Profile of osteopathic practice in Spain: results from a standardized data collection study

Gerard Alvarez Bustins, Pedro-Victor López Plaza, Sonia Roura Carvajal, Gerard Alvarez Bustins, Pedro-Victor López Plaza, Sonia Roura Carvajal

Abstract

Background: There is limited research regarding patients' profiles and consumer attitudes and habits of osteopathy in Spain. The purpose of this study was to profile patients who regularly receive osteopathic care in Spain using an internationally developed standardized data collection tool.

Method: During the period between April 2014 and December 2015, a UK-developed standardized data collection tool was distributed to Spanish osteopaths who voluntarily agreed to participate in this cross-sectional study.

Results: Thirty-six osteopaths participated in this study and returned a total of 314 completed datasets. Of 314 patients, 61% were women and 39% were men, with a mean age of 40 years (SD 17.02 years, range 0 to 83 years). Forty-four percent were full-time salaried workers, and in 78% of cases, receiving osteopathic treatment was the patient's own choice. Chronic spinal pain presentations were the most frequent reasons for consultation. Seventy-five percent of patients presented with a coexisting condition, mainly gastrointestinal disorders and headaches. The main treatment approach consisted of mobilization techniques, followed by soft tissue, cranial and high velocity thrust techniques. Improvement or resolution of the complaint was experienced by 93% of patients after a small number of sessions. Adverse events were minor and occurred in 7% of all cases.

Conclusion: This is the first study carried out in Spain analyzing the profile of patients who receive osteopathic care. The typical patient who receives osteopathic care in Spain is middle-aged, presents mainly with chronic spinal pain, and voluntarily seeks osteopathic treatment. Osteopathic treatment produces a significant improvement in the majority of cases with a low rate of minor adverse events reported.

Keywords: Clinical presentations; Cross-sectional survey; Osteopathic medicine; Osteopathy; Scope of practice; Standardized data collection.

Conflict of interest statement

Author’s information

Gerard Alvarez - PhD student on Biomedical Research Methodology and Public Health in the Medical Department of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. (Barcelona (Spain)).

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Institutional Review Board of Barcelona Osteopathic Foundation approved the study (FOB04140001). Informed consent was assumed by participation in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Tricot P, Puig JB. OSTEOPATÍA. una Terapia Por Descubrir. Editorial Paidotribo; 2006.
    1. van Dun P, Wagner C. Die Identität der Osteopathie in Europa. Osteopathische Medizin. 2012;13(4):22–26. doi: 10.1016/S1615-9071(12)60062-8.
    1. COFENAT, CONAMAD, TENACAT. Observatorio de las Terapias Naturales. Published May 1, 2008. Accessed 6 May 2017.
    1. Ministerio de Sanidad, Política Social e Igualdad. Análisis de la situación de las terapias naturales. . Published December 19, 2011. Accessed 6 May 2017.
    1. Fawkes C, Leach J, Matias S, Moore A. The standardised data collection project. Standardised data collection within osteopathic practice in the UK: development and first use of a tool to profile osteopathic care in 2009. East Sussex: National Council for osteopathic research (NCOR) university of Brighton; 2010.
    1. Burke SR, Myers R, Zhang AL. A profile of osteopathic practice in Australia 2010-2011: a cross sectional survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14(1):227. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-227.
    1. Fawkes CA, Leach CMJ, Mathias S, Moore AP. A Profile of osteopathic care in private practices in the United Kingdom: a national pilot using standardised data collection. Man Ther. 2013;19(2):125–130. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.09.001.
    1. Morin C, Aubin A. Primary reasons for osteopathic consultation: a prospective survey in Quebec. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e106259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106259.
    1. Wilkinson J, Thomas KJ, Freeman JV. Day-to-day practice of osteopaths using osteopathy in the cranial field, who are affiliated with the Sutherland Cranial College of Osteopathy (SCCO): a national survey. Int J Osteopath Med. 2015;18(1):13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2014.04.008.
    1. van Dun P, Nicolaie MA, Van Messem A. State of affairs of osteopathy in the Benelux: Benelux Osteosurvey 2013. Int J Osteopath Med. 2016;20:3–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2016.01.003.
    1. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain), numeric rating scale for pain (NRS pain), McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), chronic pain grade scale (CPGS), short Form-36 bodily pain scale (SF-36 BPS), and measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP) Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63(Suppl 11):S240–S252. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543.
    1. Ryan A, Wilson S, Taylor A, Greenfield S. Factors associated with self-care activities among adults in the United Kingdom: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-96.
    1. Murthy V, Sibbritt DW, Adams J. An integrative review of complementary and alternative medicine use for back pain: a focus on prevalence, reasons for use, influential factors, self-perceived effectiveness, and communication. Spine J. 2015;15(8):1870–1883. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.04.049.
    1. Vlieger AM, van de Putte EM, Hoeksma H. The use of complementary and alternative medicine in children at a general paediatric clinic and parental reasons for use. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006;150(11):625-30.
    1. Low E, Murray DM, O'Mahony O, O'B Hourihane J. Complementary and alternative medicine use in Irish paediatric patients. Ir J Med Sci. 2008;177(2):147–150. doi: 10.1007/s11845-008-0152-0.
    1. Hameen-Anttila KP, Niskala UR, Siponen SM, Ahonen RS. The use of complementary and alternative medicine products in preceding two days among Finnish parents - a population survey. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011;11(1):107. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-107.
    1. Posadzki P, Watson L, Alotaibi A, Ernst E. Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)-use in UK paediatric patients: a systematic review of surveys. Complement Ther Med. 2013;21(3):224–231. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2012.11.006.
    1. Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Alonso-Blanco C, Hernández-Barrera V, Palacios-Ceña D, Jiménez-García R, Carrasco-Garrido P. Has the prevalence of neck pain and low back pain changed over the last 5 years? A population-based national study in Spain. Spine J. 2013;13(9):1069–1076. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.064.
    1. Palacios-Ceña D, Alonso-Blanco C, Hernández-Barrera V, Carrasco-Garrido P, Jiménez-García R, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C. Prevalence of neck and low back pain in community-dwelling adults in Spain: an updated population-based national study (2009/10-2011/12) Eur Spine J. 2015;24(3):482–492. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3567-5.
    1. Kovacs FM, Fernández C, Cordero A, et al. Non-specific low back pain in primary care in the Spanish National Health Service: a prospective study on clinical outcomes and determinants of management. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:57. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-57.
    1. Ong C-K, Doll H, Bodeker G, Stewart-Brown S. Use of osteopathic or chiropractic services among people with back pain: a UK population survey. Health Soc Care Community. 2004;12(3):265–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00497.x.
    1. Voigt K, Liebnitzky J, Burmeister U, et al. Efficacy of osteopathic manipulative treatment of female patients with migraine: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Altern Complement Med. 2011;17(3):225–230. doi: 10.1089/acm.2009.0673.
    1. Adragna V, Bertino AS, Carano M, Soru A, Taranto G, Desideri R. O052. Migraine without aura and osteopathic medicine, a non-pharmacological approach to pain and quality of life: open pilot study. J Headache Pain. 2015;16(S1):127. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-16-S1-A127.
    1. Cerritelli F, Ginevri L, Messi G, et al. Clinical effectiveness of osteopathic treatment in chronic migraine: 3-armed randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med. 2015;23(2):149–156. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2015.01.011.
    1. D'Ippolito M, Tramontano M, Buzzi MG. Effects of osteopathic manipulative therapy on pain and mood disorders in patients with high-frequency migraine. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2017;117(6):365–369. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2017.074.
    1. Schabert E, Crow WT. Impact of osteopathic manipulative treatment on cost of care for patients with migraine headache: a retrospective review of patient records. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2009;109(8):403–407.
    1. Cerritelli F, Lacorte E, Ruffini N, Vanacore N. Osteopathy for primary headache patients: a systematic review. JPR. 2017;Volume 10:601–611. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S130501.
    1. Posadzki P, Ernst E. Osteopathy for musculoskeletal pain patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30(2):285–291. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1600-6.
    1. Franke H, Franke J-D, Fryer G. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15(1):286–218. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-286.
    1. Majchrzycki M, Wolski H, Seremak-Mrozikiewicz A, et al. Application of osteopathic manipulative technique in the treatment of back pain during pregnancy. Ginekol Pol. 2015;86(3):224–228. doi: 10.17772/gp/2066.
    1. Schwerla F, Rother K, Rother D, Ruetz M, Resch K-L. Osteopathic manipulative therapy in women with postpartum low back pain and disability: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2015;115(7):416–425. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2015.087.
    1. Licciardone JC, Gatchel RJ, Aryal S. Recovery from chronic low back pain after osteopathic manipulative treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2016;116(3):144–155. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2016.031.
    1. Franke H, Franke J-D, Fryer G. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for chronic nonspecific neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Osteopath Med. 2015;18(4):255–267. doi: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2015.05.003.
    1. Dunning JR, Butts R, Mourad F, et al. Upper cervical and upper thoracic manipulation versus mobilization and exercise in patients with cervicogenic headache: a multi-center randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):64. 10.1186/s12891-016-0912-3.
    1. Hubert D, Soubeiran L, Gourmelon F, et al. Impact of osteopathic treatment on pain in adult patients with cystic fibrosis--a pilot randomized controlled study. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102465.
    1. Muller A, Franke H, Resch K-L, Fryer G. Effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative therapy for managing symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014;114(6):470–479. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2014.098.
    1. Swender DA, Thompson G, Schneider K, McCoy K, Patel A. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for inpatients with pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis: effects on spirometry findings and patient assessments of breathing, anxiety, and pain. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014;114(6):450–458. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2014.095.
    1. Cerritelli F, Pizzolorusso G, Renzetti C, et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of osteopathic manipulative treatment on preterms. Rubens C. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0127370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127370.
    1. Ruffini N, D'Alessandro G, Cardinali L, Frondaroli F, Cerritelli F. Osteopathic manipulative treatment in gynecology and obstetrics: a systematic review. Complement Ther Med. 2016;26:72–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.03.005.
    1. Paanalahti K, Holm LW, Nordin M, Asker M, Lyander J, Skillgate E. Adverse events after manual therapy among patients seeking care for neck and/or back pain: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-77.
    1. Todd AJ, Carroll MT, Robinson A, Mitchell EKL. Adverse events due to chiropractic and other manual therapies for infants and children: a review of the literature. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2015;38(9):699–712. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.09.008.
    1. Carnes D, Mars TS, Mullinger B, Froud R, Underwood M. Adverse events and manual therapy: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010;15(4):355–363. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2009.12.006.
    1. Steel A, Sundberg T, Reid R, et al. Osteopathic manipulative treatment: a systematic review and critical appraisal of comparative effectiveness and health economics research. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;27:165–175. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.10.067.
    1. Licciardone JC. Systematic review of comparative effectiveness and health economics research relating to osteopathic manipulative treatment. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;29:e16–e17. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.01.006.
    1. Parsons S, Harding G, Breen A, et al. The influence of patients“ and primary care practitioners” beliefs and expectations about chronic musculoskeletal pain on the process of care: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Clin J Pain. 2007;23(1):91–98. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000210947.34676.34.
    1. Luxford K, Safran DG, Delbanco T. Promoting patient-centered care: a qualitative study of facilitators and barriers in healthcare organizations with a reputation for improving the patient experience. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011;23(5):510–515. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr024.
    1. Dwamena F, Holmes-Rovner M, Gaulden CM, et al. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD003267.
    1. Orrock PJ. The patient experience of osteopathic healthcare. Man Ther. 2016;22(C:131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.11.003.
    1. Alzuri AG. Osteopaths in Spain: a survey of training and practice patterns. (thesis dissertation) European School of Osteopathy. 2003.
    1. Brea JV. Exploring the identity of the osteopaths in Spain. A survey study. (thesis dissertation) European School of Osteopathy. 2012.
    1. Cano S. Osteopathy in Spain: a survey to explore the practice characteristics, training, and attitudes towards regulation. (thesis dissertation) London School of Osteopathy. 2014.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir