Development of the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research's socioeconomic status index for use in the network's sites in low and lower middle-income countries

Archana B Patel, Carla M Bann, Ana L Garces, Nancy F Krebs, Adrien Lokangaka, Antoinette Tshefu, Carl L Bose, Sarah Saleem, Robert L Goldenberg, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Richard J Derman, Elwyn Chomba, Waldemar A Carlo, Fabian Esamai, Edward A Liechty, Marion Koso-Thomas, Elizabeth M McClure, Patricia L Hibberd, Archana B Patel, Carla M Bann, Ana L Garces, Nancy F Krebs, Adrien Lokangaka, Antoinette Tshefu, Carl L Bose, Sarah Saleem, Robert L Goldenberg, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Richard J Derman, Elwyn Chomba, Waldemar A Carlo, Fabian Esamai, Edward A Liechty, Marion Koso-Thomas, Elizabeth M McClure, Patricia L Hibberd

Abstract

Background: Socioeconomic status (SES) is an important determinant of health globally and an important explanatory variable to assess causality in epidemiological research. The 10th Sustainable Development Goal is to reduce disparities in SES that impact health outcomes globally. It is easier to study SES in high-income countries because household income is representative of the SES. However, it is well recognized that income is poorly reported in low- and middle- income countries (LMIC) and is an unreliable indicator of SES. Therefore, there is a need for a robust index that will help to discriminate the SES of rural households in a pooled dataset from LMIC.

Methods: The study was nested in the population-based Maternal and Neonatal Health Registry of the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research which has 7 rural sites in 6 Asian, sub-Saharan African and Central American countries. Pregnant women enrolling in the Registry were asked questions about items such as housing conditions and household assets. The characteristics of the candidate items were evaluated using confirmatory factor analyses and item response theory analyses. Based on the results of these analyses, a final set of items were selected for the SES index.

Results: Using data from 49,536 households of pregnant women, we reduced the data collected to a 10-item index. The 10 items were feasible to administer, covered the SES continuum and had good internal reliability and validity. We developed a sum score-based Item Response Theory scoring algorithm which is easy to compute and is highly correlated with scores based on response patterns (r = 0.97), suggesting minimal loss of information with the simplified approach. Scores varied significantly by site (p < 0.001). African sites had lower mean SES scores than the Asian and Central American sites. The SES index demonstrated good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.81). Higher SES scores were significantly associated with formal education, more education, having received antenatal care, and facility delivery (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: While measuring SES in LMIC is challenging, we have developed a Global Network Socioeconomic Status Index which may be useful for comparisons of SES within and between locations. Next steps include understanding how the index is associated with maternal, perinatal and neonatal mortality. Trial Registration NCT01073475 Socioeconomic status (SES) is an important determinant of health globally, and improving SES is important to reduce disparities in health outcomes. It is easier to study SES in high-income countries because it can be measured by income and what income is spent on, but this concept does not translate easily to low and middle income countries. We developed a questionnaire that includes 10 items to determine SES in low-resource settings that was added to an ongoing Maternal and Neonatal Health Registry that is funded by the National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development's Global Network. The Registry includes sites that collect outcomes of pregnancies in women and their babies in rural areas in 6 countries in South Asia, sub-Saharan Africa and Central America. The Registry is population based and tracks women from early in pregnancy to day 42 post-partum. The questionnaire is easy to administer and has good reliability and validity. Next steps include understanding how the index is associated with maternal, fetal and neonatal mortality.

Keywords: Determinants of health; Disparities; Global Network for Women’ and Children’s Health Research; Global health; Lower and middle income countries (LMIC); Socioeconomic status.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Item characteristic curves of the relationship between SES and probability of endorsing global network SES index items by site

References

    1. American Psychological Association.. Accessed 10 Apr 2019.
    1. United Nations. Sustainable development goals. . Accessed 10 Apr 2019.
    1. Houweling TAJ, Kunst AE. Socio-economic inequalities in childhood mortality in low- and middle-income countries: a review of the international evidence. Br Med Bull. 2010;93(1):7–26. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldp048.
    1. Pollack CE, Chideya S, Cubbin C, Williams B, Dekker M, Braveman P. Should health studies measure wealth? A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:250–264. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.033.
    1. Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA, Caulfield LE, de Onis M, Ezzati M, et al. Maternal and Child Undernutrition Study Group: Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet. 2008;371:243–260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61690-0.
    1. Oakes JM, Rossi PH. The measurement of SES in health research: current practice and steps toward a new approach. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(4):769. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00073-4.
    1. Deaton A, Zaidi S. Guidelines for constructing consumption aggregates for welfare analysis, Living standards measurement study (LSMS) working paper; no. LSM 135. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. 2002.
    1. Filmer D, Pritchett LH. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data-or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography. 2001;38:115–132.
    1. Rutstein SO, Johnson K: The DHS Wealth Index: DHS comparative reports No. 6. Calverton, MD: ORC Macro; 2004.
    1. Rutstein SO: The DHS Wealth Index: approaches for rural and urban areas. DHS Working Papers No. 60. Calverton, MD: Macro International; 2008.
    1. Alkire S, Santos ME: Acute Multidimensional Poverty: a new index for developing countries. Oxford: Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative; 2010. OPHI Working Paper 38.
    1. Psaki SR, Seidman JC, Miller M, Gottlieb M, Bhutta ZA, Ahmed T, et al; MAL-ED Network Investigators. Measuring socioeconomic status in multicountry studies: results from the eight-country MAL-ED study. Popul Health Metr. 2014;12(1):8.
    1. Chasekwa B, Maluccio JA, Ntozini R, Moulton LH, Wu F, Smith LE, et al; SHINE Trial Team. Measuring wealth in rural communities: Lessons from the Sanitation, Hygiene, Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) trial. PLoS One. 2018;13(6).
    1. Smits J, Steendijk R. The international wealth index (IWI) Soc Indic Res. 2015;122(1):65–85. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0683-x.
    1. Goudar SS, Carlo WA, McClure EM, Pasha O, Patel A, Esamai F, et al. The Maternal and Newborn Health Registry Study of the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;118(3):190–193. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.04.022.
    1. Goudar SS, Stolka KB, Koso-Thomas M, Honnungar NV, Mastiholi SC, Ramadurg UY, et al. Data quality monitoring and performance metrics of a prospective, population-based observational study of maternal and newborn health in low resource settings. Reprod Health. 2015;12(Suppl 2):S2. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-12-S2-S2.
    1. Pasha O, Saleem S, Ali S, Goudar SS, Garces A, Esamai F, et al. Maternal and newborn outcomes in Pakistan compared to other low and middle income countries in the Global Network's Maternal Newborn Health Registry: an active, community-based, pregnancy surveillance mechanism. Reprod Health. 2015;12(Suppl 2):S15. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-12-S2-S15.
    1. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User’s Guide. 8. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthé; 2017.
    1. Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2015.
    1. Hu, L, and Bentler, PM. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55.
    1. Cai L, Thissen D, du Toit SHCSHC. IRTPRO for Windows [Computer Software] Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International; 2011.
    1. Thissen D, Orlando M. Item response theory for items scored in two categories. In: Wainer H, Thissen DH, editors. Test scoring. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001. pp. 73–140.
    1. Lalloué B, Monnez JM, Padilla C, Kihal W, LeMeur N, Zmirou-Navier D, Deguen S. A statistical procedure to create a neighborhood socioeconomic index for health inequalities analysis. Int J Equity in Health. 2013;12:21. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-21.
    1. Messer LC, Laraia BA, Kaufman JS, Eyster J, Holzman C, Culhane J, Elo I, Burke JG, O’Campo P. The development of a standardized neighborhood deprivation index. J Urban Health. 2006;83:1041–1062. doi: 10.1007/s11524-006-9094-x.
    1. Pampalon R, Hamel D, Gamache P, Raymond G. A deprivation index for health planning in Canada. Chronic Dis Can. 2009;29:178–191. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.29.4.05.
    1. Rey G, Jougla E, Fouillet A, Hémon D. Ecological association between a deprivation index and mortality in France over the period 1997–2001: variations with spatial scale, degree of urbanicity, age, gender and cause of death. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-33.
    1. Vyas S, Kumaranayake L. Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Plann. 2006;21(6):459–468. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czl029.
    1. Howe LD, Galobardes B, Matijasevich A, et al. Measuring socio-economic position for epidemiological studies in low- and middle-income countries: a methods of measurement in epidemiology paper. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(3):871–886. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys037.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir