8.7. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup…
8.7. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 7: Low Apgar…
8.7. Analysis Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 7: Low Apgar score at 5 minutes (less than 7 or as defined by trial authors)
8.8. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup…
8.8. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 8: Low Umbilical…
8.8. Analysis Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 8: Low Umbilical artery pH (
8.9. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup…
8.9. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 9: Caesarean section
8.9. Analysis Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 9: Caesarean section
8.10. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup…
8.10. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 10: Episiotomy
8.10. Analysis Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 10: Episiotomy
8.11. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup…
8.11. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 11: Scalp injury
8.11. Analysis Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 11: Scalp injury
8.12. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup…
8.12. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 12: Cephalhematoma
8.12. Analysis Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 12: Cephalhematoma
8.13. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup…
8.13. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 13: Subaponeurotic haemorrhage
8.13. Analysis Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 13: Subaponeurotic haemorrhage
8.14. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup…
8.14. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 14: Jaundice
8.14. Analysis Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 14: Jaundice
8.15. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup…
8.15. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 15: Anaemia
8.15. Analysis Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 15: Anaemia
8.16. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup…
8.16. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 16: Analgesia: local…
8.16. Analysis Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 16: Analgesia: local anaesthetic
8.17. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup…
8.17. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 17: Analgesia: paracervical…
8.17. Analysis Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 17: Analgesia: paracervical block
8.18. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup…
8.18. Analysis
Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 18: Analgesia: epidural
8.18. Analysis Comparison 8: Any rigid cup versus any rigid cup, Outcome 18: Analgesia: epidural
All figures (133)
Update of
-
Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery. O'Mahony F, Hofmeyr GJ, Menon V. O'Mahony F, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10;(11):CD005455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005455.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. PMID: 21069686 Updated. Review.
Similar articles
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K, Williams J, Qi YP, Gutman J, Yeung L, Mai C, Finkelstain J, Mehta S, Pons-Duran C, Menéndez C, Moraleda C, Rogers L, Daniels K, Green P. Crider K, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
-
-
-
Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation. Middleton P, Shepherd E, Morris J, Crowther CA, Gomersall JC. Middleton P, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 15;7(7):CD004945. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32666584 Free PMC article.
Publication types
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Associated data
ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01058200
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
Follow NCBI