Effect of Visit-to-Visit Variation of Heart Rate and Systolic Blood Pressure on Outcomes in Chronic Systolic Heart Failure: Results From the Systolic Heart Failure Treatment With the If Inhibitor Ivabradine Trial (SHIFT) Trial

Michael Böhm, Michele Robertson, Jeffrey Borer, Ian Ford, Michel Komajda, Felix Mahfoud, Sebastian Ewen, Karl Swedberg, Luigi Tavazzi, Michael Böhm, Michele Robertson, Jeffrey Borer, Ian Ford, Michel Komajda, Felix Mahfoud, Sebastian Ewen, Karl Swedberg, Luigi Tavazzi

Abstract

Background: Elevated resting heart rate (HR) and low systolic blood pressure (SBP) are related to poor outcomes in heart failure (HF). The association between visit-to-visit variation in SBP and HR and risk in HF is unknown.

Methods and results: In Systolic Heart Failure Treatment with the If inhibitor ivabradine Trial (SHIFT) patients, we evaluated relationships between mean HR, mean SBP, and visit-to-visit variations (coefficient of variation [CV]=SD/mean×100%) in SBP and HR (SBP-CV and HR-CV, respectively) and primary composite endpoint (cardiovascular mortality or HF hospitalization), its components, all-cause mortality, and all-cause hospitalization. High HR and low SBP were closely associated with risk for primary endpoint, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization. The highest number of primary endpoint events occurred in the highest HR tertile (38.8% vs 16.4% lowest tertile; P<0.001). For HR-CV, patients at highest risk were those in the lowest tertile. Patients in the lowest thirds of mean SBP and SBP-CV had the highest risk. The combination of high HR and low HR-CV had an additive deleterious effect on risk, as did that of low SBP and low SBP-CV. Ivabradine reduced mean HR and increased HR-CV, and increased SBP and SBP-CV slightly.

Conclusions: Beyond high HR and low SBP, low HR-CV and low SBP-CV are predictors of cardiovascular outcomes with additive effects on risk in HF, but with an unknown effect size. Beyond HR reduction, ivabradine increases HR-CV. Low visit-to-visit variation of HR and SBP might signal risk of cardiovascular outcomes in systolic HF.

Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.isrctn.com/. Unique identifier: ISRCTN70429960.

Keywords: blood pressure; heart failure; heart rate–blood pressure variation.

© 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier event curves for the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization) (A), heart failure hospitalization (B), and all‐cause mortality (C) in placebo (left) and ivabradine (right) patients according to thirds of mean rate (heart rate mean) tertiles. Cox regression P values are given. HR CV indicates coefficient of heart rate variation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier event curves for the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization) (A), heart failure hospitalization (B), and all‐cause mortality (C) in placebo (left) and ivabradine (right) patients according to thirds of coefficient of heart rate variation (HR CV). Cox regression P values are given.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Adjusted hazard ratios show the association in placebo patients between thirds of heart rate (A, HR mean, left) and heart rate coefficient of variation (B, HR CV, right) and the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure), cardiovascular mortality (CV mortality), heart failure hospitalization (HF hospitalization), all‐cause mortality, and all‐cause hospitalization.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Interaction between mean heart rate (HR mean) and heart rate coefficient of variation (HR CV) for the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization) (A), cardiovascular mortality (B), and heart failure hospitalization (C) in placebo (left) and ivabradine (right) patients.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kaplan–Meier event curves for the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization) (A), heart failure hospitalization (B), and all‐cause mortality (C) in placebo (left) and ivabradine (right) patients according to thirds of mean systolic blood pressure (SBP mean).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Kaplan–Meier event curves for the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization) (A), heart failure hospitalization (B), and all‐cause mortality (C) in placebo (left) and ivabradine (right) patients according to thirds of coefficient of variation of systolic blood pressure (SBP CV). Cox regression P values are given.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Adjusted hazard ratios show the association in placebo patients between thirds of systolic blood pressure (A, SBP mean, left) and systolic blood pressure coefficient of variation (B, SBP CV, right) and the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure), cardiovascular mortality (CV mortality), heart failure hospitalization (HF hospitalization), all‐cause mortality, and all‐cause hospitalization.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Interaction between mean systolic blood pressure (SBP mean) and systolic blood pressure coefficient of variation (SBP CV) for the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization) (A), cardiovascular mortality (B), and heart failure hospitalization (C) in placebo (left) and ivabradine (right) patients.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Kaplan–Meier event curves for the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization) (A), heart failure hospitalization (B), and all‐cause mortality (C) in placebo (left) and ivabradine (right) patients according to third of mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Cox regression P values are given.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Kaplan–Meier event curves for the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization) (A), heart failure hospitalization (B), and all‐cause mortality (C) in placebo (left) and ivabradine (right) patients according to third of diastolic blood pressure coefficient of variation (DBP CV). Cox regression P values are given.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Association in placebo patients between thirds of diastolic blood pressure (A, DBP mean, left) and diastolic blood pressure coefficient of variation (B, DBP CV, right) and the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure), cardiovascular mortality (CV mortality), heart failure hospitalization (HF hospitalization), all‐cause mortality, and all‐cause hospitalization.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Interaction between mean heart rate (HR mean) and heart rate coefficient of variation (HR CV) for the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization) (A), cardiovascular mortality (B), and heart failure hospitalization (C) in placebo (left) and on ivabradine (right) patients.

References

    1. Gheorghiade M, Vaduganathan M, Ambrosy A, Böhm M, Campia U, Cleland JG, Fedele F, Fonarow GC, Maggioni AP, Mebazaa A, Mehra M, Metra M, Nodari S, Pang PS, Ponikowski P, Sabbah HN, Komajda M, Butler J. Current management and future directions for the treatment of patients hospitalized for heart failure with low blood pressure. Heart Fail Rev. 2013;18:107–122.
    1. Ambrosy AP, Vaduganathan M, Mentz RJ, Greene SJ, Subacius H, Konstam MA, Maggioni AP, Swedberg K, Gheorghiade M. Clinical profile and prognostic value of low systolic blood pressure in patients hospitalized for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: insights from the Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure: Outcome Study with Tolvaptan (EVEREST) trial. Am Heart J. 2013;165:216–225.
    1. Komajda M, Böhm M, Borer JS, Ford I, Robertson M, Manolis AJ, Tavazzi L, Swedberg K. Efficacy and safety of ivabradine in patients with chronic systolic heart failure according to blood pressure level in SHIFT. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16:810–816.
    1. Logeart D, Gueffet JP, Rouzet F, Pousset F, Chavelas C, Solal AC, Jondeau G. Heart rate per se impacts cardiac function in patients with systolic heart failure and pacing: a pilot study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009;11:53–57.
    1. Böhm M, Swedberg K, Komajda M, Borer JS, Ford I, Dubost‐Brama A, Lerebours G, Tavazzi L. Heart rate as a risk factor in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): the association between heart rate and outcomes in a randomised placebo‐controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:886–894.
    1. Kikuya M, Ohkubo T, Metoki H, Asayama K, Hara A, Obara T, Inoue R, Hoshi H, Hashimoto J, Totsune K, Satoh H, Imai Y. Day‐by‐day variability of blood pressure and heart rate at home as a novel predictor of prognosis: the Ohasama study. Hypertension. 2008;52:1045–1050.
    1. Pierdomenico SD, Di NM, Esposito AL, Di MR, Ballone E, Lapenna D, Cuccurullo F. Prognostic value of different indices of blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens. 2009;22:842–847.
    1. Hata Y, Kimura Y, Muratani H, Fukiyama K, Kawano Y, Ashida T, Yokouchi M, Imai Y, Ozawa T, Fujii J, Omae T. Office blood pressure variability as a predictor of brain infarction in elderly hypertensive patients. Hypertens Res. 2000;23:553–560.
    1. Hsieh YT, Tu ST, Cho TJ, Chang SJ, Chen JF, Hsieh MC. Visit‐to‐visit variability in blood pressure strongly predicts all‐cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 5.5‐year prospective analysis. Eur J Clin Invest. 2012;42:245–253.
    1. Mancia G, Facchetti R, Parati G, Zanchetti A. Visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability, carotid atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular events in the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2012;126:569–578.
    1. Nagai M, Kario K. Visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability, silent cerebral injury, and risk of stroke. Am J Hypertens. 2013;26:1369–1376.
    1. Matsumoto A, Satoh M, Kikuya M, Ohkubo T, Hirano M, Inoue R, Hashimoto T, Hara A, Hirose T, Obara T, Metoki H, Asayama K, Hosokawa A, Totsune K, Hoshi H, Hosokawa T, Sato H, Imai Y. Day‐to‐day variability in home blood pressure is associated with cognitive decline: the Ohasama study. Hypertension. 2014;63:1333–1338.
    1. Swedberg K, Komajda M, Böhm M, Borer J, Ford I, Dubost‐Brama A, Lerebours G, Tavazzi L. Ivabradine and outcomes in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): a randomised placebo‐controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:875–885.
    1. Böhm M, Borer J, Ford I, Gonzalez‐Juanatey JR, Komajda M, Lopez‐Sendon J, Reil JC, Swedberg K, Tavazzi L. Heart rate at baseline influences the effect of ivabradine on cardiovascular outcomes in chronic heart failure: analysis from the SHIFT study. Clin Res Cardiol. 2013;102:11–22.
    1. Swedberg K, Komajda M, Böhm M, Borer JS, Ford I, Tavazzi L. Rationale and design of a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled outcome trial of ivabradine in chronic heart failure: the Systolic Heart Failure Treatment with the I(f) Inhibitor Ivabradine Trial (SHIFT). Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12:75–81.
    1. Muntner P, Joyce C, Levitan EB, Holt E, Shimbo D, Webber LS, Oparil S, Re R, Krousel‐Wood M. Reproducibility of visit‐to‐visit variability of blood pressure measured as part of routine clinical care. J Hypertens. 2011;29:2332–2338.
    1. Lonn EM, Rambihar S, Gao P, Custodis FF, Sliwa K, Teo KK, Yusuf S, Böhm M. Heart rate is associated with increased risk of major cardiovascular events, cardiovascular and all‐cause death in patients with stable chronic cardiovascular disease: an analysis of ONTARGET/TRANSCEND. Clin Res Cardiol. 2014;103:149–159.
    1. Rothwell PM. Limitations of the usual blood‐pressure hypothesis and importance of variability, instability, and episodic hypertension. Lancet. 2010;375:938–948.
    1. Diaz KM, Tanner RM, Falzon L, Levitan EB, Reynolds K, Shimbo D, Muntner P. Visit‐to‐visit variability of blood pressure and cardiovascular disease and all‐cause mortality: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Hypertension. 2014;64:965–982.
    1. Muntner P, Levitan EB, Joyce C, Holt E, Mann D, Oparil S, Krousel‐Wood M. Association between antihypertensive medication adherence and visit‐to‐visit variability of blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013;15:112–117.
    1. Krakoff LR. Fluctuation: does blood pressure variability matter? Circulation. 2012;126:525–527.
    1. Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, O'Brien E, Dobson JE, Dahlöf B, Sever PS, Poulter NR. Prognostic significance of visit‐to‐visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet. 2010;375:895–905.
    1. Hata J, Arima H, Rothwell PM, Woodward M, Zoungas S, Anderson C, Patel A, Neal B, Glasziou P, Hamet P, Mancia G, Poulter N, Williams B, MacMahon S, Chalmers J. Effects of visit‐to‐visit variability in systolic blood pressure on macrovascular and microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the ADVANCE trial. Circulation. 2013;128:1325–1334.
    1. Webb AJ, Fischer U, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM. Effects of antihypertensive‐drug class on interindividual variation in blood pressure and risk of stroke: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:906–915.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir