The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review

E N de Vries, M A Ramrattan, S M Smorenburg, D J Gouma, M A Boermeester, E N de Vries, M A Ramrattan, S M Smorenburg, D J Gouma, M A Boermeester

Abstract

Introduction: Adverse events in hospitals constitute a serious problem with grave consequences. Many studies have been conducted to gain an insight into this problem, but a general overview of the data is lacking. We performed a systematic review of the literature on in-hospital adverse events.

Methods: A formal search of Embase, Cochrane and Medline was performed. Studies were reviewed independently for methodology, inclusion and exclusion criteria and endpoints. Primary endpoints were incidence of in-hospital adverse events and percentage of preventability. Secondary endpoints were adverse event outcome and subdivision by provider of care, location and type of event.

Results: Eight studies including a total of 74 485 patient records were selected. The median overall incidence of in-hospital adverse events was 9.2%, with a median percentage of preventability of 43.5%. More than half (56.3%) of patients experienced no or minor disability, whereas 7.4% of events were lethal. Operation- (39.6%) and medication-related (15.1%) events constituted the majority. We present a summary of evidence-based interventions aimed at these categories of events.

Conclusions: Adverse events during hospital admission affect nearly one out of 10 patients. A substantial part of these events are preventable. Since a large proportion of the in-hospital events are operation- or drug-related, interventions aimed at preventing these events have the potential to make a substantial difference.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1. Flow chart of article retrieval.…
Figure 1. Flow chart of article retrieval. AE, adverse event.

References

    1. Kohn LT. To err is human: building a safer health care system. 1-11-1999. Institute of Medicine. (accessed 17 Mar 2008)
    1. Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR, et al. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care 2000;38:261–71
    1. Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, et al. The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust 1995;163:458–71
    1. Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Newhouse JP, et al. Costs of medical injuries in Utah and Colorado. Inquiry 1999;36:255–64
    1. Dankelman J, Grimbergen CA. Systems approach to reduce errors in surgery. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1017–21
    1. Andrews LB, Stocking C, Krizek T, et al. An alternative strategy for studying adverse events in medical care. Lancet 1997;349:309–13
    1. Ehsani JP, Jackson T, Duckett SJ. The incidence and cost of adverse events in Victorian hospitals 2003–04. Med J Aust 2006;184:551–5
    1. Jackson T, Duckett SJ, Shepheard J, et al. Measurement of adverse events using “incidence flagged” diagnosis codes. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 2006;11:21–6
    1. Forster AJ, Asmis TR, Clark HD, et al. Ottawa Hospital Patient Safety Study: incidence and timing of adverse events in patients admitted to a Canadian teaching hospital. CMAJ 2004;170:1235–40
    1. Michel P, Quenon JL, de Sarasqueta AM, et al. Comparison of three methods for estimating rates of adverse events and rates of preventable adverse events in acute care hospitals. BMJ 2004;328:199.
    1. Szekendi MK, Sullivan C, Bobb A, et al. Active surveillance using electronic triggers to detect adverse events in hospitalized patients. Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:184–90
    1. Bates DW, O’Neil AC, Boyle D, et al. Potential identifiability and preventability of adverse events using information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994;1:404–11
    1. Briant R, Buchanan J, Lay-Yee R, et al. Representative case series from New Zealand public hospital admissions in 1998—III: adverse events and death. N Z Med J 2006;119:U1909.
    1. Davis P, Lay-Yee R, Briant R, et al. Preventable in-hospital medical injury under the “no fault” system in New Zealand. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:251–6
    1. Thomas EJ, Orav EJ, Brennan TA. Hospital ownership and preventable adverse events. Int J Health Serv 2000;30:745–61
    1. Wilson RM, Harrison BT, Gibberd RW, et al. An analysis of the causes of adverse events from the Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust 1999;170:411–15
    1. Braithwaite RS, Devita MA, Mahidhara R, et al. Use of medical emergency team (MET) responses to detect medical errors. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:255–9
    1. Davis P, Lay-Yee R, Schug S, et al. Adverse events regional feasibility study: indicative findings. N Z Med J 2001;114:203–5
    1. Hayward RA, Hofer TP. Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer. JAMA 2001;286:415–20
    1. Karson AS, Bates DW. Screening for adverse events. J Eval Clin Pract 1999;5:23–32
    1. Thornlow DK, Stukenborg GJ. The association between hospital characteristics and rates of preventable complications and adverse events. Med Care 2006;44:265–9
    1. Unruh L. Trends in adverse events in hospitalized patients. J Healthc Qual 2002;24:4–10
    1. Bates DW, O’Neil AC, Petersen LA, et al. Evaluation of screening criteria for adverse events in medical patients. Med Care 1995;33:452–62
    1. Davis P, Lay-Yee R, Briant R, et al. Adverse events in New Zealand public hospitals II: preventability and clinical context. N Z Med J 2003;116:U624.
    1. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med 1991;324:377–84
    1. Neale G, Woloshynowych M, Vincent C. Exploring the causes of adverse events in NHS hospital practice. J R Soc Med 2001;94:322–30
    1. Hiatt HH, Barnes BA, Brennan TA, et al. A study of medical injury and medical malpractice. N Engl J Med 1989;321:480–4
    1. O’Neil AC, Petersen LA, Cook EF, et al. Physician reporting compared with medical-record review to identify adverse medical events. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:370–6
    1. Sari AB, Sheldon TA, Cracknell A, et al. Sensitivity of routine system for reporting patient safety incidents in an NHS hospital: retrospective patient case note review. BMJ 2007;334:79.
    1. Davis P, Lay-Yee R, Briant R, et al. Adverse events in New Zealand public hospitals I: occurrence and impact. N Z Med J 2002;115:U271.
    1. Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V, et al. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ 2004;170:1678–86
    1. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. 1991. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:145–51
    1. Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M. Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ 2001;322:517–19
    1. Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:511–20
    1. Scheeres DE, Mellinger JD, Brasser BA, et al. Animate advanced laparoscopic courses improve resident operative performance. Am J Surg 2004;188:157–60
    1. Bellomo R, Goldsmith D, Uchino S, et al. Prospective controlled trial of effect of medical emergency team on postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. Crit Care Med 2004;32:916–21
    1. Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, et al. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med 1996;24:2053–8
    1. Song F, Glenny AM. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 1998;85:1232–41
    1. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1209–15
    1. Greif R, Akca O, Horn EP, et al. Supplemental perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection. Outcomes Research Group. N Engl J Med 2000;342:161–7
    1. Furnary AP, Wu Y. Clinical effects of hyperglycemia in the cardiac surgery population: the portland diabetic project. Endocr Pract 2006;12(Suppl 3):22–6
    1. Devereaux PJ, Beattie WS, Choi PT, et al. How strong is the evidence for the use of perioperative beta blockers in non-cardiac surgery? Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2005;331:313–21
    1. Overhage JM, Tierney WM, Zhou XH, et al. A randomized trial of “corollary orders” to prevent errors of omission. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997;4:364–75
    1. Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Clapp MD, et al. Pharmacist participation on physician rounds and adverse drug events in the intensive care unit. JAMA 1999;282:267–70
    1. Poon EG, Cina JL, Churchill W, et al. Medication dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events before and after implementing bar code technology in the pharmacy. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:426–34
    1. Cromheecke ME, Levi M, Colly LP, et al. Oral anticoagulation self-management and management by a specialist anticoagulation clinic: a randomised cross-over comparison. Lancet 2000;356:97–102
    1. Runciman WB, Webb RK, Helps SC, et al. A comparison of iatrogenic injury studies in Australia and the USA. II: Reviewer behaviour and quality of care. Int J Qual Health Care 2000;12:379–88
    1. Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Runciman WB, et al. A comparison of iatrogenic injury studies in Australia and the USA. I: Context, methods, casemix, population, patient and hospital characteristics. Int J Qual Health Care 2000;12:371–8
    1. Lilford RJ, Mohammed MA, Braunholtz D, et al. The measurement of active errors: methodological issues. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12(Suppl 2):ii8–12S
    1. Brennan TA, Gawande A, Thomas E, et al. Accidental deaths, saved lives, and improved quality. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1405–9

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir