Association of maternal antiretroviral use with microcephaly in children who are HIV-exposed but uninfected (SMARTT): a prospective cohort study

Paige L Williams, Cenk Yildirim, Ellen G Chadwick, Russell B Van Dyke, Renee Smith, Katharine F Correia, Alexandria DiPerna, George R Seage 3rd, Rohan Hazra, Claudia S Crowell, Surveillance Monitoring for ART Toxicities (SMARTT) study of the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study, Paige L Williams, Cenk Yildirim, Ellen G Chadwick, Russell B Van Dyke, Renee Smith, Katharine F Correia, Alexandria DiPerna, George R Seage 3rd, Rohan Hazra, Claudia S Crowell, Surveillance Monitoring for ART Toxicities (SMARTT) study of the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study

Abstract

Background: Perinatal HIV transmission has substantially decreased with combination antiretroviral regimens, but complications in children who are HIV-exposed but uninfected, such as microcephaly, warrant ongoing surveillance. We aimed to evaluate whether individual in utero antiretroviral exposures were associated with increased risk of microcephaly based on long-term follow-up of infants and children who are HIV-exposed but uninfected.

Methods: We evaluated children aged younger than 18 years who were HIV-exposed but uninfected with at least one head circumference measurement while enrolled in the Surveillance Monitoring for ART Toxicities (SMARTT) study at 22 clinical sites in the USA, including Puerto Rico. This prospective cohort study was done by the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study network. Microcephaly was defined as having a head circumference Z score <-2 according to the 2000 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts for children 6-36 months old and according to Nellhaus standards (head circumference <2nd percentile) after 36 months (SMARTT criteria); an alternate definition for microcephaly was based on applying Nellhaus standards across all ages (Nellhaus criteria). Modified Poisson regression models were fit to obtain relative risks (RRs) for associations between in utero antiretroviral exposure and microcephaly status, adjusted for potential confounders. Neurodevelopmental functioning was compared in children who are HIV-exposed but uninfected with or without microcephaly.

Findings: Between March 21, 2007, and Aug 1, 2017, 3055 participants enrolled in SMARTT had at least one head circumference measurement. The cumulative incidence of microcephaly over a median of 5·1 years of follow-up (IQR 3·0-7·2) was 159 (5·2%, 95% CI 4·4-6·1) by Nellhaus criteria and 70 (2·3%, 1·8-2·9) by SMARTT criteria. In adjusted models, in utero exposure to efavirenz (4·7% exposed) was associated with increased risk of microcephaly by both Nellhaus standards (adjusted RR 2·02, 95% CI 1·16-3·51) and SMARTT criteria (2·56, 1·22-5·37). These associations were more pronounced in children exposed to combination regimens of efavirenz that included zidovudine plus lamivudine than those including tenofovir plus emtricitabine. Protective associations were observed for darunavir exposure (adjusted RR 0·50, 95% CI 0·24-1·00). Children who are HIV-exposed but uninfected with microcephaly had lower mean scores on neurodevelopmental assessments at age 1 and 5 years and a higher prevalence of neurodevelopmental impairment than those without microcephaly.

Interpretation: These findings support consideration of alternatives to efavirenz as part of first-line antiretroviral therapy for pregnant women.

Funding: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests: We declare no competing interests.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1.. Associations of in utero ARV…
Figure 1.. Associations of in utero ARV Exposures with Microcephaly by Nellhaus criteria
Numbers in brackets after each drug name indicate number of microcephaly cases among those exposed to the specific ARV drug during pregnancy, and number of cases among those exposed to that ARV drug during the first trimester. Adjusted relative risks (aRRs) are based on modified Poisson regression models adjusting for low education, low household income, alcohol use during pregnancy, and birth cohort (2007–2010, 2011–2014 and 2015–2017 vs

Figure 2.

Percent of HEU Infants with…

Figure 2.

Percent of HEU Infants with Microcephaly by efavirenz (EFV)-containing Maternal ARV Regimen, with…

Figure 2.
Percent of HEU Infants with Microcephaly by efavirenz (EFV)-containing Maternal ARV Regimen, with Adjusted Risk Ratios (aRRs) and 95% Confidence Intervals

Figure 3.. Sensitivity Analyses for Associations of…

Figure 3.. Sensitivity Analyses for Associations of efavirenz and darunavir with Microcephaly in HEU Infants…

Figure 3.. Sensitivity Analyses for Associations of efavirenz and darunavir with Microcephaly in HEU Infants and Children
Numbers in brackets indicate the number of microcephaly cases among those exposed to efavirenz (panel (a)) or darunavir (panel (b)), by the Nellhaus and SMARTT criteria, respectively; the total sample size for each sensitivity analysis is also provided. Adjusted relative risks (aRRs) and adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) are based on modified Poisson regression models adjusting for low education, low household income, alcohol use during pregnancy, and birth cohort (2007–2010, 2011–2014 and 2015–2017 vs st trimester tobacco, and birth cohorts (2007–2010, 2011–2014 and 2015–2017 vs <2007) for microcephaly by SMARTT criteria. Models accounting for clustering within site or within the same mother/family are fit using generalized estimating equation models with an assumed exchangeable correlation structure. Incidence rates are estimated based on person-time from birth or study entry to the first date of documented microcephaly or latest study visit without microcephaly. FUP=follow-up, cART= combination ARV regimen.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Percent of HEU Infants with Microcephaly by efavirenz (EFV)-containing Maternal ARV Regimen, with Adjusted Risk Ratios (aRRs) and 95% Confidence Intervals
Figure 3.. Sensitivity Analyses for Associations of…
Figure 3.. Sensitivity Analyses for Associations of efavirenz and darunavir with Microcephaly in HEU Infants and Children
Numbers in brackets indicate the number of microcephaly cases among those exposed to efavirenz (panel (a)) or darunavir (panel (b)), by the Nellhaus and SMARTT criteria, respectively; the total sample size for each sensitivity analysis is also provided. Adjusted relative risks (aRRs) and adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) are based on modified Poisson regression models adjusting for low education, low household income, alcohol use during pregnancy, and birth cohort (2007–2010, 2011–2014 and 2015–2017 vs st trimester tobacco, and birth cohorts (2007–2010, 2011–2014 and 2015–2017 vs <2007) for microcephaly by SMARTT criteria. Models accounting for clustering within site or within the same mother/family are fit using generalized estimating equation models with an assumed exchangeable correlation structure. Incidence rates are estimated based on person-time from birth or study entry to the first date of documented microcephaly or latest study visit without microcephaly. FUP=follow-up, cART= combination ARV regimen.

References

    1. Cooper ER, Charurat M, Mofenson L, Hanson IC, Pitt J, Diaz D, et al. Combination antiretroviral strategies for the treatment of pregnant HIV-1 infected women and prevention of perinatal HIV-1 transmission. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005; 29(5):484–494.
    1. Zash RM, Williams PL, Sibiude J, Lyall H, Kakkar F. Surveillance monitoring for safety of in utero antiretroviral therapy exposures: current strategies and challenges. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016. (11):1501–1513.
    1. World Health Organization. Updated Recommendations on First-Line and Second-Line Antiretroviral Regimens and Post-Exposure Prophylaxis and Recommendations on Early Infant Diagnosis of HIV. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2018. , Accessed 5/2/2019.
    1. Rollins JD, Collins JS, Holden KR. United States head circumference growth reference charts: birth to 21 years. J Pediatr 2010; 156: 907–913.
    1. Epstein LG, Gelbard HA. HIV-induced neuronal injury in the developing brain. J Leukoc Biol. 1999; 65:453–457.
    1. Rosman NP, Tarquinio DC, Datseris M, Hou W, Mannheim GB, Emigh CE et al. Postnatal onset microcephaly: pathogenesis, patterns of growth, and prediction of outcome. Pediatrics 2011; 127:665–671.
    1. Baxter PS, Rigby AS, Rotsaert MH, Wright I. Acquired microcephaly: causes, patterns, motor and IQ effects, and associated growth changes. Pediatrics. 2009; 124(2): 590–595.
    1. Cheong JL, Hunt RW, Anderson PJ, Howard K, Thompson DK, Wang HX, et al. Head growth in preterm infants: correlation with magnetic resonance imagining and neurodevelopmental outcome. Pediatrics. 2008; 121:e1534–e1540.
    1. Macmillan C, Magder LS, Brouwers P, Chase C, Hittelman J, Lasky T, et al J. Head growth and neurodevelopment of infants born to HIV-1-infected drug-using women. Neurology. 2001; 57(8):1402–11.
    1. Evans C, Chasekwa B, Ntozini R, Humphrey JH, Prendergast AJ. Head circumference of children born to HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected mothers in Zimbabwe during the preantiretroviral therapy area. AIDS. 2016; 30: 2323–2328.
    1. Gomez C, Archila ME, Rugeles C, Carrizosa J, Rugeles MT, Cornejo JW. A prospective study of neurodevelopment of uninfected children born to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 positive mothers. Rev Neurol. 2009; 48: 287–291.
    1. Spaulding AB, Yu Q, Civitello L, Mussi-Pinhata, Pinto J, Gomes IM,, et al.; NISDI LILAC Study Team. Neurologic outcomes in HIV-exposed/uninfected infants exposed to antiretroviral drugs during pregnancy in Latin America and the Caribbean. AIDS Res Human Retrov. 2016; 32(4): 349–356.
    1. Neri D, Somarriba A, Schaefer NN, Chaparro AI, Scott GW, Lopez Mitnik G et al. Growth and body composition of uninfected children exposed to human immunodeficiency virus: comparison with a contemporary cohort and the United States national standards. J Pediatr. 2013; 163: 249–254.
    1. Siberry GK, Williams PL, Mendez H, Seage GR III, Jacobson D, et al. for the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study. Safety of tenofovir use during pregnancy: early growth outcomes in HIV-exposed uninfected infants. AIDS. 2012; 26:151–159.
    1. Williams PL, Seage GR, Van Dyke RB, Siberry GK, Griner R, et al. for the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study. A trigger-based design for evaluating the safety of in utero antiretroviral exposure in uninfected children of human immunodeficiency virus-infected mothers. Am J Epidemiol. 2012; 175(9):950–61.
    1. Tassiopoulos K, Read JS, Brogly S, Rich K, Lester B, Spector SA Yogev R, Seage GR. Substance use in HIV-infected women during pregnancy: self-report versus meconium analysis. AIDS Behav. 2010; 14(6):1269–1278.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clinical growth charts. Available at: . Accessed on February 10, 2019.
    1. Nellhaus G Head circumference from birth to eighteen years. Practical composite international and interracial graphs. Pediatrics. 1968; 41(1):106–14.
    1. Zemel BS, Pipan M, Stallings VA Growth charts for children with Down syndrome in the United States. Pediatrics. 2015; 136:e1204–e1211.
    1. World Health Organization: WHO child growth standards. Available at . Accessed June 18, 2019.
    1. Zou G A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(7):702–6.
    1. Correia K, Williams PL. A hierarchical modeling approach for assessing the safety of exposure to complex antiretroviral drug regimens during pregnancy. Stat Methods Med Res. 2017; doi: 10.1177/0962280217732597.
    1. Bayley N Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. Third Edition. San Antonio: Harcourt Assessment Inc.; 2006.
    1. Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scales of Intelligence — Third Edition. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation; 2002.
    1. Van der Wijer, Garcia LP, Hanswijk SL, Rando J, Middelman A et al. Neurodevelopmental and behavioral consequences of perinatal exposure to the HIV drug efavirenz in a rodent study. Translational Psych 2019; 9:84.
    1. Crowell C, Williams P, Yildirim C, Van Dyke R, Smith R, Chadwick E, Seage G III, Hazra R for the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study. Safety of In Utero Antiretroviral (ARV) Exposure: Neurologic Outcomes in HIV-Exposed, Uninfected Children. ID Week Conference, October 3 – 7, 2018, San Francisco, California.
    1. Cragan JD, Isenburg JL, Parker SE, Alverson CJ, Meyer RE, Stallings EB, et al.; National Birth Defects Prevention Network. Population-based microcephaly surveillance in the United States, 2009 to 2013: An analysis of potential sources of variation. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2016; 106(11):972–982.
    1. Orioli IM, Dolk H, Lopez-Camelo JS, Mattos D, Poletta FA, et al. Prevalence and clinical profile of microcephaly in South America pre-Zika, 2005–14: prevalence and case-control study. BMJ. 2017; 359:j5018.
    1. Ford N, Mofenson L, Shubber Z, Calmy A, Andrieux-Meyer I, Vitoria M, Shaffer N, Renaud F. Safety of efavirenz in the first trimester of pregnancy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2014; 28 Suppl 2:S123–31.
    1. Zash R, Jacobson DL, Diseko M, Mayondi G, Mmalane M, Essex M, et al. Comparative safety of dolutegravir-based or efavirenz-based antiretroviral treatment started during pregnancy in Botswana: an observational study. Lancet Glob Health. 2018; 6(7):e804–e810.
    1. Kanters S, Vitoria M, Doherty M, Socias ME, Ford N, Forrest JI, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet HIV. 2016; 3(11):e510–e520.
    1. Dugdale CM, Ciaranello AL, Bekker L-G, Stern ME, Myer L, et al. Risks and benefits of dolutegravir- and efavirenz-based strategies for South African women of child bearing potential. Ann Int Med 2019; doi: 10.7326/M18-3358.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir