Cremophor EL causes (pseudo-) non-linear pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in patients

O van Tellingen, M T Huizing, V R Panday, J H Schellens, W J Nooijen, J H Beijnen, O van Tellingen, M T Huizing, V R Panday, J H Schellens, W J Nooijen, J H Beijnen

Abstract

The non-linear plasma pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in patients has been well established, however, the exact underlying mechanism remains to be elucidated. We have previously shown that the non-linear plasma pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in mice results from Cremophor EL. To investigate whether Cremophor EL also plays a role in the non-linear pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in patients, we have established its pharmacokinetics in patients receiving paclitaxel by 3-, 24- or 96-h intravenous infusion. The pharmacokinetics of Cremophor EL itself was non-linear as the clearance (Cl) in the 3-h schedules was significantly lower than when using the longer 24- or 96-h infusions (Cl175-3 h = 42.8+/-24.9 ml h(-1) m(-2); CI175-24 h = 79.7+/-24.3; P = 0.035 and Cl135-3 h = 44.1+/-21.8 ml h(-1) m(-1); Cl140-96 h = 211.8+/-32.0; P < 0.001). Consequently, the maximum plasma levels were much higher (0.62%) in the 3-h infusions than when using longer infusion durations. By using an in vitro equilibrium assay and determination in plasma ultrafiltrate we have established that the fraction of unbound paclitaxel in plasma is inversely related with the Cremophor EL level. Despite its relatively low molecular weight, no Cremophor EL was found in the ultrafiltrate fraction. Our results strongly suggest that entrapment of paclitaxel in plasma by Cremophor EL, probably by inclusion in micelles, is the cause of the apparent nonlinear plasma pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel. This mechanism of a (pseudo-)non-linearity contrasts previous postulations about saturable distribution and elimination kinetics and means that we must re-evaluate previous assumptions on pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics relationships.

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 1995 Apr 13;332(15):1004-14
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1995 Jan;13(1):180-90
    1. Cancer Invest. 1995;13(4):381-404
    1. Cancer Res. 1996 May 1;56(9):2112-5
    1. Anticancer Drugs. 1996 Jan;7(1):78-86
    1. J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl. 1995 Dec 15;674(2):261-8
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 Sep 18;88(18):1297-301
    1. J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl. 1996 Jun 7;681(2):355-62
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jan;15(1):317-29
    1. Anal Biochem. 1998 Jan 15;255(2):171-5
    1. Lancet. 1998 Jul 25;352(9124):285
    1. Clin Cancer Res. 1998 Aug;4(8):1937-42
    1. J Pharm Sci. 1984 Jul;73(7):867-73
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Oct 20;85(20):1685-90
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Nov;11(11):2127-35
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Mar;12(3):532-8
    1. Semin Oncol. 1995 Jun;22(3 Suppl 6):16-23

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir