The Italian Osteopathic Practitioners Estimates and RAtes (OPERA) study: A cross sectional survey

Francesco Cerritelli, Patrick L S van Dun, Jorge E Esteves, Giacomo Consorti, Paola Sciomachen, Eleonora Lacorte, Nicola Vanacore, OPERA-IT Group, Francesco Cerritelli, Patrick L S van Dun, Jorge E Esteves, Giacomo Consorti, Paola Sciomachen, Eleonora Lacorte, Nicola Vanacore, OPERA-IT Group

Abstract

The prevalence of osteopathic practitioners, their professional profile and features of their clinical practice, particularly where statutory regulation does not yet exist, are still significantly underreported. The Osteopathic Practitioners Estimates and RAtes (OPERA) project was developed as an European-based census dedicated to profiling the osteopathic profession across Europe. The present study aimed to describe the osteopathic practitioners and the profession in Italy. A voluntary, online based, closed-ended survey was distributed across Italy in the period between February and June 2017. An e-based campaign was set up to reach the Italian osteopathic professionals. Participants were asked to complete the forms by filling in the information regarding the demographics, working status and professional activities, education, consultation fees, patient complaints, treatment and management. The survey was completed by 4816 individuals. 196 people started the survey but did not finish, which corresponds to a 4% attrition rate. The majority of respondents were males (66.7%). The modal age group was 30-39 (40.0%). 73.8% of respondents had a previous academic degree, mainly in the fields of sports science (36.4%) and physiotherapy (25.3%). 25.6% declared not to have a previous academic degree. The majority of respondents declared to work alone (58.4%), while the remaining declared to work in association with other professionals. The osteopaths /citizens ratio was 8.0 osteopaths/100,000 citizens. The profile of osteopaths in Italy seems to be characterised by a self-employed young adult male working mostly as a sole practitioner, who has been trained as osteopath through a part-time curriculum and had a previous degree mostly in the fields of sports science or physiotherapy. These results provide important insights into the osteopathic profession in Italy. The varied professional educational backgrounds need to be considered with regard to the implementation of a professional licensing process and future pre-registration education in the country. The number of respondents is an estimate of the actual number of Italian osteopaths. Only the completion of the regulatory process and the creation of the mandatory official register will allow to know the number of Italy based osteopaths.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Data warehouse description.
Fig 1. Data warehouse description.
Fig 2. Bar chart of gender distribution…
Fig 2. Bar chart of gender distribution across different age groups.

References

    1. Dyson B. Improving general practice–phase one report. National Health System 2014.
    1. McDonnell A, Wilson R, Goodacre S. Evaluating and implementing new services. BMJ. 2006;332(7533):109–12. Epub 2006/01/18. 10.1136/bmj.332.7533.109
    1. Osteopathic International Alliance. Scope of practice. 2014.
    1. Osteopathic International Alliance. Osteopathy and osteopathic medicine. A global view of practice, patients, education and the contribution to healthcare delivery. Chicago: 2013.
    1. McGrath MC. A global view of osteopathic practice–mirror or echo chamber? Int J Osteopath Med. 2015;18(2):130–40.
    1. Burke SR, Myers R, Zhang AL. A profile of osteopathic practice in Australia 2010–2011: a cross sectional survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:227 Epub 2013/08/07. 10.1186/1471-2474-14-227
    1. Dubois T. CJ, Berthiller J., Landurier G. Osteopathy in France: a demographic and epidemiological descriptive analysis of French osteopaths patients, Osteopathic Teaching: Competencies, Education, Evaluation Paris, France: OIA, 2012.
    1. General Osteopathic Council. Osteopaths’ Opinion Survey. 2012.
    1. Landurier G BL, Drumare J.-E., Chauvin M, Lemaire D. Raport OSEOstéo Ostéopathes Exclusifs 2012. 2012.
    1. KPMG. How do osteopaths practice? London: General Osteopathic Council, 2011.
    1. Licciardone JC, Kearns CM, Ruggiere P. Background and methodology of the Osteopathic Survey of Health Care in America 2010 (OSTEOSURV 2010). J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2011;111(12):670–84. Epub 2011/12/21. .
    1. Fawkes C. LJ, Mathias S., Moore A. The Standardised Data Collection Project–Standardised data collection within osteopathic practice in the UK: development and first use of a tool to profile osteopathic care in 2009 London, UK: National Council for Osteopathic Research (NCOR), 2010.
    1. Chauvin M GM, Landurier G, Lemaire D. L’observatoire socio-economique de l'ostéopathie 2009. [06/08/2018]. Available from: .
    1. Orrock PJ. Profile of members of the Australian Osteopathic Association: Part 1 –The practitioners. Int J Osteopath Med. 2009;12:14–24.
    1. Orrock PJ. Profile of members of the Australian Osteopathic Association: Part 2 –The patients. Int J Osteopath Med. 2009;12:128–39.
    1. Vogel SH, Herrick R. Service delivery characteristics of UK osteopaths—a cross sectional survey. Int J Osteopath Med. 2008;11:153.
    1. Jamison JR. Osteopathy in Australia. Aust J Osteopathy. 1991;3:24–9.
    1. van Dun PLS, Nicolaie MA, van Messem A, State of affairs of osteopathy in the Benelux: Benelux Osteosurvey 2013. Int J Osteopath Med. 2016;20:3–17.
    1. Forum for Osteopathic Regulation in Europe. Regulation. 2018.
    1. Law 3/2018, (2018).
    1. Registro Osteopati d’italia [17/08/2018]. Available from
    1. World Health Organization. Benchmarks for training in osteopathy. Geneva: WHO, 2010.
    1. CEN//TC. Project Committee. 2015 Services in Osteopathy Osteopathic healthcare provision—Main element—Complementary element. Austria: 2015.
    1. Eumetra Monterosa. L’opinione degli italiani sull’Osteopatia. 2017.
    1. Bennett C, Khangura S, Brehaut JC, Graham ID, Moher D, Potter BK et al. Reporting guidelines for survey research: an analysis of published guidance and reporting practices. PLoS Med. 2010. August;8(8):e1001069 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001069
    1. Guo Y, Kopec JA, Cibere J, Li LC, Goldsmith CH. Population Survey Features and Response Rates: A Randomized Experiment. Am J Public Health. 2016. August;106(8):1422–6. 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303198
    1. ISTAT. Popolazione residente al 1° Gennaio 2018. 2018.
    1. European Parliament—The NUTS classification (Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics)
    1. Bleakley A. Gender matters in medical education. Med Educ. 2013;47(1):59–70. Epub 2013/01/03. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04351.x .
    1. Vaucher P, Macdonald RJD, Carnes D. The role of osteopathy in the Swiss primary health care system: a practice review. BMJ Open. 2018. September 1;8(8):e023770 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023770

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir